2014 State Champion Colquitt Co vs HS Football team with most wins: Valdosta

[Guest LOSer]

8 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

Who cares if you change your mind? I just want to show you youre an idiot.

Well, you've failed.

I don't care about your little calpreps numbers game.

Valdosta isn't good and your little exercise doesn't prove that they are. It's just a dodge.

[Guest LOSer]

8 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

What you said was that Valdosta didn't have anything. 

I asked you how many championships they'd won in the lifetime of their current students.

You then spent about 10 posts flailing.

[Guest LOSer]

7 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

Then why were you talking shit to me? 

I wasn't in the thread you quoted, think tank.

You're so dumb that the Georgians may want to make you an honorary Alabaman.

[Guest LOSer]

7 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

Its a bit like chasing your tail.... he'll evade everything you say for hours until you get bored and simply have to leave.

What have I evaded?

You care so much about my(well-sourced) opinion regarding Valdosta that you obsess all night.

You then say something "because you say so" and accuse me of evading something.

[Guest LOSer]

8 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

In his mind he'll never be wrong.. and if he hasnt learned to be open to positions other than his own by now... he never will. 

Again, I don't consider "because I say so" to be a convincing argument.

I know that you do but I don't.

So basically because I don't buy you're proven shit then I'm not open to other positions.

Cool.

Good luck convincing the board of this plight.

[Guest LOSer]

9 minutes ago, FootballGuy said:

@LOSer If valdosta wasn't that good, how good was Booker T Washington this past season?

I don't care and that's a dodge.

[Guest LOSer]

6 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

So........you don't even know if you left for the reason he said you did?  "Another thing we have to believe because you say so."

I left because I wanted to.

ECHS05 just made that up. Like he does everything else.

He just relies on dopes like you believing him.

[Guest LOSer]

1 minute ago, Sportsnut said:

This thread is about Colquitt vs Valdosta, the team with the most wins. 

IDIOT

And you quoted a post that didn't involve you.

You flew off the handle.

I told you it wasn't about you.

You then said something else dumb.

And so on.

[Guest LOSer]

Just now, Sportsnut said:

And we are supposed to believe that because you say it's true? 

You can believe whatever you want.

I don't know why it's relevant.

Just know that ECHS05 lied about it.

[Guest LOSer]

Just now, Sportsnut said:

I didn't fly anywhere.

You did.

We all saw it.

But now you're boring me (and wasting my time).

You haven't said a single thing of substance in this thread.

The only thing sorrier than a dumb person is a dumb person who thinks he's bright.

You have jumped that shark.

[ECHS05]

Heres the question to ask 1st.

Its clear LOSer doesnt believe Valdosta is good (hes wrong but ok)

LOSer... how many teams in America do you consider "good"? Maybe we can get a better idea of your thought process if you answer that question.

If its 25... than I guess Valdosta would be considered not all that great but not bad.

If its 50... then I dont see how you can deny Valdosta is pretty good.

100? Then you should think highly of Valdy.

[Guest LOSer]

1 hour ago, ECHS05 said:

Its clear LOSer doesnt believe Valdosta is good (hes wrong but ok)

Sure, because you say so.

[Guest LOSer]

2 hours ago, ECHS05 said:

LOSer... how many teams in America do you consider "good"? Maybe we can get a better idea of your thought process if you answer that question.

This isn't an argument against mine.

It's just more of the same time wasting, head faking nonsense.

This is one of the reasons (among many) why I left this board (and will again).

You are capable of spending months arguing in a 40+ page thread but you never approach a legit counter-argument on the thing that pisses you off the most: the truth about a Georgia team.

 

[Guest LOSer]

1 hour ago, ECHS05 said:

If its 25... than I guess Valdosta would be considered not all that great but not bad.

If its 50... then I dont see how you can deny Valdosta is pretty good.

100? Then you should think highly of Valdy.

There's no quota.

A team is either good or not.

This is one of the stupid things that people like you do. You place a number on something and then just go about filling it up with a quota of teams.

Valdosta played two meaningful national games and got smoked both times. Their two best wins were by 10 and 8 (against non-national teams).

Maybe if you take another 6 months you can come up with some to counter that. But I doubt it.

[ECHS05]

2 hours ago, LOSer said:

This isn't an argument against mine.

It's just more of the same time wasting, head faking nonsense.

This is one of the reasons (among many) why I left this board (and will again).

You are capable of spending months arguing in a 40+ page thread but you never approach a legit counter-argument on the thing that pisses you off the most: the truth about a Georgia team.

 

 

You evaded the question... how many teams, nationally, do you consider "good"?

[ECHS05]

2 hours ago, LOSer said:

There's no quota.

A team is either good or not.

This is one of the stupid things that people like you do. You place a number on something and then just go about filling it up with a quota of teams.

Valdosta played two meaningful national games and got smoked both times. Their two best wins were by 10 and 8 (against non-national teams).

Maybe if you take another 6 months you can come up with some to counter that. But I doubt it.

2 meaningful games?

Sorry, but Tucker, Northside-WR & Lowndes are most definitely meaningful games. They beat all 3. You can cry all you want about that, but those are good teams that WILL and DO always play anyone tough. 

To call Tucker, Northside-WR, and Lowndes not meaningful games makes you dumb. To the fullest extent. 

Those are top teams in any state.

[Guest LOSer]

1 hour ago, ECHS05 said:

You evaded the question... how many teams, nationally, do you consider "good"?

I didn't evade the question.

I said there's no quota.

So you asked for something that doesn't exist.

[Guest LOSer]

1 hour ago, ECHS05 said:

Sorry, but Tucker, Northside-WR & Lowndes are most definitely meaningful games.

Meaningful for a Georgia 6A school.

Not meaningful for a national (or regional) debate. But you're the guy who craps on Venice, Freedom, Plant type teams but loves to throw out Northside and Lowndes.

If Valdosta had stayed out of the national discussion (as their season warranted) none of this would be necessary.

[TheMaximumHornetSting]

4 hours ago, LOSer said:

Meaningful for a Georgia 6A school.

Not meaningful for a national (or regional) debate. But you're the guy who craps on Venice, Freedom, Plant type teams but loves to throw out Northside and Lowndes.

If Valdosta had stayed out of the national discussion (as their season warranted) none of this would be necessary.

Hello Pot meet Kettle.

[Guest LOSer]

Just now, TheMaximumHornetSting said:

Hello Pot meet Kettle.

This doesn't apply here.

Maybe you should figure out what that phrase actually means.

[ECHS05]

4 hours ago, LOSer said:

Meaningful for a Georgia 6A school.

Not meaningful for a national (or regional) debate. But you're the guy who craps on Venice, Freedom, Plant type teams but loves to throw out Northside and Lowndes.

If Valdosta had stayed out of the national discussion (as their season warranted) none of this would be necessary.

Thats because Tucker, Northside-WR, and Lowndes are better than Venice, Freedom, and Plant.

Valdosta beat them all. 

Just bc Valdosta lost to Chandler in a fumblicious game, does not mean Valdosta doesnt belong in the national conversation... in atleast the 45-65 range.

[TheMaximumHornetSting]

1 hour ago, LOSer said:

This doesn't apply here.

Maybe you should figure out what that phrase actually means.

Los all you do is crap on teams  but somebody else does it and theres a problem. 

and to be honest I'd take Valodsta,Lowndes,Tucker and Northside WR over Venice and Freedom. Plant looked like a Valdosta level team. 

[Camcat88]

2 hours ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said:

Los all you do is crap on teams  but somebody else does it and theres a problem. 

and to be honest I'd take Valodsta,Lowndes,Tucker and Northside WR over Venice and Freedom. Plant looked like a Valdosta level team. 

I saw both Venice and Northside in person, Venice beats Northside by 10 to 14 imo.

[Guest LOSer]

7 hours ago, ECHS05 said:

Thats because Tucker, Northside-WR, and Lowndes are better than Venice, Freedom, and Plant.

Of course.

Because you say so.

[Guest LOSer]

7 hours ago, ECHS05 said:

Just bc Valdosta lost to Chandler in a fumblicious game, does not mean Valdosta doesnt belong in the national conversation..

Again with this lie.

We were calling out Valdosta before the game with Chandler.

You have obsessively tried to blame this all on the Chandler game. It's just another one of your dodges.