AztecPadre Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 Just now, The Comish said: No Way Jose This is a money bet. $$. He threw the bet out and you accepted his terms. Done deal. Thank you in Advance for your cooperation. -The Comish Haha. I hear ya Comish, but if I had to go along with all things that I post or comes out of my mouth I would be homeless and in jail. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawgGoneIt Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 2 hours ago, ECHS05 said: 2 Top 20 CA squads face off tonight... who wins and by what score? The Broncos are trying to bronc the memory of their trip to GA with a W over the Diablos.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
15yds4gibberish Posted September 4, 2017 Report Share Posted September 4, 2017 It's Labor Day, so let's enjoy some labored explanations. Lot's of bet's proposed in this thread, lot's of bet's accepted in this thread, lot's changes to bet's in this thread ($250, cash, charity, avatars etc.) , lot's of claims of bets accepted by default, lots of claims of I'll get back to you, lot's of pictures of Bueller Bueller Bueller and laughing devils in this thread. Was commenting on Friday night that it was hard to tell exactly what came of all of this but that the follow up should be fun. So what's the follow up? Commish or others - What's the ruling on the following? What bets were officially made? Who were the official parties in the bets? What were the official stakes? Were they officially paid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Comish Posted September 5, 2017 Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 1 hour ago, 15yds4gibberish said: It's Labor Day, so let's enjoy some labored explanations. Lot's of bet's proposed in this thread, lot's of bet's accepted in this thread, lot's changes to bet's in this thread ($250, cash, charity, avatars etc.) , lot's of claims of bets accepted by default, lots of claims of I'll get back to you, lot's of pictures of Bueller Bueller Bueller and laughing devils in this thread. Was commenting on Friday night that it was hard to tell exactly what came of all of this but that the follow up should be fun. So what's the follow up? Commish or others - What's the ruling on the following? What bets were officially made? Who were the official parties in the bets? What were the official stakes? Were they officially paid? Ahem....Thank you for bringing this topic up. We checked the registry and there was only (2) two officially registered wagers on tap for this past weekend. Both involved @ECHS05 1. ECHS05 offered to accept 21 points and Vista Murrieta vs. Mission Viejo (AztecPadre team). Score was 41- 0 MV after three quarters before the (2's) two's came in. Final was 41-7 2. $50 bet with ECHS05 offering to accept 21 points and Vista Murrietta vs. Mission Viejo (Atlien12x team). ECHS05 lost both the monetary portion of both bets which was $250 to @AztecPadre and $50 to @ATLien12x ECHS05 also lost an Avatar bet and must use the attached Avatar for a week. To my knowledge, none of the bets have been paid off by ECHS05. - Thank you ECHS05 for playing, and for your cooperation in paying off your bets. -The Comish 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted September 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 An avatar bet? 1st I heard. This shit wasnt agreed on by either party... so you can put this smoking gun back in the holster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Comish Posted September 5, 2017 Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 On 9/1/2017 at 0:05 PM, ECHS05 said: I smell a bet... I'll take VM and the 21 points. Bet starts at $250... but you can raise if you like. I want my $ paid to me, not a charity. Both @AztecPadre and @ATLien12x Called you on the above bet which you initiated 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Comish Posted September 5, 2017 Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 On 9/1/2017 at 2:00 PM, AztecPadre said: You said 21pts. Im good with that. This has been reviewed in New York and has been ruled an accepted bet. @ECHS05, @AztecPadre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted September 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, The Comish said: Both @AztecPadre and @ATLien12x Called you on the above bet which you initiated Atlien offered a $50 which i never replied to. Aztec changed it to an avatar bet. Which I didnt even see til now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Comish Posted September 5, 2017 Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 On 9/1/2017 at 1:02 PM, ATLien12x said: Good catch that was honestly an accident in labeling the wrong team. California and your weird names. I meant Mission Viejo by 15+. That was the original bet, right? That MV would win by more than 21 points. I trimmed it down to 15.5. Meaning I have the Diablos by at least 16 in victory against an undermatched team. Im willing to throw $50 on MV covering (-15 1/2) This has also been reviewed in New York and ruled as an accepted bet. @ECHS05, @ATLien12x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted September 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 Just now, The Comish said: This has also been reviewed in New York and ruled as an accepted bet. @ECHS05, @ATLien12x That was never replied to by me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Comish Posted September 5, 2017 Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 Just now, ECHS05 said: Atlien offered a $50 which i never replied to. Aztec changed it to an avatar bet. Which I didnt even see til now. It was not your duty to reply. You initiated the wager, and the wager was accepted. Done Deal. -The comish @ATLien12x 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Comish Posted September 5, 2017 Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 Just now, ECHS05 said: That was never replied to by me. You can appeal to the executive committee, provided you pay off the bet first. New York reviewed and it was ruled as "offer and acceptance". -The comish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORabidOne Posted September 5, 2017 Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 On 9/1/2017 at 4:06 PM, PrepGridiron said: ok. that makes more sense. here's the stuff below the surface. St. Louis beat Baldwin 61-0 in the first game of the season. MV only beats them 39-14. If you are score watching, then it looks like MV is not as good. But MV had 271 yards at halftime to Baldwin's -3. MV finished with 422 and Baldwin with 98. It was a total mismatch. They have a first year starter that was backup at SJB and saw time in games; he's good. They have outstanding WR's and a good line. They'll hold on defense. HOWEVER, in the case of Colquitt's relatively close score with VM! Factor in the maturation process, with a team starting virtually ALL new offensive starters! How ELSE do you splain 26 against VM, and 35 against the #1 team in 6A? And it wasn't until the third quarter, that we got the lead out against Tucker! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORabidOne Posted September 5, 2017 Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 30 minutes ago, ECHS05 said: Atlien offered a $50 which i never replied to. Aztec changed it to an avatar bet. Which I didnt even see til now. C'MON EC, Nu Yok needs that money! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammyswordsman Posted September 5, 2017 Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 7 minutes ago, ORabidOne said: HOWEVER, in the case of Colquitt's relatively close score with VM! Factor in the maturation process, with a team starting virtually ALL new offensive starters! How ELSE do you splain 26 against VM, and 35 against the #1 team in 6A? And it wasn't until the third quarter, that we got the lead out against Tucker! Excuse Thread #GOLD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueliner Posted September 5, 2017 Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 2 hours ago, ORabidOne said: HOWEVER, in the case of Colquitt's relatively close score with VM! Factor in the maturation process, with a team starting virtually ALL new offensive starters! How ELSE do you splain 26 against VM, and 35 against the #1 team in 6A? And it wasn't until the third quarter, that we got the lead out against Tucker! Uh...VM is as good as the #1 GA 6a team? Just a guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.