BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted February 11, 2021 Report Share Posted February 11, 2021 On 2/10/2021 at 8:34 AM, concha said: So, probably folks facing charges and looking for a way out? People who can hear sounds up to 50,000Hz like the family pooch? Folks with selective hearing who supposedly traveled from the speech to the Capitol and got started long before Trump's speech was actually done? God damn you're a full blown idiot and that post seals it for you.... bgw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted February 15, 2021 Report Share Posted February 15, 2021 The New York Times getting busted for fake news. I meant to say it’s Sunday 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted February 15, 2021 Report Share Posted February 15, 2021 1 hour ago, Nolebull813 said: The New York Times getting busted for fake news. I meant to say it’s Sunday he wasn't killed by a Biden supporter...🤡 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaGoodBoyNow Posted February 15, 2021 Report Share Posted February 15, 2021 25 minutes ago, DBP66 said: he wasn't killed by a Biden supporter...🤡 Probably 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaGoodBoyNow Posted February 15, 2021 Report Share Posted February 15, 2021 Just wanna thank the democrats for getting trump acquitted , would not have been acquitted if y’all weren’t out there telling people to revolt against trump and to get in the face of Congress, 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted February 15, 2021 Report Share Posted February 15, 2021 33 minutes ago, imaGoodBoyNow said: Just wanna thank the democrats for getting trump acquitted , would not have been acquitted if y’all weren’t out there telling people to revolt against trump and to get in the face of Congress, history will show a majority in the House and Senate voted to impeach Trump...#loser 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 15, 2021 Report Share Posted February 15, 2021 3 hours ago, Nolebull813 said: The New York Times getting busted for fake news. I meant to say it’s Sunday The New York Times has not retracted the story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 15, 2021 Report Share Posted February 15, 2021 Nolebull813 is such an unrelenting goofball that he doesn't even read the headlines of articles. He reads the tweets falsely describing the headlines of articles. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slotback Right Posted February 16, 2021 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 13 hours ago, Atticus Finch said: The New York Times has not retracted the story. Wrong, wrong wrong. Nine google pages full of stories showing your latest face-plant. Here is just the page 1 stories. Take your pick. nytimes retracts sicknick story Search Results Web results The NY Times Retracts the Sicknick Story | RealClearPolitics www.realclearpolitics.com › 2021/02/15 › the_ny_time... 16 hours ago — Like so many fake news stories about Donald Trump and his supporters, millions of Americans believe the Sicknick story as truth; even a ... 'NYT' Corrects the Record on Officer Sicknick's Death, Sort Of ... www.nationalreview.com › 2021/02 › the-times-correct... 8 hours ago — The KHOU story made no mention of the officer's being struck by a fire extinguisher. It did claim, however, that the stroke occurred “at the Capitol ... New York Times retracts story about officer Sicknick's death ... www.youtube.com › watch 4 hours ago — The New York Times has updated an initial report from last month claiming that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick was killed due to blunt ... NYT Quietly Corrects Major Conspiracy Weaponized For ... thefederalist.com › 2021/02/15 › new-york-times-quietl... 9 hours ago — The New York Times quietly corrected a major story about Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick as the Senate impeachment trial came to a close ... The New York Times Retracts the Sicknick Story : JoeRogan www.reddit.com › JoeRogan › comments › the_new_y... 1 day ago — The New York Times Retracts the Sicknick Story ... “Mr. Sicknick, 42, an officer for the Capitol Police, died on Thursday from brain injuries he ... The New York Times Retracts Sicknick Story - Another hoax ... Feb 15, 2021 The New York Times Retracts the Sicknick Story : stupidpol Feb 15, 2021 The New York Times quietly retracts the Sicknick story - after a ... Feb 14, 2021 The New York Times Retracts the Sicknick Story : retractions Feb 14, 2021 More results from www.reddit.com The New York Times Retracts the Story Asserting Capitol ... tennesseestar.com › 2021/02/15 › the-new-york-times-r... 22 hours ago — In a quiet but stunning correction, the New York Times backed away from its original report that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick was killed ... New York Times quietly updates story that spread now ... www.theblaze.com › "News" 14 hours ago — The New York Times quietly updated an explosive story about Capitol ... of record" quietly updated its story, retracting the claims about Sicknick ... The New York Times Retracts Sicknick Story | ZeroHedge www.zerohedge.com › political › new-york-times-retra... 11 hours ago — In a quiet but stunning correction, the New York Times backed away from its original report that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick was killed by ... Julie Kelly on Twitter: "The @nytimes just retracted its ... twitter.com › julie_kelly2 › status 1 day ago — The @nytimes just retracted its January 8 report that claimed Brian Sicknick was killed by a Trump supporter using a fire ... Not only is the original story untrue, they lied about the anonymous sources linked to the story. The NY Times Retracts the Sicknick Story | RealClearPolitics news.knowledia.com › articles › the-ny-times-retracts-t... 16 hours ago — The NY Times Retracts the Sicknick Story | RealClearPolitics. 2 hours ago. www.realclearpolitics.com. 1 min read. difficult. Politics · New York Times. The NY ... Searches related to nytimes retracts sicknick story new york times retracts sicknick story new york times sicknick ny times nyt sicknick sicknick cause of death brian sicknick Page Navigation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 6 hours ago, Slotback Right said: Wrong, wrong wrong. Nine google pages full of stories showing your latest face-plant. Here is just the page 1 stories. Take your pick. nytimes retracts sicknick story All those "articles" link to the same "story" from American Greatness, a conservative website. I repeat. The New York Times has not retracted the story. Don't you ever get tired or being a dipshit? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slotback Right Posted February 16, 2021 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 26 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: All those "articles" link to the same "story" from American Greatness, a conservative website. I repeat. The New York Times has not retracted the story. Don't you ever get tired or being a dipshit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaGoodBoyNow Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 28 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: All those "articles" link to the same "story" from American Greatness, a conservative website. I repeat. The New York Times has not retracted the story. Don't you ever get tired or being a dipshit? Lol 😂 ur so fucking stupid, it’s frightening Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 9 minutes ago, Slotback Right said: So the answer is no, you're not tired of being a dumbass. Anything you can do to avoid the truth will suffice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 8 minutes ago, imaGoodBoyNow said: Lol 😂 ur so fucking stupid, it’s frightening Yet another non-response. Still too stupid and lazy to actually know things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaGoodBoyNow Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 15 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: Yet another non-response. Still too stupid and lazy to actually know things. Do you work, or ur typical lazy dem who gets free hAndouts from my taxes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 38 minutes ago, imaGoodBoyNow said: Do you work, or ur typical lazy dem who gets free hAndouts from my taxes I will answer this if you can prove that you've ever read anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 On 2/15/2021 at 9:32 AM, Atticus Finch said: The New York Times has not retracted the story. Technically correct. They issued a correction wherein they finally removed their widely shared lie that Sicknick was killed by a Trump supporter with a fire extinguisher. Carry on stomping your feet over some dumb semantics though...it's always a great look. 5 hours ago, Atticus Finch said: Still too stupid and lazy to actually know things. Speaking of which, I took five seconds and googled the article for you on the British COVID restrictions in the other thread that you were too stupid/lazy to do yourself lol. How's the job hunt going? 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 5 minutes ago, zulu1128 said: Technically correct. They issued a correction wherein they finally removed their widely shared lie that Sicknick was killed by a Trump supporter with a fire extinguisher. Carry on stomping your feet over some dumb semantics though...it's always a great look. Speaking of which, I took five seconds and googled the article for you on the British COVID restrictions in the other thread that you were too stupid/lazy to do yourself lol. How's the job hunt going? 🤣 That is "technically" incorrect.... They retracted their story....as in took it back, corrected themselves, and are now saying their story was false. Once something is put in print for posterity, you can never undo it, only say that you were wrong. See what associating with anal morons does ? Technically they did RETRACT the STORY... re·tract /rəˈtrakt/ Learn to pronounce verb verb: retract; 3rd person present: retracts; past tense: retracted; past participle: retracted; gerund or present participle: retracting 1. draw back. "she retracted her hand as if she'd been burnt" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 46 minutes ago, zulu1128 said: Technically correct. So in other words, correct. 👌 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 46 minutes ago, zulu1128 said: They issued a correction wherein they finally removed their widely shared lie that Sicknick was killed by a Trump supporter with a fire extinguisher. No, they made an update to the original story stating that, after a month, the prosecution was having trouble filing charges since the autopsy found no blunt trauma to the head. You fulfill your duties as a typical Trump toady when you claim that their reporting was a lie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 48 minutes ago, zulu1128 said: Carry on stomping your feet over some dumb semantics though...it's always a great look. I will carry on calmly correcting imbeciles who whine about fake news and then perpetrate complete lies about standard reporting. A confirmed Trump stooge like you would definitely claim that a factual understanding of an issue is semantics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 36 minutes ago, Troll said: They retracted their story.... No, they didn't. If the New York Times retracted a story then they would tell you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 38 minutes ago, Troll said: Technically they did RETRACT the STORY... Still wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 Whenever zulu1128 pops in to say something stupid I'm always reminded of his crack predictions of......well.....everything since this board was created. On 6/13/2017 at 1:21 PM, zulu1128 said: Trump could freaking bomb Canada tomorrow, and it would still be a 100% lock that the GOP will hold the house in 2018. On 1/23/2017 at 8:55 AM, zulu1128 said: Most conservatives I speak with love the riots...they hope you people keep it up as long as possible. They're already taking bets on how far north of 60 seats they'll finish with in 2018. On 1/23/2017 at 9:09 AM, zulu1128 said: Smart money as of today is 61. Burn Baby Burn! On 1/23/2017 at 9:29 AM, zulu1128 said: 58 is a lock. 60+ is a distinct possibility, especially if you people continue masking up and burning shit in lieu of re-crafting your message. You repeatedly stated the same about the mere idea of a Trump presidency...so you'll have to excuse the class if we take your rant with a grain of salt. On 1/23/2017 at 9:40 AM, zulu1128 said: They'll get 6 even if Trump sets the planet on fire. The ceiling is 10-11. Possible...but highly unlikely. The democrats are the ones with bench issues, not the GOP. On 1/23/2017 at 9:42 AM, zulu1128 said: They might...however the graveyard is gonna take 8+ years to get all the way through. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted February 16, 2021 Report Share Posted February 16, 2021 8 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: No, they made an update to the original story stating that, after a month, the prosecution was having trouble filing charges since the autopsy found no blunt trauma to the head. Right. There was no evidence present that showed he was hit with said fire extinguisher, so they corrected their widely shared lie that he was. Not sure why you're struggling with that. 🤷♂️ They also corrected their lie that the original story was "according to the CHP," now stating that it came from "sources close to the CHP." 8 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: You fulfill your duties as a typical Trump toady when you claim that their reporting was a lie. They falsely reported that he died from being struck in the head with a fire extinguisher, while lying about where the information supposedly came from. I mean, it's clearly a lie to any reasonable person lol. But carry on with your partisan boobery by all means. Guess the job search isn't going that great, huh? 🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.