Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The fact that you get your news from Clay Travis and other random twitter idiots but slam 60 minutes as being activist instead of journalist should tell everyone that you are an idiot that is too stup

It is not debatable what happened - at least for those who didn’t go to school on a short bus.

60 Minutes definitely stepped on their own dicks with this story though lol.    Terrible look for them, I'm afraid. 

Posted Images

5 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

 no rebuttal to my factual bullet points.

 

6 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

 

They edited it for ......

A known strategy

PSSSSssssst no rebuttal needed....🤣

you lose. 👌

 

Hope this helps 👍

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

So any video that's edited is therefore dishonest.

👌

Troll once again stumbling into a thread to make no point whatsoever.

yes,

very dishonest in representing the WHOLE truth....👍

as in incomplete,

like your thoughts  🤣

hope this helps 👌

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

I'm not.

It's not even up for debate which is why people like you don't even address his obvious corruption.

Biden .....

China...

billions of dollars paid...(fact)

admittedly suppressed in the media (fact)

all not even up for debate...

you were saying ????

😘

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Troll said:

yes,

very dishonest in representing the WHOLE truth....👍

as in incomplete,

like your thoughts  🤣

hope this helps 👌

 

They asked for his comment and he declined. Twice.

So then they used a video of him addressing the issue that they were going to ask him about.

But good to know that edited video is inherently dishonest.

👌

Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice not one person can even attempt to address the obvious corruption of his Administration.

Not one person will even touch the direct pay-to-play link between their donation and the Publix rollout.

Or the direct pay-to-play link between rich donors and Covid vaccine availability.

Or the direct pay-to-play link shown in the 2019 memo written by DeSantis' office which laid out their plans to be brazenly corrupt.

Because it's all true.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Atticus Finch said:

They asked for his comment and he declined. Twice.

Actually he just gave them several answers they did not like,

forcing them to edit the responses,  you know...

to be more in fitting with the authors objectives. 👍

You lose yourself in your own bullshit  already ??? 🤣

 

PS

5 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

But good to know that edited video is inherently dishonest.

👌

yes and not good for you,

when you can't even realize it 👍

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

Notice not one person can even attempt to address the obvious corruption of this Administration.

Not one person will even touch ...

...their plans to be brazenly corrupt.

Because it's all true.

already agreed here 🤣
see 👀

14 minutes ago, Troll said:

Biden .....

China...

billions of dollars paid...(fact)

admittedly suppressed in the media (fact)

all not even up for debate...

you were saying ????

😘

So what seems to be your problem....

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Troll said:

Actually he just gave them several answers they did not like,

No, they asked him for comment and he declined. Twice.

Then they ran their story using a video of him answering a question about pay-for-play.

The story is 100% true and not one of you media-bashing clowns has even attempted to address the actual issue.

Just feeding off Clay Travis' shilling and dumbassery.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

No, they asked him for comment and he declined gave them plenty. Twice as much as they asked for.

Then they ran their story using EDITING a video of him instead of what he said just answering the question.

The edited story is 100% truely incomplete, and I have not one of you media-bashing clowns has even attempted to address the actual issue.

Just feeding off Clay Travis' offering my shilling and dumbassery.

FIFY 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

I'm sure that Troll's dishonest editing of other's posts is not purposefully ironic given his stance on all editing being dishonest.

😄

you seem to be getting the point 👍

Now try applying it...

you know...

to all your claims of editing necessarily maintaining honesty !!!  🤣

 

PS: How does THAT work out for you 😝

BTW: your Anus is really flinching hard today 👌

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think that editing is inherently dishonest so there's nothing for me to apply.

What you do is dishonest. You literally change words.

60 Minutes edited a video for brevity and context. The idea that a 45 minute press conference must be aired in full or else it's dishonest is totally asinine.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

I don't think that editing is inherently dishonest so there's nothing for me to apply.

by definition incomplete...

..as in...

not telling the whole truth.

repeated for moronic comprehension 👍

 

10 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

What you do is correct dishonesty. You literally change words to make the post correct.

 

FIFY 👍

 

12 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

60 Minutes edited a video for brevity and context.

and for the authors intended narrative 👌

 

13 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

The idea that a 45 minute press conference must be aired in full or else it's dishonest is totally asinine.

Asinine is not actually recognizing that editing can in fact do that....👍

You had the right idea a post ago,

Too bad you applied it to the wrong example 😝

 

BTW: If it was asinine, you would enjoy it.

proof positive it's not.

🤣

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Troll said:

and for the authors intended narrative 👌

 

The intention was for the Governor to address the question that they intended to ask.

Still no refutation of the actual story.

And there never will be since the intention  is to change the subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Troll said:

Asinine is not actually recognizing that editing can in fact do that....👍

 

This is not your position.

Your position is that anything edited is therefore dishonest.

I know it's stupid but you still haven't realized that yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

This is not your position.

Your position is that anything edited is therefore dishonest.

I know it's stupid but you still haven't realized that yet.

keep flinching there Anus 👌

everyone knows your position and mine...👍

(except you) LOL

Flinch flinch 🤣

Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

So you can't refute that claim because it's true.

Thanks.

True like you claiming to know my own intent ?

like you claim to know MLB's intent ?

like you claim to know  this governor's intent ?

You have no claim to others actions, or intent 🤣

 

but good to know you think you do 😝

PS: you only refute yourself....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...