Jump to content

NOAA Scientists Lied...


181pl

Recommended Posts

Nu-uh!

 

"The source of their evidence, according to Committee spokesperson Thea McDonalds, was a Daily Mail article. The Daily Mail is a British tabloid most famous for outlandish headlines such as "Is the Bum the New Side Boob” and"ISIS Chief executioner winning hearts with his rugged looks.” This is not the first time that the House Science Committee has used spurious evidenceto dispute the existence of human-driven climate change."

 

http://www.popsci.com/regardless-house-science-committee-claims-noaa-scientists-probably-didnt-manipulate-climate-records

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 181pl said:

Check the source. They manipulated water temps. Didn't report the bouy temps which showed no changes. Shocking. According to Al Gore I was supposed to be under water 10 years ago ..

 

The whole liberal agenda is built on lies and racism. 

 

So Miami can just scrap that billions of dollars project they have going on down there to protect people's property from the actual water rise that is currently being felt then.

Damn. You just saved them billions and billions of dollars down there. I know I didn't see video of little old ladies walking out their front doors and standing in ankle deep sea water last king tide. It's probably fake video like the moon landing video. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, HawgGoneIt said:

 

So Miami can just scrap that billions of dollars project they have going on down there to protect people's property from the actual water rise that is currently being felt then.

Damn. You just saved them billions and billions of dollars down there. I know I didn't see video of little old ladies walking out their front doors and standing in ankle deep sea water last king tide. It's probably fake video like the moon landing video. 

I live in S. Tampa. It's a peninsula. I'm 1/4 mile from the water. Lived in this area most my life. No changes. We do have beach erosion after hurricanes or major storms. That's about it. Sea levels have risen and fallen for millions of years before man had carbon emissions. I'm not saying that we aren't polluting our environment because we are. We need to preserve nature and not endanger other species and ourselves through stupidity. But the Earth will kill us long before we can kill it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, HawgGoneIt said:

 

So Miami can just scrap that billions of dollars project they have going on down there to protect people's property from the actual water rise that is currently being felt then.

Damn. You just saved them billions and billions of dollars down there. I know I didn't see video of little old ladies walking out their front doors and standing in ankle deep sea water last king tide. It's probably fake video like the moon landing video. 

You saw a video of little old ladies standing in ankle deep water during the last king tide, combined with about 4 inches of rainfall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, 181pl said:

Check the source. They manipulated water temps. Didn't report the bouy temps which showed no changes. Shocking. According to Al Gore I was supposed to be under water 10 years ago ..

 

The whole liberal agenda is built on lies and racism. 

you really seem to hate liberals.... will you be targeting any soon for violence? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, GloryDays said:

Nu-uh!

 

"The source of their evidence, according to Committee spokesperson Thea McDonalds, was a Daily Mail article. The Daily Mail is a British tabloid most famous for outlandish headlines such as "Is the Bum the New Side Boob” and"ISIS Chief executioner winning hearts with his rugged looks.” This is not the first time that the House Science Committee has used spurious evidenceto dispute the existence of human-driven climate change."

 

http://www.popsci.com/regardless-house-science-committee-claims-noaa-scientists-probably-didnt-manipulate-climate-records

Left on Base,

The post above is the source of my confusion -- Well, that and a whole bunch of other things.  But it does appear that the original source contained in the first article is the Daily Mail -- Which is still a crap source.  So my original post was related after all....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...