Bishop Sullivan Football

[GHSFPS]

 

[ECHS05]

1 hour ago, GardenStateBaller said:

Based on GC loss, CQ should have no problem w them. 

AHP 14, BS 7 ... ?

A team with a good defense is a team that has a chance against anyone.

Unfortunately they can lose to a lot of teams also.

Colquitt isnt as good as SFA. They arent gonna win 29-8.  I doubt they are as good as AHP... so they shouldnt win by 7.

Your logic is off.

[Nolebull813]

29 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

AHP 14, BS 7 ... ?

A team with a good defense is a team that has a chance against anyone.

Unfortunately they can lose to a lot of teams also.

Colquitt isnt as good as SFA. They arent gonna win 29-8.  I doubt they are as good as AHP... so they shouldnt win by 7.

Your logic is off.

AHP was on a long ass road trip for the first game of the season. You can't judge everything by that. There are a lot of different factors that play into each and every game. Matchups, injuries, etc. 

Colquiit lost to Tucker last year but kicked the shit out of Valdosta. 

That means Tucker should crush Valdosta. WRONG. Valdosta beats Tucker. 

 

[ECHS05]

7 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

AHP was on a long ass road trip for the first game of the season. You can't judge everything by that. There are a lot of different factors that play into each and every game. Matchups, injuries, etc. 

Colquiit lost to Tucker last year but kicked the shit out of Valdosta. 

That means Tucker should crush Valdosta. WRONG. Valdosta beats Tucker. 

 

^ Exactly. You never know whats going to happen. BS is good enough... well their D is... to make this game unpredictable.

[ECHS05]

5 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

Sully was shut-out 3-0 by a Good Counsel team that lost by 12 to Mount St. Joseph!!! Stop sandbagging!! @NicholasMalibu Do you believe this??

So what? Every matchup is different.  GC has been playing pretty well. 

BS is good enough to beat a lot of teams. Doesnt mean they will, but their D is clearly very good.

Held AHP to 14, GC to 3.. etc.

They led AHP literally ALL game.

[954gator]

BS stayed with AHP because AHP had 5 turnovers.   First game of the year 1k plus miles away.   

[Omaha Vol]

Good Counsel is a team that has gotten their shit together and turned it around. I wouldn't judge how good they are based solely on their loss to Mt. St. Joseph. 

I think Colquitt wins, but it won't be easy like all of you are saying. 

[maxchoboian]

52 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

 

BS is good enough to beat a lot of teams.

Sounds like your analysis of Vista Murrieta.

[HawgGoneIt]

The locals from around there say that Good Counsel is hitting on all three cylinders with their Yugo right now. Not exactly sure what that means, but Colquitt is driving a Geo Metro. Still 3 cylinders, but at times one of the plugs is misfiring, which may give Sully more of a chance than they proved against the Yugo. 

[ORabidOne]

5 hours ago, GardenStateBaller said:

Based on GC loss, CQ should have no problem w them. 

With our sputtering O, we're having trouble scoring against AIR! ONE offensive score against 1-4 Valdosta!

[NicholasMalibu]

11 hours ago, GardenStateBaller said:

Sully was shut-out 3-0 by a Good Counsel team that lost by 12 to Mount St. Joseph!!! Stop sandbagging!! @NicholasMalibu Do you believe this??

BS might be losing steam. I'm not saying that they can't get things back in order, but scoring zilch against GC is very telling. I think BS is similar to the MD/DC power teams 5-10 years ago. They have the talent, but to play a national schedule successfully requires depth and a different type of coaching. The coaching staff will learn just like the DeMatha, Good Counsel, SJC, and Gilman/SFA guys did. Those teams lost big games to St. X, SJR, PC, St. Ed's, etc... before things started clicking. It's BS's second year doing this. Takes time.

[LeftOnBase]

12 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

AHP was on a long ass road trip for the first game of the season. You can't judge everything by that. There are a lot of different factors that play into each and every game. Matchups, injuries, etc. 

Colquiit lost to Tucker last year but kicked the shit out of Valdosta. 

That means Tucker should crush Valdosta. WRONG. Valdosta beats Tucker. 

 

Dang, how many pages would this forum be if we cut out ALL the "daisy-chaining?"

Or is this the first time you've see someone talk in hypotheticals? 

[golfaddict1]

4 hours ago, NicholasMalibu said:

BS might be losing steam. I'm not saying that they can't get things back in order, but scoring zilch against GC is very telling. I think BS is similar to the MD/DC power teams 5-10 years ago. They have the talent, but to play a national schedule successfully requires depth and a different type of coaching. The coaching staff will learn just like the DeMatha, Good Counsel, SJC, and Gilman/SFA guys did. Those teams lost big games to St. X, SJR, PC, St. Ed's, etc... before things started clicking. It's BS's second year doing this. Takes time.

GC status this year vs 2016 opinion?  200 range or better?   This game result was a wtf to me.  I thought BS would definitely take this one.  Any injuries?  Maybe team turmoil from start and this game was just salt in a wound?  

[ORabidOne]

20 hours ago, ECHS05 said:

AHP 14, BS 7 ... ?

A team with a good defense is a team that has a chance against anyone.

Unfortunately they can lose to a lot of teams also.

Colquitt isnt as good as SFA. They arent gonna win 29-8.  I doubt they are as good as AHP... so they shouldnt win by 7.

Your logic is off.

Not as good THIS season!

[ORabidOne]

6 hours ago, LeftOnBase said:

Dang, how many pages would this forum be if we cut out ALL the "daisy-chaining?"

Or is this the first time you've see someone talk in hypotheticals? 

Here's a hypothetical! What if Colquitt were to be without power for a week! And hafta shorten their practices during that time, before making a 200 plus mile trek to another country to play on a FRIDAY nite? What would be the chances of an UPset?

[ECHS05]

19 hours ago, 954gator said:

BS stayed with AHP because AHP had 5 turnovers.   First game of the year 1k plus miles away.   

Wait.

I thought turnovers werent an excuse?

Graysons 1st game, IMGs 2nd... Graysons 4 turnovers, 1 at IMGs 8 trying to go up 14-0. And another inside IMGs 25ish.

I mean... and Valdosta? Dont get me started with their fumbles vs Chandler.

[ECHS05]

19 hours ago, Omaha Vol said:

Good Counsel is a team that has gotten their shit together and turned it around. I wouldn't judge how good they are based solely on their loss to Mt. St. Joseph. 

I think Colquitt wins, but it won't be easy like all of you are saying. 

Its retarded to think this this isnt going to be a good game. BS is still a top 100 team. 

BSs defense is clearly very good. Just goes to show how nub some peeps are.

[ECHS05]

19 hours ago, maxchoboian said:

Sounds like your analysis of Vista Murrieta.

No. It doesnt at all.

Sounds like youre a bitter guy. Time to move on. 

Talk about VM all ya want, that was just shit talking. My team analytical skills outweight yours by a Big Mac and Club Soda.

[maxchoboian]

19 hours ago, ECHS05 said:

 

Sounds like youre a bitter guy. Time to move on. 

Talk about VM all ya want, that was just shit talking. My team analytical skills outweight yours by a Big Mac and Club Soda.

You think I'm bitter? Because I point out how silly your incessant attempts were to paint VM as a viable CA opponent for Colquitt?

How many times did you say we will know plenty about VM after they play Mission Viejo, Orange Lutheran, and JSerra? I saw it 3, 4 or 5 times myself. What an unfortunate strategy that ended up being for you.

The only shit talking you now suggest was going on should be regarding what VM left in the bed in those next 3 games, losing by a combined 107-36.

Time to move on, I agree, but perhaps not to the next OOS opponent you can build up. It's obvious what you are doing and hoping for.

For the record, I think Bishop Sullivan would work VM, and is a better opponent for a GA team. You hung your hat on VM, as you have on other OOS teams playing GA teams, and sometimes it backfires. So it is difficult to take seriously when you continue to "analyze" OOS opponents, because it's predictable what your opinion will be.