Jump to content

BOMBSHELL: John Bolton verbally briefed Trump in March 2019 that Putin was offering bounties for dead American soldiers in Afghanistan.


BigDrop

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said:

Fool WTF  is that?

 

I didn't ask about Universities or China fucking trailer idiot

 

Whether there was collusion or not, a foreign government did interfere with our elections to get Trump elected.

 

The question is whether you believe a foreign government actively sought to influence our election because they preferred Trump.

Apparently you do.

 

The racist POS douche never answers questions and instead post confusing and irrelevant bullshit and conspiracy nonsense.  A follower of Q and Russian propaganda tv.

Lol @ trailer idiot. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, World Citizen said:

The racist POS douche never answers questions and instead post confusing and irrelevant bullshit and conspiracy nonsense.  A follower of Q and Russian propaganda tv.

Lol @ trailer idiot. 

He acts like every other meth addict I've came across 

He can't even formulate a coherent thought but wants to harp on 'syntax'...🤡 Gtfo...

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said:

He acts like every other meth addict I've came across 

He can't even formulate a coherent thought but wants to harp on 'syntax'...🤡 Gtfo...

 

Come across meth addicts often do you? 😝

 

7 hours ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said:

Fool WTF  is that?

That's exactly as phrased ...

...by you  👍

...or didn't you recognized your OWN syntax? 🤣

 

7 hours ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said:

I didn't ask about Universities or China fucking trailer idiot

You asked about election interference....

Well all three...... ruskies, china, universities.....

.... all played propaganda games,

on youtube and facebook etc.

Why so focused on just one?

 

7 hours ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said:

Whether there was collusion or not, a foreign government did interfere with our elections to get Trump elected.

According to the Mule report ...there was no collusion...

 

7 hours ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said:

The question is whether you believe a foreign government actively sought to influence our election because they preferred Trump.

While that question was already answered, the real question is if all this 'election interference' is going on, how come the current intelligence agencies allowed it to occur?

..and if there were no collusion, you would be in a fairly ridiculous position.... to try and blame T for it....

 

7 hours ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said:

Apparently you do.

 

Of course....

of course we interfere in their elections (and everyone else's) with propaganda as well....

go figure...

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Troll said:

Come across meth addicts often do you? 😝

 

That's exactly as phrased ...

...by you  👍

...or didn't you recognized your OWN syntax? 🤣

 

You asked about election interference....

Well all three...... ruskies, china, universities.....

.... all played propaganda games,

on youtube and facebook etc.

Why so focused on just one?

 

According to the Mule report ...there was no collusion...

 

While that question was already answered, the real question is if all this 'election interference' is going on, how come the current intelligence agencies allowed it to occur?

..and if there were no collusion, you would be in a fairly ridiculous position.... to try and blame T for it....

 

Of course....

of course we interfere in their elections (and everyone else's) with propaganda as well....

go figure...

 

 

Pretty damn funny, gotta admit.... well done. 
 

bgw

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Troll said:

Come across meth addicts often do you? 😝

 

That's exactly as phrased ...

...by you  👍

...or didn't you recognized your OWN syntax? 🤣

 

You asked about election interference....

Well all three...... ruskies, china, universities.....

.... all played propaganda games,

on youtube and facebook etc.

Why so focused on just one?

 

According to the Mule report ...there was no collusion...

 

While that question was already answered, the real question is if all this 'election interference' is going on, how come the current intelligence agencies allowed it to occur?

..and if there were no collusion, you would be in a fairly ridiculous position.... to try and blame T for it....

 

Of course....

of course we interfere in their elections (and everyone else's) with propaganda as well....

go figure...

 

 

No...  Trailer Trumptard 

 

When I asked 'what was that?'.... i was referring to babbling you'd just posted: the actual 'points' you were looking to make, not your syntax... fucking idiot 🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

Keep Up!

 

I come across MANY meth addicts. We have an outstanding outreach program at my church. So yes, I know one when I see it, and like you, they are mostly Trump Loving Know-Nothings that love to debate political shit they don't understand. 

 

Most people have  always maintained that 'collusion' was a stretch, but that the Russian Government, at the highest levels, did indeed seek to have Trump elected by interfering

 

Again... its nice to see at least one Trumptard finally admit some interference. That’s normally an absolute no no for the usual Fox crowd.

 

And I don't blame Trump for it... so you can calm your tits Karen..... I don't think he's that smart or powerful enough to orchestrate such a thing....

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said:

No...  Trailer Trumptard 

 

When I asked 'what was that?'.... i was referring to babbling you'd just posted: the actual 'points' you were looking to make, not your syntax... fucking idiot 🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

Keep Up!

 

I come across MANY meth addicts. We have an outstanding outreach program at my church. So yes, I know one when I see it, and like you, they are mostly Trump Loving Know-Nothings that love to debate political shit they don't understand. 

 

Most people have  always maintained that 'collusion' was a stretch, but that the Russian Government, at the highest levels, did indeed seek to have Trump elected by interfering

 

Again... its nice to see at least one Trumptard finally admit some interference. That’s normally an absolute no no for the usual Fox crowd.

 

And I don't blame Trump for it... so you can calm your tits Karen..... I don't think he's that smart or powerful enough to orchestrate such a thing....

 

 

 

 

 

Just curious while you ponder Karen's tits....

what makes you think I'm a Trumptard (BTW: I'm sure those disabled appreciate the virtue signaling reference 👌)....

Do I seem the type to support a life long Democrat ?...

You know the kind that "switches parties" ?

 

BTW: I've got a nice Trailer in the back....but I don't live in it tho....you looking for one?

You and your meth buddies can all hang out 👍....

...and swap stories about how 'everyone else' is...you know...

😝...."Trump Loving Know-Nothings that love to debate political shit they don't understand."   

🤣🤣🤣

giphy.gif

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

 

I guess you, Kurt and Ironmam weren't watching the Sunday a.m. political shows??...CNN, Fox and NBC all talked about it and the House is having hearings on it this week..wishful thinking it went away....I wonder why you Patriots don't give a shit about our troops?!...SAD...#soldyoursouls...😔

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DBP66 said:

I guess you,  weren't watching the Sunday a.m. political shows??...

giphy.gif

giphy.gif

 

 

2 hours ago, DBP66 said:

..CNN, Fox and NBC all talked about it ....

giphy.gif

 

 

2 hours ago, DBP66 said:

 and the House is having hearings on it this week..!...SAD......😔

giphy.gif

 

You forget about the 🤡 popcorn ?

giphy.gif

 

🤡

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Troll said:

giphy.gif

giphy.gif

 

 

giphy.gif

 

 

giphy.gif

 

You forget about the 🤡 popcorn ?

giphy.gif

 

🤡

I figured you'd be too embarrassed to reply Ronnie...didn't you think this wasn't a big story a few days ago??...it was just another conspiracy from the "deep state"....silly clown...🤡

did they mention it on Russian T.V. this a.m.??...😔

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

I figured you'd be too embarrassed to reply Ronnie...didn't you think this wasn't a big story a few days ago??...it was just another conspiracy from the "deep state"....silly clown...🤡

did they mention it on Russian T.V. this a.m.??...😔

better butter that 🤡 popcorn....

Sunday morning cartoons told you to do so.....

giphy.gif

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

what cartoons did they show on Russian T.V. this a.m...🤡.

 

Don't know ...was outside this am.

But since you ask....here you go...🍿 🤡 🍿

Who REALLY funded the Taliban to kill Americans?

Sreeram Chaulia
Sreeram Chaulia is a professor and dean at the Jindal School of International Affairs in Sonipat, India.
3 Jul, 2020 18:03
Who REALLY funded the Taliban to kill Americans?
2017 file photo, American soldiers wait on the tarmac in Logar province, Afghanistan © AP Photo/Rahmat Gul
 
While accusing Russia, without proof, of paying the Taliban to kill American soldiers, US politicians are conveniently ignoring facts about who really armed and financed terrorist groups in Afghanistan.

The allegation by some US intelligence agencies that Russia paid the Taliban to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan has kicked up a partisan furore in Washington. It has renewed the tirade by the Democratic Party that President Donald Trump is soft on Russia and raised fresh demands for additional sanctions on Russia. 

With a US presidential election due shortly, reusing the ‘Russia’ card to paint Trump as incompetent on national security or as a commander-in-chief who treacherously colluded with Russia to spill the blood of American troops is a handy political attack tool.

For the liberal camp in the US, nothing quite stirs up hair-raising emotions and passions like Russia and its supposed evil actions around the world. Even though both Russia and the Taliban have denied any collaboration, Trump’s National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien clarified that the Russia-Taliban bounty theory was “uncorroborated,” and despite the Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) information about Russia “incentivizing” the Taliban being met with skepticism from the National Security Agency (NSA), it is open season for the political knives to be brought out in Washington.

This imbroglio has everything to do with American domestic politics and little do with Russian foreign policy. American politicians accusing Trump of negligence or naivety towards Russia are conveniently ignoring facts about who really armed and financed the Taliban and several other terrorist and rogue actors in Afghanistan’s complex multi-sided, two-decade-long war which began with the US invasion in 2001.

 

Forgot Pakistan?

For years, American strategic experts, intelligence agencies and military commanders have held a near unanimous and consistent view that sanctuary and sponsorship of the Taliban came from sections of Pakistan’s military establishment and its allied jihadist infrastructure across the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.

President George W. Bush’s Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage spoke of “substantial information that there was direct assistance from the Pakistan government to the Taliban between 2002 and 2004,” the crucial period when the Taliban regrouped and re-emerged to fight a long anti-US insurgency.

In 2011, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff under President Barack Obama, Admiral Mike Mullen, called the dreaded Haqqani terrorist network, which carried out several terrorist attacks on American forces and is almost inseparable from the Taliban, “a veritable arm of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency.”

And in 2018, the chief of staff of the US Army under President Trump, General Mark Milley, lamented it was “very difficult to eliminate” the insurgency in Afghanistan because “the Taliban, the Haqqanis and other organizations do, in fact, enjoy some safe haven in the border regions on the Pakistani side.”

Yet, in spite of the mountains of proof collected by the US national security institutions that Pakistan was the key foreign sustainer of the Taliban, Washington failed to break this nexus. The US, while fully knowing what was happening on the ground, cumulatively gave Pakistan $33 billion in aid between 2002 and 2018, until an exasperated President Trump switched off the money tap and slammed Pakistan for providing safe havens to “agents of chaos” that kill Americans in Afghanistan.

If you do a simple back-of-the-envelope calculation of the military and civilian aid that the US gave to Pakistan, which in turn was channeling funds to the Taliban and the Haqqani network, a straightforward conclusion emerges: multiple US administrations were indirectly financing violent attacks on US soldiers in Afghanistan. The Democrats crying hoarse about ‘Russia’ and the Taliban dare not go this deep in analyzing responsibility. 

 

America’s war economy

But the truth is murkier than just Pakistan meddling in neighboring Afghanistan and the US’ kid-gloves treatment of the former. As part and parcel of the anti-Taliban counter-insurgency, American occupation forces in Afghanistan patronized a variety of local warlords, private militias, paramilitaries and ethnic entrepreneurs who were extremely brutal, abusive and lawless.

According to a forensic accountant cited in the Washington Post, out of $106 billion worth of US Defense Department contracts given out, “about 40 percent of the money ended up in the pockets of insurgents, criminal syndicates or corrupt Afghan officials.” To boot, the investigator specified that “18 percent of the contract money went to the Taliban, Haqqani, other insurgent groups.”

On one hand, there were American diplomats and military personnel attempting to shore up the fledgling Afghan state and ward off the jihadist threat of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, but on the other hand was the war economy in Afghanistan and the mindboggling corruption wherein elements of the American state structure enabled warlords who kept the Afghan state weak and incapable of governing the whole country.

As the US Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) mildly rebuked in 2016, “the US government should limit alliances with malign powerbrokers and aim to balance any short-term gains from such relationships against the risk that empowering these actors will lead to systemic corruption.”

In retrospect, the prolonged Afghan war which cost nearly 2,400 American soldiers’ lives and killed 1,100 more soldiers from multiple US coalition partner countries, is a fiasco whose major cause was misguided American policies and dangerous American alliances. Blaming Russia or Iran (another country frequently cited by Western intelligence as a covert sponsor of the Taliban) at the fag end of a disastrous American war does not hold water.

With Trump having already executed a peace deal with the Taliban and a post-American Afghanistan on the anvil, pretty much every regional stakeholder country has planned in advance and established contacts with the Taliban and other forces in Afghanistan to create buffers and safety nets for its own security.

But raking up unverified claims that Russia financed the Taliban to attack Americans is sheer hypocrisy and a diversion from the culpability of multiple US administrations, including the Democratic presidency of Barack Obama, for badly bungling the Afghan war and putting thousands of US troops’ lives on the line. If the critics and partisans crying foul about Russia self-introspect, they will realize that America was not so ‘liberal’ or noble after all in its longest war.

 

----------------------------------

🤡

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Troll said:

 

Don't know ...was outside this am.

But since you ask....here you go...🍿 🤡 🍿

Who REALLY funded the Taliban to kill Americans?

Sreeram Chaulia
Sreeram Chaulia is a professor and dean at the Jindal School of International Affairs in Sonipat, India.
3 Jul, 2020 18:03
Who REALLY funded the Taliban to kill Americans?
2017 file photo, American soldiers wait on the tarmac in Logar province, Afghanistan © AP Photo/Rahmat Gul
 
While accusing Russia, without proof, of paying the Taliban to kill American soldiers, US politicians are conveniently ignoring facts about who really armed and financed terrorist groups in Afghanistan.

The allegation by some US intelligence agencies that Russia paid the Taliban to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan has kicked up a partisan furore in Washington. It has renewed the tirade by the Democratic Party that President Donald Trump is soft on Russia and raised fresh demands for additional sanctions on Russia. 

With a US presidential election due shortly, reusing the ‘Russia’ card to paint Trump as incompetent on national security or as a commander-in-chief who treacherously colluded with Russia to spill the blood of American troops is a handy political attack tool.

For the liberal camp in the US, nothing quite stirs up hair-raising emotions and passions like Russia and its supposed evil actions around the world. Even though both Russia and the Taliban have denied any collaboration, Trump’s National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien clarified that the Russia-Taliban bounty theory was “uncorroborated,” and despite the Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) information about Russia “incentivizing” the Taliban being met with skepticism from the National Security Agency (NSA), it is open season for the political knives to be brought out in Washington.

This imbroglio has everything to do with American domestic politics and little do with Russian foreign policy. American politicians accusing Trump of negligence or naivety towards Russia are conveniently ignoring facts about who really armed and financed the Taliban and several other terrorist and rogue actors in Afghanistan’s complex multi-sided, two-decade-long war which began with the US invasion in 2001.

 

Forgot Pakistan?

For years, American strategic experts, intelligence agencies and military commanders have held a near unanimous and consistent view that sanctuary and sponsorship of the Taliban came from sections of Pakistan’s military establishment and its allied jihadist infrastructure across the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.

President George W. Bush’s Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage spoke of “substantial information that there was direct assistance from the Pakistan government to the Taliban between 2002 and 2004,” the crucial period when the Taliban regrouped and re-emerged to fight a long anti-US insurgency.

In 2011, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff under President Barack Obama, Admiral Mike Mullen, called the dreaded Haqqani terrorist network, which carried out several terrorist attacks on American forces and is almost inseparable from the Taliban, “a veritable arm of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency.”

And in 2018, the chief of staff of the US Army under President Trump, General Mark Milley, lamented it was “very difficult to eliminate” the insurgency in Afghanistan because “the Taliban, the Haqqanis and other organizations do, in fact, enjoy some safe haven in the border regions on the Pakistani side.”

Yet, in spite of the mountains of proof collected by the US national security institutions that Pakistan was the key foreign sustainer of the Taliban, Washington failed to break this nexus. The US, while fully knowing what was happening on the ground, cumulatively gave Pakistan $33 billion in aid between 2002 and 2018, until an exasperated President Trump switched off the money tap and slammed Pakistan for providing safe havens to “agents of chaos” that kill Americans in Afghanistan.

If you do a simple back-of-the-envelope calculation of the military and civilian aid that the US gave to Pakistan, which in turn was channeling funds to the Taliban and the Haqqani network, a straightforward conclusion emerges: multiple US administrations were indirectly financing violent attacks on US soldiers in Afghanistan. The Democrats crying hoarse about ‘Russia’ and the Taliban dare not go this deep in analyzing responsibility. 

 

America’s war economy

But the truth is murkier than just Pakistan meddling in neighboring Afghanistan and the US’ kid-gloves treatment of the former. As part and parcel of the anti-Taliban counter-insurgency, American occupation forces in Afghanistan patronized a variety of local warlords, private militias, paramilitaries and ethnic entrepreneurs who were extremely brutal, abusive and lawless.

According to a forensic accountant cited in the Washington Post, out of $106 billion worth of US Defense Department contracts given out, “about 40 percent of the money ended up in the pockets of insurgents, criminal syndicates or corrupt Afghan officials.” To boot, the investigator specified that “18 percent of the contract money went to the Taliban, Haqqani, other insurgent groups.”

On one hand, there were American diplomats and military personnel attempting to shore up the fledgling Afghan state and ward off the jihadist threat of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, but on the other hand was the war economy in Afghanistan and the mindboggling corruption wherein elements of the American state structure enabled warlords who kept the Afghan state weak and incapable of governing the whole country.

As the US Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) mildly rebuked in 2016, “the US government should limit alliances with malign powerbrokers and aim to balance any short-term gains from such relationships against the risk that empowering these actors will lead to systemic corruption.”

In retrospect, the prolonged Afghan war which cost nearly 2,400 American soldiers’ lives and killed 1,100 more soldiers from multiple US coalition partner countries, is a fiasco whose major cause was misguided American policies and dangerous American alliances. Blaming Russia or Iran (another country frequently cited by Western intelligence as a covert sponsor of the Taliban) at the fag end of a disastrous American war does not hold water.

With Trump having already executed a peace deal with the Taliban and a post-American Afghanistan on the anvil, pretty much every regional stakeholder country has planned in advance and established contacts with the Taliban and other forces in Afghanistan to create buffers and safety nets for its own security.

But raking up unverified claims that Russia financed the Taliban to attack Americans is sheer hypocrisy and a diversion from the culpability of multiple US administrations, including the Democratic presidency of Barack Obama, for badly bungling the Afghan war and putting thousands of US troops’ lives on the line. If the critics and partisans crying foul about Russia self-introspect, they will realize that America was not so ‘liberal’ or noble after all in its longest war.

 

----------------------------------

🤡

 

the first 5 words of your "news" article are bullshit..."While accusing Russia, without proof,"..LOL.tell the nutty professor they have bank transactions linking the two....nice link you got going there Ronnie!!...today's conspiracy??...Ironmam seems to baaalieve you!!...🤡..🤡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

the first 5 words of your "news" article are bullshit..."While accusing Russia, without proof,"..LOL.tell the nutty professor they have bank transactions linking the two....nice link you got going there Ronnie!!...today's conspiracy??...Ironmam seems to baaalieve you!!...🤡..🤡

Russia Russia Russia.

Ok Jan Brady

🙊🙉🙈

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

No...that's your dept....🤡

 

56 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

 they have bank transactions linking the two...

.🤡..🤡

You think it was that Jared bank transaction conspiracy theory...🤣

yet again ??? LOL

giphy.gif

 

...stellar 🤡 conspiracies...

👍

 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Troll said:

 

You think it was that Jared bank transaction conspiracy theory...🤣

yet again ??? LOL

giphy.gif

 

...stellar 🤡 conspiracies...

👍

 

you can't keep your conspiracies straight Ronnie!!..that little Jared thingy?? is on it's way to the S.C...the Bank transactions between Russia and the Afgans was reported in the NY Times (no conspiracy Ronnie)....I know you prefer to get your info. from Russian T.V. but I'll stick with the N.Y Times!....🤡

any concern for our troops being targets??....any goofy gifs for that??...😔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...