Jump to content

Why are people here not claiming Biden conquered the Vid?


Bormio

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Bormio said:

Cases down about 85% since January.    Cases falling everywhere.  Methinks deep down they know the truth.

Chances are if you come up with a thought it will be ignorant and incorrect. Try to remember that next time before posting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bormio said:

Cases down about 85% since January.    Cases falling everywhere.  Methinks deep down they know the truth.

You and mag44 are seriously battling to see who can post the least viewed threads. 

I think mag44 has a slight lead.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Bormio said:

Cases down about 85% since January.    Cases falling everywhere.  Methinks deep down they know the truth.

Wonder if anyone ever checked the ingredients...

image.png.4a57223d222a21a45e16e45bd0c75363.png

https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Coronavirus/Community_Resources/Vaccinations/Print-Materials/Fact-Sheets/Ingredients_English.pdf

Hmmm #1 is....MRNA lipids SM-102...

can we get an actual definition of that???

maybe from the maufacturer...

image.thumb.png.33d1053ce409e4737f17eeb247b2935f.png

https://www.caymanchem.com/msdss/33474m.pdf

 

Nevermind....

checking the actual ingredients of something you are going to ingest is silly

 🤪

 

 

Meanwhile.....

image.thumb.png.3e7f4a440eb9275a94773b44e38471de.png

go figure...

🤷‍♂️

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Bormio said:

Cases down about 85% since January.    Cases falling everywhere.  Methinks deep down they know the truth.

Because to do so would be that Biden in 6 months did 85% more than Trump did in over a year when it comes to Covid!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Troll said:

Wonder if anyone ever checked the ingredients...

image.png.4a57223d222a21a45e16e45bd0c75363.png

https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Coronavirus/Community_Resources/Vaccinations/Print-Materials/Fact-Sheets/Ingredients_English.pdf

Hmmm #1 is....MRNA lipids SM-102...

can we get an actual definition of that???

maybe from the maufacturer...

image.thumb.png.33d1053ce409e4737f17eeb247b2935f.png

https://www.caymanchem.com/msdss/33474m.pdf

 

Nevermind....

checking the actual ingredients of something you are going to ingest is silly

 🤪

 

 

Meanwhile.....

image.thumb.png.3e7f4a440eb9275a94773b44e38471de.png

go figure...

🤷‍♂️

 

 

Had some lady try to convince me  not to get the vaccine and  try to find Zantac and store up on it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, imaGoodBoyNow said:

Had some lady try to convince me  not to get the vaccine and  try to find Zantac and store up on it

Well at least "some lady",

is not some admitted liar to your face for your his own good....

So there is that...

🤷‍♂️

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Troll said:

Wonder if anyone ever checked the ingredients...

image.png.4a57223d222a21a45e16e45bd0c75363.png

https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Coronavirus/Community_Resources/Vaccinations/Print-Materials/Fact-Sheets/Ingredients_English.pdf

Hmmm #1 is....MRNA lipids SM-102...

can we get an actual definition of that???

maybe from the maufacturer...

image.thumb.png.33d1053ce409e4737f17eeb247b2935f.png

https://www.caymanchem.com/msdss/33474m.pdf

 

Nevermind....

checking the actual ingredients of something you are going to ingest is silly

 🤪

 

 

Meanwhile.....

image.thumb.png.3e7f4a440eb9275a94773b44e38471de.png

go figure...

🤷‍♂️

 

 

WELL 💩....THAT GOT SOME ATTENTION !!!!!

Newsweek is ON it....better de-bunk quickly !!!

I had noted the inclusion of the chloroform when I read it.... and also noted as a proprietary mix they won't say...(and maintaining -30 degrees while 'trying to remove the solvent  would be an extra neat trick LOL)

But Newsweek gonna try the old end around the debunk...🙄

"Al Edwards, impact lead for the pharmacy research division at the University of Reading, told Newsweek: "Some solvents are often used to prepare things like lipids, but are removed after use.

"I don't know the exact process used to make the Moderna vaccine, but even if it did involve dissolving the lipid in a solvent such as chloroform, any residual amount of solvent left in the vaccine—if not fully removed—would be measured very precisely and listed as an ingredient. It would also only be allowed if it was known to be safe.?...."

Just Amazing how you think you debunked something when your entire argument is you  "DON'T KNOW " 🤣

but they go on to later explain how to "just ignore those meaningless warnings" 🙄

would you believe their LITERAL ENDING AND TAKEAWAY...

"A seller can label something as not for human consumption or use in medicines just because they don't want the product to be used in that way; the business does not want to certify that it's safe for human use."

"But this doesn't reflect that the product and all its components are unsafe—just that particular preparation.

"Peanuts sold for bird seed often are labelled in this way. That doesn't mean peanuts are hazardous to humans."

 

Soooo maybe you should just ignore this...ingredient...you want to ingest

image.thumb.png.33d1053ce409e4737f17eeb247b2935f.png

 

Remember guys....just because the manufacturer says so...

Doesn't mean those peanuts aren't safe (newsweek kickin azz) 👍

giphy.gif

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mag44 said:

Your on the right path,yet some think denial is a River in Egypt..

everyone  that is diagnosed with Covid is no longer counted if they have been vaccinated...

...since 2 days ago.

The numbers are too embarrassing,

to actually make proper decisions on real ones.

🤪

 

PS....of course the numbers are going to tank...🤓

BTW: when everyone is vaccinated, the numbers and the entire disease, will cease by definition 🤔

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Troll said:

everyone  that is diagnosed with Covid is no longer counted if they have been vaccinated...

...since 2 days ago.

The numbers are too embarrassing,

to actually make proper decisions on real ones.

🤪

 

PS....of course the numbers are going to tank...🤓

BTW: when everyone is vaccinated, the numbers and the entire disease, will cease by definition 🤔

 

Thank you...Your a good poster...who is not rude, crude or boorish...Thank you again..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Troll said:

Wonder if anyone ever checked the ingredients...

image.png.4a57223d222a21a45e16e45bd0c75363.png

https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Coronavirus/Community_Resources/Vaccinations/Print-Materials/Fact-Sheets/Ingredients_English.pdf

Hmmm #1 is....MRNA lipids SM-102...

can we get an actual definition of that???

maybe from the maufacturer...

image.thumb.png.33d1053ce409e4737f17eeb247b2935f.png

https://www.caymanchem.com/msdss/33474m.pdf

 

Nevermind....

checking the actual ingredients of something you are going to ingest is silly

 🤪

 

 

Meanwhile.....

image.thumb.png.3e7f4a440eb9275a94773b44e38471de.png

go figure...

🤷‍♂️

 

 

Yet, you’ll still find people focusing on HCQ alone and quoting studies pointing to it’s in efficacy.  The positive results of combined effect of HCQ/Ivermectin, when found to be effective here in the US was quickly swept under the carpet so as to protect certain narratives.  After all, how could two relatively inexpensive existing ingredients perform as well as the very expensive alternatives the “follow the science” set were suggesting.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, On2whls said:

Yet, you’ll still find people focusing on HCQ alone and quoting studies pointing to it’s in efficacy.  The positive results of combined effect of HCQ/Ivermectin, when found to be effective here in the US was quickly swept under the carpet so as to protect certain narratives.  After all, how could two relatively inexpensive existing ingredients perform as well as the very expensive alternatives the “follow the science” set were suggesting.  

 India's results meet fake science....

giphy.gif

 

how's it going?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...