Jump to content

Civil War Is Coming


Texasball

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, AztecPadre said:

And you are totally entitled to that opinion.  You might be happy to know that many of those we have helped have done pretty well for themselves and their families.  They are homeowners and as y'all know, Cali ain't cheap. Some own their own business.  Many who have had kids here in america, have sent their kids to college, which is another area we help them out on.  Finding different types of scholarships and grants to offset the cost of tuition and room n board.  The group has folks from almost every race.  No asian yet, but everyone else is well represented.  The OG folks who first started this in our area started it sometime in the late 70's.  And the group has grown from there.  I joined right about when I hit 30.  Had to wait to get my career going first.  We have a lot of Immigration Lawyers who do the work pro bono.  Proud to say some of those lawyers are my famiglia.  It's a great foundation and one that many in the Carmel area try in many ways to help.  If you like we can even help you start on in your area.  But I am pretty sure there are a bunch already in the NY/NJ area.  

You the man!  Much respect brother.  

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nolebull813 said:

 Do you always have to cheerlead anti-American leftist views? 

Being American means having a variety of views. That's what I love about this country. So just because someone has some Democratic views doesn't mean they are anti-American. Come on, man, I know that you know better.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, World Citizen said:

You the man!  Much respect brother.  

Sounds more like the 'lawyer' man type, whose 'familia' makes a pretty decent buck off of the back of your illegal status...

So much so that he can even do some jobs 'pro-bono'......tee time at 6am you say?.

At least we know he gets paid to be irrational with his integrity, and self serving on the topic...

 

PAR for the course tho...some lawyer types give everyone a bad name...

Looks like Aztec is just your basic paid scumbag proffessional advocate...

But feel free to go play golf with him...

giphy.gif

he'll take care good of you...

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Troll said:

Sounds more like the 'lawyer' man type, whose 'familia' makes a pretty decent buck off of the back of your illegal status...

So much so that he can even do some jobs 'pro-bono'......tee time at 6am you say?.

At least we know he gets paid to be irrational with his integrity, and self serving on the topic...

 

PAR for the course tho...some lawyer types give everyone a bad name...

Looks like Aztec is just your basic paid scumbag proffessional advocate...

But feel free to go play golf with him...

giphy.gif

he'll take care good of you...

 

Got damn and I thought you to be reasonable.

Well shit, I’m gonna go kick my self. 
 

Is that jealousy and hate?

bgw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said:

Got damn and I thought you to be reasonable.

Well shit, I’m gonna go kick my self. 
 

Is that jealousy and hate?

bgw

Nah...just funny to solve the mystery of how someone can justify the unreasonable....

Now we know.....mystery solved.... so I couldn't care less 🤷‍♂️

 

PS: Not to worry tho, I won't be beating that drum....you know...

the same way Aztec plays a mean beat on them 👎 titties.... 🤣

 

giphy.gif

 

 

 

BTW: But in this case,  "👎 team" looks more like ...

giphy.gif

😝

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, concha said:

 

It is fucking hilarious, amirite?

How you doin'?

 

Amazing how they just ignore the obvious and factual...I’m this case direct video...information just to fit their narrative. It’s pretty comical actually. Here’s how it goes:

you: BLM is a Neo-Marxist organization that doesnt care about blacks.

them: insert laughing emoji

you: posts actual video...a close up video...of one of the founders of BLM staring right into the camera that they are trained Marxists etc...

them: attack you

Good grief🤣

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Blueliner said:

Amazing how they just ignore the obvious and factual...I’m this case direct video...information just to fit their narrative. It’s pretty comical actually. Here’s how it goes:

you: BLM is a Neo-Marxist organization that doesnt care about blacks.

them: insert laughing emoji

you: posts actual video...a close up video...of one of the founders of BLM staring right into the camera that they are trained Marxists etc...

them: attack you

Good grief🤣

 

Yep.

I also like the narrative how demonstrations are peaceful as buildings are engulfed in flames in the background.  Somehow, "peaceful" protests "intensify" into riots.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/07/31/intensifying_into_violence_143850.html

 

"Protestors in California," tweeted ABC News, about an incident in Oakland, "set fire to a courthouse, damaged a police station and assaulted officers after a peaceful demonstration intensified."

If you'd presented your ninth-grade teacher with that sentence in your weekly writing assignment, she might have taken out her red pen and asked you, "How does a peaceful demonstration intensify?"

This sentence, however, was written not by a ninth-grader but by an adult, a professional journalist working for one of the world's major television news organizations. It was not an accident. As Modern Age editor Daniel McCarthy noted, "George Orwell could not improve on this."

Any "peaceful demonstration" capable of "intensifying" into setting fire to a courthouse, damaging a police station and assaulting law enforcement personnel was never really "peaceful" in the first place.

As The New Criterion editor Roger Kimball wrote, "the overriding criterion for choosing which narrative to plug" is which "will do the most damage to Donald Trump and Republican prospects in the November election."

The narrative that serves that purpose is that the demonstrations that broke out after the May 25 death of George Floyd are peaceful, and the demands of many demonstrators to "defund" the police are a reasonable response with no downside risk. Video footage suggesting the contrary has appeared sparingly, if at all, on broadcast news, CNN and MSNBC.

Demonstrations that have continued for more than 60 days in cities such as Oakland, Portland and Seattle are described as "largely peaceful" -- which, translated into English, means "violent."

Setting fires in federal buildings, aiming blinding lasers and shooting pellet guns at law enforcement personnel are to be ignored (as the Associated Press's Mike Balsamo's reports from Portland have been) or characterized as, in House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler's words, "a myth."

In that spirit, committee members questioning (and permitting few replies from) Attorney General William Barr declined his invitation to condemn violent attacks on federal courthouses and to endorse federal law enforcement attempts to defend them.

Major journalistic organizations seem uninterested as well in learning just who the mostly white and mask-clad violent protesters are, and whether they are part of an organized antifa network. Some, like MSNBC's Joy Reid, are willing to take antifa groups' anti-fascist label literally despite their use of tactics reminiscent of Mussolini's Blackshirts and Hitler's Brownshirts.

It's interesting as well that journalists sympathetic to the Black Lives Matter movement seem either puzzled by or blithely ignorant of the sharp rise in post-May 25 homicides in cities ranging from New York to Chicago to Minneapolis to Milwaukee to Denver to Los Angeles.

It's the fastest rise in murder rates since the late 1960s, another era of urban riots and complaints (more justified then than now) about police conduct.

Democrats and journalists have struggled to explain the spike. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, fresh from "Les Miz," suspects fathers are stealing to feed their children. The New York Times indicts summer heat waves.

They resist the obvious explanation: Less policing plus lighter punishment and delegitimizing law enforcement yields more violent crime. Almost all the extra victims, including children, are minorities in underprivileged neighborhoods. Some black lives evidently don't matter so much.

But that's not a story most journalists want to cover. Falling in the same category is the continued unraveling of the Russia-collusion hoax. The theory that Donald Trump was in cahoots with Russia was rendered "inoperative" (to borrow a word from the Watergate era) by Robert Mueller and his report last year.

Now comes information that former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Joe Biden were kept aware of FBI spying on Trump and his campaign, supposedly justified by the Clinton campaign-financed Steele memorandum. Now it turns out that the supposed Russia expert who was Steele's primary source was a D.C.-based bibulous operative connected with the Brookings Institution.

Thus, media outlets that could not produce enough Russia-collusion stories suddenly have no interest in the subject now that their conspiracy theory has been debunked. They evidently have zero interest in the Obama administration's violation of the American norms of refraining from using legal and intelligence agencies against political opponents, and of accepting election results.

That's "willful blindness" and "deliberately ignoring the facts," says law professor Jonathan Turley. In the process of exaggerating Trump's departures from norms and ignoring those of Trump's opponents, much of the media is doing a good job of tearing down American norms themselves -- a case, perhaps, of peaceful demonstration intensifying.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, concha said:

 

Yep.

I also like the narrative how demonstrations are peaceful as buildings are engulfed in flames in the background.  Somehow, "peaceful" protests "intensify" into riots.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/07/31/intensifying_into_violence_143850.html

 

"Protestors in California," tweeted ABC News, about an incident in Oakland, "set fire to a courthouse, damaged a police station and assaulted officers after a peaceful demonstration intensified."

If you'd presented your ninth-grade teacher with that sentence in your weekly writing assignment, she might have taken out her red pen and asked you, "How does a peaceful demonstration intensify?"

This sentence, however, was written not by a ninth-grader but by an adult, a professional journalist working for one of the world's major television news organizations. It was not an accident. As Modern Age editor Daniel McCarthy noted, "George Orwell could not improve on this."

Any "peaceful demonstration" capable of "intensifying" into setting fire to a courthouse, damaging a police station and assaulting law enforcement personnel was never really "peaceful" in the first place.

As The New Criterion editor Roger Kimball wrote, "the overriding criterion for choosing which narrative to plug" is which "will do the most damage to Donald Trump and Republican prospects in the November election."

The narrative that serves that purpose is that the demonstrations that broke out after the May 25 death of George Floyd are peaceful, and the demands of many demonstrators to "defund" the police are a reasonable response with no downside risk. Video footage suggesting the contrary has appeared sparingly, if at all, on broadcast news, CNN and MSNBC.

Demonstrations that have continued for more than 60 days in cities such as Oakland, Portland and Seattle are described as "largely peaceful" -- which, translated into English, means "violent."

Setting fires in federal buildings, aiming blinding lasers and shooting pellet guns at law enforcement personnel are to be ignored (as the Associated Press's Mike Balsamo's reports from Portland have been) or characterized as, in House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler's words, "a myth."

In that spirit, committee members questioning (and permitting few replies from) Attorney General William Barr declined his invitation to condemn violent attacks on federal courthouses and to endorse federal law enforcement attempts to defend them.

Major journalistic organizations seem uninterested as well in learning just who the mostly white and mask-clad violent protesters are, and whether they are part of an organized antifa network. Some, like MSNBC's Joy Reid, are willing to take antifa groups' anti-fascist label literally despite their use of tactics reminiscent of Mussolini's Blackshirts and Hitler's Brownshirts.

It's interesting as well that journalists sympathetic to the Black Lives Matter movement seem either puzzled by or blithely ignorant of the sharp rise in post-May 25 homicides in cities ranging from New York to Chicago to Minneapolis to Milwaukee to Denver to Los Angeles.

It's the fastest rise in murder rates since the late 1960s, another era of urban riots and complaints (more justified then than now) about police conduct.

Democrats and journalists have struggled to explain the spike. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, fresh from "Les Miz," suspects fathers are stealing to feed their children. The New York Times indicts summer heat waves.

They resist the obvious explanation: Less policing plus lighter punishment and delegitimizing law enforcement yields more violent crime. Almost all the extra victims, including children, are minorities in underprivileged neighborhoods. Some black lives evidently don't matter so much.

But that's not a story most journalists want to cover. Falling in the same category is the continued unraveling of the Russia-collusion hoax. The theory that Donald Trump was in cahoots with Russia was rendered "inoperative" (to borrow a word from the Watergate era) by Robert Mueller and his report last year.

Now comes information that former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Joe Biden were kept aware of FBI spying on Trump and his campaign, supposedly justified by the Clinton campaign-financed Steele memorandum. Now it turns out that the supposed Russia expert who was Steele's primary source was a D.C.-based bibulous operative connected with the Brookings Institution.

Thus, media outlets that could not produce enough Russia-collusion stories suddenly have no interest in the subject now that their conspiracy theory has been debunked. They evidently have zero interest in the Obama administration's violation of the American norms of refraining from using legal and intelligence agencies against political opponents, and of accepting election results.

That's "willful blindness" and "deliberately ignoring the facts," says law professor Jonathan Turley. In the process of exaggerating Trump's departures from norms and ignoring those of Trump's opponents, much of the media is doing a good job of tearing down American norms themselves -- a case, perhaps, of peaceful demonstration intensifying.

 

 

Isn’t it absolutely incredible...and pathetic...as to the level of low that journalism has sunk? We have the biggest, cumulative, political scandal in US history, and the press is in on it rather than reporting on it. The left and press (one in the same actually) make me sick. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Blueliner said:

Isn’t it absolutely incredible...and pathetic...as to the level of low that journalism has sunk? We have the biggest, cumulative, political scandal in US history, and the press is in on it rather than reporting on it. The left and press (one in the same actually) make me sick. 

 

BLM

Except for the 5 dead in Chicago just since midnight and many like them across America. "those BLDon'tM". Because they don't advance the far left cause.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, concha said:

 

BLM

Except for the 5 dead in Chicago just since midnight and many like them across America. "those BLDon'tM". Because they don't advance the far left cause.

 

Nope. It’s not about black lives. That is clear. The ever-increasing irony is that more and more blacks see through the BLM BS and seeing them for what they are..and that’s NOT caring about black lives. It’s the goofy, self-hating, indoctrinated, woke white liberals that are being played for fools. I firmly believe Trump will record a record high percentage of the black vote. Like really high. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BUFORDGAWOLVES said:

The Far Right is selling “it” to EACH other....

Let THAT sink in. 
 

Bahahaha.

Clowns 🤡 

bgw

 

Larry,  It's cute that you stop by for your dumbass woke drive-by.

Of course, you cant refute the substance of anything.

Because you're a dumbass.

 

Stay woke, Larry.

 

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, concha said:

 

There's lots of dumbasses in the world. You're not all minority, Larry.

 

Heyyyyyy Conchita, hows that wall holding up? You know the one on the border. Didn’t it blow over? 
How many casinos were bankrupted by your hero in office?

Fo, fo, fo, fo.... yeah I’m the dumbass. 
 

Fucking clown. 
 

Larry the Woke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...