Jump to content

GA State Championship Matchups


ECHS05

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, ATLien12x said:

Now it is you changing the subject :) I never said Jeff Davis was a good team;

I didn't say you did.

You said you'd bet Buford was a top 100 team despite their three best wins being by 7, 8 and 12.

And not against very good teams either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, LOSer said:

And here's another thing.

Will you clowns please stop with your one game samples?

Buford beat Carrolton by 7, Jeff Davis by 8 and Kell by 12.

Those were the best teams they beat.

But you'd bet they're top 100?

All you can say about that is clown show.

Im not sure what your point is about Kell & Carrollton. Play them and find out how bad they suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said:

Yup los is a HSFB god. if you beat a team by 24 you should be dissapointed because thats not a blow out.

They didn't beat a team by 24. They beat them by 8.

And if you're Roswell and you're aspiring to top 10 (or 25) then you should be disappointed that you didn't blow a team out.

To not be disappointed is to not understand what it takes to be that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

Im not sure what your point is about Kell & Carrollton. Play them and find out how bad they suck.

My point is rather obvious to anybody of sentience.

A top 100 team wouldn't beat those teams by 7 and 12.

Only in your warped world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can keep blabbering... but its been made clear how good most teams are in GA. We know how good other teams are in comparison. Beating Kell by 12 & Carrollton by 7 isnt an argument against a top 100 team, sorry to say. And only a dimwitted fool using CalPreps would say other.

And the fact youd argue using CalPreps means youare to be ignored anyway because your intellect doesnt extend far enough to see the failing of your own argument in using it.

So play with yourself. Maybe NOR will join and stroke you for a bit.

I need you to let NOR know he cant argue that SPP was up by any amount, the fact BT pulled it to within 13 is all that matters. Since your argument is the samenwith Buford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

You ignore losses but clamor over close wins.

I take one game with a grain of salt.

3 or 4 or 5 close wins against mediocre competition is a sign.

Only bozos like you refuse to heed those signs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

Beating Kell by 12 & Carrollton by 7 isnt an argument against a top 100 team, sorry to say.

Because you don't know anything at all about high school football.

There are 14,000 high school playing football. A team will play between 10-16 games. You think beating 3 middle of the road teams by 12 points or less means nothing to their standing?

We'd probably get better insight from any other random community college student in Georgia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok

1 minute ago, LOSer said:

I take one game with a grain of salt.

3 or 4 or 5 close wins against mediocre competition is a sign.

Only bozos like you refuse to heed those signs.

Ok how about 4 or 5 good wins? the 34-3 win over Colquitt. 24-7 over Buford. 42-21 over North Cobb.  And 28 over Westlake. Those differ from the others. If they can do that. They are pretty good. Regardless of a few close games.

They dont lose like STA. Losing and winning closely are 100% different... and elementary school HSFB follower knows this... well, most but you. You are at the PreK level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

And the fact youd argue using CalPreps means youare to be ignored anyway because your intellect doesnt extend far enough to see the failing of your own argument in using it.

Not only are you clueless about football but you're obsessed with calpreps. When did I use calpreps?

I'm citing score and results.

Delusional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

THEY ARE LOSSES MORON.

Stupidity personified.

We're trying to determine ability. It's not about who wins and loses. It's about who's better.

A 3-point loss on a muddy field with a backup kicker missing a short field goal has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of a team.

STA went 13-0 in all their other games and while having about 10 starters miss significant time with injuries.

But you want to talk about a one game sample size.

Just dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

If they can do that. They are pretty good.

We're not talking about good numbnuts.

They are being given top 10-15 rankings.

That's laughable.

Pretty good ain't good enough for that ranking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

They dont lose like STA.

But if they lost two games like STA did I wouldn't hold it against them at all.

Granted that they had 10 running clocks and dominated like a top 10 team should.

It's about context.

You might as well be an honorary DLS Spartan with your loss obsession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

Losing and winning closely are 100% different...

No it's not.

That's why Vegas smokes clowns likes you because they understand what matters most. It's performance not W/L.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LOSer said:

Because you don't know anything at all about high school football.

There are 14,000 high school playing football. A team will play between 10-16 games. You think beating 3 middle of the road teams by 12 points or less means nothing to their standing?

We'd probably get better insight from any other random community college student in Georgia.

You arenalt middle of the road when you are one of the better 500 of those 14000... 

Lets take a glance at the way you think... your track record...

Bosco loses 20-10... you claim they really win because they had better stats... LOL.

You are silenced for a day, but disappear for the whole year to avoid having all your shit talking thrown back in your face. 

Bosco 24, STA 7... again STA really won to Los. Because Bosco plays boring football... STA is REALLY better Los says... because of the way they play. No matter they just lost 24-7.

STA loses to DFB 6-3? No matter its one game. 

Thats the type of mind you have. You will twist  words and conversation any way you want. Its impossible to have a SINGULAR point made, because the second you see you are wrong... you slip to another.

Heres a clue... LOSING to a mediocre team is worse than 3 WINS over mediocre teams. The goal is to win. And though some may be close, when theres other games showing your potential... you have more to go on, Roswell does.

You have yet to grow a pair of balls since you ran from the board 2 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...