Jump to content

Whiteshoes Top 100


whiteshoes

Recommended Posts

Here we go boys, lots of changes as playoffs are forcing the best to play each other.

1.       Santa Ana (CA) Mater Dei (10-0)

2.       Austin (TX) Westlake (13-0)

3.       Baltimore (MD) St. Frances Academy (7-1)

4.       Bradenton (FL) IMG Academy (9-1)

5.       Anaheim (CA) Servite (10-3)

6.       Oradell (NJ) Bergen Catholic (12-0)

7.       Bellflower (CA) St. John Bosco (10-2)

8.       Suwanee (GA) Collins Hill (12-0)

9.       Southlake (TX) Carroll (13-0)

10.   Greenwood (IN) Center Grove (14-0)

11.   Duncanville (TX) (11-1)

12.   Katy (TX) (13-0)

13.   Washington (DC) St. Johns (11-0)

14.   Bixby (OK) (12-0)

15.   Chandler (AZ) Hamilton (11-0)

16.   Las Vegas (NV) Bishop Gorman (12-1)

17.   Corona (CA) Centennial (10-1)

18.   Alabaster (AL) Thompson (12-1)

19.   Tampa (FL) Jesuit (13-0)

20.   Chandler (AZ) (10-1)

21.   Fort Lauderdale (FL) St. Thomas Aquinas (12-1)

22.   Murfreesboro (TN) Oakland (13-0)

23.   Irmo (SC) Dutch Fork (12-0)

24.   Houston (TX) North Shore (12-1)

25.   Highlands Ranch (CO) Valor Christian (13-0)

26.   Concord (CA) De La Salle (10-2)

27.   Miami (FL) Central (11-2)

28.   St. Louis (MO) Christian Brothers (13-1)

29.   New Orleans (LA) Edna Karr (11-0)

30.   Lakewood (OH) St. Edward (14-1)

31.   Humble (TX) Atascocita (11-2)

32.   Indianapolis (IN) Cathedral (14-1)

33.   Allen (TX) (11-2)

34.   Hoover (AL) (12-1)

35.   Denton (TX) Guyer (12-1)

36.   Nashville (TN) Lipscomb Academy (11-1)

37.   Chesapeake (VA) Oscar Smith (10-1)

38.   Denton (TX) Ryan (12-1)

39.   Hollywood (FL) Chaminade-Madonna (9-1)

40.   Cornelius (NC) Hough (14-0)

41.   Buford (GA) (12-1)

42.   Louisville (KY) Male (13-0)

43.   Miami (FL) Northwestern (10-3)

44.   Milton (GA) (12-1)

45.   Baton Rouge (LA) Catholic (11-1)

46.   Gaffney (SC) (13-0)

47.   Warner Robins (GA) (12-1)

48.   Philadelphia (PA) St. Joseph Prep (9-2)

49.   Highland (UT) Lone Peak (10-2)

50.   Phenix City (AL) Central (13-0)

51.   Hochston (GA) Mill Creek (11-2)

52.   Draper (UT) Corner Canyon (12-2)

53.   Severn (MD) Archbishop Spalding (10-1)

54.   Graham (WA) Graham-Kapowsin (13-0)

55.   Joliet (IL) Catholic (14-0)

56.   Pickerington (OH) Central (12-2)

57.   Madison (MS) Central (12-1)

58.   Charlotte (NC) Chambers (13-1)

59.   Ashburn (VA) Stone Bridge (13-0)

60.   Lockport (IL) (13-1)

61.   Pittsburgh (PA) Mt. Lebanon (13-0)

62.   Hyattsville (MD) DeMatha (7-3)

63.   Fort Lauderdale (FL) Cardinal Gibbons (9-2)

64.   North Charleston (SC) Fort Dorchester (12-1)

65.   Bryant (AR) (12-1)

66.   Venice (FL) (12-1)

67.   Columbus (OH) Upper Arlington (14-1)

68.   Henderson (NV) Liberty (10-2)

69.   Mission Viejo (CA) (9-2)

70.   Baton Rouge (LA) University Lab (12-0)

71.   Cary Grove (IL) (14-0)

72.   Wyndmoor (PA) LaSalle College (8-2)

73.   Springfield (OH) (13-1)

74.   DeSoto (10-2)

75.   Portland (OR) Central Catholic (12-0)

76.   Little Rock (AR) Pulaski Academy (11-1)

77.   Pinson (AL) Clay-Chalkville (14-0)

78.   Zachary (LA) (12-0)

79.   Houston (TX) Westfield (12-1)

80.   West Chester (OH) Lakota West (12-2)

81.   Lehi (UT) Skybridge (11-2)

82.   Austin (TX) Lake Travis (11-2)

83.   Trussville (AL) Hewitt-Trussville (9-3)

84.   Franklin (WI) (14-0)

85.   Scottsdale (AZ) Saguaro (10-1)

86.   Kennesaw (GA) North Cobb (10-2)

87.   Chattanooga (TN) McCallie (11-0)

88.   Warren (MI) De LaSalle Collegiate (12-0)

89.   Katy (TX) Tompkins (11-2)

90.   Maryville (TN) (13-1)

91.   Jenks (OK) (11-1)

92.   San Mateo (CA) Serra (11-1)

93.   Louisville (KY) St. Xavier (13-1)

94.   Lakeville (MN) South (13-0)

95.   College Station (TX) (13-0)

96.   Chandler (AZ) Basha (10-1)

97.   San Diego (CA) Cathedral Catholic (9-2)

98.   Huntington (WV) (13-0)

99.   Leesburg (GA) Lee County (11-2)

100.    East St. Louis (IL) (11-3)

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, badrouter said:

It continues to amaze me that DLS is #26. They are not top 100 IMO. One can admire the program and the history without being delusional about the quality of the 2021 team.

Wow! Not even top 100? Whipping SD Cathedral and dominating Folsom and Pittsburg doesn’t mean squat to you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, badrouter said:

It continues to amaze me that DLS is #26. They are not top 100 IMO. One can admire the program and the history without being delusional about the quality of the 2021 team.

It's comical.

They've beaten nobody and their last two games will be against the "best" two nobodies that they already beat.

In other words, another totally empty season.

But what that usually means is random fan thinks they're top 30.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

It's comical.

They've beaten nobody and their last two games will be against the "best" two nobodies that they beat.

In other words, another totally empty season.

But what that usually means is random fan thinks they're top 30.

Tampa Jesuit would crush DLS by 5-6 TDs......🤡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for reference, all three teams that Omaha Vol is using to justify De La Salle's ranking *also* got dominated by somebody else.

In fact, in two of the cases (Folsom and Cathedral) they were dominated more thoroughly by another opponent than they were by De La Salle.

Folsom lost to Rocklin, 40-7.

Cathedral lost to Centennial, 57-14.

The only instance where De La Salle dominated the team worse than an opponent was crappy Pittsburg whom De La Salle beat by 28 (Folsom beat them by 21).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

They've beaten nobody and their last two games will be against the "best" two nobodies that they already beat.

In other words, another totally empty season.

Put this way, yes it’s a hollow chocolate bunny at Easter when you’re used to a solid one.  But, it could get worse.  Although unlikely, OLU could beat CCSD.  Imagine then, if DLS lost to OLU.  Yet another title shot denied by Trinity League, this time TL B division.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, On2whls said:

Put this way, yes it’s a hollow chocolate bunny at Easter when you’re used to a solid one.  But, it could get worse.  Although unlikely, OLU could beat CCSD.  Imagine then, if DLS lost to OLU.  Yet another title shot denied by Trinity League, this time TL B division.  

It could happen, but I don’t think so. If they do lose to OLu they will be ranked accordingly. 
Please don’t listen to that buffoon known as the Guzzlin’ Guru (Finch). He is under the impression that if a team gets blown out by one of the Trinity League’s big 3 (or Cen10) that they shouldn’t even sniff a top 100. Those aforementioned teams are all top 10 nationally and would blow out most teams outside of the nation’s top 15. They are just THAT good. Folsom, Pitt, SD Cathedral and OLu are not chump teams in the grand scheme. All 4 of them would, most likely, be a top 5-10 team in 90% of states. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said:

He is under the impression that if a team gets blown out by one of the Trinity League’s big 3 (or Cen10) that they shouldn’t even sniff a top 100.

I didn't say or even insinuate that.

Also, De La Salle hasn't played Centennial or a Trininty League team so I don't know what the hell you're smoking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, On2whls said:

Put this way, yes it’s a hollow chocolate bunny at Easter when you’re used to a solid one.  But, it could get worse.  Although unlikely, OLU could beat CCSD.  Imagine then, if DLS lost to OLU.  Yet another title shot denied by Trinity League, this time TL B division.  

Aint going to happen . The only scenario that I could possibly see DLS (thats for you badrouter ) lose, is to Folsom because of a deflation hangover that obstructed some of their preparation . Taking Folsom too lightly and a " could care less " attitude by players . I think that is a long shot because they are so well coached , but anything is possible . Dela to win the D-1 bowl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Atticus Finch said:

I didn't say or even insinuate that.

Also, De La Salle hasn't played Centennial or a Trininty League team so I don't know what the hell you're smoking.

That was a general statement, dumbass. Not being able to read between the lines is one of your worst qualities. I know they haven’t played any one of those four teams, but you can link them together via SD Cathedral (Cen10 57-14, DLS 49-21). That’s a 15 point difference between the two teams. Cen10 lost to Mater Dei by 5. Based on those results MD would beat DLS by 3 TDs (I hope you understand the basic math here). Losing to MD by ONLY 21 points definitely puts DLS in the top 20-40 range. Especially since MD routed a top 4 TX power by 42. 

Since you, obviously, can’t generalize I hope this is specific enough for you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Omaha Vol said:

Sure it does. Name off a few teams that you think would beat DLS (not any recruited up powerhouse academies, either). All of those teams are already ranked in the top 20. 

There isn't a single position group on the field for which DLS would have Lakeland beat. Most groups they are inferior. Lakeland may or may not have been one of the 10 best teams in Florida, but surely won't be ranked there. And nobody is touting them for top 100 in the country. Knowing the huge talent edge Lakeland would have makes it very difficult for me to see DLS being better than them, and from there I'd put all the teams ahead of Lakeland also ahead of DLS. 

That said, I also don't acknowledge DLS as being merely two TD's less than SFA. DLS looked like an FCS team vs. a top 10 team FBS in that game. Only through some cheap plays and playing out of their mind with the game decided did they happen to close to a two TD defeat. None of the other teams they played are any good relative to the top teams in Florida. I don't think the employment of some cheap tricks and hustle when way down amounts to being a top 100 team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaliNorth said:

Aint going to happen . The only scenario that I could possibly see DLS (thats for you badrouter ) lose, is to Folsom because of a deflation hangover that obstructed some of their preparation . Taking Folsom too lightly and a " could care less " attitude by players . I think that is a long shot because they are so well coached , but anything is possible . Dela to win the D-1 bowl

There's just absolutely no reason to believe that beating Folsom amounts to being a top 100 team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...