badrouter Posted January 8 Report Share Posted January 8 Not to be confused with any sort of theory (or fact) which is deemed unfavorable to those controlling "the narrative". There are historically awful fires burning throughout the Los Angeles area. As I type this, I see dark, grey skies despite being more than 5 miles from any fires. It is understood that the severity and widespread nature of the fires is due to historically bad Santa Ana winds. The extreme winds spread the fires far and wide. But what started the fire? According to authorities, at the moment it is undetermined and under investigation. Certainly, it is entirely possible that some random occurence ignited flames and that no one is to blame. But, often we find out that specific human behavior caused the fire to start. Sometimes, it was intentional, by some crazy person. These fires are unique to the area in that they have severely impacted heavily populated areas. The town centers of Pacific Palisades and Altadena have been burned to the ground, along with countless homes that belong almost exclusively to wealthy people. The proximity of the fires to more densely populated areas strongly suggests human behavior is to blame, and possibly intentionally. What kind of person might want to set wealthy areas on fire? With seemingly infinite cases of "total losses" through houses and businesses being gutted, who or what group of people figure to be most harmed? Of course the residents and business owners are devastated. Where will they turn for help? There's the government (which means the taxpayers, which means heavily disproportionately wealthy people). What other industry figures to be heavily impacted by- here's a clue- claims that will be put forth by citizens harmed by the total losses? Is there evidence that there is a backlash against or hatred for that industry? I don't have any special evidence specific to the L.A. fires as to their cause. I'm not making any claims with any certainty just yet. But, yes, I am suspicious as fuck. Does Luigi have any comrades in the L.A. area? (that's a stupid question. No place is home to more Luigi fans than L.A.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badrouter Posted January 8 Author Report Share Posted January 8 The problem with fires, even those which grow as large as these fires, is that as little as one person is all that is needed to get the fire started. (It also only took one deranged lunatic to muder CEO Johnson). Just ONE (1) person like those who write the type of radical garbage I've reposted here (this includes many university professors at prominent universities) can snap. Certainly, we do know there are GROUPS holding cladestine meetings and discussions around subverting, chipping away at, and ultimately abolishing the United States. I think we may be witnessing the results of the latest "direct action" by radical extremists. Yesterday's bank bombing is today's mass wildfire, ignited by a fan of the "It's Going Down" network prevously found on places like Twitter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted January 8 Report Share Posted January 8 More importantly. Don't talk about wild fires in Public. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreeBird Posted January 8 Report Share Posted January 8 53 minutes ago, RedZone said: More importantly. Don't talk about wild fires in Public. Quick tell us what Ron Flipowski has to say about this 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badrouter Posted January 8 Author Report Share Posted January 8 3 hours ago, RedZone said: More importantly. Don't talk about wild fires in Public. Talk about wild fires all you please...just don't share that you've considered starting the fire in the hopes of burning down rich people's homes and forcing an impossible number of insurance claims 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted January 8 Report Share Posted January 8 According to Democrats The victims of these wildfires deserve it based on who they voted for. That’s what they said about the victims in New Palestine, Indiana after that disaster. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted January 8 Report Share Posted January 8 A sick joke that Biden is boots on the ground in California in seconds for a wildfire that has claimed 5 lives but was missing in action until a national uproar for stranding the people in North Carolina who were ravaged with a far worse catastrophe that left 140 plus dead. And Newsom has the audacity to say Biden isn’t playing politics. These people are sick in the head Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badrouter Posted January 9 Author Report Share Posted January 9 3 hours ago, Nolebull813 said: According to Democrats The victims of these wildfires deserve it based on who they voted for. That’s what they said about the victims in New Palestine, Indiana after that disaster. nah, despite being mostly wealthy, they are overwhelmingly Democrat out here. Not radical for the most part, but still heavy on the wokescold scale. You're MUCH more likely to find the "in this house, we believe..." signs than MAGA signs. Though I am aware of the declining to help those with Tr*mp signs on the grounds that the signs made workers feel "unsafe". The median Democrat voter has NO IDEA that that happened... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badrouter Posted January 9 Author Report Share Posted January 9 1 hour ago, Nolebull813 said: A sick joke that Biden is boots on the ground in California in seconds for a wildfire that has claimed 5 lives but was missing in action until a national uproar for stranding the people in North Carolina who were ravaged with a far worse catastrophe that left 140 plus dead. And Newsom has the audacity to say Biden isn’t playing politics. These people are sick in the head Biden was here before the fires broke out, or at least had other plans and arrived roughly the time they started. Biden's gaffe on this- acknowledging he's mostly out of touch and not really involved in a meaningful way- might be that he took time out of his photoshoot/press conference for the fire to announce he's a new grandfather. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreeBird Posted January 9 Report Share Posted January 9 21 hours ago, badrouter said: Not to be confused with any sort of theory (or fact) which is deemed unfavorable to those controlling "the narrative". There are historically awful fires burning throughout the Los Angeles area. As I type this, I see dark, grey skies despite being more than 5 miles from any fires. It is understood that the severity and widespread nature of the fires is due to historically bad Santa Ana winds. The extreme winds spread the fires far and wide. But what started the fire? According to authorities, at the moment it is undetermined and under investigation. Certainly, it is entirely possible that some random occurence ignited flames and that no one is to blame. But, often we find out that specific human behavior caused the fire to start. Sometimes, it was intentional, by some crazy person. These fires are unique to the area in that they have severely impacted heavily populated areas. The town centers of Pacific Palisades and Altadena have been burned to the ground, along with countless homes that belong almost exclusively to wealthy people. The proximity of the fires to more densely populated areas strongly suggests human behavior is to blame, and possibly intentionally. What kind of person might want to set wealthy areas on fire? With seemingly infinite cases of "total losses" through houses and businesses being gutted, who or what group of people figure to be most harmed? Of course the residents and business owners are devastated. Where will they turn for help? There's the government (which means the taxpayers, which means heavily disproportionately wealthy people). What other industry figures to be heavily impacted by- here's a clue- claims that will be put forth by citizens harmed by the total losses? Is there evidence that there is a backlash against or hatred for that industry? I don't have any special evidence specific to the L.A. fires as to their cause. I'm not making any claims with any certainty just yet. But, yes, I am suspicious as fuck. Does Luigi have any comrades in the L.A. area? (that's a stupid question. No place is home to more Luigi fans than L.A.) No conspiracy , just liberal mentality, we tried warning y’all ima just leave this here 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badrouter Posted January 9 Author Report Share Posted January 9 It's worth pointing out that the mass looting being repeatedly discussed in a press conference as I type this- which we knew would occur in a hellhole with radical leadership- is ENTIRELY ideologically driven. Yes, even the lunatic gang-banger who can't read or write is acting ideologically when they "roll up" and start looking for goods to take. The ideology? A crude or rudimentary version of Critical Theory, which they had forced upon them as students in the public school system. Critical Theory is a conspiracy theory which alleges that America is intentionally and irreparrably racist and oppressive against "people of color" (non-whites, but, also, Asians have now been assigned white). ALL aspects of the United States are deliberately racist. This means, to Critical Theory cultists, that all wealth acquired was acquired by stealing from enslaved black people (it alleges that black people are STILL enslaved and in need of "liberation"). It means that All Cops Are Bastards, and that the function/purpose of the police is to hunt and jail black people. To these ideologues, this all means: 1) stealing from wealthy people merely amounts to just redistribution of goods and 2) one should NEVER cooperate with police. The lack of cooperation can take many forms, from running from police to assaulting or trying to murder police. All of the looting and violence can be traced back to the following mantra: "No Peace, No Justice". Which isn't- indeed couldn't be- a terroristic form of blackmail. It isn't that because, you know, "Oh please don't call me racist on social media!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted January 9 Report Share Posted January 9 23 hours ago, FreeBird said: Quick tell us what Ron Flipowski has to say about this RON !!!!🤣 Screw all this conspiracy bs, Lets get the "real world" update from the LA Mayor https://x.com/i/status/1877115173443400065 PS: Did the "Didn't Earn It" mayor, hire the "Didn't Earn It" fire chief (who gave their equipment to UkR, and had no water in the hydrants)? Not sure exactly how it works in that state... BTW: Not making fun of any victims here...I have family in the Pacific Palasades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreeBird Posted January 9 Report Share Posted January 9 On 1/8/2025 at 12:33 PM, badrouter said: Not to be confused with any sort of theory (or fact) which is deemed unfavorable to those controlling "the narrative". There are historically awful fires burning throughout the Los Angeles area. As I type this, I see dark, grey skies despite being more than 5 miles from any fires. It is understood that the severity and widespread nature of the fires is due to historically bad Santa Ana winds. The extreme winds spread the fires far and wide. But what started the fire? According to authorities, at the moment it is undetermined and under investigation. Certainly, it is entirely possible that some random occurence ignited flames and that no one is to blame. But, often we find out that specific human behavior caused the fire to start. Sometimes, it was intentional, by some crazy person. These fires are unique to the area in that they have severely impacted heavily populated areas. The town centers of Pacific Palisades and Altadena have been burned to the ground, along with countless homes that belong almost exclusively to wealthy people. The proximity of the fires to more densely populated areas strongly suggests human behavior is to blame, and possibly intentionally. What kind of person might want to set wealthy areas on fire? With seemingly infinite cases of "total losses" through houses and businesses being gutted, who or what group of people figure to be most harmed? Of course the residents and business owners are devastated. Where will they turn for help? There's the government (which means the taxpayers, which means heavily disproportionately wealthy people). What other industry figures to be heavily impacted by- here's a clue- claims that will be put forth by citizens harmed by the total losses? Is there evidence that there is a backlash against or hatred for that industry? I don't have any special evidence specific to the L.A. fires as to their cause. I'm not making any claims with any certainty just yet. But, yes, I am suspicious as fuck. Does Luigi have any comrades in the L.A. area? (that's a stupid question. No place is home to more Luigi fans than L.A.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreeBird Posted January 10 Report Share Posted January 10 19 hours ago, Troll said: RON !!!!🤣 Screw all this conspiracy bs, Lets get the "real world" update from the LA Mayor https://x.com/i/status/1877115173443400065 PS: Did the "Didn't Earn It" mayor, hire the "Didn't Earn It" fire chief (who gave their equipment to UkR, and had no water in the hydrants)? Not sure exactly how it works in that state... BTW: Not making fun of any victims here...I have family in the Pacific Palasades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior Posted January 10 Report Share Posted January 10 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I AM IRONMAN Posted January 10 Report Share Posted January 10 21 minutes ago, Warrior said: And all those fish that have been saved!!! 🧐 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badrouter Posted Wednesday at 12:07 AM Author Report Share Posted Wednesday at 12:07 AM On 1/9/2025 at 12:46 PM, FreeBird said: I don't think, with any confidence, that anyone paid arsonists (I think it's not out of the realm of possibility that foreign terorist organizations may have lent a hand or some money). I think we have a society full of mentally ill nihilists and abolitonists. Some of them took to arson. Others took to looting. Perhaps some did both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted Thursday at 11:00 PM Report Share Posted Thursday at 11:00 PM 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I AM IRONMAN Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago 22 hours ago, concha said: Can only wonder what bs trash Dandy boy will reply with?🤔 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.