Jump to content

So the shooter was a Trumper...


DBP66

Recommended Posts

My question is why is a 17 year old out here with a rifle anyway... 

Only time I was ever allowed to hold a gun before being grown and getting my own was when I went hunting with my friends and my uncle's... 

This case will be spun in his favor some how... 

We already got people bringing up the background of the people he shot because that's what people love to do... 

Scream "I'm not saying it's justified but the person he shot had a warrant" 

Cut the BS just say you think he deserved and make all our lives easier... I don't have time to play with snakes... 

  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, concha said:

 

It's fascinating to observe how the liberal mind works.

Anthony Huber (who tried to brain the 17-year old with his skateboard) had a history of domestic abuse and battery.

Joseph Rosenbaum's curriculum vitae includes arson, sex offenses and assault (amongst others).

Gaige Grosskreutz apparently has at least a burglary on his record and was in possession of a firearm.

 

But no matter what, it's the kid's fault.

14 minutes ago, Bormio said:

Brainwashed?  He supports Trump and Blue Lives Matter.  So do millions out there - sorry to ruin your day

Big time supporter, found it necessary to commit murder.... makes sense. 
 

bgw

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bormio said:

Somebody with a gun makes you nervous?  Good, maybe you won’t riot and loot

Shit somebody with a gun makes you nervous... Better pray they don't panic and shoot... 

 

Because you never know when someone may feel threatened by a man with his back turned... Or running away from you... 

Edited by TheMaximumHornetSting
  • Thanks 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bormio said:

Somebody with a gun makes you nervous?  Good, maybe you won’t riot and loot

seeing that kid walking around with a gun doesn't make you nervous??...LOL...you're a REAL tough guy huh??...with no brain!…O.o...BTW I got a gun and I'm a hunter.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ngdawg said:

Let's get this straight:

 

- Kid kills two people and injures a few others and is handed water by the police and is unharmed.

- Guy walks back to his car after breaking up a fight and gets shot 7 times in the back.

 

Makes sense.

 

Damn are you simple-minded.

"Kid shoots people with criminal records in self-defense". Watch the video. And BTW, there is another video surfacing of the kid being chased and one of the people firing a pistol.  He is then later assaulted and a guy tries to brain him while he's on the ground. Then he shoots another dipshit with a handgun.

"Guy has a sexual assault warrant, resists arrest, decides to not listen to cops, and then reaches in his car where he has a knife"

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, concha said:

 

Damn are you simple-minded.

"Kid shoots people with criminal records in self-defense". Watch the video. And BTW, there is another video surfacing of the kid being chased and one of the people firing a pistol.  He is then later assaulted and a guy tries to brain him while he's on the ground. Then he shoots another dipshit with a handgun.

"Guy has a sexual assault warrant, resists arrest, decides to not listen to cops, and then reaches in his car where he has a knife"

 

So he decided to take the law into his own hands. That's the police's job, if they even do it well.

The guy had no weapon in his hands, but the 17 year old had a gun. The 17 year old killed people, and the black guy didn't. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ngdawg said:

So he decided to take the law into his own hands. That's the police's job, if they even do it well.

The guy had no weapon in his hands, but the 17 year old had a gun. The 17 year old killed people, and the black guy didn't. 

 

So he's taking the law into his own hands by being assaulted?  Do you even bother to think for a second?  Videos appear to show that the kid did nothing violent until he was assaulted.

 

The black guy (not that his skin color matters) had a sexual assault warrant out on him.  He resisted arrest. He ignored the cop's lawful orders. He then reached into a vehicle where he had a knife and could well have a gun for all the police know.  I suppose the police were supposed to wait and see if he was getting them a bouquet of flowers (after he had just resisted arrest)?  

 

Do liberals EVER demand common sense and responsibility from people?  

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DBP66 said:

The Kenosha Shooting Suspect Was In The Front Row Of A Trump Rally In January

Kyle Rittenhouse’s social media is filled with references to “Blue Lives Matter.” A Trump campaign spokesperson said, "This individual had nothing to do with our campaign."

 
 
Trump speaks behind a lectern at a rally; a white circle focuses on a boy in the front row of the audience
CSPAN
 

Kyle Rittenhouse (circled) can be seen wearing a white hat in the front row of a Trump rally in Des Moines, Iowa, Jan. 30.

 

The law enforcement–obsessed 17-year-old who was charged with shooting and killing two people and injuring another in Kenosha, Wisconsin, during protests for Jacob Blake appeared in the front row at a Donald Trump rally in January.

Kyle Howard Rittenhouse’s social media presence is filled with him posing with weapons, posting “Blue Lives Matter,” and supporting Trump for president. Footage from the Des Moines, Iowa, rally on Jan. 30 shows Rittenhouse feet away from the president, in the front row, to the left of the podium. He posted a TikTok video from the event.

Please don't leave this site on 11/4 after Trump wins.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, concha said:

 

So he's taking the law into his own hands by being assaulted?  Do you even bother to think for a second?  Videos appear to show that the kid did nothing violent until he was assaulted.

 

The black guy (not that his skin color matters) had a sexual assault warrant out on him.  He resisted arrest. He ignored the cop's lawful orders. He then reached into a vehicle where he had a knife and could well have a gun for all the police know.  I suppose the police were supposed to wait and see if he was getting them a bouquet of flowers (after he had just resisted arrest)?  

 

Do liberals EVER demand common sense and responsibility from people?  

 

The problem is that skin color does matter to the cops. They wouldn't have done the same thing to a white person, as evident after the 17-year old's shooting and in the Charleston church shooting. In both cases, lives were lost and the perpetrators were not shot/attacked. However, the cops paralyzed a man by shooting him 7 times in the back from point-blank range when he didn't even have a weapon in his hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Bormio said:

Racist?  The guy he shot was white

And how did the cops react?

Even for someone who shot one person out of the four that were white, the cops' lack of response shows all you need to know. Instead of injuring the kid or shooting him (you know, the guy who actually had a weapon in his hand and killed people), they let him walk. But then when a guy doesn't even have a weapon in his hands, cops claim they "fear for their lives" and shoot 7 times. Not once, SEVEN times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ngdawg said:

The problem is that skin color does matter to the cops. They wouldn't have done the same thing to a white person, as evident after the 17-year old's shooting and in the Charleston church shooting. In both cases, lives were lost and the perpetrators were not shot/attacked. However, the cops paralyzed a man by shooting him 7 times in the back from point-blank range when he didn't even have a weapon in his hands.

 

1) You have no clue what they may or may not have done to a white guy with a sexual assault warrant out who resisted arrest, ignored lawful orders and reached his hand inside a vehicle where he had a weapon.

2) The 17-year old kid upon approaching the police had his hands up and there is zero indication that he attempted to resist arrest.

3) Not sure of the Charleston shooter but did he actually resist arrest?

4) He was a violent man who was reaching where there was a weapon.  You can't be this stupid.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ngdawg said:

And how did the cops react?

Even for someone who shot one person out of the four that were white, the cops' lack of response shows all you need to know. Instead of injuring the kid or shooting him (you know, the guy who actually had a weapon in his hand and killed people), they let him walk. But then when a guy doesn't even have a weapon in his hands, cops claim they "fear for their lives" and shoot 7 times. Not once, SEVEN times.

 

Were there even cops nearby when he was assaulted?

What's that? You don't know. Oh... what a shocker.

 

Guess what?  Had this dumbass not assaulted a woman, not resisted arrest, not ignored lawful orders to stop and not reached into a vehicle where he had a weapon, there would have been ZERO shots fired.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, concha said:

So the guys he was defending himself against were all criminals, including a felon with a gun,  and the shooter was clearly defending himself.   👍

This is so predictable.

A kid drives 20 miles away from his home to "protect himself."

This kid will be lauded as a hero by the concha types.

The "law and order" party will try their hardest to get him off scott free.

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, concha said:

 

1) You have no clue what they may or may not have done to a white guy with a sexual assault warrant out who resisted arrest, ignored lawful orders and reached his hand inside a vehicle where he had a weapon.

2) The 17-year old kid upon approaching the police had his hands up and there is zero indication that he attempted to resist arrest.

3) Not sure of the Charleston shooter but did he actually resist arrest?

4) He was a violent man who was reaching where there was a weapon.  You can't be this stupid.

 

So what you're saying is that it's ok to kill as many people as you want, but if comply with police, we won't complain! However, if you do nothing wrong and are simply walk away, it's acceptable to be shot.

 

Listen to yourself speak.

  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, concha said:

 

Were there even cops nearby when he was assaulted?

What's that? You don't know. Oh... what a shocker.

 

I do know enough to know that Kenosha police shared water with the shooter and the armed group before the 17 year old killed 2 people and injured a 3rd badly. The kid claimed to be a part of a local militia. So the police helped out a local militia. If that isn't bias, I don't know what is.

  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Atticus Finch said:

This is so predictable.

A kid drives 20 miles away from his home to "protect himself."

This kid will be lauded as a hero by the concha types.

The "law and order" party will try their hardest to get him off scott free.

 

He was protecting property as the local Democrat-run government was unwilling and/or unable.  Laudable.

He was assaulted, but predictably Andy will side with the criminal thugs who attacked him.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ngdawg said:

 

I do know enough to know that Kenosha police shared water with the shooter and the armed group before the 17 year old killed 2 people and injured a 3rd badly. The kid claimed to be a part of a local militia. So the police helped out a local militia. If that isn't bias, I don't know what is.

 

So they gave water to a group of people who weren't breaking the law.

Wow.

And then the kid doesn't shoot anyone until he is attacked.

 

Again, the left requires zero from it's own when it comes to violence, looting, rioting etc...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, concha said:

 

So they gave water to a group of people who weren't breaking the law.

Wow.

And then the kid doesn't shoot anyone until he is attacked.

 

Again, the left requires zero from it's own when it comes to violence, looting, rioting etc...

 

And did they give water to all the peaceful protesters in the other cities? Didn't think so. Nice double standard you've got going.

If you can judge BLM by their worst protesters, how are we not allowed to judge the police by their worst cops?

You're just racist, concha. You'll never see it or admit it, but you're racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...