Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 4 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: I guess everyone would need to come to a consensus to what a domestic terrorist is. That's not how that works. 🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 1 minute ago, Belly Bob said: We wouldn't need everyone to agree. Not everyone agrees that the Earth is roughly spherical in shape. But we would need a reasonable definition of domestic terrorism. Yeah. I think common sense would need to come into play. Sadly common sense gets left at the door when walking into politics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 2 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: I completely understand why they would ban them. Because they're corrupt and want to censor free expression for their benefit. I can't imagine being as dumb as you and apparently being proud of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 7 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: A lot of people feel that the BLM movement is a terrorist organization. And a lot of people think the 2020 election was rigged (it wasn't). Facts over feelings, snowflake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 5 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: side note. I don’t agree with any banning of any kind. I just find it humorous that the leaders of banning are mad that they are banned. It’s like a thief being offended someone stole from them It's not funny or ironic or hypocritical. You're just dumb as a rock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 5 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: No because big tech isn’t a requirement to exercise free speech. You're failing to grasp the crucial distinction between a government actor and a private citizen. As recently as 2017, the SCOTUS ruled that it was unconstitutional for the government to forbid convicted child molesters from using social media. It was an 8-0 ruling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 4 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: Sadly common sense gets left at the door when walking into politics. As you've so deftly proven. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 1 minute ago, Belly Bob said: You're failing to grasp the crucial distinction between a government actor and a private citizen. He's never going to understand this. He's the perfect right-wing loon to have stayed on the sinking ship. He's like the department store mannequin of right-wing lunacy. Perfect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 1 hour ago, Nolebull813 said: Yes that is as hypocritical as it gets. Twitter bans people based on beliefs they disagree with. So leaders in Uganda disagree with big techs beliefs and shut them down. And Twitter is mad about it. Twitter being upset is a parody. No normal human could express that in a serious manner Ummm bullshit, Twitter would flag Trumpy’s tweets with a statement and a “regular” tweeter posting the same content was shutdown. Its been proven. bgw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 2 hours ago, Atticus Finch said: No they didn't. Type in “stop the steal” and go tweet it and get back to us 🤓 🍿 Or you could just keep screaming lies lies lies 🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slotback Right Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 Internet Provider to Restrict Access to Facebook, Twitter to Customers Who Request It Your T1 WiFi, an internet service provider based in northwestern Idaho, will implement firewalls that restrict access to Facebook and Twitter at its customers' requests." ...It has come to our Attention that Twitter and Facebook are engaged in Censorship of our Customers and Information," the company wrote. A customer posted screenshots of the email to Twitter on Sunday evening, and Fink verified its contents in his comments to Newsweek. "We have the past couple days been fielding calls from customers voicing the concern that they do not want these sites allowed to be displayed on their internet feed…and that they do not want their children to go to these sites," the email continued. "They could do this themselves but some do not have the technical knowledge to do so and it would be very tiresome for us to do it for them and it would be expensive to visit each customer that wants this done." https://www.newsweek.com/internet-provider-restrict-access-facebook-twitter-customers-who-request-it-1560656 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slotback Right Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slotback Right Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownSouth Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 Didn’t realize so many conservatives here had so much hostility towards private enterprises enacting their own rules in a free market place. Double-surprised that so many conservatives now want the government to come to the rescue and destroy private companies for...being private companies. I never could have predicted this day would come.🤣🙄 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 1 hour ago, DownSouth said: Didn’t realize so many conservatives here had so much hostility towards private enterprises enacting their own rules in a free market place. Double-surprised that so many conservatives now want the government to come to the rescue and destroy private companies for...being private companies. I never could have predicted this day would come.🤣🙄 Sounds like you are on board with private companies discriminating against people they don’t like. Hate and discrimination is hate and discrimination no matter how you try to justify it. Why does every private company have to do business with anyone no matter what with fear of being sued for discrimination if they don’t? Like the Colorado baker. That was his private company. Why should he be forced to do business with people he doesn’t want to? Free market right? Go create your own bakery if you want cakes. it is so funny watching left wingers who claim to be for the little guy stick up for giant tech companies who are the most powerful businesses in the world. and you were sticking up for them in defense of gross discrimination. things no small business would ever get away with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 8 hours ago, Atticus Finch said: And a lot of people think the 2020 election was rigged (it wasn't). Facts over feelings, snowflake. There are sworn testimony’s and affidavits of people witnessing election fraud. I guess the Justice Department should just get rid of eyewitnesses all together. what’s the point? You either have the video evidence of the guilty person caught in the act or you are useless to the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 22 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: Sounds like you are on board with private companies discriminating against people they don’t like. That's not what happened but, yes, they could if they wanted to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 28 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: Why does every private company have to do business with anyone no matter what with fear of being sued for discrimination if they don’t? Like the Colorado baker. That was his private company. Why should he be forced to do business with people he doesn’t want to? Free market right? Go create your own bakery if you want cakes. The law states that service can't be denied based on race, sexual orientation, etc. So another whiff by the resident goofball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 24 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: it is so funny watching left wingers who claim to be for the little guy stick up for giant tech companies who are the most powerful businesses in the world. and you were sticking up for them in defense of gross discrimination. things no small business would ever get away with The right of private companies to do business as they please supersedes any fight for the "little guy" which Trump actually is not. It's as if you want to advertise to everybody how stupid you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 20 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: There are sworn testimony’s and affidavits of people witnessing election fraud. Which is just as much evidence as somebody saying that they "feel" that the election wasn't fair. If I sign a sworn affidavit saying that I saw you rob a bank you wouldn't even be arrested for that let alone convicted. They would still need, you know, actual evidence that you did it. 🤡 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 21 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: I guess the Justice Department should just get rid of eyewitnesses all together. what’s the point? Biased eyewitnesses are the only evidence that you have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 This is the new normal. https://summit.news/2021/01/13/conservative-commentator-says-aig-canceled-his-insurance-over-his-social-media-posts/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 2 hours ago, Atticus Finch said: Biased eyewitnesses are the only evidence that you have. Why are they biased? You sound like a left wing activist disguised as a journalist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 2 hours ago, Atticus Finch said: The law states that service can't be denied based on race, sexual orientation, etc. So another whiff by the resident goofball. “The law” states that you can not enter this counter illegally. But your kind facilitate breaking that law every day. It is actually cheered and applauded when that law is broken. Even protected and defended when the law breakers are caught. And now you are talking about “the law states” LMAO! More hypocrisy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 13, 2021 Report Share Posted January 13, 2021 5 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: Why are they biased? They're lunatic Trump supporters. And even if they weren't their "evidence" isn't sufficient for even a charge let alone a conviction of any kind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.