Bestcoast Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 Just now, Ararar said: Let's try and live in here and now.stay in the moment It's comical watching this guy squirm. He works so hard at nonsense 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 21 minutes ago, Ararar said: Let's try and live in here and now.stay in the moment Explain this please.... 2016 season Murrieta Valley 42, Vista Murrieta 37 Vista Murrieta 38, Bishop Amat 24 -- 2017 preseason in some random poll #5 Murrieta Valley - 7 return on O, 5 on D #13 Bishop Amat - 7 on O, 3 on D (watched video and checked the #s eligibility... it might just be 2 on D, definitely no more than 3) Vista Murrieta - NR in Top 25 ... Returns 6 on O, 5 on D Explain how this makes any sense what so ever. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bestcoast Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 5 minutes ago, ECHS05 said: Explain this please.... 2016 season Murrieta Valley 42, Vista Murrieta 37 Vista Murrieta 38, Bishop Amat 24 -- 2017 preseason in some random poll #5 Murrieta Valley - 7 return on O, 5 on D #13 Bishop Amat - 7 on O, 3 on D (watched video and checked the #s eligibility... it might just be 2 on D, definitely no more than 3) Vista Murrieta - NR in Top 25 ... Returns 6 on O, 5 on D Explain how this makes any sense what so ever. Thanks. VM returns 3 on D and there 2 best guys transferred out. It is what it is 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ararar Posted August 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 11 minutes ago, ECHS05 said: Explain this please.... 2016 season Murrieta Valley 42, Vista Murrieta 37 Vista Murrieta 38, Bishop Amat 24 -- 2017 preseason in some random poll #5 Murrieta Valley - 7 return on O, 5 on D #13 Bishop Amat - 7 on O, 3 on D (watched video and checked the #s eligibility... it might just be 2 on D, definitely no more than 3) Vista Murrieta - NR in Top 25 ... Returns 6 on O, 5 on D Explain how this makes any sense what so ever. Thanks. 7A championship Grayson 23 Roswell 20 6A Championship Colquitt 30 Roswell 13 Roswell based on past success is obviously a GA power THIS year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 17 minutes ago, Ararar said: 7A championship Grayson 23 Roswell 20 6A Championship Colquitt 30 Roswell 13 Roswell based on past success is obviously a GA power THIS year No... i just showed u VM returns plenty of starters to be fine. I also showed u Roswell lost 20 of 22 starters and the HC that brought them this success. Again... your words will be meaningless in a short time. VM plays Colquitt, Mission Viejo, OLu, JSerra, and Murrieta Valley... your pointless sandbagging is just pathetic at this point. VM returns a solid core from a team that beat that polls #13 team 38-24 in the playoffs last year... and that played Mater Dei closer than any team except SJB & Rancho (-28) ... and scored more on MD than any team but SJB. So keep your bagging pants on... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ararar Posted August 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, ECHS05 said: No... i just showed u VM returns plenty of starters to be fine. I also showed u Roswell lost 20 of 22 starters and the HC that brought them this success. Again... your words will be meaningless in a short time. VM plays Colquitt, Mission Viejo, OLu, JSerra, and Murrieta Valley... your pointless sandbagging is just pathetic at this point. Sandbagging? I just showed you two polls,one from actual coaches, that show VM is not what you desperately want them to be. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 Just now, Ararar said: Sandbagging? I just showed you two polls,one from actual coaches, that show VM is not what you desperately want them to be. Again... your words will be meaningless soon. I just showed you their list of opponents. A preseason poll is for entertainment value .. it holds no meaning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 Your states flagship rankings disagrees..[2017] Vista Murrieta (Murrieta, CA) 28, [2017] Colquitt County (Moultrie, GA) 27 Win... or be shown as a fraud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bestcoast Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, Ararar said: Sandbagging? I just showed you two polls,one from actual coaches, that show VM is not what you desperately want them to be. Desperate is exactly what this guy is. Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, Bestcoast said: Desperate is exactly what this guy is. Lol Meaningless words soon. We will revisit this sandbagging after VM has played Mission V, OLu, JSerra, and Murrieta Valley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorCalRuss Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 7 hours ago, FootballGuy said: And part of me feels like that newspaper who did the rankings are sandbagging VM because they're getting ready to play a team based off of their reputation. In other words, rank VM really low so that if they lose to Colquitt, it won't mean much because of where they're ranked. Why didn't they rank SJB lower? They're playing a much better team than CC... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steeler01 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 3 hours ago, Bestcoast said: VM returns 3 on D and there 2 best guys transferred out. It is what it is He never addresses the true number VM returns. He keeps going based off of what Calpreps says they return. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 3 hours ago, steeler01 said: He never addresses the true number VM returns. He keeps going based off of what Calpreps says they return. Its actually 4 on D. Or it may be 5, not sure if Keyon Ware-Hudson is counted in that # or not. LB Jake Martinez (#10) LB Travis Plantier (#9) DE Metoriah Faoliu (#58) CB Cole Worthy (#18) At the very least those 4 return on D. Im watching video trying to find the other. And they return 6 on O. 6 off of an offense that scored the 2nd most points against Mater Dei of any team all season. The 1st being SJB. Thatd be atleast 10 all together. Bishop Amat returns 7 on O, 2 on D... 9 all together. Someone tell me why BA is ranked higher than VM in that LA poll after VM beat them 38-24 in the playoffs last year. VM returns 9 of the players on their KR unit. Wacka, flacka, flame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steeler01 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 2 hours ago, ECHS05 said: Its actually 4 on D. Or it may be 5, not sure if Keyon Ware-Hudson is counted in that # or not. LB Jake Martinez (#10) LB Travis Plantier (#9) DE Metoriah Faoliu (#58) CB Cole Worthy (#18) At the very least those 4 return on D. Im watching video trying to find the other. And they return 6 on O. 6 off of an offense that scored the 2nd most points against Mater Dei of any team all season. The 1st being SJB. Thatd be atleast 10 all together. Bishop Amat returns 7 on O, 2 on D... 9 all together. Someone tell me why BA is ranked higher than VM in that LA poll after VM beat them 38-24 in the playoffs last year. VM returns 9 of the players on their KR unit. Wacka, flacka, flame. Keyon Ware is added to that number, and he's probably being added as a returner on offense as well. Maybe because the players VM lost were more impactful players Their QB Their top 2 rushers(Guidry and Dubots) Their 2nd, 3rd and 4th leading WR. 4 Star Keyon Ware Hudson(DE/FB) I think he's counted as a returner on offense as well 3 Star HB/DB Javelin Guidry(Utah) 2 Star DT Anthony Mermea(Hawaii) 2 Star DT Pounno Faagi(Cal Poly) 2 Star OL Chase Windham(Nevada) 2 Star HB Cole Dubots(Washington State) 2 Star WR/DB Jaylin White(UC Davis) QB Karson Greeley(Hawaii) So their entire D-line is gone, and every guy that produced on offense minus Khalil Shakir VM was down 42-7, why anyone would point to that game as any indicator is mind blowing. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 VM won't make the playoffs. Jeez, all you have to do is just schedule a GA team and the Georgia PR firm will turn you into a National Title contender Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 Funny thing is this is the number 2 ranked team in Georgia playing the 40th ranked team in Cali, and it will still be a dog fight. Lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bones Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 The Bishop is kind of low, should be top 3. Either way they should be the heavy favorites over an injured and suspended Loyola. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 1 hour ago, steeler01 said: Keyon Ware is added to that number, and he's probably being added as a returner on offense as well. Maybe because the players VM lost were more impactful players Their QB Their top 2 rushers(Guidry and Dubots) Their 2nd, 3rd and 4th leading WR. 4 Star Keyon Ware Hudson(DE/FB) I think he's counted as a returner on offense as well 3 Star HB/DB Javelin Guidry(Utah) 2 Star DT Anthony Mermea(Hawaii) 2 Star DT Pounno Faagi(Cal Poly) 2 Star OL Chase Windham(Nevada) 2 Star HB Cole Dubots(Washington State) 2 Star WR/DB Jaylin White(UC Davis) QB Karson Greeley(Hawaii) So their entire D-line is gone, and every guy that produced on offense minus Khalil Shakir VM was down 42-7, why anyone would point to that game as any indicator is mind blowing. VM was never down 42-7. VM was down 35-7. Then just 4 minutes into the 3rd quarter, the score was 35-16. Colquitt also lost their QB, and all but 1 of their top 4 receivers also, and they lost a D1 TE. The D returns only 2 or 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steeler01 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 Just now, ECHS05 said: VM was never down 42-7. VM was down 35-7. Then just 4 minutes into the 3rd quarter, the score was 35-16. 35-7 is any better? And two minutes later it was 49-16. So when Mater Dei took it serious, they'd blow them out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 14 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: Funny thing is this is the number 2 ranked team in Georgia playing the 40th ranked team in Cali, and it will still be a dog fight. Lol. Dont think Colquitt is #2 anywhere. They may be at the AJC but thats crud. Nobody in GA has Colquitt any higher than 5, especially after their struggle with Norcross. Calians are trying to take advantage of an erroneous preseason poll. Which will be useless bc VM plays 4 of the top 10 in SoCal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 1 minute ago, steeler01 said: 35-7 is any better? And two minutes later it was 49-16. So when Mater Dei took it serious, they'd blow them out. MD blew out everybody but SJB. Even the #4 team in Cali. But VM gave them their 3rd toughest game... and their 2nd was Rancho, who lost but only a couple points less than VM. Either way it wasnt 42-7. The difference is a running clock, so yes... 35-7 is better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steeler01 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 Just now, ECHS05 said: MD blew out everybody but SJB. Even the #4 team in Cali. But VM gave them their 3rd toughest game... and their 2nd was Rancho, who lost but only a couple points less than VM. Either way it wasnt 42-7. The difference is a running clock, so yes... 35-7 is better. I don't think Rancho was the 4th best team in Cali, but that's just me. And that's not really saying much. There was a big separation from the top 3 in Southern Cali to the 4th best team(Rancho) Both are blowouts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steeler01 Posted August 22, 2017 Report Share Posted August 22, 2017 This game is A team that lost its coach last season and is on a downward spiral(They don't even get transfers anymore. 3 of their best players last year were all transfers, instead their best players transfer out now) Vs a team that is better this year than they were last year. If this game was played in 2009-2013 it would be a good game, now not so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.