Belly Bob Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 18 minutes ago, zulu1128 said: Well, tbh giving you any more English lessons is starting to seem a bit harsh at this point lol. Anyway, sorry for pointing out your derp and upsetting you. Carry on. Oh, thank you. I can't wait to use "...accidental implication of such." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 NewsMax reports that Trump has gained 11 votes and Biden has lost 1 after an election audit in MI. https://www.newsmax.com/politics/michigan-trump-biden-election/2020/12/17/id/1002140/ "There was a concern that voting machines were dramatically flipping votes from Trump to Biden," according to NewsMax. But it turns out that the machines were not flipping votes quite as dramatically as people feared. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 32 minutes ago, Belly Bob said: Oh, thank you. I can't wait to use "...accidental implication of such." Indeed. Personally, I’m looking forward to the next time you try to inappropriately shoehorn “modus tollens” into another outburst. 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 11 minutes ago, zulu1128 said: Indeed. Personally, I’m looking forward to the next time you try to inappropriately shoehorn “modus tollens” into another outburst. 👍 Oh, good. But modus tollens is a classic schema of logical implication. You must've forgotten that we were talking about implication. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 You should probably pause, and make up your mind if you're going to discuss semantic or logical implications. You seem to either have confused yourself again, or are trying to do both simultaneously. 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 1 hour ago, zulu1128 said: You should probably pause, and make up your mind if you're going to discuss semantic or logical implications. You seem to either have confused yourself again, or are trying to do both simultaneously. 🤣 You're not going to catch up by reading wikipedia. Maybe you have conversational implicature in mind, but I doubt you've read Grice, because if you had, you'd realize that it's not going to help you here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 2 hours ago, zulu1128 said: You should probably pause, and make up your mind if you're going to discuss semantic or logical implications Stop using google search immediately! You are the "lol" guy. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 34 minutes ago, Belly Bob said: You're not going to catch up by reading wikipedia. Maybe you have conversational implicature in mind, but I doubt you've read Grice, because if you had, you'd realize that it's not going to help you here. LOL...you're the one confusing them, dude. Not me. 🤷♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 6 minutes ago, RedZone said: Stop using google search immediately! You are the "lol" guy. lol Okay, Hemmingway. Find any fish yet? 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 9 minutes ago, zulu1128 said: Okay, Hemmingway. Find any fish yet? 🤣 You can't be the "lol" guy all your career and then be expected to be taken seriously discussing logical consequence. It looks funny. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 Oh noes....the fat racist semi-literate fish finder guy doesn't take me seriously. That's just turrible. 🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 22 minutes ago, zulu1128 said: doesn't take me seriously. You say "lol" A LOT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 Of course, since it clearly upsets you so much. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 3 hours ago, zulu1128 said: LOL...you're the one confusing them, dude. Not me. 🤷♂️ This is funny. I introduced the distinction above. I said the implication might be in the semantic content of what I wrote, to which you replied, "The semantic content isn't really relevant to there being an implication. The fact that you chose the term creates the implication in and of itself. That's how the definition works." Now you're saying that I'm confusing logical implication with what you're embarrassingly calling "semantic implication," but what you really want to talk about is conversational implicature, which is different. If you want, we can work through Grice's conversational maxims together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 8 minutes ago, Belly Bob said: This is funny. I introduced the distinction above. I said the implication might be in the semantic content of what I wrote, to which you replied, "The semantic content isn't really relevant to there being an implication. The fact that you chose the term creates the implication in and of itself. That's how the definition works." Now you're saying that I'm confusing logical implication with what you're embarrassingly calling "semantic implication," but what you really want to talk about to is conversational implicature, which is different. If you want, we can work through Grice's conversational maxims together. Don't sweat it.....he tried talking "fishing" with me. lol I'm out.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 31 minutes ago, Belly Bob said: This is funny. I introduced the distinction above. I said the implication might be in the semantic content of what I wrote, to which you replied, "The semantic content isn't really relevant to there being an implication. The fact that you chose the term creates the implication in and of itself. That's how the definition works." Now you're saying that I'm confusing logical implication with what you're embarrassingly calling "semantic implication," but what you really want to talk about to is conversational implicature, which is different. If you want, we can work through Grice's conversational maxims together. Not gonna lie...it's tempting to just sit here and watch you continue twisting yourself into a pretzel over this. Again, sorry for calling out your derp and upsetting you. Have a great rest of your day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bormio Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 Poster compares Trump supporters to Nazis, and then writes 10,000 words to say he was misunderstood. An early Christmas gift. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 34 minutes ago, zulu1128 said: Not gonna lie...it's tempting to just sit here and watch you continue twisting yourself into a pretzel over this. Belly Bob never "lols" Just sayin" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 Okay, I guess? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 1 hour ago, Bormio said: Poster compares Trump supporters to Nazis, and then writes 10,000 words to say he was misunderstood. An early Christmas gift. That's not in dispute. What's in dispute is whether what I wrote implied that Trump supporters are Nazis. To compare x to y isn't to imply that x is y. Merry Christmas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 1 hour ago, zulu1128 said: Not gonna lie...it's tempting to just sit here and watch you continue twisting yourself into a pretzel over this. Again, sorry for calling out your derp and upsetting you. Have a great rest of your day. You're too nice. I'll be here if you change your mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 16 minutes ago, Belly Bob said: You're too nice. I'll be here if you change your mind. I know you will. 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 1 minute ago, zulu1128 said: I know you will. 🤣 Back already? That was fast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 zulu1128 has never posted this much. And to think it's all about fake outrage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
World Citizen Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 25 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: zulu1128 has never posted this much. And to think it's all about fake outrage. Too funny. Fake outrage over something @Belly Bob never even said. But zulu claims others are having a hard time. 🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.