noonereal Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 Well Boys, today is the show, tomorrow the vote. Will "pussy grabbing" become an acceptable conduct or not? I am guessing it will be embraced by the majority and celebrated nationally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 11 minutes ago, noonereal said: Well Boys, today is the show, tomorrow the vote. Will "pussy grabbing" become an acceptable conduct or not? I am guessing it will be embarrassed by the majority and celebrated nationally. Judge K will be confirmed tomorrow. And the SC will be a conservative court. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 So, nooner, based on your opening post it appears you, like most leftists, have disdain for presumption of innocence and burden of proof. You also apparently choose to ignore the complete lack of evidence, denials by witnesses (including the friends of the accusers), the drunken state of at least one accuser who admits to gaps in her memory, the utter absurdity of the gang rape accuser and her hard-left carnival barker attorney... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus69 Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, concha said: So, nooner, based on your opening post it appears you, like most leftists, have disdain for presumption of innocence and burden of proof. You also apparently choose to ignore the complete lack of evidence, denials by witnesses (including the friends of the accusers), the drunken state of at least one accuser who admits to gaps in her memory, the utter absurdity of the gang rape accuser and her hard-left carnival barker attorney... Hey conch....tell me you're not gonna watch any of the circus. Tell me why the vote is tomorrow. Why haven't the Pubs already voted the "predator" in? I mean...it doesn't matter if he's guilty or not. It really doesn't. You know that. Why go thru all this mess? The Pubs want him and they got the votes to get him...so what the fork is this all about? It's a frigging waste of time and dollars. Oh...I'm sorry...I forgot...this is Congress. Carry on.... Rufus>> 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 All of these accusations were intentionally outrageous. There was no intent for justice or credibility. The one singular goal was to throw as much shit at Kavanaugh as possible so that when they vote, there is doubt planted in the heads of key swing voters. That's what this is all about. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, Rufus69 said: Hey conch....tell me you're not gonna watch any of the circus. Tell me why the vote is tomorrow. Why haven't the Pubs already voted the "predator" in? I mean...it doesn't matter if he's guilty or not. It really doesn't. You know that. Why go thru all this mess? The Pubs want him and they got the votes to get him...so what the fork is this all about? It's a frigging waste of time and dollars. Oh...I'm sorry...I forgot...this is Congress. Carry on.... Rufus>> By sentence three the stupid was so deep I had to turn back. Sorry, rufus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 8 minutes ago, concha said: By sentence three the stupid was so deep I had to turn back. Sorry, rufus unfortunately this ^ is his M.O. Rufus when you make him look silly....he'll call you stupid and any other name that comes to mind...he's a frustrated dude.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 and, and, and, and > shots for the bar! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 18 minutes ago, Rufus69 said: Hey conch....tell me you're not gonna watch any of the circus. Tell me why the vote is tomorrow. Why haven't the Pubs already voted the "predator" in? I mean...it doesn't matter if he's guilty or not. It really doesn't. You know that. Why go thru all this mess? The Pubs want him and they got the votes to get him...so what the fork is this all about? It's a frigging waste of time and dollars. Oh...I'm sorry...I forgot...this is Congress. Carry on.... Rufus>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 Can the Democrat shitshow actually cost them the midterms. https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/1437100002 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted September 27, 2018 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 30 minutes ago, concha said: So, nooner, based on your opening post it appears you, like most leftists, have disdain for presumption of innocence and burden of proof. You also apparently choose to ignore the complete lack of evidence, denials by witnesses (including the friends of the accusers), the drunken state of at least one accuser who admits to gaps in her memory, the utter absurdity of the gang rape accuser and her hard-left carnival barker attorney... This is not a criminal nor civil matter. It is a job interview. that "proof" nonsense is a sidetrack. Plus the folks yelling "proof" don't want an investigation. So it's not only sidetracking the real issue. It's completely hypocritical. Real swamp stuff. I was never gonna support a social conservative in the first place BUT I sure would not change my vote over this either. Even if he did it and it's seems likely, that was a high school kid 36 years ago. That is not who he is today. None the less the optics are mesmerizing. We already have Thomas on the bench then with this addition and Trump in the White House it truly is a marginalization of women's issues. In other words, the Dem's FINALLY "played" something well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted September 27, 2018 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 10 minutes ago, HSFBfan said: Can the Democrat shitshow actually cost them the midterms. https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/1437100002 What do I know... well, more than you but I think they played it perfect up till now. If you are a women and you support the GOP, frankly you are either mentally challenged or a self loather. I do think if Kav is not confirmed it may hit the Dem's in the AZZ. But if he is confirmed by all republicans I think it's a very impressive win for them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, noonereal said: It is a job interview. Really? Where are all the applicants.....never effing mind! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted September 27, 2018 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 18 minutes ago, RedZone said: and, and, and, and > shots for the bar! Think I'll play this on one of my "big" systems. Awesome music! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 20 minutes ago, noonereal said: This is not a criminal nor civil matter. It is a job interview. that "proof" nonsense is a sidetrack. Plus the folks yelling "proof" don't want an investigation. So it's not only sidetracking the real issue. It's completely hypocritical. Real swamp stuff. I was never gonna support a social conservative in the first place BUT I sure would not change my vote over this either. Even if he did it and it's seems likely, that was a high school kid 36 years ago. That is not who he is today. None the less the optics are mesmerizing. We already have Thomas on the bench then with this addition and Trump in the White House it truly is a marginalization of women's issues. In other words, the Dem's FINALLY "played" something well. No. It is a critical part of our constitutional system and the left is making a mockery of it. At least you are honest in admitting that this sham is actually due to one thing and one thing only: Roe v Wade. Heaven forbid the law return to the states where it constitutionally belongs. For the left, the ends justify the means, no matter what harm it does. I know you have a daughter. Got a son? A nephew? Remember your bullshit position on this when someone close to you has a completely unsubstantiated accusation made that ruins their life. Have the balls to be consistent and support their lynching. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horsefly Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 48 minutes ago, concha said: So, nooner, based on your opening post it appears you, like most leftists, have disdain for presumption of innocence and burden of proof. You also apparently choose to ignore the complete lack of evidence, denials by witnesses (including the friends of the accusers), the drunken state of at least one accuser who admits to gaps in her memory, the utter absurdity of the gang rape accuser and her hard-left carnival barker attorney... Interesting, do you condemn your president pretty much marginalizing the accuser? He's been very public in his stance and has not allowed a presumption of innocence. But, you are all over benign posters stating their thoughts. Unbelievable. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Horsefly said: Interesting, do you condemn your president pretty much marginalizing the accuser? He's been very public in his stance and has not allowed a presumption of innocence. But, you are all over benign posters stating their thoughts. Unbelievable. Why should I condemn him for looking at the information regarding the case and using common sense? It's not even "he said, she said". Even her close friend won't back her up. She can't even remember the house or date (or apparently the year). She is a leftist activist who scrubbed her social media while still running off to find the most rabidly leftist, ant-Trump lawyer she could. Care to see a video of that same lawyer declaring she's going to resist? Care to see how this POS lawyer treats women making claims against fellow leftists? "Unbelievable" indeed. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted September 27, 2018 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, concha said: No. It is a critical part of our constitutional system and is the left is making a mockery of it. At least you are honest in admitting that this sham is actually due to one thing and one thing only: Roe v Wade. Heaven forbid the law return to the states where it constitutionally belongs. For the left, the ends justify the means, no matter what harm it does. I know you have a daughter. Got a son? A nephew? Remember your bullshit position on this when someone close to you has a completely unsubstantiated accusation made that ruins their life. Have the balls to be consistent and support their lynching. It's a job interview. It's not ruining a life. Stop the hysterics. BTW, I am not Roe v Wade fanatic either. I would vote that women should have the right to choose but I have zero passion about the issue. There is no high ground for either side. The swamp is murkier and larger than ever. New invasive creatures have moved in. Take off the partisan glasses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 Just put on the video of Clarence Thomas from 1991 and photo shop Kavanaugh's head on him. Its just a political hit job. It would have never gotten this far if Republicans would have said the fact that democrats not calling for an FBI Investigation into Keith Ellison is proof enough that they don't give a damn about victims of abuse. Why would someone contact a politician instead of the police? It's a con game that Republicans should have picked up on a while ago and Kavanaugh should have been confirmed weeks ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, noonereal said: It's a job interview. It's not ruining a life. Stop the hysterics. BTW, I am not Roe v Wade fanatic either. I would vote that women should have the right to choose but I have zero passion about the issue. There is no high ground for either side. The swamp is murkier and larger than ever. New invasive creatures have moved in. Take off the partisan glasses. That's what this is all about. Women wanting the freedom to kill their offspring. That's what destroying this man's life is all about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, noonereal said: It's a job interview. It's not ruining a life. Stop the hysterics. BTW, I am not Roe v Wade fanatic either. I would vote that women should have the right to choose but I have zero passion about the issue. There is no high ground for either side. The swamp is murkier and larger than ever. New invasive creatures have moved in. Take off the partisan glasses. Completely unsubstantiated claims of sexual predation made on a national stage made for political gain are not potentially life ruining? Even DBP isn't that stupid. Actually, I take that back. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted September 27, 2018 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, concha said: Completely unsubstantiated claims of sexual predation made on a national stage made for political gain are not potentially life ruining? Your postings in this thread: not a good look. Kavvy boy outed himself as a freakin freak. Never had sex till way past college? Honest, I would never support a weirdo like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, noonereal said: Your postings in this thread: not a good look. Kavvy boy outed himself as a freakin freak. Never had sex till way past college? Honest, I would never support a weirdo like that. That's a freak?? Someone that was too busy to have sex. Isnt that someone that can be considered a role model Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 10 minutes ago, concha said: Completely unsubstantiated claims of sexual predation made on a national stage made for political gain are not potentially life ruining? Even DBP isn't that stupid. Actually, I take that back. is there where you call noonereal "stupid" 100 times again and he calls you "stupid" 100 times again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.