Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 Just now, TheRealCAJ said: You have no idea who is implementing the change. You just know Roth is the Head Coach and knows change is needed. And guys who run molasses offenses for 20+ years aren't the best-equipped to pull off this kind of change. It should be entertaining (not really) to watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 15 minutes ago, LOSer said: If it was so easy to flip on a dime then why haven't they done it before now? The article explained it all, los. You don't read though. Rummel, has never been this blessed at the WR position and Roth knows he cannot waste this talent. It's a no-brainer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, TheRealCAJ said: Rummel, has never been this blessed at the WR position and Roth knows he cannot waste this talent. It's a no-brainer. Again, reading comprehension on this is paramount. I never said a change shouldn't be made. I said it's not likely to be successful right away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 1 minute ago, LOSer said: And guys who run molasses offenses for 20+ years aren't the best-equipped to pull off this kind of change. If we throw the ball 350+ times this year "we" have pulled change off perfectly, los.... You act like Roth is trying to cure cancer. Take a break, los. Regroup..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 Just now, TheRealCAJ said: If we throw the ball 350+ times this year "we" have pulled change off perfectly, los.... Not true. You can throw it 350 times and suck at it. You keep missing the point because you suffer from the same issues as ECHS05. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 Just now, LOSer said: Again, reading comprehension on this is paramount. I never said a change shouldn't be made. I said it's not likely to be successful right away. You said Quote If it was so easy to flip on a dime then why haven't they done it before now? I told you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 Just now, TheRealCAJ said: I told you. It was a rhetorical question. He's not an offensive mastermind. That's why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 1 minute ago, LOSer said: Not true. You can throw it 350 times and suck at it. You keep missing the point because you suffer from the same issues as ECHS05. You assume we will suck at it....you base this on the last time we threw it 350+ times. This is getting sad, los. Just stop and move back to, peanut or something. I'm obviously a little out of your league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 Just now, TheRealCAJ said: You assume we will suck at it.... No I don't. I assume that it won't be very good right away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 Just now, TheRealCAJ said: ....you base this on the last time we threw it 350+ times. I base it on the fact they've never done it before, yes. But apparently you can give tons of examples of molasses coaches just "deciding" one day to throw the ball around the park and being ultra successful, right? Nothing like basing your belief in something on no evidence at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 Just now, LOSer said: I base it on the fact they've never done it before, yes. Nothing like basing your belief in something on no evidence at all. The only belief I have is we have skill at QB and WR and are going to throw the ball this year. Everyone in the city knows this ......you clearly can't grasp a very simple fact. Your opinions on Rummel throwing the ball more this year are more than noted, los. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 Just now, TheRealCAJ said: The only belief I have is we have skill at QB and WR and are going to throw the ball this year. Everyone in the city knows this For the third time, I don't care about the "why" question. I know "why" they're doing it. My statement involved the success of it. You are about as dense as ECHS05. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 13 minutes ago, LOSer said: I know "why" they're doing it. My statement involved the success of it. Clearly, you didn't because I had to explain that to you two times already as well. You've expressed your sentiments that we will fail badly nicely and it's noted for the court. What else do you want a here? A Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, TheRealCAJ said: Clearly, you didn't because I had to explain that to you two times already as well. Clearly, you're never going to change (or start reading context properly). You're the only one who didn't understand a simple statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 5 minutes ago, TheRealCAJ said: You've expressed your sentiments that we will fail badly nicely and it's noted for the court. Not what I said. But typical of you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 1 minute ago, LOSer said: Clearly, you're never going to change (or start reading context properly). Offer complete context not your version next time and I will read it properly next time... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, LOSer said: Not what I said. But typical of you. What you said is recorded for the court......you cannot take it back. You have been found guilty of babbling.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, TheRealCAJ said: What you said is recorded for the court......you cannot take it back. I didn't take it back. You just lied about it. I said it's not likely to be successful right away. Then you did what you always do: whine for pages and misrepresent what I said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 6 minutes ago, TheRealCAJ said: Offer complete context not your version next time and I will read it properly next time... I did. Molasses team don't just decide to switch one day and have immediate success. You will not read it properly this time either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, LOSer said: I said it's not likely to be successful right away. You are a liar.... Your first response out of the blue when I mentioned I was more concerned with Air Rummel than Curtis was this. Quote los, What? Did they figure out where the laces on the ball were? That's funny. You then go on one of your silly rants trying to prove we would NOT be Air Rummel or a bad Air Rummel, or whatever else you threw out there. Give it up, los. I'm NOT peanut who you can pick on.... I'm, Caj> the guy that makes you look foolish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 3 hours ago, LOSer said: Of course anything could happen but the likelihood that it succeeds to a high level is low. 1 hour ago, LOSer said: I merely pointed out that past is prologue and teams don't just change on a whim and have success right away. 1 hour ago, LOSer said: I didn't dispute that a change occurred. I merely questioned how successful it would be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 5 minutes ago, TheRealCAJ said: You then go on one of your silly rants trying to prove we would NOT be Air Rummel or a bad Air Rummel, or whatever else you threw out there. I never said they wouldn't be "Air Rummel" at all. I made a joke. Then I've been about as clear as humanly possible since then and you just do what Caj does. Which is mangle stuff for 3+ pages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 I've basically made myself clear every hour for the last three hours. But Caj is doing Caj things. Which means mangling the written language and quibbling over minutiae that he can't seem to understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 15 minutes ago, LOSer said: I made a joke. Your entire debate has been based on a bad joke...which makes your debate a complete joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted July 22, 2017 Report Share Posted July 22, 2017 13 minutes ago, LOSer said: I've basically made myself clear every hour for the last three hours. and, I have "basically" acknowledged your entire joke debate...it doesn't change your original position of laughter Air Rummel is a reality regardless of our success which you believe will not happen or in your words "low chance"...... When I mention "Air Rummel" it's more a fun thing anyways. We are going to throw the ball though, los. You big dummy! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.