Jump to content

The Great March 4 Insurrection


On2whls

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

so what does a tragic car accident have to do with Trump separating families and creating over 500 orphans??....🤡

That  topic you refer to is illegal immigration,

and all the resulting tragedies which occur,

when lawlessness activities are encouraged....

but you probably support rendering immigrant families

to an unlawful and risky plight

with promises of "possible" amnesty...

giphy.gif

🤡

 

PS: but don't worry, your buddy DS will keep posting even more tragedies.....you know...

Thinking he is helping you any... 🤣

 

BTW: you might want to consider working on your question skills....

no such thing as a stupid question, but when you ask some, you reveal how stupid  the questioner (🤡) actually is....😉

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

yea...they are occupying (a.k.a. protecting our leaders from your buddies who tried to kill them) D.C. to protect it from the nut jobs on your side Dave...🤡

are you going to pay for that wall around DC,

or did Joey promise you that Trump was going to pay for it...

🤡

image.jpeg.d4fe79512694f928983687fd44d88135.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Troll said:

That  topic you refer to is illegal immigration,

and all the resulting tragedies which occur,

when lawlessness activities are encouraged....

but you probably support rendering immigrant families

to an unlawful and risky plight

with promises of "possible" amnesty...

giphy.gif

🤡

 

PS: but don't worry, your buddy DS will keep posting even more tragedies.....you know...

Thinking he is helping you any... 🤣

 

BTW: you might want to consider working on your question skills....

no such thing as a stupid question, but when you ask some, you reveal how stupid  the questioner (🤡) actually is....😉

 

 

 

 

 

you got the whole stupidity thing down to a science Newbie....once again you went down a rabbit hole,,,,🤡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

you got the whole stupidity thing down to a science Newbie....once again you went down a rabbit hole,,,,🤡

sorry wrong address...

captain obvious

does not live in a 🤡 rabbit hole....

But at least that is better than screaming "Lies 💩 Lies",

or  JuSt  TrIgGeRiNg  YoUrSeLf when you cannot address any point or topic 🤣

and are forced to...

giphy.gif 

 

That's just your shtick...

so just 🤡 run with it 👍

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/as-the-insurrection-narrative-crumbles

As the Insurrection Narrative Crumbles, Democrats Cling to it More Desperately Than Ever

If the threat of "armed insurrectionists" and "domestic terrorists" is as great as some claim, why do they have to keep lying and peddling crude media fictions about it?

 

...The argument then, and the argument now, is that the threat was being deliberately inflated and exaggerated, and fears stoked and exploited, both for political gain and to justify the placement of more and more powers in the hands of the state in the name of stopping these threats. That is the core formula of authoritarianism — to place the population in a state of such acute fear that it acquiesces to any assertion of power which security state agencies and politicians demand and which they insist are necessary to keep everyone safe.

There is, relatedly, a massive political benefit from convincing the population that the opponents and critics of those in power do not merely hold a different ideology but are coup plotters, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists. That is the same political benefit that accrued from trying to persuade the population that adversaries of the Democratic Party were treasonous Kremlin agents. The more you can demonize your opponents as something monstrous, the more political power you can acquire...

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, concha said:

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/as-the-insurrection-narrative-crumbles

As the Insurrection Narrative Crumbles, Democrats Cling to it More Desperately Than Ever

If the threat of "armed insurrectionists" and "domestic terrorists" is as great as some claim, why do they have to keep lying and peddling crude media fictions about it?

 

...The argument then, and the argument now, is that the threat was being deliberately inflated and exaggerated, and fears stoked and exploited, both for political gain and to justify the placement of more and more powers in the hands of the state in the name of stopping these threats. That is the core formula of authoritarianism — to place the population in a state of such acute fear that it acquiesces to any assertion of power which security state agencies and politicians demand and which they insist are necessary to keep everyone safe.

There is, relatedly, a massive political benefit from convincing the population that the opponents and critics of those in power do not merely hold a different ideology but are coup plotters, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists. That is the same political benefit that accrued from trying to persuade the population that adversaries of the Democratic Party were treasonous Kremlin agents. The more you can demonize your opponents as something monstrous, the more political power you can acquire...

 

this guy?

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/world/americas/glenn-greenwald-brazil-cybercrimes.html

bgw

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

concha always has the best sources. Just the best.

 

Of course Dishonest Andy and Larry the Dumbass neglect to point out that the charges were dismissed. 

And they dodge the points of Greewald's article also.

People shocked?

ZERO

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, concha said:

Of course Dishonest Andy and Larry the Dumbass neglect to point out that the charges were dismissed. 

And they dodge the points of Greewald's article also.

People shocked?

ZERO

That Greenwald blog piece is one of the stupidest things I've ever read.

His claim:

Since the government warned of potential armed mobs storming state capitols, after they actually did storm the Capitol, and those mobs didn't materialize then therefore there was no right-wing threat and any preparations and/or warnings made were simply liberal hysteria.

That's just as stupid as saying that since the government warned or additional attacks after 9/11, after 9/11 had actually occurred, and those attacks didn't materialize then therefore there was no Islamic terrorist threat and any preparations and/warnings made were simply hysteria.

It's no wonder concha fully endorsed this silly blog post by a discredited hack like Glenn Greenwald.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, imaGoodBoyNow said:

@Troll I personally think it’s hilarious Biden has put up a wall in Washington DC, dude has been in office 100 days and I don’t think he has done anything he promised he was gonna do 

Biden didn't put the wall up (it was up before he got there), hasn't been in office 10 days (or even half that) and has done quite of bit of what he promised.

This perfect post of misinformation deserves a name.

We'll call it a concha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

That Greenwald blog piece is one of the stupidest things I've ever read.

His claim:

Since the government warned of potential armed mobs storming state capitols, after they actually did storm the Capitol, and those mobs didn't materialize then therefore there was no right-wing threat and any preparations and/or warnings made were simply liberal hysteria.

That's just as stupid as saying that since the government warned or additional attacks after 9/11, after 9/11 had actually occurred, and those attacks didn't materialize then therefore there was no Islamic terrorist threat and any preparations and/warnings made were simply hysteria.

It's no wonder concha fully endorsed this silly blog post by a discredited hack like Glenn Greenwald.

 

1) Virtually nobody even showed up at all. Armed or unarmed. Except for some rioting by Antifa and BLM. You know. Your guys. The usual suspects.

2) No arms were found on any of the people in the Capitol.

3) Greenwald is not discredited just because you don't like him.

 

Andy is mad.

And stupid.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

Biden didn't put the wall up (it was up before he got there), hasn't been in office 10 days (or even half that) and has done quite of bit of what he promised.

This perfect post of misinformation deserves a name.

We'll call it a concha. 

 

🤡 😂

 

So where are we these days with "walls don't work"?

Anyone?

Andy?

🤣

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, concha said:

1) Virtually nobody even showed up at all. Armed or unarmed.

Which is irrelevant to whether there was a threat or not.

If you lock something down and show force then the likelihood that the armed morons are going to gather is lessened.

But that doesn't mean they don't exist.

They stormed the Capitol on January 6th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Atticus Finch said:

Which is irrelevant to whether there was a threat or not.

If you lock something down and show force then the likelihood that the armed morons are going to gather is lessened.

But that doesn't mean they don't exist.

They stormed the Capitol on January 6th.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, concha said:

So where are we these days with "walls don't work"?

Anyone?

concha resorting to his strawman arguments.

I have never said that walls don't work around a building where a perimeter is set.

The idea that you're trying to equate a few blocks to 2,000 miles of border is laughable even for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

concha resorting to his strawman arguments.

I have never said that walls don't work around a building where a perimeter is set.

The idea that you're trying to equate a few blocks to 2,000 miles of border is laughable even for you.

 

So for the record, walls on the border along with the Border Patrol and surveillance are no more effective as tools for controlling illegal immigration than having no walls.  Walls deter no one. Walls do not make the Border Patrol's job easier or more efficient. Is that your position?

We'll leave the left actively encouraging border crossings to the side.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, concha said:

 

Of course Dishonest Andy and Larry the Dumbass neglect to point out that the charges were dismissed. 

And they dodge the points of Greewald's article also.

People shocked?

ZERO

 

 

 

You have proven to be consistently unreliable when it comes to recognizing sources, points, facts and the truth.  Zero credibility and everyone knows this except you.  Now you know, now go defend some dictator or racist or whatever it is you do and do it someplace where your lies go unnoticed.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...