Jump to content

Vaccine For Covid


Mag44

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Rippers said:

I don't see where you get 50-60 "immediate deaths" when the article says 13 (but mentions 15 although that number inexplicably jumps to 45 a sentence later so there may or may not have been a typo).  4800+ injections since January 9th and not one mention of how many of the 15 were involved.  You'd think that if there was a correlation, that would have led off the story.  The article provides no details other than they died.

 
 
 
Last updated: January 26, 2021, 23:23 GMT

Deaths: 69

tn_gi-flag.gif

 Gibraltar

every couple hours....has to be more than 70 now

18 minutes ago, Rippers said:

 

And if your argument is that the vaccine does not work, if they started on the 9th, they would not start with the second dose until the 30th at the earliest.

That's not my argument that's just some manufacturers (See CNN post above) and apparently yours as well LOL.

but I am more in the camp of "take a vaccine that actually works" and it will cause your body to go through many of the "symptoms" of a live bug.....

More in line with the same way the additional symptoms of covid actually kill you (not the bug itself)....

unless you would rather say it was the vax itself that did it...

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Troll said:

but I am more in the camp of "take a vaccine that actually works" and it will cause your body to go through many of the "symptoms" of a live bug.....

More in line with the same way the additional symptoms of covid actually kill you (not the bug itself)....

unless you would rather say it was the vax itself that did it...

That is fair enough.  I have just never seen you come out and say it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Rippers said:

That is fair enough.  I have just never seen you come out and say it that way.

I'm also NOT an anti-vaxer....

Have had all my normal vaccines, as well as my entire family/children etc.

But I have found skepticism to be one of the best determiners....

when vetting options on untested, rushed to market, experimental, fake vaccines*....especially where the manufacturer has finagled an immunity to any and all damage done, and where there will be absolutely no recourse.

go figure 🤷‍♂️

  * For all those who claim we need to  follow actual science this "vaccine" would necessarily have to be classified as a therapuedic ( gene therapy) agent, not a "vaccine"..... but used instead to try to vaccinate....much like the latest orange clorox people will use to vaccinate...

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200407/parasite-drug-shows-early-promise-against-covid-19

 

PS: A veterinary parasitic makes about as much sense  as gene therapy, to "vaccinate" for a flu....(all else considered)...which is fine...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...