Jump to content

Cen10 vs IMG


Sammyswordsman

Recommended Posts

Guest LOSer
6 minutes ago, Fred said:

The problem is he a) won't admit when he is wrong, b) when he is wrong he changes the criteria to try to make himself right again, c) repeats ad nauseum until the reasonable person gives up.  Then the personal attacks kick in.

You're just really crappy at making arguments.

You're a clueless fanboy who can't avoid logical fallacies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LOSer said:

I never said teams don't change.

You can't even get your story straight.

You said that running teams won't change and be successful...multiple times.  I showed you one that was.  You changed the criteria.  Sad really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I think I figured it out.  LOSer generates multiple replies because he is unable to build a cohesive argument if he has to reply to a whole post.  By taking snippets and trying to build individual responses he both artificially inflates his post count to make himself seem more important than he really is and hides the fact he isn't responding to the entire thought his is trying to tear down.  That is really funny and then for him to start hollering logical fallacy is hilarious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
8 hours ago, Fred said:

You said that running teams won't change and be successful...multiple times. 

I never said teams won't change and be successful.

Fred, you're just a fanboy who doesn't read and can't comprehend even when he does.

I said it's unlikely that a predominately running team is going to change to a passing team and be successful right away.

That's what I said.

Stop making stuff up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
7 hours ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said:

Why dont you get evidence to back up your Bullshit. 

This is comical coming from an obviously incompetent Georgia who wouldn't last 5 seconds debating me on, well, anything.

My evidence is just fine considering that I've got every Georgian stuttering, lying and/or running for the hills. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LOSer said:

This is comical coming from an obviously incompetent Georgia who wouldn't last 5 seconds debating me on, well, anything.

My evidence is just fine considering that I've got every Georgian stuttering, lying and/or running for the hills. 

This is pathetic coming from you. 

You havent done or said anything that has me heading for the hills. Rather than poll to back up your.BS you start belittling me. 

Classic. 

You're the one who said Grayson had no compelling games. 

You made that claim now back it up with evidence by polling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
26 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said:

You havent done or said anything that has me heading for the hills

ECHS05 is usually a loudmouthed blowhard who doesn't stop for any reason.

He's like my poodle now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
27 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said:

You're the one who said Grayson had no compelling games. 

Actually Fred was asked a question and he mentioned three games.

So he made the claim. I just challenged it.

So Fred has the burden (one that he won't even try to support).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LOSer said:

Actually Fred was asked a question and he mentioned three games.

So he made the claim. I just challenged it.

So Fred has the burden (one that he won't even try to support).

You just contradicted yourself. 

You stated "Fred mentioned 3 games" 

But you where the one who said No. 

Fred mentioned 3 games. 

Doesnt sound like he said No to me. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/19/2017 at 2:32 PM, Sammyswordsman said:

How bout this

Colquitt Pastes 21 on Grayson

Collquitt can only muster 20 on Tucker

Valdosta pastes 17 on Tucker

Tucker can only muster 7 on Valdosta

Chandler Pastes 44 on Valdosta

Colquitt paste 45 on Valdosta. 

Tell Chandler to step it up. 

An 8-5 Colquitt did the same thing 15-1 Chandler did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/19/2017 at 2:59 PM, Sammyswordsman said:

Give it a rest Fred.

F'ing Woodstock pasted 21 on Grayson too.  Same as they scored on North Paulding.

Grayson defense = North Paulding.

Ga offenses are generally horrendous and unimaginative.  We used to have offenses like those,  in Calif back in the 1960's

When did Grayson play Tucker in 2016?

Because I'm lost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
12 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

You are a burden.

I'm a burden to feckless buffoons like you who can't get a single fact right and mangle the English language while doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
5 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said:

You stated "Fred mentioned 3 games" 

But you where the one who said No. 

Fred mentioned 3 games. 

Doesnt sound like he said No to me. 

Fred was asked if Grayson had any compelling games.

He mentioned 3 games.

I responded facetiously that it means no.

So Fred has the burden. Not me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/21/2017 at 3:25 PM, Fred said:

Well, we have have Hoover at home week 1, John Curtis at the BOB week 3 and Ramsey AL at home week 5.  I expect us to do well against our in state rivals although McEachern week 2 can be tough but they come to us this time.  I think we have a pretty shot of playing December football.  It is far from a sure thing we make it to the finals but I think we can.  New head coach who is a nice guy but he only has one year of HC experience.  He has a good background  now we just need him to step it up as head of the program.  Defense shouldn't be a problem this year, offense may be a little shaky due to losing so many to graduation.  It really is going to come down to how fast the guys mature and if they stay healthy.  We've got a lot of talent even if it isn't as flashy as last year.

The games Fred mentioned as compelling. 

On 7/21/2017 at 3:28 PM, LOSer said:

So the answer is no.

^ you said No. 

On 7/21/2017 at 5:08 PM, LOSer said:

Those games are not compelling.

Your opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LOSer said:

Fred was asked if Grayson had any compelling games.

He mentioned 3 games.

I responded facetiously that it means no.

So Fred has the burden. Not me.

So you said No. Because Fred didnt say No. 

He gave a decent Overview and Explanation of the games and Graysons situation. 

You said "So the answer is no" Fred didnt say no you twisted it to be no. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
18 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said:

He gave a decent Overview and Explanation of the games and Graysons situation. 

He can give an overview and explanation until he's blue in the face. It doesn't' make those games compelling.

And now 3 days later none of you have made that case either.

Don't you see who I always win? Because you and your cavalry of boneheads get bogged down in getting angry and attacking me instead of making an argument.

You guys are so incompetent it's mind-boggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
19 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said:

You said "So the answer is no" Fred didnt say no you twisted it to be no. 

And three days later you're still dissecting a sarcastic quip.

Amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...