181pl Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 Let's see what an unbiased Court does... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 They reinstated parts of it for now, and rightly so. It'll be interesting to see what happens this fall, but smart money should probably be on the POTUS here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 I never understood the obsession with turning America into a war zone like the Middle East and now Europe. The insanity going on in all of Europe due to refugees should be common sense enough to ban all travel from these terrorist country's. If you have been following politics the last year you would see that every single issue that common sense would tell you the answers, the kooky liberals choose the opposite. And the worst part is they choose the opposite just to spite conservatives. No matter how dangerous the consequences 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thc6795 Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 5 minutes ago, zulu1128 said: They reinstated parts of it for now, and rightly so. It'll be interesting to see what happens this fall, but smart money should probably be on the POTUS here. I think what they did today speaks volumes as to how they will rule in Oct. They also refused to define gun ownership by states today I believe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus69 Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 26 minutes ago, 181pl said: Let's see what an unbiased Court does... Unbiased? LOL..... Rufus>> 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bormio Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 The fact they lifted the injunction almost by definition tells you how they will rule. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thc6795 Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 5 minutes ago, Rufus69 said: Unbiased? LOL..... Rufus>> losing elections has ramifications. I would suggest in 2020 you find someone better the Killiar. It really should be easy, hell I have a few candidates my dog left on my front lawn better than her. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus69 Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 15 minutes ago, thc6795 said: losing elections has ramifications. I would suggest in 2020 you find someone better the Killiar. It really should be easy, hell I have a few candidates my dog left on my front lawn better than her. You always seem to miss the point. The original poster more than implied that the SC was unbiased. That is where my "LOL" kicked in. I did not campaign nor support Clinton in her quest for the Presidency. I was...and will continue to be...a Bernie man. Bernie For Despot !!!!! Rufus>> 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thc6795 Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 4 minutes ago, Rufus69 said: You always seem to miss the point. The original poster more than implied that the SC was unbiased. That is where my "LOL" kicked in. I did not campaign nor support Clinton in her quest for the Presidency. I was...and will continue to be...a Bernie man. Bernie For Despot !!!!! Rufus>> Which party elects SCJ's? The winning party right? hence the reason I said losing elections have ramifications. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AztecPadre Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 43 minutes ago, Rufus69 said: Unbiased? LOL..... Rufus>> Darn it!!! Beat me to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cat_Scratch Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 18 minutes ago, Rufus69 said: You always seem to miss the point. The original poster more than implied that the SC was unbiased. That is where my "LOL" kicked in. I did not campaign nor support Clinton in her quest for the Presidency. I was...and will continue to be...a Bernie man. Bernie For Despot !!!!! Rufus>> Will Bernie run again in 2020? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thc6795 Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 So for months people have been saying once it gets to the Supreme Court the lowers courts ruling would be reversed. Now you libs are upset with a biased SC. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 1 hour ago, Rufus69 said: Unbiased? LOL..... Rufus>> Sucks to have your activist courts with their awful overturn stats being consistent with their failure, huh? . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
181pl Posted June 26, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 1 hour ago, Rufus69 said: Unbiased? LOL..... Rufus>> OK, less biased. But it's not a 3 judge panel made up of liberal activists like the Courts the left has used to forum shop their f'd up agenda. It's 9 judges. The restored Supreme Court leans center right. Just like the rest of the country and the civilzed world. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotBigdaddybloom Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paladin4ever Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 Heard a great joke today: President Trump is the first president in 128 years to not have a pet in the White House....that's because the Democratic Party is already his bitch. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarterBlue Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 4 hours ago, 181pl said: Let's see what an unbiased Court does... As an Attorney, I would expect somewhat more accurate information from you in the subject area of this thread. It was a partial reinstatement. Those with a connection (family, job, school, etc.), would not be subject to the ban, if I understand the ruling correctly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aZjimbo Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 4 hours ago, Nolebull813 said: I never understood the obsession with turning America into a war zone like the Middle East and now Europe. The insanity going on in all of Europe due to refugees should be common sense enough to ban all travel from these terrorist country's. If you have been following politics the last year you would see that every single issue that common sense would tell you the answers, the kooky liberals choose the opposite. And the worst part is they choose the opposite just to spite conservatives. No matter how dangerous the consequences Here's where I disagree with you. Kooky liberals don't choose the opposite of Conservatives to spite them. They choose the opposite because they line up with communists that simply hate America and what it stands for. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, aZjimbo said: Here's where I disagree with you. Kooky liberals don't choose the opposite of Conservatives to spite them. They choose the opposite because they line up with communists that simply hate America and what it stands for. Now that I agree with! They are all minority groups who have this victim mentality, and want everyone to accommodate them and change everything and anything. And if you don't, your a hateful bigot. Kinda like LGBT people wanting to edit the bible to fit their agenda. All these kooky liberals will NEVER be happy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AztecPadre Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 39 minutes ago, paladin4ever said: Heard a great joke today: President Trump is the first president in 128 years to not have a pet in the White House....that's because the Democratic Party is already his bitch. Someone said he had gerbils. Do those not count as pets? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorCalRuss Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 4 hours ago, Cat_Scratch said: Will Bernie run again in 2020? Republicans can only hope so and hopefully it's a 3rd party run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bestcoast Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 5 hours ago, Rufus69 said: Unbiased? LOL..... Rufus>> It was a 9-0 vote to uphold Trumps ban. Even the lib judges agreed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aZjimbo Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 1 hour ago, Nolebull813 said: Now that I agree with! They are all minority groups who have this victim mentality, and want everyone to accommodate them and change everything and anything. And if you don't, your a hateful bigot. Kinda like LGBT people wanting to edit the bible to fit their agenda. All these kooky liberals will NEVER be happy Don't forget you are a racist also if you disagree with their politics and ideology. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawgGoneIt Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 It was not a 9-0 vote to uphold Trump's ban. They actually sided with the plaintiffs on this case. It is however, evidence that the SCOTUS doesn't care what the man said while running for office,at least for now. which was part of the main argument from the lower courts. There was the three screwy right wing justices that felt like the court should have reinstated the ban in it's entirety, and then there was the chief justice siding with the majority that ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, while still allowing the president to get his w.. So far the court basically hasn't appeared to consider the language from the lower courts that spoke to the campaign rhetoric. Maybe they still will, although the ban is only 90 days so it will probably have expired by the time it has a chance to be argued again. Also, Justice Kennedy didn't fade away yet either. Actually Kennedy and Roberts are probably the two most fair and centrist jurists on the court. They will and have ruled against both political ideologies pretty regularly as compared to the rest pretty much going ideological party line on every ruling. While we are on the subject of biased/unbiased courts, losing either one of those guys would be a pretty big loss to the country as a whole. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted June 26, 2017 Report Share Posted June 26, 2017 Long-winded and partially inaccurate diatribe aside...The SCOTUS will rule in favor of the President this fall. Look for something in the 6-3 range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.