Jump to content

BOMBSHELL: John Bolton verbally briefed Trump in March 2019 that Putin was offering bounties for dead American soldiers in Afghanistan.


BigDrop

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, I AM IRONMAN said:

Russia Russia Russia.

Ok Jan Brady

🙊🙉🙈

how about....Bounty...Bounty...Bounty???....you Moron..Moron...Moron....you don't seem to care about our Troops....Troops...Troops??...you "fake American" with the eagle and flag icon!...LOL...🤡

#selfexpsoed...😔

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

you can't keep your conspiracies straight Ronnie!!..that little Jared thingy?? is on it's way to the S.C...

Supreme Court ?   🤣

and the docket # is...

giphy.gif

 

27 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

...the Bank transactions between Russia and the Afgans was reported in the NY Times (no conspiracy Ronnie)...

they reported no conspiracy you say?

that's pretty amazing

🤡

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Troll said:

Supreme Court ?   🤣

and the docket # is...

giphy.gif

 

they reported no conspiracy you say?

that's pretty amazing

🤡

 

docket number??...LOL...I'm sure you can find it on Russian T.V.!..it's the Duetsch Bank case Ronnie....🤡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

docket number??...LOL...I'm sure you can find it on Russian T.V.!..it's the Duetsch Bank case Ronnie....🤡

So you don't have it?

golly gee

Well here is the only case set.....DB and Mazars were merged...they are essentially the same...

Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP

Consolidated with:

Linked with:

 
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-715 D.C. Cir. May 12, 2020
Tr.Aud.
TBD TBD TBD OT 2019
 

Issue: Whether the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House of Representatives has the constitutional and statutory authority to issue a subpoena to the accountant for President Trump and several of his business entities demanding private financial records belonging to the president.

-------------------------------------

Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG

Consolidated with:

Linked with:

 
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-760 2nd Cir. May 12, 2020
Tr.Aud.
TBD TBD TBD OT 2019
 

Issue: Whether the Committee on Financial Services and the Intelligence Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives have the constitutional and statutory authority to issue a subpoena to creditors for President Donald Trump and several of his business entities demanding private financial records belonging to the president.

-------------------

 

So you think House members trying to get statutory authority over T's tax returns have anything to do with Jared ???

Maybe you should explain that one to the class...

giphy.gif

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Troll said:

So you don't have it?

golly gee

Well here is the only case set.....DB and Mazars were merged...they are essentially the same...

Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP

Consolidated with:

Linked with:

 
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-715 D.C. Cir. May 12, 2020
Tr.Aud.
TBD TBD TBD OT 2019
 

Issue: Whether the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House of Representatives has the constitutional and statutory authority to issue a subpoena to the accountant for President Trump and several of his business entities demanding private financial records belonging to the president.

-------------------------------------

Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG

Consolidated with:

Linked with:

 
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-760 2nd Cir. May 12, 2020
Tr.Aud.
TBD TBD TBD OT 2019
 

Issue: Whether the Committee on Financial Services and the Intelligence Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives have the constitutional and statutory authority to issue a subpoena to creditors for President Donald Trump and several of his business entities demanding private financial records belonging to the president.

-------------------

 

So you think House members trying to get statutory authority over T's tax returns have anything to do with Jared ???

Maybe you should explain that one to the class...

giphy.gif

Bravo Ronnie!!....Jared's records are part of the case..so you don't doubt it's in the S.C anymore??....🤡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

Bravo Ronnie!!....Jared's records are part of the case..so you don't doubt it's in the S.C anymore??....🤡

PSSSSSSsssssssst.....

Jared's records are not part.......

of T's income tax returns.....

You think they are?....

🤡

 

giphy.gif

 

PS: sounds like a conspiracy....

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Troll said:

PSSSSSSsssssssst.....

Jared's records are not part.......

of T's income tax returns.....

You think they are?....

🤡

 

giphy.gif

no...and it's not just his tax returns...it's also money related to money laundering...🤡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So since they don't have the returns....

4 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

no...and it's not just his tax returns...it's also money related to money laundering...🤡

sure sounds like a 🤡 conspiracy.....

don't you think?

 

PS: and how did you figure that one out.....  LOLOLOL

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Troll said:

So since they don't have the returns....

sure sounds like a 🤡 conspiracy.....

don't you think?

 

PS: and how did you figure that one out.....  LOLOLOL

 

 

conspiracies don't get to the S.C...you find them on Russian T.V...🤡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

conspiracies don't get to the S.C...you find them on Russian T.V...🤡

Unauthorized Tax return requests  get to the SC (when they come from the house)...

Conspiracies of "jared somehow getting caught" live in your head.

and the two are entirely separate.

unless you are some conspiracy theorist.

🤡

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, zulu1128 said:

Just checking in to see how the BOMBSHELL is going lol. 

you could care less Dave...like the rest of the flag waving Trumpers here...bounties on our troops??...no big deal huh Dave??...the House is having hearings on it and I guess you didn't see any Political talk shows this weekend???..it was discussed on all the networks....isn't it funny we tell our allies about it but not our Pres.??....🙁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, I AM IRONMAN said:

Well....its a shell....with a bomb inside of it 😮😂

you don't care about our troops you're a "fake American"  mam....with the eagle/flag icon and all!....because you sold your soul to Trump...silly ass red-neck...🤡

#selfexposed....😞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DBP66 said:

...silly ass red-neck...🤡

#selfexposed....😞

Now I know you love your new #selfexposed 🤡 tags....

But you are using them sooooooo much, people may be getting confused 🤔

Are you trying to indicate you think someone 'else' is self-exposing??? 🤣

Because that doesn't actually need a tag, or someone to point..... by definition .....DUH

 

Now if you are trying to indicate every time you #selfexpose yourself....well...

THEN It looks like you HAVE picked.....

the appropriate 🤡 tag...

for for your 'self'.

 

 

🤡 #66selfexposedyetagain

giphy.gif

 

 

PS: did you even realize when you are pointing, and you are the one trying to expose, you are thus rendering your own "self" exposed accusations and tag as false.???..🤣

F'in brilliant  tag you made up there 👌

giphy.gif

 

 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DBP66 said:

you could care less Dave...like the rest of the flag waving Trumpers here...bounties on our troops??...no big deal huh Dave??...the House is having hearings on it and I guess you didn't see any Political talk shows this weekend???..it was discussed on all the networks....isn't it funny we tell our allies about it but not our Pres.??....🙁

Sounds like it's not going as well as you'd hoped lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Troll said:

Now I know you love your new #selfexposed 🤡 tags....

But you are using them sooooooo much, people may be getting confused 🤔

Are you trying to indicate you think someone 'else' is self-exposing??? 🤣

Because that doesn't actually need a tag, or someone to point..... by definition .....DUH

 

Now if you are trying to indicate every time you #selfexpose yourself....well...

THEN It looks like you HAVE picked.....

the appropriate 🤡 tag...

for for your 'self'.

 

 

🤡 #66selfexposedyetagain

giphy.gif

 

 

PS: did you even realize when you are pointing, and you are the one trying to expose, you are thus rendering your own "self" exposed accusations and tag as false.???..🤣

F'in brilliant  tag you made up there 👌

giphy.gif

 

 

He is comical they way he backs himself into a corner and calls everyone red necks..when he himself is similar to Cletus the slack jawed local.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...