Jump to content

Election results 2020


HSFBfan

Recommended Posts

"center-right" Nolebull813

On 10/22/2018 at 11:18 PM, Nolebull813 said:

This is war. They should treat it like war. Shoot anyone within 1,000 feet of the border. This invasion is not being taken serious enough. This will be known as the North American war, and hopefully our military uses the maximum force to get rid of this deadly and terrorist threat by any means necessary 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

"center-right" Nolebull813

 

Sounds pretty reasonable given the fact that it was a terrorist invasion. Our borders are the thresholds of our home. As soon as you illegally cross into a home, it is the responsibility of that home owner to blow you off planet earth to protect said home. 
 

They didn’t go far enough to deter this behavior. I would think being against terrorism would be mainstream but you lefties find new ways to surprise me everyday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

Walking up to a border crossing and requesting asylum is not only not terrorism it's perfectly legal.

🤡

No I’m talking about the areas nowhere near the ports of entry. and you are supposed to claim asylum in country of origin. They are storming across international borders to illegally invade ours. The dictionary definition of terrorism. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

What a mess the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (MCBOS) have gotten themselves into. After refusing to provide ballots to the Arizona Senate for months, as soon as the judge ordered the MCBOS to hand them over, shredded ballots are found in a dumpster.

AZ-Ballot-Shredded-3-6-8.jpgAZ-Ballot-Shredded-3-6.jpg

Maricopa-County-Chicken-Coop-345x181.jpg

After Finding Shredded Ballots in the Dumpster Earlier Today – A Mysterious Fire Breaks Out at Maricopa County Official’s Farm

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/breaking-exclusive-early-indications-ballots-found-shredded-maricopa-county-dumpster-completed-ballots-2020-election/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2021 at 5:15 AM, BUFORDGAWOLVES said:

Who needs daytime soaps, enter the mind of Slot and confirmation bias effluent. 

Slotback is embarrassing.

This same tactic was tried in Georgia.

Says shredded ballots were found in Dell boxes in Georgia

d089e796db6628261f228086d4084fa8.jpg

Maricopa County did a hand recount and two audits before any ballots were found "shredded" in a dumpster.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

Slotback is embarrassing.

This same tactic was tried in Georgia.

Says shredded ballots were found in Dell boxes in Georgia

d089e796db6628261f228086d4084fa8.jpg

Maricopa County did a hand recount and two audits before any ballots were found "shredded" in a dumpster.

Yes, I am embarrassing you. Easy to do.

WE CAUGHT THEM: Arizona’s Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Lied – EAC Updated Website after Gateway Pundit Report Discovered Their Auditors Were Uncertified

1. The two companies chosen to audit the election, one of which was involved in the Georgia debacle, had accreditation from the United States Election Assistance Commission which had expired in 2017. The USEAC, upon being called on this quickly amended their records to show that they really had accreditation, but, what with Covid 19 and all, there had been a delayed. So they issued two memos after the fact to accredit them.

2. Both companies had been used to audit Dominion both entities were used by Dominion voting systems for their recent audits.

3. Guess who the CIO of the USEAC worked for for 10 years...Dominion Voting Systems. What a surprise!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/caught-arizonas-maricopa-county-board-supervisors-lied-eac-updated-website-gateway-pundit-report-discovered-auditors-uncertified/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Slotback Right said:

Oh, and by the way, I already showed you photos of the shredded ballots that are being reassembled. And if it is fake, then I wonder why the Maricopa County Election Board of Supervisors was threatening to prosecute this man for trespassing in their dumpster.

AZ-Ballot-Shredded-3-6-7.jpg

AZ-Ballot-Shredded-3-6-4.jpg

maybe because he's bat shit crazy like you?....🤡

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Slotback Right said:

Yes, I am embarrassing you. Easy to do.

How many more times are you going to faceplant by making ridiculous claims about this election?

Maricopa County's Board of Supervisors is majority Republican. The Board has been unanimous in their certification of the election results. There was a hand count. There were two audits. The auditors were well-respected and accredited.

But by all means. Keep embarrassing yourself over and over again. It's seemingly the only thing you're good at.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GOP-controlled Arizona Senate browbeat the Board of Supervisors for the ballots that had already been hand-counted and audited.

Then when they got them didn't know what to do with them.

Arizona Senate has no plan for storing the 2.1 million ballots it plans to audit? Terrific

For two months, the Arizona Senate has been demanding that Maricopa County turn over the 2.1 million ballots cast in the November election.

Now, the Senate doesn’t know what to do with them.

If this is how the Republicans’ “full forensic audit” begins, get ready for a train wreck, Arizona.

Republican senators have been itching since November to get their hands on the ballots that delivered the state’s 11 electoral votes to Joe Biden.

Senators issued a pair of subpoenas on Dec. 15, demanding that the county turn over all ballots, voting machines and detailed information on every Arizona voter, among other things. On Jan. 12, Senate President Karen Fann issued a third subpoena ordering the county to deliver the ballots by 9 a.m. Jan. 13.

When the county refused, contending state law required that the ballots remain sealed in a secure county warehouse, the Senate actually came within one vote of tossing the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in jail.

The standoff ended last week when Superior Court Judge Timothy Thomason ordered the county to comply with the Senate subpoena. So on Monday, Maricopa County officials boxed up the ballots and early ballot affadavit envelopes and began loading them onto trucks.

All 78 pallets of them.

Now, we learn the Senate has no idea what to do with the ballots?

Late Monday, a lawyer for the Senate asked Maricopa County to hold off on delivery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BREAKING: Judge Rules MI Sec. of State Benson Directed City Clerks to Ignore Signature Matching Law on Absentee Ballots in Nov. 2020 Election

After countless irregularities in the 2020 election and questions that arose due to the handling of ballots, counting of ballots, and absentee ballots, a Michigan judge has ruled that Michigan’s Secretary of State did in fact direct city clerks to ignore signature matching law on absentee ballots in the 2020 election.  However, the ruling appears to be too little too late to have any effect on the fantastically mismanaged 2020 election that millions of reasonable Americans do not trust.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/breaking-judge-rules-mi-sec-state-benson-directed-city-clerks-ignore-signature-matching-law-absentee-ballots-nov-2020-election/

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course the Gateway Pundit headline is a lie. No such order was given.

If you read an actual news story on this you'd know that it was a fairly minor procedural issue regarding what constituted "sufficient" agreement of signatures.

Judge rules Benson's ballot signature verification guidance 'invalid'

Michigan law requires clerks to match required signatures on absentee ballot applications and absentee ballot envelopes with the voter signature on file to ensure the person submitting the ballot is the same one registered to vote in Michigan. 

But state law doesn't define what it means for signatures to "agree sufficiently."

Benson on Oct. 6 instructed clerks who were matching signatures that they "must perform" their duties under the "presumption" that the signature is valid and uphold the signature's validity if there were "more matching features than nonmatching features." Whenever possible, clerks and election officials were instructed to resolve slight differences "in favor of finding that the voter's signature was valid," Murray wrote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...