DBP66 Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 34 minutes ago, Warrior said: Umm you can't show/prove a negative. The benefit of the doubt goes to the person accused until Proven otherwise. But for one second you believe if they were there it wouldn't be front page you're foolish. I knew this would happen - it was expected. you missed the pictures of several the top secret files on the floor...and what about the file they found in HIS DESK DRAW...I wonder how that got there...🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 You don't see how this works - The FBI has now leaked, one week after a pivotal election, to the Washington Post that the Regime’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was basically a political-op: “Agents and prosecutors found no discernible business interest in the Mar-a-Lago documents” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBigBlack Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 Just now, Warrior said: I know this is difficult - show me anywhere that it says they found "NuClear Docs" in the article? The've already posted prior "Sources say" DJT has NuClear docs. Now they wrote a soft piece and don't mention NuClear docs found anywhere? Because they didn't find anything to report. You Lost - it's fine I knew the outcome before it started. I don’t have to show anything because I’m not making the claim that it was confirmed there were nuclear docs. You are making the claim that it was confirmed he didn’t have nuclear docs. All I’m saying is show me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 1 minute ago, DBP66 said: you missed the pictures of several the top secret files on the floor...and what about the file they found in HIS DESK DRAW...I wonder how that got there...🙄 Show me anywhere NuClear docs - that's what the bet was. Anyone can stage anything. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Will Posted November 17, 2022 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 25 minutes ago, Warrior said: The bet is on the nuclear docs you’re doubting. If it turns out the leak was made up, you win. If it wasn’t then I win. $1,000 is fine unless you want to bump it up. I’m on board with the deadline, but we don’t need to go that far out. Let’s call it 12/31. You in? Here's your bet - - the leak was MADE UP. I win. There is a constant you keep harping on. That there was a leak. It does not matter if there was a leak or not, documents on nuclear preparedness, from foreign countries, were found at Mar A Lago. Consider this, there was no place for a leak to come from other than in his home. The docs were found. Simple Mr. Simpleton. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 Just now, GoBigBlack said: I don’t have to show anything because I’m not making the claim that it was confirmed there were nuclear docs. You are making the claim that it was confirmed he didn’t have nuclear docs. All I’m saying is show me. You made the bet and now your welching when you lose YOUR bet. Expected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 3 minutes ago, Warrior said: I know this is difficult - show me anywhere that it says they found "NuClear Docs" in the article? The've already posted prior "Sources say" DJT has NuClear docs. Now they wrote a soft piece and don't mention NuClear docs found anywhere? Because they didn't find anything to report. You Lost - it's fine I knew the outcome before it started. LOL...so they didn't mention it huh...so that makes the first article go away?...it never existed??...LOL..you're as silly as they get...desperation...😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBigBlack Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 Just now, Warrior said: You don't see how this works - The FBI has now leaked, one week after a pivotal election, to the Washington Post that the Regime’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was basically a political-op: “Agents and prosecutors found no discernible business interest in the Mar-a-Lago documents” Your proof is this — since he wasn’t using them for business purposes (allegedly, right?) there were no nuclear docs. Correct? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 2 minutes ago, Wildcat Will said: There is a constant you keep harping on. That there was a leak. It does not matter if there was a leak or not, documents on nuclear preparedness, from foreign countries, were found at Mar A Lago. Consider this, there was no place for a leak to come from other than in his home. The docs were found. Simple Mr. Simpleton. Show me any confirmation of NuClear Docs at Mar-A-Lago and I'll gladly pay they bet. It's what I do. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 2 minutes ago, GoBigBlack said: Your proof is this — since he wasn’t using them for business purposes (allegedly, right?) there were no nuclear docs. Correct? Show me any proof of NuClear Docs anywhere and I'll gladly pay the bet I lost. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBigBlack Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 Just now, Warrior said: She me any confirmation of NuClear Docs at Mar-A-Lago and I'll gladly pay they bet. It's what I do. Show me any confirmation none were found and I’ll gladly pay the bet. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Will Posted November 17, 2022 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 4 minutes ago, Warrior said: You don't see how this works - The FBI has now leaked, one week after a pivotal election, to the Washington Post that the Regime’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was basically a political-op: “Agents and prosecutors found no discernible business interest in the Mar-a-Lago documents” Link that. No new news has come out related to the search. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 Just now, GoBigBlack said: Show me any confirmation none were found and I’ll gladly pay the bet. Read the WaPo article that just came out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 2 minutes ago, Warrior said: Show me anywhere NuClear docs - that's what the bet was. Anyone can stage anything. do you honestly think the DOJ is going to print pictures of what's in the top-secret files??....how about a little common sense here?...we'll never see pictures of any of the top secret files Trump stole...that's because they're TOP-SECRECT!....😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBigBlack Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 Just now, Warrior said: Read the WaPo article that just came out. Highlight. Where. It. Says. None. Were. Found. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 3 minutes ago, Warrior said: Show me any proof of NuClear Docs anywhere and I'll gladly pay the bet I lost. LOL...you think they will print top-secret files in newspapers huh??...LOL...🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTerrapin Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 Why don't you two just pay each other $500 and call it a day... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 5 minutes ago, DBP66 said: LOL...you think they will print top-secret files in newspapers huh??...LOL...🤡 Just show confirmation - it's not hard if true. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 8 minutes ago, GoBigBlack said: Highlight. Where. It. Says. None. Were. Found. Highlight where it shows they were found. They are going to report what wasn't found? It was fluff piece to cover the FBI's ass now the R's have the house. It was a leaked BS story that you took and ran and now lost a bet you never intended to pay. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBigBlack Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 1 minute ago, Warrior said: Just show confirmation - it's not hard if true. Just show confirmation - it’s not hard if false. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 Just now, Warrior said: Just show confirmation - it's not hard if true. confirmation was/is the Washington Post story...but you would rather stick your fingers in your ears and close you eyes and ignore the story because you don't like it....sad way to go through life...🙄 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBigBlack Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 Just now, Warrior said: Highlight where it shows they were found. They are going to report what wasn't found? It was fluff piece to cover the FBI's ass now the R's have the house. It was a leaked BS story that you took and ran and now lost a bet you never intended to pay. We’ll go slower this time. I (me, GBB) cannot show that. It doesn’t exist, so I cannot show it. It doesn’t exist, and I never said it did. I’m not making the claim it was confirmed. I didn’t say it was confirmed. I have no proof of a claim I never made being supported by something that doesn’t exist. You’re asking for something that doesn’t exist and at the same time claiming that something else that doesn’t exist exists. Neither exist. They aren’t real. One of them might exist in the future, but neither do now. There is no confirmation the docs were there. There is no confirmation the docs were not there. It’s impossible to know either way. You don’t know yet. I made the bet that a touchdown will be scored in the game, and you made the bet that there wouldn’t be. It’s 3-3 at the end of the first quarter and you want to get paid. Gtfo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I AM IRONMAN Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 21 minutes ago, OldTerrapin said: Why don't you two just pay each other $500 and call it a day... Right! Who makes bets online over politics ON A HS FOOTBALL FORUM?🤔🤔🤔 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 14 minutes ago, DBP66 said: confirmation was/is the Washington Post story...but you would rather stick your fingers in your ears and close you eyes and ignore the story because you don't like it....sad way to go through life...🙄 See that's where you and I differ - you take 3rd party hearsay as facts and I don't. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 4 minutes ago, Warrior said: See that's where you and I differ - you take 3rd party hearsay as facts and I don't. so if you don't see something with your own eyes or hear it with your own ears it didn't happen huh??.....nice way to go through life...deaf, dumb and blind....good luck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.