Jump to content

Trump's world....


DBP66

Recommended Posts

The Trump Org Stiffed a Hotel. His Kids May Pay the Price.

Ā 
Ā 
Jose Pagliery
Mon, January 17, 2022, 3:39 AM
Ā 
Ā 
Photo Illustration by Thomas Levinson/The Daily Beast/Getty
Ā 
Photo Illustration by Thomas Levinson/The Daily Beast/Getty

Former President Donald Trump and his family company have a long history of stiffing contractors, but thereā€™s one bill they almost certainly wish they had paid.

Ahead of theĀ 2017 presidential inauguration, the Trump Organization reserved a block of rooms at theĀ Loews Madison Hotel. When at least 13 people didnā€™t show up, the Trump Organization refused to pay the bill, something it has done many times in the past. The company then dodged a credit collection agency and eventually squirmed out of it by pushing the $49,358 bill off to the nonprofit presidential inaugural committee, the PIC.

That dodged payment is now the crux of the attorney general for the District of Columbiaā€™s latest effort to put the Trump Organization back in its crosshairs inĀ an ongoing investigationĀ into how the Trump kids used theĀ Presidential Inauguration CommitteeĀ to throw lavish parties of their own.

ā€œIt was their friends. It should never have been sent to the PIC. Thatā€™s misuse of funding. The Trump Organization being involved in any way and getting the PIC to pay any sort of balance anywhere on their behalf? It just doesnā€™t seem legitimate,ā€ said Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, who coordinated inaugural events and is now the governmentā€™s lead witness in this case.

<div class="inline-image__caption"><p>Stephanie Winston Wolkoff</p></div> <div class="inline-image__credit">Drew Angerer/Getty</div>
Ā 

Stephanie Winston Wolkoff

Drew Angerer/Getty
- ADVERTISEMENT -

Winston Wolkoff is no friend of the Trumpsā€”any more. Although she was close to the family for more than a decade and eventually became ā€œTrusted Adviserā€ to First Lady Melania Trump, there was a fallout after Winston Wolkoff felt that the Trump White House made her the scapegoat for inauguration misspending.Ā The New York TimesĀ identified a company associated with her, WIS Media Partners, as the recipient of a whopping $26 million, and Winston Wolkoff later overcame Justice Department resistance toĀ publication of her tell-all bookĀ calledĀ Melania and Me.

D.C. Attorney GeneralĀ Karl RacineĀ continues to investigate how the inauguration committee allegedly misspent more than $1 million and was allegedly used to essentially enrich Trumpā€™s own company on his way into the White House. And the Attorney Generalā€™s office is trying to recover from a courtroom defeat late last year.

In November, D.C. Superior Court Judge JosĆ© M. LĆ³pez seemed to doom the local attorney generalā€™s investigation when he cut the Trump Organization loose from the lawsuit. His reasoning, which surprised those following the case, was that the familyā€™s company wasnā€™t directly involvedā€”even thoughĀ Don Jr.,Ā Ivanka, and other staffers at the companyā€™s New York office were on a lot of the paperwork. So he dropped the Trump Organization from the lawsuit.

<div class="inline-image__caption"><p>Washington, D.C., Attorney General Karl Racine</p></div> <div class="inline-image__credit">Alex Wong/Getty</div>
Ā 

Washington, D.C., Attorney General Karl Racine

Alex Wong/Getty

The judgeā€™s Nov. 8 order hinged on the companyā€™s claims that Texas financierĀ Gentry BeachĀ didnā€™t have the authority to list the Trump Organization when he pulled out an American Express credit card and made the large and expensive reservation. However, Beach was no stranger to the Trump Organization. He was Donald Trump Jr.ā€™s college pal and was handpicked to serve on the nonprofitā€™s finance committee. He was alsoĀ outed by journalistsĀ even before the inauguration for being part of a nonprofitā€”directed byĀ Eric Trump,Ā Don Jr. and another wealthy Texanā€”that seemed to be auctioning off access to the Trumps.

Since then, Racineā€™s office has filed documents in court seeking to reverse that, pointing to numerous receipts and memos that show how even the debt collector wouldnā€™t be duped into letting the Trump Organization weasel its way out of this one.

In the typical fashion of an aggressive collections agency, Campbell Hightower & Adams in Arizona started bombarding the company with phone calls and emails in June 2017, picking up where the Loews Madison Hotel had left off.

A collector, identified only as ā€œSherie,ā€ jotted down notes when she repeatedly communicated with Don Jr.ā€™s executive assistant, Kara Hanley.

ā€œUnfortunately, this was not an agreement made by anyone at The Trump Organization. Best, Kara,ā€ Hanley wrote on June 8.

ā€œA contract was signed and then 13 people did not show up for the rooms you reserved [sic] so according to the contract terms, those rooms still have to be paid for. What am I missing?ā€ Sherie wrote back.

<div class="inline-image__caption"><p>Donald Trump Jr. </p></div> <div class="inline-image__credit">Brandon Bell/Getty</div>
Ā 

Donald Trump Jr.

Brandon Bell/Getty

A few weeks later, Sherie notified the Trump Organization that she had just found out that yet another Don Jr. executive assistant, Lindsey Santoro, had initially requested the rooms and added Beach as the main contact for the deal. That information seemed to cement even further that the company was indeed involved.

And when the hotel contacted the collections agency in July to request that the bill suddenly change the listed debtor to ā€œ58th Presidential Inauguration Committeeā€ā€”with an odd special note saying ā€œIt just cannot say ā€˜The Trump Organizationā€™ā€ā€”Sherie grew suspicious.

ā€œI hesitate as they all seem to be pointing fingers and making excuses as to why they wonā€™t pay it and this seems to be another ploy so the Trump Organizationā€™s name is not on it,ā€ Sherie wrote back on July 10.

Records show the bill was eventually paid by the Presidential Inaugural Committee at the direction of Rick Gates, a Trump political operator ally who served on the committeeā€”and eventually served jail time for committing unrelated crimes caught by special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation.

The District of Columbiaā€™s AG hopes this evidence proves that the Trump Organization should remain part of the lawsuit, which seeks to seize money it deems was misused and divert it instead to another nonprofit. Otherwise, the civil investigation would continue only against the PIC (which is no longer active) and the Trump International Hotel Washington (whichĀ is being sold anyway).

In court filings, a lawyer for the Trump Organization and Trump Hotel blasted the AGā€™s last-ditch effort as merely ā€œrehashed argumentsā€ that seek ā€œseveral bites at several apples.ā€ On Dec. 14, attorney Rebecca Woods reiterated that Don Jr.ā€™s buddy, Beach, didnā€™t have the explicit authority to make the deal. She also wrote that investigators shouldnā€™t be allowed to now seek sworn testimony from him or Santoro, the executive assistant.

When approached by The Daily Beast, the AGā€™s office pointed to the arguments it made in court. The Trump Organizationā€™s lawyer didnā€™t respond to a request for comment. The collection agency didnā€™t return calls on Friday.

Notably, none of these documents described yet another layer of Trump Organization involvement: how company chief financial officerĀ Allen WeisselbergĀ puzzlingly assumed the responsibility of auditing the nonprofit PICā€™s finances. Last summer, D.C. investigatorsĀ wanted to interview himĀ under oath, but he was thenĀ indicted for criminal tax fraudĀ in New York City.

The local attorney generalā€™s request is now up to the judgeā€”but a different one this time. On New Yearā€™s Eve, the case was reassigned to D.C. Superior Court Judge Yvonne Williams, a former NAACP lawyer appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

N.Y. Attorney General Outlines Pattern of Possible Fraud at Trump Business

The attorney general, Letitia James, released new details of her investigation as she argued for the need to question Donald J. Trump and two of his children under oath.

  • Ā 

]]]]]merlin_177439788_956432be-227e-4bf4-abb6

Ā 

The New York State attorney general, Letitia James, has been investigating Mr. Trumpā€™s business practices since March 2019.The New York State attorney general, Letitia James, has been investigating Mr. Trumpā€™s business practices since March 2019.Credit...Doug Mills/The New York Times

PublishedĀ Jan. 18, 2022UpdatedĀ Jan. 19, 2022,Ā 6:20 a.m. ET

The New York State attorney general, Letitia James, accused Donald J. Trumpā€™s family business late Tuesday of repeatedly misrepresenting the value of its assets to bolster its bottom line, saying in court papers that the company had engaged in ā€œfraudulent or misleadingā€ practices.

The filingĀ came in response toĀ Mr. Trumpā€™s recent effort to block Ms. James from questioningĀ him and two of his adult childrenĀ under oath as part of a civil investigation of his business, the Trump Organization. Ms. Jamesā€™s inquiry into Mr. Trump and the company is ongoing, and it is unclear whether her lawyers will ultimately file a lawsuit against them.

Still, the filing marked the first time that the attorney generalā€™s office leveled such specific accusations against the former presidentā€™s company. Her broadside ratchets up the pressure on Mr. Trump as he seeks to shut down her investigation, which he has called a partisan witch hunt. Ms. James is a Democrat.

The filing outlined what Ms. Jamesā€™s office termed misleading statements about the value of six Trump properties, as well as the ā€œTrump brand.ā€ The properties included golf clubs in Westchester County, N.Y., and Scotland, flagship buildings such as 40 Wall Street in Manhattan and Mr. Trumpā€™s own penthouse home in Trump Towers.

Ms. Jamesā€™s filing argued that the company misstated the value of the properties to lenders, insurers and the Internal Revenue Service. Many of the statements, the filing argued, were ā€œgenerally inflated as part of a pattern to suggest that Mr. Trumpā€™s net worth was higher than it otherwise would have appeared.ā€

Ms. James highlighted details of how she said the company inflated the valuations: $150,000 initiation fees into Mr. Trumpā€™s golf club in Westchester that it never collected; mansions that had not yet been built on one of his private estates; and 20,000 square feet in his Trump Tower triplex that did not exist.

ā€œWe have uncovered significant evidence that suggests Donald J. Trump and the Trump Organization falsely and fraudulently valued multiple assets and misrepresented those values to financial institutions for economic benefit,ā€ Ms. James said in a statement.

It is unusual for such specific and serious allegations to emerge in court papers ā€” filed less than an hour before a midnight deadline to respond to Mr. Trumpā€™s effort to avoid being questioned ā€” instead of in a formal complaint. Ms. Jamesā€™s lawyers said that the release of the details would not hamper their investigation, and added that the office was also looking into other conduct not discussed in the filing.

Lawyers for Mr. Trump and his company did not respond to requests for comment.

Because Ms. Jamesā€™s investigation is civil, she can sue Mr. Trump and his company but cannot file criminal charges.Ā Her inquiry is running parallel to a criminal investigationĀ led by theĀ Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, which is examining some of the same conduct. Ms. Jamesā€™s office is participating in that separate investigation, which is continuing. Mr. Bragg, also a Democrat, inherited the inquiry from his predecessor after taking office on Jan. 1.

In early December, Ms. James issued a subpoena for Mr. Trump as well as for Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, seeking to question them as part of her civil inquiry. Ms. James already questioned another of Mr. Trumpā€™s sons, Eric Trump,Ā in October 2020.Ā He invoked his Fifth Amendment right against incriminating himself in response to more than 500 questions, the new court filing said.

After receiving the subpoenas, lawyers for Mr. TrumpĀ filed a federal lawsuitĀ seeking to halt Ms. Jamesā€™s civil investigation and to bar her office from participating in the district attorneyā€™s criminal investigation. The lawsuit, which accused Ms. James of violating Mr. Trumpā€™s constitutional rights, argued that her investigation was politically motivated and cited a long list of her public attacks on Mr. Trump.

This month, Mr. Trumpā€™s lawyers alsoĀ filed court papersĀ in New York State seeking to block Ms. Jamesā€™s subpoenas, prompting her filing on Tuesday.

Ms. James, who is running for re-election this year, argued in the court papers that while her office had compiled evidence that Mr. Trumpā€™s company had engaged in possible fraud, investigators needed to question Mr. Trump in order to determine who was responsible for ā€œthe numerous misstatements and omissions made by him or on his behalfā€ ā€” and whether they were intentional.

A case could be hard to prove. Property valuations are often subjective, and Mr. Trumpā€™s lawyers are likely to note that his lenders and insurers ā€” sophisticated financial institutions that turned a profit off their relationship with the Trumps ā€” did not rely on the companyā€™s estimates.

Ms. James has been investigating Mr. Trumpā€™s business practices since March 2019. In previous filings, she described some of the properties she was scrutinizing and said that her investigators were looking into whether Mr. Trump had inflated values in order to secure loans and obtain economic and tax benefits.

In Tuesdayā€™s filing, she went further, giving examples in which she said the former presidentā€™s business had misrepresented the worth of some of its properties and showing how those claims had benefited the company, allowing it to receive favorable loans, insurance coverage and tax benefits.

The accusations center onĀ Mr. Trumpā€™s statements of financial condition, the annual record of his assets and liabilities that he gave to lenders and insurers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Former President Donald Trump tells A Bunch of Lies at his Rally

Ā 
Ā 
Murjani Rawls
Tue, January 18, 2022, 5:00 PM
Ā 
Ā 
Former US President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at the Canyon Moon Ranch festival grounds in Florence, Arizona, southeast of Phoenix, on January 15, 2022
Ā 
Former US President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at the Canyon Moon Ranch festival grounds in Florence, Arizona, southeast of Phoenix, on January 15, 2022

Since 2016, the song is still a familiar tune. A Trump rally and big lies go together like mac and cheese or better yet, in the case of Trump, potato salad with raisins. Saturday night in Arizona began with election security expert and My Pillow owner Mike LindellĀ proclaiming the 2020 election will be overturned, Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari LakeĀ stating Dr. Anthony Fauci should be in jail. It was an open mic night to the MAGA faithful, which somehow, a year later, believes the former President isnā€™t using them for his own gain.

But everybody is used to these rallies, right? We have lived through five years of words just like this, with the former President tagging politicians and dissenters with nicknames, and outlets covered it because it brought ratings. Fast forward to last Saturday night where the former President had his first rally of the year amongst people who still take his word as gospel. Itā€™s the continuation of fear-mongering, hate speech, and rhetoric for him to get applauseā€“then heā€™ll have another one whenever he feels terrible about himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Associated Press

Supreme Court allows Jan. 6 committee to get Trump documents

996a0d3787a7ab97ec55e970ddecf8da
Ā 
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday, Jan.19, 2022, in Washington. In a rebuff to former President Donald Trump, the Supreme Court is allowing the release of presidential documents sought by the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)
Ā 
MARK SHERMAN
Wed, January 19, 2022, 6:17 PM EST
Ā 
Ā 

WASHINGTON (AP) ā€” In a rebuff to former President Donald Trump, the Supreme Court is allowing the release of presidential documents sought by the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection.

The justices on Wednesday rejected a bid by Trump to withhold the documents from the committee until the issue is finally resolved by the courts. Trump's lawyers had hoped to prolong the court fight and keep the documents on hold.

Following the high court's action, there is no legal impediment to turning over the documents, which are held by the National Archives and Records Administration. They include presidential diaries, visitor logs, speech drafts and handwritten notes dealing with Jan. 6 from the files of former chief of staff Mark Meadows.

Alone among the justices, Clarence Thomas said he would have granted Trumpā€™s request to keep the documents on hold.

Ā 

Trumpā€™s attorneys had asked the high court to reverse rulings by the federal appeals court in Washington and block the release of the records even after President Joe Biden waived executive privilege over them.

In an unsigned opinion, the court acknowledged there are ā€œserious and substantial concernsā€ over whether a former president can win a court order to prevent disclosure of certain records from his time in office in a situation like this one.

But the court noted that the appeals court determined that Trump's assertion of privilege over the documents would fail under any circumstances, ā€œeven if he were the incumbent."

Trump spokespeople did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Ā 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bormio said:

So much effort to avoid talking about Biden. Ā Posts that go on for days. Ā They donā€™t hide the disaster in the White House now. Ā And thatā€™s what the next 2 elections are going to be about.

we're not done taking out the garbage and exposing all the insurrectionists....and trying to erase/expose the BIG lie that still lives...SAD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Guardian

Trump held secret meetings in days before Capitol attack, ex-press secretary tells panel

Hugo Lowell in WashingtonĀ -Ā 6h ago

Ā 

Ā© Provided by The Guardian

The former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham told the House select committee investigating the Capitol attack that Donald Trump hosted secret meetings in the White House residence in days before 6 January, according to two sources familiar with the matter.

The former senior Trump aide also told House investigators that the details of whether Trump actually intended to march to the Capitol after his speech at the Ellipse rally would be memorialized in documents provided to the US Secret Service, the sources said.

The select committeeā€™s interview with Grisham, who was Melania Trumpā€™s chief of staff when she resigned on 6 January, was more significant than expected, the sources said, giving the panel new details about the Trump White House and what the former US president was doing before the Capitol attack.

Grisham gave House investigators an overview of the chaotic final weeks in the Trump White House in the days leading up to the Capitol attack, recalling how the former president held off-the-books meetings in the White House residence, the sources said.

The secret meetings were apparently known by only a small number of aides, the sources said. Grisham recounted that they were mostly scheduled by Trumpā€™s chief of staff,Ā Mark Meadows, and that the former chief usher, Timothy Harleth, would wave participants upstairs, the sources said.

Harleth, the former director of rooms at the Trump International Hotel before moving with the Trumps to the White House in 2017, was once one of the former first familyā€™s most trusted employees, according to a top former White House aide to Melania Trump.

But after Harleth sought to ingratiate himself with the Biden transition team after Trumpā€™s defeat in the 2020 election in order to keep his White House role, Trump and Meadows moved to fire him before Melania Trump stepped in to keep him until Bidenā€™s inauguration.

Grisham told the select committee she was not sure who exactly Trump met with in the White House residence, but provided Harlethā€™s name and the identities of other Trump aides in the usherā€™s office who might know of the meetings, the sources said.

The GuardianĀ previously reportedĀ that Trump made several phone calls from the Yellow Oval Room and elsewhere in the White House residence to lieutenants at the Willard hotel in Washington the night before the Capitol attack, telling them to stop Joe Bidenā€™s certification.

Trump increasingly retreated to the White House residence to conduct work as his presidency progressed, according to another former Trump administration official, as he felt less watched by West Wing aides than in the Oval Office.

Towards the end of his presidency, the former Trump administration official said, an aide to former White House adviser Peter Navarro tried at least once to quietly usher into the residence Sidney Powell, a lawyer pushing lies about election fraud, to speak with Trump.

A spokesperson for the select committee declined to comment on Grishamā€™s interview that took place the first week of January. Harleth did not respond to questions about the meetings in the White House residence when reached last week by phone.

Over the course of her hours-long interview, Grisham told House investigators that the mystery surrounding Trumpā€™s promise at the Ellipse rally that he would march with his supporters to the Capitol might be resolved in Trump White House documents, the sources said.

The former presidentā€™s purported intention to go to the Capitol has emerged as a crucial issue for the select committee, as they examine whether TrumpĀ oversaw a criminal conspiracyĀ coordinating his political plan to stop Bidenā€™s certification with the insurrection.

Trumpā€™s promise is significant as it served as one of the primary motivations for his supporters to march to the Capitol alongside militia groups like the Oath Keepers, and was used by far-right activists like Alex Jones to encourage the crowd along the route.

But Trump never went to the Capitol and instead returned to the White House, where he watched the attack unfold on television ā€“ after beingĀ informed by the Secret ServiceĀ before the insurrection that they could not guarantee his security if he marched to the Capitol.

The select committee is now trying to untangle whether Trump made a promise that he perhaps had no intention of honoring because he hoped to incite an insurrection that stopped the certification ā€“ his only remaining play to get a second term ā€“ one of the sources said.

Grisham told the select committee that Trumpā€™s intentions ā€“ and whether the Secret Service had been told Trump had decided not to march to the Capitol ā€“ should be reflected in the presidential line-by-line, the document that outlines the presidentā€™s movements, the sources said.

The chairman of the select committee, Bennie Thompson, has told reporters the panel is already seeking information from the Secret Service about what plans they had for Trump on January 6, as well as what evacuation strategies they had for then-vice president Mike Pence.

But the presidential line-by-line, which gets sent to the Secret Service, could also reveal discussions about security concerns and suggest a new line of inquiry into why an assessment about conditions that were too dangerous for the president were not disseminated further.

Grisham also told the select committee about the necessary coordination between the Trump White House, the Secret Service and organizers of the ā€œSave Americaā€ rally at the Ellipse on 6 January in order to ensure Trumpā€™s appearance, the sources said.

The former Trump aide suggested to the select committee that Trump was determined to speak at the rally once he heard about its existence, the sources said, and was constantly on the phone to oversee the eventā€™s optics, the sources said.

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

INSIDER

The Trump Org claimed an apartment was worth $25 million while also offering it to Ivanka Trump for $8 million, New York AG alleges in fraud case

Tom Porter
Wed, January 19, 2022, 7:51 AM
Ā 
Ā 
  • The New York attorney general alleged value inflation by Trump's businessĀ in new filings.

  • An apartment was valued at $25 million, documents say, but offered to Ivanka Trump for $8 million.

  • Donald Trump has long denied wrongdoing and says the investigation is politically motivated.

An apartment leased by Ivanka Trump from the Trump Organization was given a sky-high public valuation but offered to her for far less, new legal documents allege.

The Park Avenue property was said publicly to be worth $25 million, but Ivanka Trump retained an option to buy it for $8 million, according to a slew of legal filings from the New York attorney general.

They are part of a wider case against the Trump Organization alleging that the company illegally manipulated the value of its assets for its own gain.

In legal documents filed Tuesday night, staff for New York Attorney General Letitia James presented what they said was evidence of possible value inflation.

Among the propertiesĀ identified in the documents is Trump Park Avenue, a luxury apartment complex in Manhattan.

According to the documents, the Trump Organization in financial statements between 2011 and 2020 said the entire property was worth between $135 million and $350 million, with unsold residential condominiums representing about 95% of the value.Ā 

Trump&#39;s 502 Park Avenue building under a blue sky
Ā 
Traffic in front of the Trump Park Avenue building in Manhattan.Frank Franklin II/AP Photo

But, according to James, evidence indicates that the real value of the properties was boosted as part of a scheme, involving several other Trump assets, to secure financial gain.Ā 

"Evidence obtained by OAG indicates both that the reported values of the unsold residential units of the Trump Park Avenue building were significantly higher than the internal valuations used by the Trump Organization for business planning and failed to account for the fact that many units were rent stabilized," a news release from James' office reads.Ā 

One apartment, according to the release, was leased by Ivanka Trump, who is also a Trump Organization executive and who was a White House advisor during Donald Trump's presidency.

According to the statement, Ivanka Trump was given the option to buy the apartment for $8.5 million even though it was valued at $25 million in Trump's financial statements. This, James alleged, highlighted the discrepancy between what the company was claiming the apartment was worth and its true value.Ā 

The complex is one of several Trump properties and businesses mentioned in the documents.

Others include the Trump Tower apartment; a golf course in Westchester County, New York; and a golf course near Aberdeen, Scotland. Evidence indicates that the values of those were also inflated, according to the attorney general's office.

In the documents, James' office says it "has not yet reached a final decision regarding whether this evidence merits legal action."

In a statement posted on Twitter by his spokesperson Liz Harrington, Trump criticized James' investigation.Ā 

"The only one misleading the public is Letitia James. She defrauded New Yorkers by basing her entire candidacy on a promise to get Trump at all costs without having seen a shred of evidence and in violation of every conceivable ethical rule," said Trump.Ā 

Trump has long denied any wrongdoing and has claimed that James, a Democrat, is politically motivated.Ā 

Attorneys for the Trump Organization and Ivanka Trump did not immediately reply to requests for comment.Ā 

The release of the lawsuit comes after Trump soughtĀ to quash a series of subpoenas issued by the New York attorney generalĀ seeking testimony from him, his son Donald Trump Jr., and Ivanka.

The investigation is being conducted alongside a parallel criminal investigation by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...