concha Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 1 minute ago, DevilDog said: Republicans are all in with Law Enforcement when a Minority is beaten, murdered or mistreated. They always scream wait till all the facts come out and BlueLivesMatter and they should have just complied. All of a sudden the FBI is the most corrupt, secretive, deep State rooted Law Enforcement in the Land. It is quite Ironic how shit keeps coming back and slapping their asses in the face. Republicans are mere enablers. They and the President would do well to remember who the Watergate source worked for #FBIinvestigationsMatter Seriously? 1) Waiting for all the facts to come in is pretty fucking basic. As a Marine, "Ready, shoot, aim!" should ring a bell as NOT the way to do things. 2) Not the FBI. Certain leadership there is looking suspect and the Republicans are looking for transparency and the Dems are shitting themselves about it. You got it about 10% right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilDog Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 1 minute ago, concha said: Seriously? 1) Waiting for all the facts to come in is pretty fucking basic. As a Marine, "Ready, shoot, aim!" should ring a bell as NOT the way to do things. 2) Not the FBI. Certain leadership there is looking suspect and the Republicans are looking for transparency and the Dems are shitting themselves about it. You got it about 10% right. YES SERIOUSLY And you got it about 90% Wrong. Clearly firing and running people off is not waiting for the facts in most thoughtful minds. I did say thoughtful sir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilDog Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 1 minute ago, Drummer61 said: In Ferguson, Mo..... Leave this to Concha you have proven to take a verbal beating by me constantly. You need to read more things than Pat Buchanan. Ferguson MO Police department: Justice Dept Findings on Ferguson. Please try to stay on the topic. You're like a 3 year old. The justice department found it was rife with racism and targeted blacks for monetary reasons and harassed them: Ferguson, Mo., is a third white, but the crime statistics compiled in the city over the past two years seemed to suggest that only black people were breaking the law. They accounted for 85 percent of traffic stops, 90 percent of tickets and 93 percent of arrests. In cases like jaywalking, which often hinge on police discretion, blacks accounted for 95 percent of all arrests. Over 100 racist emails by cops about Blacks including the President: Issuing three or four charges in one stop is not uncommon. Officers sometimes write six, eight, or, in at least one instance, fourteen citations for a single encounter." Some officers compete to see who can issue the most citations in a single stop. In one email, the police chief, who also oversees the municipal court, brags to the city manager about how much revenue it is generating. Ignoring that conflict of interest is a recipe for a justice system that bleeds the powerless of their meager resources. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilDog Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 8 minutes ago, Drummer61 said: In Ferguson, Mo..... This has nothing to do with Ferguson unless you think the FBI is rife with Racism and is targeting Black Trump to ticket his Motorcade to generate city funds and stop and harass him and send racist emails about him. Getting ahead of you this will be next: Try to stay on the topic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 6 minutes ago, concha said: There are those who know far more than you or I that think he's got some issues. Like who? Devin Nunes? This is comical. Right out of the playbook. Write your own memo. Vote to declassify it. Release it as if it's authoritative. Vote against a counter memo that provides context. Rinse, repeat. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 57 minutes ago, concha said: You don't know if this guy's clean or not and anyone reading these posts can see your slobbering partisan devotions shining through. I have no reason to think he's not. Again, this is just feces throwing. You're not even denying it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 55 minutes ago, concha said: You studiously avoid the fact that the investigation itself is yielding bupkus Four guilty pleas and/or convictions = bupkus But McCabe doing his job? Might be something there. Comical crookedness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 46 minutes ago, concha said: For things unassociated with the campaign and Russia that could/should have been handled by normal investigative and prosecutorial entities rather than a special counsel with a specific mandate that is being violated.. They lied to the FBI while being interviewed about their role in the Russia investigation. Now lying to the FBI about pertinent issues = bupkus Again, comical crookedness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 43 minutes ago, concha said: Seriously? Yes. When an unarmed black guy is shot it's all hands on deck. Law enforcement is sacred. Can't question them. It's a tough job. We have to give our full support. When they investigate potential treason (and get 4 guilty pleas) they're corrupt and need to be dissolved! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 44 minutes ago, concha said: 1) Waiting for all the facts to come in is pretty fucking basic. Concha's ability to lie and obfuscate is Trump level. They're creating their own "facts" and then declassifying it so they can steer the narrative away from the facts. Concha claiming that his dishonest ass is waiting for the facts is next level comical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 6 minutes ago, Guccifer said: I have no reason to think he's not. Again, this is just feces throwing. You're not even denying it. You don't know if it's "feces throwing" or not. You're not even denying it. See how that works? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 46 minutes ago, concha said: 2) Not the FBI. Certain leadership there is looking suspect and the Republicans are looking for transparency and the Dems are shitting themselves about it. How? I thought you were waiting for the facts? Transparency? They voted against releasing a counter memo that involved the underlying intelligence. concha is the worst of the bunch because he's articulate and deceitful unlike his illiterate and borderline retarded cohorts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 6 minutes ago, Guccifer said: Four guilty pleas and/or convictions = bupkus But McCabe doing his job? Might be something there. Comical crookedness. Anything related to the actual mandate of the Mueller investigation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 Just now, concha said: You don't know if it's "feces throwing" or not. You're not even denying it. See how that works? I do know that it's throwing feces because a man has been tarred, feathered and "pushed" out based on nothing on whatsoever. And this is the Republican playbook. They do this all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 1 minute ago, Guccifer said: Concha's ability to lie and obfuscate is Trump level. They're creating their own "facts" and then declassifying it so they can steer the narrative away from the facts. Concha claiming that his dishonest ass is waiting for the facts is next level comical. How do you know "facts are being created"? Oh, you don't. You are, in fact, creating the "fact" that you "know". Which you don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 Just now, Guccifer said: I do know that it's throwing feces because a man has been tarred, feathered and "pushed" out based on nothing on whatsoever. And this is the Republican playbook. They do this all the time. It's much more convincing when you bold and underline, and then point at just the party you hate. Well done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 1 minute ago, concha said: Anything related to the actual mandate of the Mueller investigation? Yes. He's investigating potential Russian interference in the election and 4 Trump associates lied about their contacts with Russians. Are you serious with this? First, you lie and claim that "bupkus" has come from it (despite four guilty pleas). Then you pivot and claim that, well, it's not related to the actual investigation (which is another lie). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanscript Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 1 hour ago, concha said: 1) None of us can prove who is right 2) You don't know if he's running or not, or if he's truly done nothing wrong. There are those who know far more than you or I that think he's got some issues. I'm not sure how government works on this particular issue about Andrew McCabe, but it could also be that since he is basically now inactive that he wouldn't get fired and lose his whole pension. It could be as simple as that. Maybe there is a lot more to this story and if there is it should come out. What I find disturbing is that Devin Nunes wants to release a highly partisan 4 page memo (probably double-spaced) while not allowing the Democrats to release their 10 page response. If we are discussing transparency, this certainly isn't an example of it. To be tried in public without being able to defend yourself is very un-American. It's a disgrace. Devin Nunes is supposed to be recused in the Trump/Russia investigation not be a cheerleader. Below is a pretty good article of what is at stake: http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-nunes-memo-20180129-htmlstory.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 2 minutes ago, concha said: How do you know "facts are being created"? A known Trump lackey wrote a memo of his opinions and is now releasing it as "facts" that are "troubling" to him. It's feces against a wall. Nobody of any stature would give two seconds to such a compromised piece of garbage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 4 minutes ago, concha said: Oh, you don't. I have a lot more backing for "feces" than you do for "troubling" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 2 minutes ago, Guccifer said: How? I thought you were waiting for the facts? Transparency? They voted against releasing a counter memo that involved the underlying intelligence. concha is the worst of the bunch because he's articulate and deceitful unlike his illiterate and borderline retarded cohorts. I am. I would like to see both released. The Dems wanted to keep everything hidden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 Just now, Guccifer said: I have a lot more backing for "feces" than you do for "troubling" No, you don't. You just think you do because it's what you want to believe. Are a government employee by chance? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 4 minutes ago, concha said: It's much more convincing when you bold and underline, and then point at just the party you hate. Well done. Whitewater = 4 years and found nothing, had to push a blowjob IRS "scandal" = nothing Benghazi = 9 investigations, nothing This is what they do. Drum up "troubling" accusations, investigate relentlessly for years, feast off the negative press, then quietly announce that no wrongdoing was discovered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 6 minutes ago, stanscript said: If we are discussing transparency, this certainly isn't an example of it. The transparency line is one of the most transparent lies I've ever seen. concha somehow types that with a straight face. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted January 30, 2018 Report Share Posted January 30, 2018 6 minutes ago, concha said: The Dems wanted to keep everything hidden. And Trump's Justice Department. Either none of it is released or both are. That's actual transparency. Not this nonsense that you're telling to sell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.