Jump to content

In the Maxpreps Era how many Different teams from your state have been ranked in the MP Top 100?

RedZone

By RedZone
in Varsity Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Adam Kurkjian Collaborator

Adam Kurkjian

Posted
Posted

Massachusetts

2003: Mansfield (37); Everett (44)

2005: Brockton (85)

2007: Everett (59)

2009: Xaverian (91)

2010: Everett (96)

2014: Xaverian (42)

2015: Xaverian (45)

03 Mansfield was a good HS team for New England but not even necessarily the best team in the region. You could have made a good case for Everett, Acton-Boxboro, New Britain (Conn.), or even Longmeadow that year. Everett would not have fared very well against a team that could spread it out with the type of speed you see in the elite states. But in terms of packing it in and mashing you for four quarters, they could've beat a lot of teams in the Northeast.

05 Brockton was not as good as the 04 team which had two losses. Very good defensively, but too many close calls against average teams to consider a ranking like that. Still, could have beaten a lot of teams in the Northeast.

07 Everett was good but would have had the same type of mismatch as the 03 team. Struggled to contain Dartmouth's Jordan Todman in the title game, and there are a lot of teams around the country with 3-4 guys like that.

09 Xaverian was like a lot of teams on this list. Big, physical, but not especially fast. A team with a good line and burners on the outside would have handled them. They could get in a rock fight and beat teams, though.

10 Everett was more of the spread, up-tempo team, but not as talented as some of their other squads.

14 and 15 Xaverian weren't 42 and 45 worthy but were very, very good. Extremely physical on both lines, deep, well coached. 14 team was more talented but 15 team was better. Defense gave up 41 points in 12 games and maybe half that against their starters.

17 Everett team was better than most of the teams on this list, maybe all (that is debated heavily here). Scholarship kids at every positional unit with high-end talent that is already performing well at the next level. Most of the points scored on the defense were against the second unit. Everett coach did not run up the score. He'd tell refs to throw a flag if the Crimson Tide scored a TD in a rout. If they wanted, they could have averaged 60-70 a game. Total wagon. Really wish we could have seen them play an OOS squad but it never happened.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RedZone Grand Master

RedZone

Posted
  • Author
Posted
58 minutes ago, Adam Kurkjian said:

Massachusetts

2003: Mansfield (37); Everett (44)

2005: Brockton (85)

2007: Everett (59)

2009: Xaverian (91)

2010: Everett (96)

2014: Xaverian (42)

2015: Xaverian (45)

03 Mansfield was a good HS team for New England but not even necessarily the best team in the region. You could have made a good case for Everett, Acton-Boxboro, New Britain (Conn.), or even Longmeadow that year. Everett would not have fared very well against a team that could spread it out with the type of speed you see in the elite states. But in terms of packing it in and mashing you for four quarters, they could've beat a lot of teams in the Northeast.

05 Brockton was not as good as the 04 team which had two losses. Very good defensively, but too many close calls against average teams to consider a ranking like that. Still, could have beaten a lot of teams in the Northeast.

07 Everett was good but would have had the same type of mismatch as the 03 team. Struggled to contain Dartmouth's Jordan Todman in the title game, and there are a lot of teams around the country with 3-4 guys like that.

09 Xaverian was like a lot of teams on this list. Big, physical, but not especially fast. A team with a good line and burners on the outside would have handled them. They could get in a rock fight and beat teams, though.

10 Everett was more of the spread, up-tempo team, but not as talented as some of their other squads.

14 and 15 Xaverian weren't 42 and 45 worthy but were very, very good. Extremely physical on both lines, deep, well coached. 14 team was more talented but 15 team was better. Defense gave up 41 points in 12 games and maybe half that against their starters.

17 Everett team was better than most of the teams on this list, maybe all (that is debated heavily here). Scholarship kids at every positional unit with high-end talent that is already performing well at the next level. Most of the points scored on the defense were against the second unit. Everett coach did not run up the score. He'd tell refs to throw a flag if the Crimson Tide scored a TD in a rout. If they wanted, they could have averaged 60-70 a game. Total wagon. Really wish we could have seen them play an OOS squad but it never happened.

Good work.....not being picky, but some of the teams look the same though. ☺️

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHS05 Community Regular

ECHS05

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, RedZone said:

In 2004 (starting point Maxpreps era).......... John Curtis was #77 at Maxpreps and #128 at Calpreps..

 

 

 

 

Ok... I could be wrong... But Im pretty sure they are the same thing & MP only recently started putting out their own Top 100.

If I had to say why JC is 77 on one & 128 at CalPreps... Is because CP recently started the state scaling and thats changed every ranking a bit in every year. MaxPreps might not have changed or updated  it on their website to reflect the changes.

Again, I could be wrong.

  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RedZone Grand Master

RedZone

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just using the CCS 5A Preseason Poll this year 7/10 have made the Maxpreps Top 100 since 2004.

Highest ranking listed

Class 5A
1) John Curtis Christian-#18 (2018)
2) Catholic (BR)-#79 (2015)
3) Zachary-#64 (2015)
4) West Monroe-#13 (2009)
5) Archbishop Rummel-#59 (2012)
6) Destrehan-#18 (2008)
7) John Ehret
😎 East Ascension
9) Acadiana-#10 (2010)
10) Alexandria

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...