NicholasMalibu Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 15 minutes ago, LOSer said: You must have ignored my second example of 2009 Camden County. But I know you want to escape this as quickly as possible. Not only because you're so out of your league but also, you know, it's such a waste of your time. Camden County had at least 3 Top 100 wins that season, maybe more. I stopped counting after 3... You need to start responding to full questions and stop picking what you want to answer like a spoiled brat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 6 minutes ago, NicholasMalibu said: Camden County had at least 3 Top 100 wins that season, maybe more. I stopped counting after 3... Or one top 100 win according to calpreps (A 10-7 win over 10-2 Lowndes). Just give it up. Your performance here is embarrassing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NicholasMalibu Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 3 minutes ago, LOSer said: Or one top 100 win according to calpreps (A 10-7 win over 10-2 Lowndes). Just give it up. Your performance here is embarrassing. Or you could look again and see that Northside and North Gwinnett finished in the top 100 in 2009. Camden County beat them that season. That's three top 100 wins, at least. Like I said, I stopped looking after three... Even if I was wrong, you just admitted that '09 CC had one top 100 win. The question was for zero top 100 wins. Again, you don't give solid answers. You jump around questions and name call like a 6 year old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 23 minutes ago, NicholasMalibu said: Or you could look again and see that Northside and North Gwinnett finished in the top 100 in 2009. Camden County beat them that season. That's three top 100 wins, at least. Like I said, I stopped looking after three... Look again at.....calpreps? So I don't need to look again. Maybe you're saying according to Dallas Jackson? Which would be perfect for you. A clown endorsing a clown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NicholasMalibu Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 33 minutes ago, LOSer said: Look again at.....calpreps? So I don't need to look again. Maybe you're saying according to Dallas Jackson? Which would be perfect for you. A clown endorsing a clown. 2009 CalPreps compilation poll and Rivals had both teams in the top 100. Even if you discredit those rankings, you were still wrong with Lowndes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 1 minute ago, NicholasMalibu said: Even if you discredit those rankings, you were still wrong with Lowndes. I didn't even look until you said 3 teams. They beat a 10-2 team by 3 points. What a joke. Regardless of precedent (which exists) your argument is garbage as usual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NicholasMalibu Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 14 minutes ago, LOSer said: I didn't even look until you said 3 teams. They beat a 10-2 team by 3 points. What a joke. Regardless of precedent (which exists) your argument is garbage as usual. My argument is garbage, but you have tried and failed to prove it wrong? As ridiculous as you are, I will give you credit for effort. You've dug as deep as 2000 looking for comparable teams/rankings. You also have went wayyyyy out on a limb with examples from Las Vegas oddsmakers to proclaiming STA as national champion "if" they scheduled differently. Los, you make me laugh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 16 minutes ago, NicholasMalibu said: My argument is garbage, but you have tried and failed to prove it wrong? I didn't fail. West Monroe had two worse losses and from I can tell a worse a schedule and finished #8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 17 minutes ago, NicholasMalibu said: As ridiculous as you are, I will give you credit for effort. You've dug as deep as 2000 looking for comparable teams/rankings. So you follow up your claim that I couldn't prove you wrong (which is wrong) by saying that you give me credit for finding an instance that proved you wrong. The amount of goofballs who parade around this board saying insanely stupid things is unbelievable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 19 minutes ago, NicholasMalibu said: You also have went wayyyyy out on a limb with examples from Las Vegas oddsmakers to proclaiming STA as national champion "if" they scheduled differently. Los, you make me laugh. What's that? Another lie from NickMalibu? Shocking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 You cannot call anyone a goofball when CalPreps is what you use to back your argument. CalPreps is not a national rating/ranking service despite some guy in California trying to parade it as one. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 7 minutes ago, ECHS05 said: You cannot call anyone a goofball when CalPreps is what you use to back your argument. Are still on this? You are deluded and obsessed. When someone says top 100 I'm going to use the only one that I know of and the easiest to access. I don't use it as fact, numbnuts. I merely use it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NicholasMalibu Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 3 hours ago, LOSer said: So you follow up your claim that I couldn't prove you wrong (which is wrong) by saying that you give me credit for finding an instance that proved you wrong. The amount of goofballs who parade around this board saying insanely stupid things is unbelievable. You never proved me wrong. You tried to hide under an era without a top 100, then were completely embarrassed with Camden County. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NicholasMalibu Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 3 hours ago, LOSer said: What's that? Another lie from NickMalibu? Shocking. "If STA had played slapdicks like Norland and West Monroe instead of BTW and Bishop Gorman they'd be three days away from a national championship". -YOU "Vegas is in the business of accurately rating teams and then setting lines. They have as much incentive as anybody to be right". -YOU I'm not lying. Trust me, I couldn't make this stuff up... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 5 hours ago, LOSer said: Are still on this? You are deluded and obsessed. When someone says top 100 I'm going to use the only one that I know of and the easiest to access. I don't use it as fact, numbnuts. I merely use it. Yet you present it as fact. The only reason its seen as a top 100 is because some guy threw the teams together and numbered them as such, doesnt make it accurate or informative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 3 hours ago, NicholasMalibu said: You never proved me wrong. You tried to hide under an era without a top 100. 2000 Midland Lee. I merely found a 2-loss team with crappy losses and crappy wins that finished #8. It's not my fault that they didn't have a top 100 back then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 2 hours ago, NicholasMalibu said: Trust me, I couldn't make this stuff up... You wouldn't have to make up the fact that a preseason #1 team would be national champions if they scheduled weaker opponents. That's really mind-boggling to you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 29 minutes ago, ECHS05 said: Yet you present it as fact. No I don't. That's just you making stuff up. I present it. You then whine and throw a hissy fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 30 minutes ago, ECHS05 said: The only reason its seen as a top 100 is because some guy threw the teams together and numbered them as such, doesnt make it accurate or informative. Nobody ever presented it as fact. It's merely presented as something which is much more than anything you offer. Your offerings are 'Tift is good, Carrolton is good, blah.' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 1 minute ago, LOSer said: Nobody ever presented it as fact. It's merely presented as something which is much more than anything you offer. Your offerings are 'Tift is good, Carrolton is good, blah.' No its not more than I offer. I can make a list of teams and number them also. Doesnt make me more or less correct then CalPreps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, ECHS05 said: No its not more than I offer. So your refutation is your word. Classic. Exactly the way you argue everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, ECHS05 said: Doesnt make me more or less correct then CalPreps. Again, agreed. It just makes your claims far less supported. While calpreps has a methodology backing you have literally zero backing for anything you say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, LOSer said: Again, agreed. It just makes your claims far less supported. While calpreps has a methodology backing you have literally zero backing for anything you say. Except a mind better at selecting winners to games than CalPreps. A mind keen enough to find CalPreps fundamental flaws in their national services... of which you yet remain blind. Your only purpose is to linger & infest the board with negativity & headaches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, ECHS05 said: Except a mind better at selecting winners to games than CalPreps. And it comes full circle in the most pathetic way. Once again claiming that the Pick'em is an arbiter of football acumen. You pick 20 cherr-picked games every week. They pick all 7,000. Even if you pick more games correctly, all we can tell is that it's dumb luck. You don't present any support for anything you say. You just wing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 10 hours ago, ECHS05 said: A mind keen enough to find CalPreps fundamental flaws in their national services... of which you yet remain blind. Your deluded mind has somehow come to the conclusion that I'm a calpreps follower which would be funny to someone like noonereal about 7 years ago. You're just a clown kid who is obsessed with calpreps and needs hi self-esteem raised on a daily basis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.