Jump to content

Your taxes are gonna be raised, not cut


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

More than the last 5 presidents combined in the same timeframe.

Again, who cares? You can't articulate why signing EOs in the first week is a bad thing. You just parrot what other people tell you.

Donald Trump signed 220 EOs in 4 years. That's the highest rate (55 per year) of EOs among the last 6 Presidents.

So if you think EOs are inherently bad (which you can't explain) then you should be calling Trump a dictator.

  • Thanks 2
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You would benefit from taking a high school economics class.

Again, who cares? You can't articulate why signing EOs in the first week is a bad thing. You just parrot what other people tell you. Donald Trump signed 220 EOs in 4 years. That's the highest rat

We have to subsidize radical and extreme agendas that cripple lower and middle class Americans. Instead of holding China and India accountable, we punish hard working Americans just trying to live. Cl

Posted Images

23 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

Again, who cares? You can't articulate why signing EOs in the first week is a bad thing. You just parrot what other people tell you.

Donald Trump signed 220 EOs in 4 years. That's the highest rate (55 per year) of EOs among the last 6 Presidents.

So if you think EOs are inherently bad (which you can't explain) then you should be calling Trump a dictator.

It's past embarrassing watching you kick this dumb moron's ass every day, but I have to ask.....why do you do it?

I get he's easily kicked and a weak link.

..crying chuck puts up better fights.

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

China tried destroying it. Left wing leaders all locked their economies down and crushed small businesses in the process as a political weapon against Trump. As soon as Biden was inaugurated they magically want to open up even after some bad numbers coming in from their cities and states in regards to Covid. 
 

Then they wanted federal bailouts after destroying their cites and states. And that was during and after the summer riots that destroyed small businesses. 
 

You know it, but you are too biased to admit it. 

You know bull, this post is not false, it's insane.

Peace brother

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

left wing scum bags of this country will be to blame for their leaders tanking the economy. 
 

and the white working class family is the one most to suffer. That is the core of the Republican Party. They will be most hurt as payback. That is why they are assisting people based on race. Minorities tend to  vote democrat so saying they are helping minority communities first and foremost is subliminal for “Fuck you” to conservatives. 
 

your leaders will tank the economy while getting rich and selling out the middle class to the highest global bidder. 
 

you can never call someone a terrorist again. You create economic terrorism 

You need to lay off that Limbaugh.

 

It's making your head mushy. 

 

Peace out 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, noonereal said:

EO's are bad. 

 

Generally true, but  sometimes they work out.  I think the realistic view is that if that’s how you have to get any support for your policies, or if that’s how you rule, then you are doing it dictatorially.  🤓

So who is/was worse? 🤷‍♂️

🍿

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

An Executive Order is just an order that the executive gives to an agency (or agencies) of the executive branch regarding the administration of the law.

It's not inherently good or bad. It's actually just governing.

Actually it IS inherently bad as you so expertly stated 💩 with your proof of wrong conclusion 🤓

The fact that they occur in an emergency 🚨 where better, more preferable methods of rule, aka “the accepted norm” cannot occur, leaves them at a distinct disadvantage 👌

hope this helps 👍

🍿

 

ps. But you go right ahead and feel free to go fact-check that one for your self 🤣

btw who’s the liar liar liar now?🤓

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Newbie said:

Thow shall not kill ? 🤓

🍿

The rule didn't allow any organization that received American money to use even their own money on abortions. And abortions mean women's health services.

If you don't know that cutting funding for abortions means cutting funding for women's health services then you don't know anything about it.

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

The rule didn't allow any organization that received American money to use even their own money on abortions. And abortions mean women's health services.

If you don't know that cutting funding for abortions means cutting funding for women's health services then you don't know anything about it.

You mean like that corporate United way scam where you can “direct where you want your charity to go” but everything is just later “balanced “ by them ? Did you know they fully funded abortions at the same rate as before all the brouhaha and drop off in donations? 

Nothing like using others money as leverage to spend where they didn’t want their  money spent.  How come you are not calling that one the incredibly stupid rule 🤓

🍿

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Atticus Finch said:

Paying for women's health services which are one of the leading anti-poverty initiatives on planet Earth.

You're much too stupid to know the full extent of this rule.

Trump was doing that minus the abortions. Why should American tax payers be on the hook for global abortions? Simple question 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

Trump was doing that minus the abortions.

No, moron.

Joe Biden axes 'global gag rule' but health groups call on him to go further

But Donald Trump went further than previous Republican presidents. The policy usually applies to family planning organisations. But the Trump administration expanded the policy to include all global health programmes, including programmes that address HIV, nutrition, malaria and cholera.

The consequences of Thursday’s memorandum will ripple out from Washington into more than 70 countries including some of the poorest places in the world, where essential women’s health operations were abruptly halted or scaled down after Trump reinstated the rule in January 2017.

In Zimbabwe, a women’s health team run by Abebe Shibru, from the organisation MSI Reproductive Choices, cut its operations by 60%. “We reduced our outreach from 700,000 women to about 300,000,” Shibru, who now heads the organisation’s Ethiopian operations, told the Guardian.

“Women missed out on information, they had no access to family planning, and in return they were exposed to unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion, which contributed to higher maternal mortality.”

Zimbabwe’s teenage pregnancy rate increased by 2% over the past four years, according to Unicef data, a trend Shibru said was exacerbated by cuts as a result of the gag rule.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

Why should American tax payers be on the hook for global abortions? Simple question 

Because women having control of their own reproductive rights is the world's leading anti-poverty program.

The anti-abortion fanaticism made the lives of already miserable people a lot more miserable.

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

Because women having control of their own reproductive rights is the world's leading anti-poverty program.

The anti-abortion fanaticism made the lives of already miserable people a lot more miserable.

Sounds like the last thing poor miserable women need is some random dude shooting loads inside them unprotected. 
 

and that still doesn’t answer the question on why a middle class tax paying American should have to foot the bill for some random foreigner to kill a baby because they let some dude raw dog it and blow in her unprotected. 
 

sounds like that money could be used for literally anything else here in America

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

and that still doesn’t answer the question on why a middle class tax paying American should have to foot the bill for some random foreigner to kill a baby because they let some dude raw dog it and blow in her unprotected.

You are so clueless.

A normal person would be embarrassed or at least introspective about it.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

sounds like that money could be used for literally anything else here in America

But it won't be.

Because Republicans don't actually want to spend money on Americans. Especially when they're in the minority. Fiscal responsibility!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/27/2021 at 3:43 PM, John Adams said:

The "White Working Class" is the core of America......Unlike many welfare blood suckers, ILLEGAL INVADER blood suckers and others who are takers and will never be makers....

More whites get assistance from the government than any others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...