Jump to content

Vista Murrieta @ Mission Viejo , who wins tonight?


ECHS05

Recommended Posts

It's Labor Day,  so let's enjoy some labored explanations.  

Lot's of bet's proposed in this thread, lot's of bet's accepted in this thread, lot's changes to bet's in this thread ($250, cash, charity, avatars etc.) , lot's of claims of bets accepted by default, lots of claims of I'll get back to you, lot's of pictures of Bueller Bueller Bueller and laughing devils in this thread. Was commenting on Friday night that it was hard to tell exactly what came of all of this but that the follow up should be fun.  So what's the follow up?

Commish or others - What's the ruling on the following?

  • What bets were officially made?
  • Who were the official parties in the bets?
  • What were the official stakes?
  • Were they officially paid?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 15yds4gibberish said:

It's Labor Day,  so let's enjoy some labored explanations.  

Lot's of bet's proposed in this thread, lot's of bet's accepted in this thread, lot's changes to bet's in this thread ($250, cash, charity, avatars etc.) , lot's of claims of bets accepted by default, lots of claims of I'll get back to you, lot's of pictures of Bueller Bueller Bueller and laughing devils in this thread. Was commenting on Friday night that it was hard to tell exactly what came of all of this but that the follow up should be fun.  So what's the follow up?

Commish or others - What's the ruling on the following?

  • What bets were officially made?
  • Who were the official parties in the bets?
  • What were the official stakes?
  • Were they officially paid?

 

Ahem....Thank you for bringing this topic up.

We checked the registry and there was only (2) two officially registered wagers on tap for this past weekend.  Both involved @ECHS05

1.  ECHS05 offered to accept 21 points and Vista Murrieta vs. Mission Viejo (AztecPadre team).  Score was 41- 0 MV after three quarters before the (2's) two's came in.  Final was 41-7

2. $50 bet with ECHS05 offering to accept 21 points and Vista Murrietta vs.  Mission Viejo (Atlien12x team).

ECHS05 lost both the monetary portion of both bets which was $250 to @AztecPadre and $50 to @ATLien12x

ECHS05 also lost an Avatar bet and must use the attached Avatar for a week.

To my knowledge, none of the bets have been paid off by ECHS05.

- Thank you ECHS05 for playing, and for your cooperation in paying off your bets.

-The Comish

 

cholo1.jpg

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎9‎/‎1‎/‎2017 at 1:02 PM, ATLien12x said:

Good catch that was honestly an accident in labeling the wrong team. California and your weird names. I meant Mission Viejo by 15+. That was the original bet, right? That MV would win by more than 21 points. I trimmed it down to 15.5. Meaning I have the Diablos by at least 16 in victory against an undermatched team. 

Im willing to throw $50 on MV covering (-15 1/2) 

 

This has also been reviewed in New York and ruled as an accepted bet.

@ECHS05, @ATLien12x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/1/2017 at 4:06 PM, PrepGridiron said:

ok. that makes more sense. here's the stuff below the surface. St. Louis beat Baldwin 61-0 in the first game of the season. MV only beats them 39-14. If you are score watching, then it looks like MV is not as good. But MV had 271 yards at halftime to Baldwin's -3. MV finished with 422 and Baldwin with 98. It was a total mismatch. They have a first year starter that was backup at SJB and saw time in games; he's good. They have outstanding WR's and a good line. They'll hold on defense. 

HOWEVER, in the case of Colquitt's relatively close score with VM! Factor in the maturation process, with a team starting virtually ALL new offensive starters! How ELSE do you splain 26 against VM, and 35 against the #1 team in 6A? And it wasn't until the third quarter, that we got the lead out against Tucker!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ORabidOne said:

HOWEVER, in the case of Colquitt's relatively close score with VM! Factor in the maturation process, with a team starting virtually ALL new offensive starters! How ELSE do you splain 26 against VM, and 35 against the #1 team in 6A? And it wasn't until the third quarter, that we got the lead out against Tucker!

 

Excuse Thread #GOLD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ORabidOne said:

HOWEVER, in the case of Colquitt's relatively close score with VM! Factor in the maturation process, with a team starting virtually ALL new offensive starters! How ELSE do you splain 26 against VM, and 35 against the #1 team in 6A? And it wasn't until the third quarter, that we got the lead out against Tucker!

Uh...VM is as good as the #1 GA 6a team? Just a guess. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...