Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

If you really want to take the garbage out, you will ban @BUFORDGAWOLVES @AztecPadre @Ga96 and @RedZone

That right there would get Prep the freaking Nobel Peace Prize 😂

GSB’s heart just went pitter patter a fluttering  with that post, GSB would love to promote scam after scam without repercussions. Maybe not one after another just USAA. 
 

You can’t just dish it out and not take it return, but the outright bull hockey on the Varsity side can’t go on. That’s why we have the OT AMIRITE?

I like this forum and want it to continue, the rules are pretty simple... no politics on the Varsity side.

bgw

 

  • Thanks 3
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

or...the 'Noble Peace Prize Medal'..like the one Trumpy The Ass Clown showed in his tweet...that he said he won...LOL.     Rufus>>

GSB’s heart just went pitter patter a fluttering  with that post, GSB would love to promote scam after scam without repercussions. Maybe not one after another just USAA.    You can’t just dish

Can  we just ban @Cossacks and @CODBEARD I feel like that’s the easier route 

Posted Images

9 hours ago, PrepGridiron said:

I know I haven’t been around at all, but I want to say one thing that’s been on my mind. For most of you that don’t know, I have a bit of background in these things and I can tell you nearly unequivocally that if section 230 is repealed, I will shut down this site immediately. Now that may be welcome news to some, but I can assure you that it will be a dark day in the big picture. 

What the hell is section 230? Apologies, I thought this was a NoBalls thread. 

 

bgw

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said:

Just did a Wiki.... I reckon the exposure will elevate but I think the intent was a measure of protection, no?

bgw

I don't want to oversimplify, but Section 230 allows service providers on the internet to be immune from liability for third party content. It is what protects Yelp from being sued by Acme Corp for libelous comments made by John Doe on Yelp's website. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

If you really want to take the garbage out, you will ban @BUFORDGAWOLVES @AztecPadre @Ga96 and @RedZone

That right there would get Prep the freaking Nobel Peace Prize 😂

or...the 'Noble Peace Prize Medal'..like the one Trumpy The Ass Clown showed in his tweet...that he said he won...LOL.

 

 

Rufus>>

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Rufus69 said:

or...the 'Noble Peace Prize Medal'..like the one Trumpy The Ass Clown showed in his tweet...that he said he won...LOL.

 

 

Rufus>>

If you werent such an obedient dem hack, you would know that he deserved it more than anyone else eligible. I don’t give a shit either way. He loves to troll you ass clowns. It’s his most redeeming quality 

  • Haha 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, PrepGridiron said:

I don't want to oversimplify, but Section 230 allows service providers on the internet to be immune from liability for third party content. It is what protects Yelp from being sued by Acme Corp for libelous comments made by John Doe on Yelp's website. 

Can’t say I blame your position one bit especially in a litigating little society we live in. 
 

What would be the benefit of a repeal?

bgw

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

If you werent such an obedient dem hack, you would know that he deserved it more than anyone else eligible. I don’t give a shit either way. He loves to troll you ass clowns. It’s his most redeeming quality 

Bout the only damn redeeming quality the Orange Idiot possesses.... now don’t get too fuckin’ wound up NoBalls I barely like you, just barely....

bgw

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something to ponder 🤔 230 came about because the courts were presented with 2 cases. One where the website allowed a free for all 🤪and neglected any monitoring and one where the website “attempted to do the right thing “ and was censoring  🙃 some content.  Both where sued for defamation but the free for all 🤪 gets off because they are not legally responsible whilst the “right thing “ censorship 🙃site winds  up legally having to pay because they are in control of the content.  

Legislature got together after some lobbying and 230 was created to allow sites to censor (control content) without penalty 🖊.  

230 is not what most people think it is,  and all the other normal well worn publishing rules still apply and have not changed.   

Just sayin’

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If yens need a sac lamb you can ban me. I don't give a shit but I want all my info removed from the site and I don't want to count in the membership number that can be used to sell adds... so in other words if you ban me then your membership count needs to go down one and all evidence of my existence on this site removed.. capice?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Newbie said:

Legislature got together after some lobbying and 230 was created to allow sites to censor (control content) without penalty 🖊.  

 

 

Please provide a source for this as I'd like to know if I have been previously misinformed. 230 does not allow sites to censor without penalty. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/29/2020 at 8:36 AM, Nolebull813 said:

If you really want to take the garbage out, you will ban @BUFORDGAWOLVES @AztecPadre @Ga96 and @RedZone

That right there would get Prep the freaking Nobel Peace Prize 😂

Shut up racist pussy.  As much as you wish this could happen so that only your white folk kin can be allowed to stay, but being I'm half white, that might throw a wrinkle in your plans you little bitch.

  • Haha 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, PrepGridiron said:

I don't want to oversimplify, but Section 230 allows service providers on the internet to be immune from liability for third party content. It is what protects Yelp from being sued by Acme Corp for libelous comments made by John Doe on Yelp's website. 

So basically it protects the site owner from being sued when bitches like nolebull call people illegal terrorist and BEANERS.  and this was on the Varsity side.  Just curious why he gets a pass when other who have used the N word got banned?  And rightfully so.  But is there a double standard?  Asking for a friend. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, AztecPadre said:

So basically it protects the site owner from being sued when bitches like nolebull call people illegal terrorist and BEANERS.  and this was on the Varsity side.  Just curious why he gets a pass when other who have used the N word got banned?  And rightfully so.  But is there a double standard?  Asking for a friend. 

It’s funny because you are all those things. You said it not me you racist scumbag 😂

  • Thumbs Down 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/29/2020 at 4:02 AM, PrepGridiron said:

I know I haven’t been around at all, but I want to say one thing that’s been on my mind. For most of you that don’t know, I have a bit of background in these things and I can tell you nearly unequivocally that if section 230 is repealed, I will shut down this site immediately. Now that may be welcome news to some, but I can assure you that it will be a dark day in the big picture. 

Don't threaten me with a good time. 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, PrepGridiron said:

Unless there is new, smart legislation crafted, I don't immediately see a benefit to a repeal. 

I agree that they should not just repeal but replace with better smart legislation.  I will have to go back and see if I can find that background article and will post a link but give me a little time as I’m kind of busy right now.  

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, PrepGridiron said:

Unless there is new, smart legislation crafted, I don't immediately see a benefit to a repeal. 

Repealing 230 is a dangerous ball game... 

Making  websites responsible for what some Loon on the internet says (Right or Wrong) is gonna open the gateway to some funky Lawsuits... 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, PrepGridiron said:

Please provide a source for this as I'd like to know if I have been previously misinformed. 230 does not allow sites to censor without penalty. 

Careful you don't go down the rabbit hole as that is how these conversations usually go.  

Hope all is well brother.  

  • Like 3
  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/29/2020 at 2:08 PM, Nolebull813 said:

If you werent such an obedient dem hack, you would know that he deserved it more than anyone else eligible. I don’t give a shit either way. He loves to troll you ass clowns. It’s his most redeeming quality 

What Trumpy The Ass Clown deserves is prison...for mass murder.

History will NOT be kind to Cheeto Man.

 

 

Rufus>>

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...