Bormio Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 Because he said if his successor was a woman, she should be attractive. 2019 in a nutshell, folks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 On 6/30/2019 at 11:25 AM, Bormio said: Because he said if his successor was a woman, she should be attractive. 2019 in a nutshell, folks. Looks like it's time for the Presidential Emergency broadcast system.... Public will just love this one..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 4 hours ago, Bormio said: Because he said if his successor was a woman, she should be attractive. 2019 in a nutshell, folks. Is that really true? You didn't post a link. I don't know why I doubt it given Twitter's past, but it still surprises me when I hear stuff like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 On 6/30/2019 at 3:31 PM, Belly Bob said: Is that really true? You didn't post a link. I don't know why I doubt it given Twitter's past, but it still surprises me I hear stuff like this. here's a good one.... guess he got caught on the wrong political side huh? I know I know... total trash...but picken's are ridiculously thin these days for some topics.. on some platforms anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mjd33 Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Belly Bob said: don't know why I doubt it given Twitter's past, but it still surprises me when I hear stuff like this. Why’s that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 10 minutes ago, Mjd33 said: Why’s that? Because it's unwise to censor people on such trivial grounds as these and because I forget just how foolish people can be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mjd33 Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 47 minutes ago, Belly Bob said: Because it's unwise to censor people on such trivial grounds as these and because I forget just how foolish people can be. But Considering the past actions of twitter, Facebook, 95% of the media here in our country .... this is not surprising..... at all. You think ESPN disabled the comment section for shits and giggles ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mjd33 Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 Peter Thiel was the first with balls to tell Silicon Valley to suck his dick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 5 minutes ago, Mjd33 said: But Considering the past actions of twitter, Facebook, 95% of the media here in our country .... this is not surprising..... at all. You think ESPN disabled the comment section for shits and giggles ? That's why I said "I don't know why I doubt it given Twitter's past..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mjd33 Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 22 minutes ago, Belly Bob said: That's why I said "I don't know why I doubt it given Twitter's past..." So I guess my next Q is .... how did we get to this point? Why is the vast majority of our news sources so left leaning? As well as.... Social media monopolies? Hollywood thespians? Professional Athletes? Last time I checked a bird needs two wings to fly. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 18 minutes ago, Mjd33 said: So I guess my next Q is .... how did we get to this point? Why is the vast majority of our news sources so left leaning? As well as.... Social media monopolies? Hollywood thespians? Professional Athletes? Last time I checked a bird needs two wings to fly. I think that's a really good question. I think at least part of the answer is that in the early 1970s radical feminists who had failed to find success in mainstream politics moved into academia and were effective in generating majors and in proselytizing young people who then became school teachers and journalists and academics and lawyers and entrepreneurs and so on. That's an idea I got from Christina Hoff Sommers who had a successful career as a professional philosopher and who, although she identifies as a feminist of a certain kind, has found a second career as a historian of feminism and as a critic of certain strands of feminism and of contemporary campus culture and of the effects of feminism on primary education. I think her stuff is good and insightful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.