RedZone Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 8 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said: So we're gonna use the Coat tail method?... OOF.... Pretty dumb question. Alabama is a "team", like anyone else. They happened to play the #1 team in the nation. Their only loss. It's not rocket science here. Had Alabama played NC State or Maryland they are still undefeated. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 1 hour ago, The Guru said: ATLien doesn't know simple facts. He's a ranting lunatic who has no self-esteem. Clemson won with Chase Brice. They were losing with Trevor Lawrence. You and redzone must be related 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 One year 2 Big 10 "teams" may make the playoffs....not this year though. No other league has a legit shot for right now. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
954gator Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 If they beat Auburn and LSU then yes they should be in, but that shit ain't happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
954gator Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 1 hour ago, mje44 said: I'm not making excuses. I literally said "No excuse. Not a great win". Oregon's average score is 48-19 and they are 8-1 this year, with a chance at winning 10 straight conference games (which I don't believe has ever been done before) . There body of work is solid. You think they beat Utah if they play? I feel like everyone talks about Oregon when thinking Pac12 while forgetting about Utah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 1 hour ago, RedZone said: Have it your way.. "Alabama, the team" gets in for playing LSU of the SEC. Better? If Alabama's resume was evaluated without regard for conference, as I said, they wouldn't get in. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mje44 Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 21 minutes ago, 954gator said: You think they beat Utah if they play? I go back & forth on this matchup but I think I'd take Utah. Utah's front 7 is pretty damn stout, so I could see Oregon having trouble running the ball like they did against Auburn. But then again Utah's secondary has been exposed a little by better athletes at WR. Overall I take Whittingham over Cristoball in a close game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 Just now, The Guru said: If Alabama's resume was evaluated without regard for conference, as I said, they wouldn't get in. Neither would Clemson.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 Just now, RedZone said: Neither would Clemson.... Actually their place would be even stronger. The only claim against Clemson is their conference. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 2 hours ago, mje44 said: I'm not making excuses. I literally said "No excuse. Not a great win". Oregon's average score is 48-19 and they are 8-1 this year, with a chance at winning 10 straight conference games (which I don't believe has ever been done before) . There body of work is solid. PAC12... there's your body of work. Pretty sure that's why the committee moved the way they did. Still, games left. BGW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 7 minutes ago, The Guru said: The only claim against Clemson is their conference. Which is a valid point with anyone NOT named Clemson from the ACC, los... The system is broken or about as good as it's going to get with 4 teams. If Georgia beats LSU you then have 3 1-loss SEC teams......should only 1 of them qualify for the playoffs? Or, do we keep taking champs from shitty leagues? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
954gator Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 1 minute ago, mje44 said: I go back & forth on this matchup but I think I'd take Utah. Utah's front 7 is pretty damn stout, so I could see Oregon having trouble running the ball like they did against Auburn. But then again Utah's secondary has been exposed a little by better athletes at WR. Overall I take Whittingham over Cristoball in a close game. I think I lean slightly towards Utah as well. No, I don't think Utah has the same type of run D that Auburn has, but it's pretty good. I just think that Tyler Huntley is a gamer. I feel he's underrated because he doesn't put up crazy numbers, but he knows he has a stud RB that can do work (Zack Moss). Those two guys can make things happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, RedZone said: If Georgia beats LSU you then have 3 1-loss SEC teams......should only 1 of them qualify for the playoffs? There's no should. All 3 should be evaluated without regard for conference. And then 1 gets in or 2 get in or 3 get in. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 6 minutes ago, RedZone said: Which is a valid point with anyone NOT named Clemson from the ACC, los... The system is broken or about as good as it's going to get with 4 teams. If Georgia beats LSU you then have 3 1-loss SEC teams......should only 1 of them qualify for the playoffs? Or, do we keep taking champs from shitty leagues? Every 1-loss team in America then becomes a playoff contender and their fan base's go crazy with playoff fever........look at me, look at me and my mulligan.....it's better, it's better.. BUT, the simple truth is their mulligans aren't better. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 Team Anonymous has: 1) Zero wins of any note. 2) A loss. At home. 3) Not even a divisional title, let alone a conference title. What is the argument for Team Anonymous to play for a national championship? . 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, The Guru said: And then 1 gets in or 2 get in or 3 get in. Thank you...Exactly! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 9 minutes ago, RedZone said: Which is a valid point with anyone NOT named Clemson from the ACC, los... The system is broken or about as good as it's going to get with 4 teams. If Georgia beats LSU you then have 3 1-loss SEC teams......should only 1 of them qualify for the playoffs? Or, do we keep taking champs from shitty leagues? In what logic is UGA beating LSU gonna cause 3 teams to get in If Ohio State and Clemson both win out both are getting in, if you think otherwise you are as stupid as Los 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 1 minute ago, concha said: Team Anonymous has: 1) Zero wins of any note. 2) A loss. At home. 3) Not even a divisional title, let alone a conference title. What is the argument for Team Anonymous to play for a national championship? . There is none If they get in it shows the NCAA (I mean playoff committee) don't really care about deserving resumes, only getting biggest names possible into the playoffs 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, RedZone said: Every 1-loss team in America then becomes a playoff contender and their fan base's go crazy with playoff fever........look at me, look at me and my mulligan.....it's better, it's better.. BUT, the simple truth is their mulligans aren't better. Good idea It should go to undefeated teams and if there isn't enough to fill out the 4 then we can consider 1 loss conference champs Problem solved 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mje44 Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 4 minutes ago, 954gator said: I think I lean slightly towards Utah as well. No, I don't think Utah has the same type of run D that Auburn has, but it's pretty good. I just think that Tyler Huntley is a gamer. I feel he's underrated because he doesn't put up crazy numbers, but he knows he has a stud RB that can do work (Zack Moss). Those two guys can make things happen. Totally agree. Huntley and Moss are gamers. They rarely turn the ball over as an offense. I think people underestimate how good of a coach Whittingham is as well. He gets 2 & 3 stars to play at 4star level. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
954gator Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 13 minutes ago, The Guru said: There's no should. All 3 should be evaluated without regard for conference. And then 1 gets in or 2 get in or 3 get in. I think that if all things go as expected from here on out (which of course they won't lol), the SEC's only chance to get two in would be the scenario of UGA beating undefeated LSU (close game)in the SEC game. LSU and UGA would have solid resumes that I'm not sure 1 loss teams like Oregon, OU, Minnesota, Baylor etc would be able to match. Now if Baylor goes undefeated they would get in for sure leaving LSU out. Damn that would be one hell of a shit storm though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 5 hours ago, Iletteredintrack said: It is all politics. The committee puts UGA at 4 knowing they still have Auburn and LSU to play and counting on them losing and taking themselves out of the conversation. They had to drop Alabama to avoid any suspicions but can move them up once UGA loses. Bingo!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
954gator Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 9 minutes ago, concha said: Team Anonymous has: 1) Zero wins of any note. 2) A loss. At home. 3) Not even a divisional title, let alone a conference title. What is the argument for Team Anonymous to play for a national championship? . None. Now if other teams start dropping and they handle Auburn and LSU handles UGA easily then I could see it happening. Do I want 2 SEC teams in? Hell no, but it could definitely happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 15 minutes ago, RedZone said: Thank you...Exactly! You were not saying the same thing that I was. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted November 13, 2019 Report Share Posted November 13, 2019 12 minutes ago, Columbiafan said: In what logic is UGA beating LSU gonna cause 3 teams to get in Advanced logic......if I had said that. Learn to read junior if you want to hang with the big boys. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.