Jump to content

Cen10 vs IMG


Sammyswordsman

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LOSer said:

So let me get this straight.

You're not going to read the threads that you post in. You're going to whine for 3 days. You're going to get angry.

But you're not under any circumstances going to understand what people post.

And then you're going to ask them to search for the appropriate thread and re-post the arguments because you're too lazy and/or incompetent?

Why don't you just go rub one out, kid. You're a hopeless loser.

Who said I was angry. 

Im simply responding to your Bullshit. 

Isn't that what you want? 

But you dont wanna back up your statements instead you tell me that I have to back up my stuff but you dont have to back up yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LOSer said:

So let me get this straight.

You're not going to read the threads that you post in. You're going to whine for 3 days. You're going to get angry.

But you're not under any circumstances going to understand what people post.

And then you're going to ask them to search for the appropriate thread and re-post the arguments because you're too lazy and/or incompetent?

Why don't you just go rub one out, kid. You're a hopeless loser.

You're out here giving advice you should be taking yourself. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/24/2017 at 8:05 AM, LOSer said:

I never said teams won't change and be successful.

Fred, you're just a fanboy who doesn't read and can't comprehend even when he does.

I said it's unlikely that a predominately running team is going to change to a passing team and be successful right away.

That's what I said.

Stop making stuff up.

And I showed you a team that DID change but because it doesn't' fit your narrative you won't admit it.  Which part of going from a 98% run to a 50% run 50% pass team that made a lot of yards and scored a lot passing touchdowns is so hard to comprehend?  Who's reading skills are lacking here?  Certainly not mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2017 at 11:43 PM, LOSer said:

Again, another fallacy.

Going from 2 passes a game to 50% of your plays being passes doesn't mean that you were a good passing team.

Simple, simple concepts.

Let me rephrase for your simple mind then.  50% of our yards came from our passing attack.  We turned into one of the top 20 passing teams in the state, maybe higher but I don't care to do your work for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2017 at 11:45 PM, LOSer said:

You're just really crappy at making arguments.

You're a clueless fanboy who can't avoid logical fallacies.

From the king of the ad homenim attacks?  Ha!  That may be the funniest thing you've ever posted.  Thanks for the chuckle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
9 minutes ago, Fred said:

And I showed you a team that DID change but because it doesn't' fit your narrative you won't admit it.  

No you didn't.

You gave an example of a team that made the semifinal.

That has nothing to do with whether they became a successful passing team.

Simple concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...