Jump to content

A few of GAs 2017 OOS Games Predicted by CP


ECHS05

Recommended Posts

A very early look at how CalPreps Predict A Matchup thinks some of GAs better 2017 OOS matchups will go...

Just for the record...

(This is extremely stupid, as is CalPreps attempt at National Ratings which are pointless because of the limited amount of interstate play... nonetheless, some are extremely thick or have little reasoning skills)

Im going to love watching how badly off these turn out to be...

---

[2017] Colquitt County (Moultrie, GA) 31, [2017] Vista Murrieta (Murrieta, CA) 26

[2017] Valor Christian (Highlands Ranch, CO) 35, [2017] Greater Atlanta Christian (Norcross, GA) 14
[2017] Hoover (AL) 24, [2017] Grayson (Loganville, GA) 17

[2017] Grayson (Loganville, GA) 28, [2017] Ramsay (Birmingham, AL) 17
[2017] Venice (FL) 49, [2017] Camden County (Kingsland, GA) 6

[2017] University Christian (Jacksonville, FL) 28, [2017] Coffee (Douglas, GA) 26
[2017] Cartersville (GA) 41, [2017] Bartram Trail (St. Johns, FL) 20

[2017] East Lake (Tarpon Springs, FL) 22, [2017] Ware County (Waycross, GA) 17

[2017] Curtis [John] (River Ridge, LA) 26, [2017] Grayson (Loganville, GA) 21
[2017] Spartanburg (SC) 28, [2017] Etowah (Woodstock, GA) 7
[2017] South Pointe (Rock Hill, SC) 38, [2017] Buford (GA) 14
[2017] Eagle's Landing Christian Academy (McDonough, GA) 35, [2017] Knoxville Catholic (Knoxville, TN 21
[2017] Baylor (Chattanooga, TN) 38, [2017] Marist (Atlanta, GA) 0

[2017] McCallie (Chattanooga, TN) 31, [2017] Blessed Trinity (Roswell, GA) 22
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 954gator said:

I wouldn't go that far.  Can't expect that much of a turn around.   I mean I could see them winning for sure, but Venice ain't bad either. 

I know but Id like to believe that Bob has some sort of Magic playbook that turns them around overnight.... 

Not really... 

But I do miss the Camdem of yesteryear...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh and about this thread....

 

-"Projection" ratings are used on this screen, as opposed to the standard ratings seen on this site.  They are very much like the other ratings seen on this site, except that recent results are weighted more heavily and the "politically correct" moderately-low cutoff point at which margin of victory is no longer counted is eliminated.  Also, historical ratings of the teams (including head-to-head history) are a very small factor in projections.  In other words, predicting future outcomes and acknowledging to-date success are not the same thing.  Given that two different systems are used, yes, the results will be different in some cases.  You do not need to try to contact us every time you see Team A rated above Team B, but Team B predicted to beat Team A in a hypothetical or real game.  It happens.
-Project your own hypothetical matchups by clicking here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ararar said:

Oh and about this thread....

 

-"Projection" ratings are used on this screen, as opposed to the standard ratings seen on this site.  They are very much like the other ratings seen on this site, except that recent results are weighted more heavily and the "politically correct" moderately-low cutoff point at which margin of victory is no longer counted is eliminated.  Also, historical ratings of the teams (including head-to-head history) are a very small factor in projections.  In other words, predicting future outcomes and acknowledging to-date success are not the same thing.  Given that two different systems are used, yes, the results will be different in some cases.  You do not need to try to contact us every time you see Team A rated above Team B, but Team B predicted to beat Team A in a hypothetical or real game.  It happens.
-Project your own hypothetical matchups by clicking here.

BUT when 0 games have been played... there is nothing to go on BUT the ratings.

Yeah their "system" for projecting games during the season adds in momentum, either upward or downward and doesnt completely rely on ratings.

But at the same time, its the same thing.

You are always the 1st to try and post something from there you dont understand. Its just heartwarming to see you try to stand up for CP.

But you arent smart enough to get CPs National Ratings can never be accurate because the only way for states to scale together, is by numerous teams from said state, playing numerous teams from around the country... and that doesnt happen. Not enough for states to scale together. 

Ned is like Donald Trump... except hes not President, and hes not worth 3.5 billion dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ECHS05 said:

BUT when 0 games have been played... there is nothing to go on BUT the ratings.

Yeah their "system" for projecting games during the season adds in momentum, either upward or downward and doesnt completely rely on ratings.

But at the same time, its the same thing.

This is probably false.

 

Fun story though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...