The No Nonsense Top 50: #29 Oakland, TN

[Columbiafan]

3 hours ago, RedZone said:

I probably shouldn't worry too much about it.

Maybe I will start hitting the crack pipe so I can understand polls better and most of the general conversation on this forum.

If you don't like the conversation here or people aren't believing your lies enough

 

There's a door and your free to leave

 

Be sure to take that know it nothing prick Los with you so this board will be rid of it's resident trolls

[Columbiafan]

1 hour ago, RedZone said:

It doesn't matter...they were both road wins OOS.

We are two weeks behind everyone else too...in some cases 3 weeks.

 

All that is not the point anyways....we are much better than Oakland, TN.

 

 

Just cause they OOS don't mean they good

 

Lake Placid is OOS but is probably weakest team on JCC schedule

 

Even though you will probably try and prop them up into something they aren't

[Columbiafan]

15 minutes ago, RedZone said:

Yet again, if Omaha was great at ranking teams he would have Rummel ranked and not Oakland.

Hey Sherlock where's your poll?

 

You made a big ass deal about it a few weeks back then disappeared and went back to leaching

 

If your gonna say someone ain't good at ranking get your ass to do your ranking and show what level of expert you are

[RedZone]

4 minutes ago, Columbiafan said:

if your gonna say someone ain't good

columbia

[Columbiafan]

2 minutes ago, RedZone said:

columbia

You know nothing about Columbia as you haven't seen them play a down this year

 

Clearly John Curtis was scared enough with what they saw to decline us twice so they could go play Lake Placid

 

 

Btw bring Rummel ass over to Lake City next year and we will set your program back decades

[RedZone]

35 minutes ago, Columbiafan said:

You know nothing about Columbia 

 

 

They won a state championship in 1967. Was there anything else?

 

[Columbiafan]

1 hour ago, RedZone said:

They won a state championship in 1967. Was there anything else?

 

You are as stupid as Los is

 

You make statements like these living off the past because you know nothing about the current team

 

That's why you are so far out of the loop when it comes to Florida, douchebag

[The Guru]

2 hours ago, RedZone said:

They won a state championship in 1967. Was there anything else?

The real question is why would you want to know anything about Columbia?

[Columbiafan]

12 minutes ago, The Guru said:

The real question is why would you want to know anything about Columbia?

Idk 

 

Maybe same reason your such a bitch you have me on ignore because I have your number you dumb fuck

[Omaha Vol]

The problem here is both of you tools think Oakland sucks. That’s your first mistake. Yeah, their schedule isn’t on par with St. John’s or IMG or even Rummel, but they will roll through it like they are supposed to until they play Maryville and/or Whitehaven/Ravenwood in the playoffs. It’s akin to Lakeland. (Not saying they would beat Lakeland, btw.) They did the same thing last year, with the exception of playing Maryville in the regular season. I can’t reiterate this enough.....schedules don’t determine how good a team is (ie. Lakeland)!!!! 
 

Also, who says I don’t have Rummel in my top 100? Am I going to have to post a top 100 every week now just so you can see their name mentioned? Lol

[The Guru]

2 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said:

The problem here is both of you tools think Oakland sucks. That’s your first mistake.

So you think it's a mistake to judge teams according to their accomplishments?

Cool.

[The Guru]

4 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said:

Yeah, their schedule isn’t on par with St. John’s or IMG or even Rummel, but they will roll through it like they are supposed to until they play Maryville and/or Whitehaven/Ravenwood in the playoffs.

I love it.

"Yeah, their schedule isn't on par with (insert any team in America) but they'll run through it until they play (insert other middling Tennessee team) in the playoffs!"

What a ringing endorsement.

🤡

[The Guru]

5 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said:

but they will roll through it like they are supposed to until they play Maryville and/or Whitehaven/Ravenwood in the playoffs.

Yeah, I can't wait until those stiff playoff tests against teams that beat #2498 Ridgeway, 23-7, and #2678 Blackman, 16-13.

🤡

[The Guru]

7 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said:

I can’t reiterate this enough.....schedules don’t determine how good a team is (ie. Lakeland)!!!!

Nobody is making this claim, Einstein.

They're saying that Oakland shouldn't get the benefit of any doubt given that their schedule is abysmal and their accomplishments are practically nil.

[Columbiafan]

22 minutes ago, The Guru said:

Yeah, I can't wait until those stiff playoff tests against teams that beat #2498 Ridgeway, 23-7, and #2678 Blackman, 16-13.

🤡

More teams you bashing that you have never seen play

[RedZone]

I don't know if the guy at PrepNation has Tennessee in the Southeast or Midwest, but Oakland is nowhere to be found. He's been doing polls forever.

Oakland is the sort of team you might could hide at #81 or #89 and no one would ever question it......Omaha has them #29, one big win away from busting his Top 25. I don't understand why?

New PrepNation poll.

http://therealprepnation.blogspot.com/2019/09/week-6-prepnation-national-prep.html

SOUTHEAST

1. IMG Academy (Bradenton, Fla.), 5-0

2. Lakeland HS (Fla.), 6-0

3. St. Thomas Aquinas HS (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.), 4-0

4. Lowndes HS (Valdosta, Ga.), 6-0

5. Thompson HS (Alabaster, Ala.), 5-0

6. Central HS (Miami), 5-1

7. John Curtis HS (River Ridge, La.), 4-0

8. McEachern HS (Powder Springs, Ga.), 4-0

9. Colquitt County HS (Moultrie, Ga.), 4-1

10. Hoover HS (Ala.), 4-1

11. Central HS (Phenix City, Ala.), 5-1

12. Catholic HS (Baton Rouge, La.), 4-0

13. Madison Central HS (Madison, Miss.), 5-0

14. Grayson HS (Loganville, Ga.), 4-1

15. Marietta HS (Ga.), 3-1

 

MIDWEST

1. Mentor HS (Ohio), 5-0

2. Male HS (Louisville, Ky.), 5-0

3. Trinity HS (Louisville, Ky.), 5-1

4. Muskegon HS (Mich.), 5-0

5. St. Edward HS (Lakewood, Ohio), 4-1

6. East St. Louis HS (Ill.), 5-0

7. Washington HS (Massillon, Ohio), 5-0

8. St. Xavier HS (Cincinnati), 5-0

9. Lincoln-Way East HS (Frankfort, Ill.), 5-0

10. New Palestine HS (Ind.), 6-0

11. Muskego HS (Wis.), 6-0

12. Avon HS (Ind.), 6-0

13. St. Ignatius HS (Cleveland), 2-3

14. Archbishop Hoban HS (Akron, Ohio), 4-1

15. Fairfield HS (Ohio), 5-0

[The Guru]

Just now, RedZone said:

Oakland is the sort of team you might could hide at #81 or #89 and no one would ever question it......Omaha has them #29, one big win away from busting his Top 25. I don't understand why?

He's a 🤡

[Columbiafan]

6 minutes ago, The Guru said:

He's a 🤡

What's your credentials douchebag?

 

What have you done at any level that makes you a expert?

 

Getting butt raped in locker room doesn't count

[Omaha Vol]

25 minutes ago, RedZone said:

I don't know if the guy at PrepNation has Tennessee in the Southeast or Midwest, but Oakland is nowhere to be found. He's been doing polls forever.

Oakland is the sort of team you might could hide at #81 or #89 and no one would ever question it......Omaha has them #29, one big win away from busting his Top 25. I don't understand why?

New PrepNation poll.

http://therealprepnation.blogspot.com/2019/09/week-6-prepnation-national-prep.html

SOUTHEAST

1. IMG Academy (Bradenton, Fla.), 5-0

2. Lakeland HS (Fla.), 6-0

3. St. Thomas Aquinas HS (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.), 4-0

4. Lowndes HS (Valdosta, Ga.), 6-0

5. Thompson HS (Alabaster, Ala.), 5-0

6. Central HS (Miami), 5-1

7. John Curtis HS (River Ridge, La.), 4-0

8. McEachern HS (Powder Springs, Ga.), 4-0

9. Colquitt County HS (Moultrie, Ga.), 4-1

10. Hoover HS (Ala.), 4-1

11. Central HS (Phenix City, Ala.), 5-1

12. Catholic HS (Baton Rouge, La.), 4-0

13. Madison Central HS (Madison, Miss.), 5-0

14. Grayson HS (Loganville, Ga.), 4-1

15. Marietta HS (Ga.), 3-1

 

MIDWEST

1. Mentor HS (Ohio), 5-0

2. Male HS (Louisville, Ky.), 5-0

3. Trinity HS (Louisville, Ky.), 5-1

4. Muskegon HS (Mich.), 5-0

5. St. Edward HS (Lakewood, Ohio), 4-1

6. East St. Louis HS (Ill.), 5-0

7. Washington HS (Massillon, Ohio), 5-0

8. St. Xavier HS (Cincinnati), 5-0

9. Lincoln-Way East HS (Frankfort, Ill.), 5-0

10. New Palestine HS (Ind.), 6-0

11. Muskego HS (Wis.), 6-0

12. Avon HS (Ind.), 6-0

13. St. Ignatius HS (Cleveland), 2-3

14. Archbishop Hoban HS (Akron, Ohio), 4-1

15. Fairfield HS (Ohio), 5-0

Good God! I don’t think I’ve ever seen two people so butthurt over one team that’s an undefeated and reigning state champ. This is quite amusing. 

[Columbiafan]

3 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said:

Good God! I don’t think I’ve ever seen two people so butthurt over one team that’s an undefeated and reigning state champ. This is quite amusing. 

More like they are desperate for attention since they can't get it on their own merit so they leach off other people's posts to feel important here

[The Guru]

1 hour ago, Omaha Vol said:

I don’t think I’ve ever seen two people so butthurt over one team that’s an undefeated and reigning state champ. This is quite amusing. 

So is Billings Central Catholic.

Where are they ranked?

[Columbiafan]

3 minutes ago, The Guru said:

So is Billings Central Catholic.

Where are they ranked?

No but they were in the national tournament last year

 

#AllStatesRepresented 

[Nolebull813]

 Why was John Curtis ranked number one or even in the top five back in 2012? 

 Probably the worst schedule in American high school football history 

[Omaha Vol]

2 hours ago, The Guru said:

So is Billings Central Catholic.

Where are they ranked?

That’s a lame comparison, even for you. You’re actually going put Montana in the same category with Tennessee? You truly are an idiot. 

[The Guru]

7 hours ago, Omaha Vol said:

That’s a lame comparison, even for you. You’re actually going put Montana in the same category with Tennessee? You truly are an idiot. 

I found a team that fit the exact criteria that you mentioned: an undefeated reigning state champion.

Apparently, it's lame to be accurate.

Maybe your criteria is just lame and you're just really terrible at this.