Jump to content

Thank you Rand Paul


HSFBfan

Recommended Posts

Sen. Rand Paul used the Senate floor on Tuesday to read aloud the name of an intelligence community official alleged to be the whistleblower who first raised alarms about President Donald Trump's conduct toward Ukraine.

Chief Justice John Roberts denied the Kentucky Republican’s attempts to mention the person’s identity last week during the question-and-answer portion of Trump’s impeachment trial. And Paul said he didn't intend to out the alleged whistleblower or stoke reprisals against the person.

https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/02/04/rand-paul-reads-alleged-whistleblowers-name-senate-floor-110684

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a POS who got insulted Chief Justice Roberts shot him down on his first attempt like he should have...and his rational makes ZERO sense.."Paul said Tuesday that he supports protections against reprisal for whistleblowers but not necessarily anonymity."...and how can you protect someone after you exposed them??..you can't....what a F*in moron...just another clown doing the Presidents bidding...sickening...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

He's a POS who got insulted Chief Justice Roberts shot him down on his first attempt like he should have...and his rational makes ZERO sense.."Paul said Tuesday that he supports protections against reprisal for whistleblowers but not necessarily anonymity."...and how can you protect someone after you exposed them??..you can't....what a F*in moron...just another clown doing the Presidents bidding...sickening...

The government should do whatever is possible in keeping the whistleblower anonymous, if the whistleblower chooses.  It should only be breached if they’re called to be a witness on the witness stand. But to call him out by name just to call him out is dangerous and unnecessary 

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Horsefly said:

The government should do whatever is possible in keeping the whistleblower anonymous, if the whistleblower chooses.  It should only be breached if they’re called to be a witness on the witness stand. But to call him out by name just to call him out is dangerous and unnecessary 

His name is Eric Ciamarella 

And hes not a whistleblower. Hes a partisan hack who worked with schiff 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Horsefly said:

The government should do whatever is possible in keeping the whistleblower anonymous, if the whistleblower chooses.  It should only be breached if they’re called to be a witness on the witness stand. But to call him out by name just to call him out is dangerous and unnecessary 

I agree, however Ciamarella is technically not a whistleblower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

he's an American hero who ratted a dirty Pres. out!...….only to have his dirty Republicons save his lying ass...Rand Paul is a hack!

Who just so happened to work for Biden, who just so happened to be conspiring with another Obama left over about getting rid of President Trump, who just happens to be dating Schiffs daughter blah blah blah.

Enjoy watching your President tonight...or dont. Either way know one cares. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, thc6795 said:

Who just so happened to work for Biden, who just so happened to be conspiring with another Obama left over about getting rid of President Trump, who just happens to be dating Schiffs daughter blah blah blah.

Enjoy watching your President tonight...or dont. Either way know one cares. 

Doesn't matter who he works for....he didn't make the "perfect" call...our POS Pres. did...don't blame the hero who didn't want to witness a Pres. selling his own country out for political gain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DBP66 said:

He's a POS who got insulted Chief Justice Roberts shot him down on his first attempt like he should have...and his rational makes ZERO sense.."Paul said Tuesday that he supports protections against reprisal for whistleblowers but not necessarily anonymity."...and how can you protect someone after you exposed them??..you can't....what a F*in moron...just another clown doing the Presidents bidding...sickening...

What Rand did is just fine.

Quote

"They made a big mistake not allowing my question. My question did not talk about anybody who is a whistleblower, my question did not accuse anybody of being whistleblower, it did not make a statement believing that someone was a whistleblower. I simply named two people's names because I think it's very important to know what happened," Paul said on the floor.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

what facts mam??….stop being dumb...please...:$

 

 

Krusty..do You dispute these FACTS?

 

  • A Tuskeegee airman being honored and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • A young black girl gets a scholarship and chance to better her lot in life, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president announces historically low unemployment for blacks, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president announces historically low unemployment for Latinos, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president announces historically low unemployment for Asians, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president announces record employment achievements for women, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president announces income gains for Americans, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president talks about Americans coming off food stamps, and the Democrats boo...
  • The president talks about the death of a terrorist responsible for the killing and maiming of hundreds if not thousands of Americans, and the Democrats sit in disapproval...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, I AM IRONMAN said:

Krusty..do You dispute these FACTS?

 

  • A Tuskeegee airman being honored and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • A young black girl gets a scholarship and chance to better her lot in life, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president announces historically low unemployment for blacks, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president announces historically low unemployment for Latinos, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president announces historically low unemployment for Asians, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president announces record employment achievements for women, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president announces income gains for Americans, and the Dems sit in disgust.
  • The president talks about Americans coming off food stamps, and the Democrats boo...
  • The president talks about the death of a terrorist responsible for the killing and maiming of hundreds if not thousands of Americans, and the Democrats sit in disapproval...

did you type those facts mam??…LOL...nice cut and paste mam...:$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...