Jump to content

Graham-Kapowsin further demonstrates the "Mythical" in MNC


badrouter

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

As it stands he'd be the highest rated DL at STA as a 3-star.

People have a false impression that STA has more 4-star players than they actually do.

I don't think he meant STA in particular this year but a brand name school like a STA. Just used them as an example. A geographic area would also suffice to make this point. 

I honestly can't tell you what makes a 3* kid into a 4* but I assume it has to do with number of verbal offers and maybe you get the bump for showing up at one of their camps or something but I do know they suck up to certain schools/coaches as well. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

As it stands he'd be the highest rated DL at STA as a 3-star.

People have a false impression that STA has more 4-star players than they actually do.

Point taken.  I've see many a Broward County player transfer to STA over the years and magically jump one star.  That's my paradigm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

You're mistaking that as well.

It's just not true.

I have no interest in debating.  Being from the area, I know STA and the Broward County scene very well...now and going back 50 years ago.  STA routinely gets transfers from the local public schools and a substantial number jump in recruiting status when they do.  Current UM Cane Xavier Restrepo is an example.  Ask any public school coach from the area.  The kids down there know it, too.  That's why some transfer.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Highly ranked Tampa Jesuit of FL just needed a last minute TD to defeat Pensacola Pine Forest in a FL state final.  Unless you are 50+, you likely don't recognize the name "Pine Forest."  PF had to travel 650 miles for this game at a neutral site.

If that game was representative of how those teams would play would against each other, Jesuit would likely be the underdog if Jesuit had to make the 450+ mile trip to play PF at their home field. 

"Experts" in FL were predicting a complete blowout, and I have to think the hype of a national ranking contributed to it.  If in-state experts cannot even get in-state predictions correct, good luck trying to predict two teams from across the country playing each other.   

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OldCoach said:

Highly ranked Tampa Jesuit of FL just needed a last minute TD to defeat Pensacola Pine Forest in a FL state final.  Unless you are 50+, you likely don't recognize the name "Pine Forest."  PF had to travel 650 miles for this game at a neutral site.

If that game was representative of how those teams would play would against each other, Jesuit would likely be the underdog if Jesuit had to make the 450+ mile trip to play PF at their home field. 

"Experts" in FL were predicting a complete blowout, and I have to think the hype of a national ranking contributed to it.  If in-state experts cannot even get in-state predictions correct, good luck trying to predict two teams from across the country playing each other.   

There is no such thing as “in state experts”

There is no magic formula to predict who is gonna win. It’s more common sense than anything. If the result strays from that common sense then its most likely considered an upset. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, OldTerrapin said:

CP put GK at 9 and CH at 10

Cali teams 1.2.3.4. Texas teams at 5.6.7.. lol

 

Rank School State League Division W-L League W-L Division W-L Rating Schedule Strength Opponents' W-L
1 Mater Dei (Santa Ana, CA)   team preview   trend Southern Trinity 1 12-0 5-0 (1st) 6-0 103.9 70.7 108-41
WINS: #2 Servite (Anaheim, CA) (27-7), #2 Servite (Anaheim, CA) (46-37), #3 Centennial (Corona, CA) (21-16), #4 St. John Bosco (Bellflower, CA) (42-21), #7 Duncanville (TX) (45-3), #27 Lutheran (Orange, CA) (55-16), #41 Santa Margarita (Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) (56-3), #42 Serra [Junipero] (San Mateo, CA) (44-7), #50 Norco (CA) (49-14), #133 Liberty (Henderson, NV) (49-7), #205 JSerra (San Juan Capistrano, CA) (56-14), #2948 La Mirada (CA) (58-7), LOSSES: none

 

2 Servite (Anaheim, CA)   team preview   trend Southern Trinity 1 10-3 3-2 (3rd) 4-3 91.3 73.4 110-46
WINS: #4 St. John Bosco (Bellflower, CA) (40-21), #25 Mission Viejo (CA) (44-7), #27 Lutheran (Orange, CA) (56-12), #41 Santa Margarita (Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) (48-21), #41 Santa Margarita (Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) (34-3), #48 Sierra Canyon (Chatsworth, CA) (44-22), #73 Bishop Amat (La Puente, CA) (58-7), #109 Edison (Huntington Beach, CA) (54-14), #205 JSerra (San Juan Capistrano, CA) (53-0), #364 Helix (La Mesa, CA) (42-7), LOSSES: #1 Mater Dei (Santa Ana, CA) (46-37), #1 Mater Dei (Santa Ana, CA) (27-7), #4 St. John Bosco (Bellflower, CA) (24-10)

 

3 Centennial (Corona, CA)   team preview   trend Southern Big VIII 1 11-1 5-0 (1st) 2-1 89.6 55.1 86-52
WINS: #13 Cathedral (San Diego, CA) (57-14), #25 Mission Viejo (CA) (62-16), #48 Sierra Canyon (Chatsworth, CA) (35-14), #50 Norco (CA) (48-24), #94 Poly (Long Beach, CA) (52-7), #205 JSerra (San Juan Capistrano, CA) (48-0), #467 Roosevelt [Eleanor] (Eastvale, CA) (64-0), #603 Citrus Valley (Redlands, CA) (63-20), #2639 Santiago (Corona, CA) (69-14), #3489 King [Dr. Martin Luther] (Riverside, CA) (84-0), #4656 Corona (CA) (64-0), LOSSES: #1 Mater Dei (Santa Ana, CA) (21-16)

 

4 St. John Bosco (Bellflower, CA)   team preview   trend Southern Trinity 1 10-2 4-1 (2nd) 3-2 85.7 70.5 112-40
WINS: #2 Servite (Anaheim, CA) (24-10), #27 Lutheran (Orange, CA) (49-25), #32 Central (Miami, FL) (35-12), #35 Alemany (Mission Hills, CA) (24-3), #41 Santa Margarita (Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) (41-16), #63 Los Alamitos (CA) (63-38), #72 Smith [Oscar] (Chesapeake, VA) (49-0), #73 Bishop Amat (La Puente, CA) (47-7), #124 East St. Louis (IL) (42-26), #205 JSerra (San Juan Capistrano, CA) (44-7), LOSSES: #1 Mater Dei (Santa Ana, CA) (42-21), #2 Servite (Anaheim, CA) (40-21)

 

5 Westlake (Austin, TX)   team preview   trend Texas 6A Region IV District 26 6A 16-0 7-0 (1st) 15-0 80.1 38.1 133-67
WINS: #33 Guyer [John H.] (Denton, TX) (40-21), #54 Katy (TX) (45-14), #110 Vandegrift (Austin, TX) (70-7), #126 Lake Travis (Austin, TX) (63-21), #229 Summit (Arlington, TX) (59-21), #237 Trinity (Euless, TX) (34-14), #368 Temple (TX) (54-13), #576 Bowie (Austin, TX) (35-0), #746 New Braunfels (TX) (70-7), #1230 Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) (56-0), #1535 Hutto (TX) (54-9), #2221 San Marcos (TX) (56-0), #3497 Hays [Jack C.] (Buda, TX) (77-0), #4489 Del Valle (TX) (63-6), #5044 Akins (Austin, TX) (55-6), #7458 Austin [Stephen F.] (Austin, TX) (77-3), LOSSES: none

 

6 North Shore (Houston, TX)   team preview   trend Texas 6A Region III District 21 6A 15-1 6-0 (1st) 15-1 75.5 46 134-65
WINS: #7 Duncanville (TX) (17-10), #56 Atascocita (Humble, TX) (31-21), #56 Atascocita (Humble, TX) (44-20), #126 Lake Travis (Austin, TX) (49-21), #143 Tompkins (Katy, TX) (26-20), #178 King [C. E.] (Houston, TX) (17-0), #245 Summer Creek (Houston, TX) (45-16), #463 Klein Collins (Spring, TX) (34-7), #568 Clear Springs (League City, TX) (41-13), #566 Klein Oak (Spring, TX) (58-34), #690 Shadow Creek (Pearland, TX) (33-10), #1253 West Brook (Beaumont, TX) (44-7), #1707 Dobie [J. Frank] (Houston, TX) (62-14), #4007 Kingwood (TX) (56-0), #4492 Humble (TX) (68-6), LOSSES: #96 Westfield (Houston, TX) (27-21)

 

7 Duncanville (TX)   team preview   trend Texas 6A Region II District 11 6A 13-2 7-0 (1st) 12-1 75.1 47.1 124-63
WINS: #18 Carroll (Southlake, TX) (35-9), #53 South Oak Cliff (Dallas, TX) (42-27), #64 DeSoto (TX) (42-21), #64 DeSoto (TX) (38-20), #162 Spring (TX) (42-7), #646 Cedar Hill (TX) (58-7), #954 Mesquite (TX) (52-2), #1058 Waxahachie (TX) (52-3), #1537 Lake Ridge (Mansfield, TX) (59-0), #1633 Belton (TX) (63-7), #1862 Mansfield (TX) (63-17), #3271 Midway (Waco, TX) (76-0), #6358 Waco (TX) (76-0), LOSSES: #1 Mater Dei (Santa Ana, CA) (45-3), #6 North Shore (Houston, TX) (17-10)

 

8 Venice (FL)   team preview   trend Florida 8A District 12 8A 14-1 4-0 (1st) 9-0 74.0 38.9 113-61
WINS: #78 Apopka (FL) (35-7), #114 Cocoa (FL) (21-20), #166 West Orange (Winter Garden, FL) (49-7), #228 Columbus [Christopher] (Miami, FL) (35-7), #295 Edgewater (Orlando, FL) (41-7), #342 Riverview (Sarasota, FL) (56-14), #342 Riverview (Sarasota, FL) (42-7), #638 Palmetto (FL) (35-10), #1457 Plant City (FL) (55-7), #2297 Sarasota (FL) (49-13), #2437 Manatee (Bradenton, FL) (41-8), #3252 Gulf Coast (Naples, FL) (56-6), #3730 North Fort Myers (FL) (60-7), #6184 Lakewood Ranch (Bradenton, FL) (61-7), LOSSES: #65 Cardinal Gibbons (Fort Lauderdale, FL) (28-22)

 

9 Graham-Kapowsin (Graham, WA)   team preview   trend Washington 4A South Puget Sound 4A 15-0 9-0 (1st) 14-0 73.8 22.6 99-64
WINS: #10 Collins Hill (Suwanee, GA) (40-36), #303 Lake Stevens (WA) (44-7), #461 Kamiakin (Kennewick, WA) (42-0), #816 Sumner (WA) (41-14), #864 Bothell (WA) (41-25), #1498 Puyallup (WA) (34-3), #2771 Bellarmine Prep (Tacoma, WA) (41-0), #3185 Emerald Ridge (South Hill, WA) (35-0), #3199 Kentwood (Covington, WA) (49-7), #3930 Curtis (University Place, WA) (58-12), #5774 Bethel (Spanaway, WA) (45-0), #5848 Olympia (WA) (56-0), #7839 Rogers [Governor John R.] (Puyallup, WA) (48-0), #8165 Federal Way (WA) (63-6), #11235 South Kitsap (Port Orchard, WA) (54-0), LOSSES: none

 

10 Collins Hill (Suwanee, GA)   team preview   trend Georgia AAAAAAA Region 8 AAAAAAA 15-1 4-0 (1st) 12-0 73.6 47.6 130-62-1
WINS: #24 Milton (GA) (24-8), #43 Mill Creek (Hoschton, GA) (40-10), #86 Brookwood (Snellville, GA) (36-10), #118 Grayson (Loganville, GA) (31-0), #130 Lowndes (Valdosta, GA) (49-7), #221 Greenville Christian (Greenville, MS) (37-22), #293 North Gwinnett (Suwanee, GA) (35-7), #400 Pebblebrook (Mableton, GA) (48-6), #569 Rome (GA) (34-0), #652 Lambert (Suwanee, GA) (56-13), #726 East Coweta (Sharpsburg, GA) (34-0), #1003 Mountain View (Lawrenceville, GA) (28-0), #1577 Alpharetta (GA) (42-0), #2649 Peachtree Ridge (Suwanee, GA) (63-0), #4307 Sprayberry (Marietta, GA) (2-0), LOSSES: #9 Graham-Kapowsin (Graham, WA) (40-36)

 

Maxpreps Human final

 

Final MaxPreps Top 25 High School Football Rankings
 
Record: 12-0 | Last week: 1
Season complete
 
Record: 16-0 | Last week: 2
Last week: Beat Guyer (Denton) 40-21
Season complete
 
Record: 12-0 | Last week: 4
Season complete
 
Record: 8-1 | Last week: 5
Season complete
 
Record: 10-3 | Last week: 6
Season complete
 
Record: 10-2 | Last week: 7
Season complete
 
Record: 14-0 | Last week: 9
Season complete
 
Record: 15-0 | Last week: 10
Last week: Beat Pine Forest (Pensacola) 35-29
Season complete
 
Record: 14-1 | Last week: 11
Last week: Beat Tampa Bay Tech (Tampa) 42-14
Season complete
 
Record: 11-1 | Last week: 12
Season complete
 
Record: 15-0 | Last week: NR
Last week: Beat Collins Hill (Suwanee, Ga.) 40-36
Season complete
 
Record: 15-1 | Last week: 3
Last week: Lost to Graham-Kapowsin (Graham) 40-36
Season complete
 
Record: 15-1 | Last week: 20
Last week: Beat Duncanville 17-10
Season complete
 
Record: 12-1 | Last week: 13
Season complete
 
Record: 12-1 | Last week: 14
Season complete
 
Record: 13-1 | Last week: 15
Season complete
 
Record: 9-1 | Last week: 16
Season complete
 
Record: 13-0 | Last week: 17
Season complete
 
Record: 11-0 | Last week: 18
Season complete
 
Record: 12-2 | Last week: 19
Last week: Beat Merritt Island 49-14
Season complete
 
Record: 13-2 | Last week: 8
Last week: Lost to North Shore (Houston) 17-10
Season complete
 
Record: 15-0 | Last week: 21
Season complete
 
Record: 11-1 | Last week: 22
Season complete
 
Record: 12-1 | Last week: 23
Last week: Beat Highland (Gilbert, Ariz.) 35-24
Season complete
 
Record: 15-1 | Last week: 24
Season complete
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how do we know Bixby (OK) aint #1 or at least top 5?

They blew everyone the fuck out.. no way of knowing how they would to against the teams at the top

 

Fri, 8/27
7:00pm
Mansfield Timberview Mascot
Mansfield TimberviewArlington, TX
Home  Non-District
W69-14Box Score
Fri, 9/3
7:30pm
Jenks Mascot
Jenks
Away  Non-District
W23-15Box Score
Fri, 9/17
7:00pm
Stillwater Mascot
Stillwater
Home  Non-District
W42-14Box Score
Fri, 9/24
7:00pm
Bartlesville Mascot
Bartlesville
Away  District
W71-0Box Score
Fri, 10/1
7:00pm
Putnam City West Mascot
Putnam City WestOklahoma City
Home  District
W81-6Box Score
Fri, 10/8
7:00pm
Choctaw Mascot
Choctaw
Away  District
W70-7Box Score
Thu, 10/14
7:00pm
Page Mascot
PageSand Springs
Home  District
W58-14Box Score
Fri, 10/22
7:00pm
Muskogee Mascot
Muskogee
Home  District
W56-14Box Score
Fri, 10/29
Time TBA
P
Ponca City
Away  District
W66-13Box Score
Fri, 11/5
7:00pm
Booker T. Washington Mascot
Booker T. WashingtonTulsa
Away  District
W61-20Box Score
Fri, 11/12
7:00pm
Putnam City North Mascot
Putnam City NorthOklahoma City
Home  Playoff
W78-7Box Score
Fri, 11/19
7:00pm
Stillwater Mascot
Stillwater
Neutral  Playoff
W48-6Box Score
Thu, 12/2
7:00pm
Deer Creek Mascot
Deer CreekEdmond
Neutral  Playoff
W63-14Box Score
PrintSchedule CorrectionScore Correction

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

There is no such thing as “in state experts”

There is no magic formula to predict who is gonna win. It’s more common sense than anything. If the result strays from that common sense then its most likely considered an upset. 

That's why I wrote "experts" as such..tongue in cheek.  I agree there is no magic formula.  And that is why national rankings in high school, while amusing, are very limited in their use to make predictions.  At a high school level, individual matchups are often huge, especially when a team has a big playmaker.  Yet some choose to focus on past wins-losses to predict the future versus analyzing who is going to be able to exploit who come gametime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, OldTerrapin said:

So how do we know Bixby (OK) aint #1 or at least top 5?

They blew everyone the fuck out.. no way of knowing how they would to against the teams at the top

 

We don't We can only speculate in the same way we would speculate that NDSU might be the best college football team above Clemson. Unless they play, we have no idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...to generate discussion.

Further below are the approximate student populations of 35 of the Top 100 public high school football teams in the country this year.  Only 3 schools under 1500 students made the list.

I guess one could debate it is natural that larger public schools will be disproportionately represented due to a larger pool of prospective players, but we've all run into some very tough small teams out there who can routinely hang with the big boys.

It's my perception that public schools with less than 1200 students are rarely represented in the national polls in the modern era.  If that is true, it follows that less populous states lacking large metro areas will rarely be represented in the rankings.  So, what's the point?

A talent-rich state such as Mississippi only has a dozen high schools with populations of 1500 or or more students.  The vast majority of their schools are "small."  Anyone who has traveled to the backwoods of the South can appreciate how intimidating it could be for one of these big city, ranked teams to play there.  There are undoubtedly some smaller schools in talent rich areas that I believe could roll one of these ranked teams on a good night if playing at home.

I have found that many of these smaller schools in the South can be a bit up and down in terms of their performance year-to-year because of their limited pool to pull from.  But, when the stars align, you occasionally have an absolute powerhouse that is flying under the radar.  I saw this phenomenon with some of the teams from south Georgia.  Per capita, there are rural areas of the Deep South that are as rich or richer talent-wise than anywhere in the country.  

In a way, high school rankings are a bit like trying to rank fighters in different weight classes against each, ie who is the best fighter pound-for-pound?, since there are not well-defined, separate polls for large/medium/small schools  Unfortunately, I think smaller schools often get left out of the discussion.

North Shore (TX) 4600
Duncanville (TX) 4400
Hamilton (AZ) 3900
Cherry Creek (CO) 3800
Mill Creek (GA) 3700
Chandler (AZ) 3400
Katy (TX) 3400
Centennial (CA) 3200
Collins Hill (TX)  2900
Westlake (TX) 2800
Hoover (AL) 2800
Westland (TX) 2800
Center Grove (IN) 2600
Guyer (TX) 2600
Lone Peak (UT) 2500
Milton (GA) 2300
Venice (FL) 2300
Oscar Smith (VA) 2200
Paetow (TX) 2200
Thompson (AL) 2100
Chambers (NC) 2000
Graham Kapowsin (WA) 1900
Oakland (TN) 1900
Gaffney (SC) 1900
Bixby (OK) 1800
Dutch Fork (SC) 1700
Springfield (OH) 1700
Warner Robins (GA) 1600
Cocoa (FL) 1600
Zachary (LA) 1600
Miami Central (FL) 1500
Buford (GA) 1500
Southlake Carroll (TX) 1400
South Oak Cliff (TX) 1200
Saguaro (AZ) 1200
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/19/2021 at 10:09 AM, badrouter said:

None of us had ever heard of them, and they had beaten nobody with any sort of ranking. But, they destroyed everyone they played. Turns out, being an undefeated, unchallenged state champion can mean you're pretty damn good, whether anyone else realizes it or not. I think there are a few Graham-Kapowsins throughout the country most years. And that is the correct way to interpret their win, not just to laugh at Collins Hill. We can't possibly know all there is to know about all of the teams throughout the country. And, contrary to common belief, a team doesn't have to schedule Mater Dei or St. John Bosco to be really good. GK should be top 15 in the country at worst.

There is no way GK is top 15 , top 50 maybe . Honestly, I would take CCSD over them . Way more talent and size for CC . The big reveal was how unimpressive CH was, being ranked in top 5 in some polls . Ca , mainly socal, is on a different level this season. I know you want your Lakeland to be viewed higher in polls , but using GK as an example doesn't cut it . Maybe the game was anticlimactic for CH after winning GA state championship 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OldCoach said:

Highly ranked Tampa Jesuit of FL just needed a last minute TD to defeat Pensacola Pine Forest in a FL state final.  Unless you are 50+, you likely don't recognize the name "Pine Forest."  PF had to travel 650 miles for this game at a neutral site.

If that game was representative of how those teams would play would against each other, Jesuit would likely be the underdog if Jesuit had to make the 450+ mile trip to play PF at their home field. 

"Experts" in FL were predicting a complete blowout, and I have to think the hype of a national ranking contributed to it.  If in-state experts cannot even get in-state predictions correct, good luck trying to predict two teams from across the country playing each other.   

If you separate the emotion from the decision, its possible to have a 70%+ correct pick rate in any match.  In state or out of state.  Regarding Bixby, their record is not a good gauge of their fit among other top teams.  Three big reasons.  1.  Probably 50+ teams could be 14-0 against the Bixby schedule.  2.  Bixby has no Tier 1-3 wins.  3. Bixby does not have the 3*, 4*, 5* kids that the top teams have.

As far as GK, we know they are about = to Collins Hill, but we don't really know where CH stacks up since they don't have any Tier 1-3 wins either.

We know SJB easily beat Oscar Smith and Miami Central and both those teams ran their state division.

We know Mater Dei rolled DV who is a Top 3-4 team in Texas.  MD won by 40 while NS only beat DV by 7.

We know Servite easily  beat SJB in the playoffs by 3 scores.

We know that Cen10 and Servite gave MD their toughest games and beat 2-3 common opponnents by the same margins.

We know that SFA beat IMG who rolled their other opponnent's.  We know STA beat SFA.

Based on all this, I can state with 70%+ certainty that the top teams are: (In no particular order) STA, SFA  Servite, SJB, Mater Dei, Cen10,  

The next group include: DV, Westlake, IMG, Jesuit, Bergen, North Shore

The next group would include:  Collins Hill, Gk, Bishop Gorman, Hamilton, Saguaro, Chandler, Center Grove

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, CaliNorth said:

There is no way GK is top 15 , top 50 maybe . Honestly, I would take CCSD over them . Way more talent and size for CC . The big reveal was how unimpressive CH was, being ranked in top 5 in some polls . Ca , mainly socal, is on a different level this season. I know you want your Lakeland to be viewed higher in polls , but using GK as an example doesn't cut it . Maybe the game was anticlimactic for CH after winning GA state championship 

“Maybe”??? Don’t venture out too far. 🙄🙄🙄

bgw

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Sammyswordsman said:

If you separate the emotion from the decision, its possible to have a 70%+ correct pick rate in any match.  In state or out of state.  Regarding Bixby, their record is not a good gauge of their fit among other top teams.  Three big reasons.  1.  Probably 50+ teams could be 14-0 against the Bixby schedule.  2.  Bixby has no Tier 1-3 wins.  3. Bixby does not have the 3*, 4*, 5* kids that the top teams have.

As far as GK, we know they are about = to Collins Hill, but we don't really know where CH stacks up since they don't have any Tier 1-3 wins either.

We know SJB easily beat Oscar Smith and Miami Central and both those teams ran their state division.

We know Mater Dei rolled DV who is a Top 3-4 team in Texas.  MD won by 40 while NS only beat DV by 7.

We know Servite easily  beat SJB in the playoffs by 3 scores.

We know that Cen10 and Servite gave MD their toughest games and beat 2-3 common opponnents by the same margins.

We know that SFA beat IMG who rolled their other opponnent's.  We know STA beat SFA.

Based on all this, I can state with 70%+ certainty that the top teams are: (In no particular order) STA, SFA  Servite, SJB, Mater Dei, Cen10,  

The next group include: DV, Westlake, IMG, Jesuit, Bergen, North Shore

The next group would include:  Collins Hill, Gk, Bishop Gorman, Hamilton, Saguaro, Chandler, Center Grove

I'm not so sure Westlake is tier 2 . I think they looked to me tier 1. That O-line of theirs would definitely stand up to most, if not all of the pass rushes from the tier 1 teams. They  pass extremely well , the key to moving ball against  MD's defense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, CaliNorth said:

There is no way GK is top 15 , top 50 maybe . Honestly, I would take CCSD over them . Way more talent and size for CC . The big reveal was how unimpressive CH was, being ranked in top 5 in some polls . Ca , mainly socal, is on a different level this season. I know you want your Lakeland to be viewed higher in polls , but using GK as an example doesn't cut it . Maybe the game was anticlimactic for CH after winning GA state championship 

 

Haha what a homer take. It can't be that WA plays decent football, it must just be that CH sucks...

 

WA state has a proud history of beating "top" California high schools.

 

Sit this one out junior.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CaliNorth said:

I'm not so sure Westlake is tier 2 . I think they looked to me tier 1. That O-line of theirs would definitely stand up to most, if not all of the pass rushes from the tier 1 teams. They  pass extremely well , the key to moving ball against  MD's defense

Those weren't Tiers.  More like loose groupings.  But Based on the MD destruction of DV, I am not confident that Texas has any teams that can hang within 2 scores of the top "Power privates".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...