HSFBfan Posted January 3, 2019 Report Share Posted January 3, 2019 Hard to believe something good came out of that state but 1.5 million names will be removed from the voting rolls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
World Citizen Posted January 3, 2019 Report Share Posted January 3, 2019 Judicial Watch? They sue everybody and it's par for the course. But by all means you go celebrate people losing their vote Or making it harder for them to vote. You must have been thrilled with GA bc they removed more voters than any state. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorCalRuss Posted January 3, 2019 Report Share Posted January 3, 2019 3 hours ago, World Citizen said: Judicial Watch? They sue everybody and it's par for the course. But by all means you go celebrate people losing their vote Or making it harder for them to vote. You must have been thrilled with GA bc they removed more voters than any state. Let’s make voting as simple as possible. You have to have a state Or federal Id that proves your a citizen and can be scanned. Once you show up to vote, you scan id, vote and your done. Problem solved but Dems don’t want to make it that simple.... I wonder why? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted January 3, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2019 They may sue everybody but this is a big win on the voting front and yes I was very proud of Georgia to clean up their voting rolls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted January 4, 2019 Report Share Posted January 4, 2019 25 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: All they have to do is register again, for those that are considered "inactive" ^^^^^This......👍 even saw one do it on the spot when I voted a couple months ago. I don't think anyone from either side should be worried about cleaning up the voter roles... If you do...then your intentions are almost certainly corrupt. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
World Citizen Posted January 9, 2019 Report Share Posted January 9, 2019 On 1/3/2019 at 3:43 PM, NorCalRuss said: Let’s make voting as simple as possible. You have to have a state Or federal Id that proves your a citizen and can be scanned. Once you show up to vote, you scan id, vote and your done. Problem solved but Dems don’t want to make it that simple.... I wonder why? There is one thing that we should take into account. And that is that there is not a voting fraud problem. There is however a coordinated and intentional effort to keep US citizens from voting. Much like to created crisis on the border, the voter fraud issue is statistically insignificant. If you want to learn about voter suppression I highly recommend listening to this lady Carol Anderson. https://www.c-span.org/video/?452065-25/discussion-one-person-vote Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
World Citizen Posted January 9, 2019 Report Share Posted January 9, 2019 On 1/4/2019 at 4:57 AM, Troll said: ^^^^^This......👍 even saw one do it on the spot when I voted a couple months ago. I don't think anyone from either side should be worried about cleaning up the voter roles... If you do...then your intentions are almost certainly corrupt. If you are curious about the real issue on voting fraud and suppression I recommend listening to this - https://www.c-span.org/video/?452065-25/discussion-one-person-vote Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted January 9, 2019 Report Share Posted January 9, 2019 13 minutes ago, World Citizen said: If you are curious about the real issue on voting fraud and suppression I recommend listening to this - https://www.c-span.org/video/?452065-25/discussion-one-person-vote From this viewpoint (NJ w/Dem Supermajority), voter 'suppression' would be an exercise in futility....although YMMV in your state. But come to think of it...it WAS a Republican that had to re-register on the spot.....hmmmm 🤔 LOL Similarly as voter fraud 'should' also being seemingly pointless here, we don't seem to have as many issues here , as reported in other states (excepting 'possibly' at the VERY local level slots). So I guess my curiosity is somewhat muted on the topic....which might explain my previous post a bit. I might tend to think that 'electronic voting' and the 'vulnerability of technology' with regard to congregation and tally, would woud concern me MUCH more......if I were to worry about it..... just sayin'..... but thanks for the link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.