BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 6 minutes ago, Goldmember said: So this is the second thing someone says when they can't address the facts. Pretend like they're winning and rely on the inevtiable fanboy "like" from boneheads like columbiafan. Is that right? Well shit son, since you can read minds and operate telepathically What the actual fook are you doing here? Isnt time to step out from moms basement and make millions with your brilliance. Unkind regards Daddy ColumbiaFan is a fanboy? Not likely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 3 minutes ago, Goldmember said: So this is the second thing someone says when they can't address the facts. Pretend like they're winning and rely on the inevtiable fanboy "like" from boneheads like columbiafan. You are more fanboy then me you stupid bitch I don't go joining forums just to attack people who say my team underperformed, unlike you dumbass You are the biggest hypocrite on this entire board, one of these days you gonna run your mouth to the wrong person and I'm not gonna feel any remorse for what happens because you will have it coming Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 1 minute ago, Goldmember said: No, you didn't. Basketball players were neither better back then nor tougher. So therefore the Eastern Conference couldn't possibly be better. And you didn't provide any support for what you said. Just typical foolishness from you. And it doesn't have to be basketball. It can be anything. You didn't support your claims either you arrogant prick Your word don't mean shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 1 minute ago, Columbiafan said: You are more fanboy then me you stupid bitch I don't go joining forums just to attack people who say my team underperformed, unlike you dumbass You are the biggest hypocrite on this entire board, one of these days you gonna run your mouth to the wrong person and I'm not gonna feel any remorse for what happens because you will have it coming Canes is what’s known as a cyber bully Thats all he/she/it is Keyboard Warrior Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 8 minutes ago, Goldmember said: No, you didn't. Basketball players were neither better back then nor tougher. So therefore the Eastern Conference couldn't possibly be better. And you didn't provide any support for what you said. Just typical foolishness from you. And it doesn't have to be basketball. It can be anything. I’ve only seen 1-2 sentence actual analysis since you’ve been on here The rest is insults and slurs But yet you require support for rebuttals. What is your point, it sure isn’t the “hard truth” as you indicated. Regards, Your Dad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 1 minute ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said: I’ve only seen 1-2 sentence actual analysis since you’ve been on here The rest is insults and slurs But yet you require support for rebuttals. What is your point, it sure isn’t the “hard truth” as you indicated? Regards, Your Dad He has no truth, he is biggest fraud on here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 11 minutes ago, Goldmember said: This is comical. I've given you numbers, stats, facts, evidence galore. All you've done is talk about arm bars. Yet I'm the one who insults? No you didn’t.... you spoke scoring averages that’s it. No real evidence, just opinions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, Columbiafan said: He has no truth, he is biggest fraud on here It’s the absolute worst I’ve seen Rab is a pristine virgin choirboy next to this spawn of hell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said: It’s the absolute worst I’ve seen Rab is a pristine virgin choirboy next to this spawn of hell Agreed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldmember Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 36 minutes ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said: No you didn’t.... you spoke scoring averages that’s it. No real evidence, just opinions On 6/8/2018 at 9:50 AM, Goldmember said: McHale and Parish wouldn't be on the floor. And if they were then the Warriors would win by whatever margin they wanted. If the Warriors went with a small lineup, and they would, then who would McHale and Parish defend? Two 6'11" skeletons trying to run around with the greatest "small" ball team in basketball history? It would be laughable. On 6/8/2018 at 9:58 AM, Goldmember said: There wasn't a lot of three-point shooting because they didn't understand it's value. Larry Bird was a 42% three-point shooter but only averaged 1 made three per game. They didn't get it. They didn't design their offense around the three point shot. Malcolm Gladwell had a great talk about this very topic. He likened it to the ATM Machine when it was introduced. For the first 10 years, nobody used ATMs. People still went into the bank and used the teller window to withdraw cash. It took about 10 years for people to realize that they could save 10 minutes of time, and be way more efficient, if they used the ATM. Same with three-point shots. The guys in the 1980s were clueless. On 6/8/2018 at 10:07 AM, Goldmember said: https://www.theringer.com/2017/2/17/16040274/bill-simmons-gladwell-3-point-line-nba-steph-curry-a6823a3b4c47 Gladwell: The history of the 3-point line is completely consistent with the history of all major innovations. There’s a literature on time lag in innovations. So you introduce an idea, it’s clearly a disruptive, revolutionary idea — how long does it take to be adopted in a widespread way? You can look at the ATM. The first ATM [was introduced] in the [late ’60s]. The ATM doesn’t reach maturity until 20 years later or so. Same thing with the telephone, same thing with the fax machine, same thing with the smartphone. You go down the list — it always takes a generation. Simmons: You think a generation? Gladwell: Yeah. Like I said, there is a massive literature on this in economics about how it takes a generation for even the most obviously good ideas to get widespread acceptance. The 3-point shot is a perfect example of that. What seems like a no-brainer to us now — move back two feet and all of a sudden — Simmons: It’s worth an extra point! The math! Gladwell: Same thing, no-brainer. Get your cash from a machine! Don’t go to the bank during bank hours and line up in a long line and spend 20 minutes getting your $40 for the weekend. That seems really obvious to us now; it was not obvious in 1989! It was a weird idea. Do I trust the machine? The banks were like, "I don’t know how many machines we should put out there." It’s the same thing. On 6/8/2018 at 1:12 PM, Goldmember said: The 1986 Celtics shot .508% from the field and this year's Warriors shot .503% from the field. Statistical dead heat. The difference is that the Warriors shot .391% from three and the Celtics shot .351% from three. Here's the kicker though. The Celtics had 393 three-point attempts. The Warriors had 2,369 three point attempts. On 6/8/2018 at 1:17 PM, Goldmember said: Utter nonsense. Teams are more than welcome to play a press defense today if they want. The truth is the Warriors don't only have 4 shooters on the court at all times but they also have 4 ball-handlers. They would push, space and shoot the Celtics silly. On 6/8/2018 at 1:39 PM, Goldmember said: The Warriors would force the Celtics to take their physical players off the court or get run off of it because of their spacing and shooting. The Warriors style dictates the pace of play. Not the other way around. On 6/8/2018 at 1:47 PM, Goldmember said: The Warriors mostly get dunks or 3-pointers. They rely on Durant to get mid-range jumpers when they iso but they don't care about getting into the lane unless their opponent is crowding the perimeter and giving them the pick and roll. the 1986 Celtics would be in a world of hurt. On 6/8/2018 at 2:28 PM, Goldmember said: Everybody has seen the 1980s Lakers play. Everybody knows they could run. The issue is spacing and math. The 1987 Lakers took 447 threes and made 37% of them. The 2016 Warriors took 2,592 threes and made 42% of them. They're playing chess while the Lakers were rubbing two sticks together. On 6/8/2018 at 2:51 PM, Goldmember said: Not the Warriors. They don't care about your preconceived biases. They put four shooters and a big on the floor. Magic and Worthy couldn't shoot a lick. On 6/8/2018 at 2:59 PM, Goldmember said: The Warriors don't post guys up. You're clueless. The Warriors aren't going to play the Lakers' or Celtics' game. They're going to force those teams to play theirs. Try putting McHale and Parish on the floor with that Warriors lineup. The game would be over the moment they tried to get those to trees to defend a bunch of guards and wings. On 6/8/2018 at 3:00 PM, Goldmember said: The Warriors would be shooting uncontested threes all night. On 6/8/2018 at 3:21 PM, Goldmember said: Among the top 15 guards by win shares since the NBA added the 3-point arc, Johnson ranks last in 3-pointers made, last in 3-pointers attempted and last in 3-point percentage. On 6/8/2018 at 5:11 PM, Goldmember said: The Warriors don't care about your weird infatuation with post moves. They'll shoot 55% taking mostly 2's and the Warriors will shoot 40% taking mostly 3's and the Warriors will win in a rout. It's math. On 6/8/2018 at 5:48 PM, Goldmember said: Jordan in his early ball hog days without a sufficient roster and, again, playing with the same old style that everybody else was using. The 1987 Bulls took only 299 threes all season and only shot 26% from three. 😂 On 6/8/2018 at 5:59 PM, Goldmember said: The Warriors, again, are not concerned with your conception of basketball. They will play 4 shooters and 1 big and their opponent will either match them in kind or it will be bombs away. Durant would play Bird and McHale/Parish couldn't be on the floor together or it would be a massacre. Who else are we missing? On 6/8/2018 at 6:33 PM, Goldmember said: Steph went 1-for-11 in game 3. The Warriors still won by 8 on the road. The only chance the Lakers/Celtics have is if the Warriors all have a game like that on the same night. On 6/8/2018 at 6:35 PM, Goldmember said: No they didn't. Why do you keep saying this? They made a bunch of layups, dunks and hook shots. The jumpers they made were inefficient 18 footers. The Warriors are the greatest shooting team of all-time. On 6/8/2018 at 7:28 PM, Goldmember said: They were such geniuses that they didn't shoot any threes during their careers. Ainge averaged less than one attempt per game in 1986. is this registering with you? They didn't shoot threes. How would they adjust? They didn't even understand the three point shot. You just think that one night they're going to see the Warriors and go "Oh, we better shoot 15 threes tonight." On 6/8/2018 at 7:30 PM, Goldmember said: They didn't play smart basketball. That's what we know for certain. Also, I find it funny that people like you both talk about how much better and physical the defense was back then but then talk about how everybody averaged 110 points a game. Which one is it? Was the defense great or were the offenses great? On 6/8/2018 at 7:39 PM, Goldmember said: Career 3-point FG% Stephen Curry: .436% Klay Thompson: .422% Kevin Durant: .384% Danny Ainge: .378% Larry Bird: .376% And now.... Career 3-point Attempts per Game Stephen Curry: 7.8 Klay Thompson: 6.9 Kevin Durant: 4.8 Danny Ainge: 2.5 Larry Bird: 1.9 On 6/8/2018 at 7:49 PM, Goldmember said: Draymond Green is not GSW's big. They'd play some 7-footer to rim protect and their other 4 guys would be shooters. The Lakers/Celtics would either play small ball and get beat by a more efficient lineup or stick with their bigs and get run out of the building. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 1 hour ago, Goldmember said: Son, You're late to the party. Dad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.