concha Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 Just now, stanscript said: Yeah, yeah, yeah. The link wasn't an article, it was an "on the money" skit. Very funny stuff, if you have an open mind. Oops, forget who I was talking to.....sorry. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bill-maher-donald-trump-russia-joins-the-dots_us_59cf4640e4b05f005d346ae5 The Conservative Tree House has problems with fact based reporting. Even Shep Smith from FOX has pointed that out (See supposed Puerto Rico Truckers' strike lie from Conservative Tree House. That you buy such garbarge (sh*t) is hilarious, "lad." The take-down is done by a number of sources. Even Byron York is in there. Again, you have no interest.That's fine. The Times counts on you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanscript Posted December 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 28 minutes ago, concha said: The take-down is done by a number of sources. Even Byron York is in there. Again, you have no interest.That's fine. The Times counts on you. Again, a right wing pundit = fake news Sorry, coffee boy, you'll have to do a lot better than that. Can't wait to see Trump's tweets in the AM. Bet he is warming up his thumbs as we speak. Oh wait after 3 straight days of golf (or is it 4?), he probably will sleep like a baby tonight. Melania is relieved than he won't be grabbing her by the............tonight. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 3 minutes ago, stanscript said: Again, a right wing pundit = fake news Sorry, coffee boy, you'll have to do a lot better than that. Can't wait to see Trump's tweets in the AM. Bet he is warming up his thumbs as we speak. It'll be interesting to see if you can last 7 more years. Get some sleep. Being a libtard rage monkey has got to be exhausting. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanscript Posted December 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 minute ago, concha said: It'll be interesting to see if you can last 7 more years. Get some sleep. Being a libtard rage monkey has got to be exhausting. BTW, have you noticed how much weight Trump has put on lately? Quite the portly President. Hard to believe that such a porker could have questioned Hillary's health. Must be all that riding in golf carts. Wonder why he doesn't walk the course. Oh, I forgot, bone spurs. G'night COFFEE BOY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 minute ago, stanscript said: BTW, have you noticed how much weight Trump has put on lately? Quite the portly President. Hard to believe that such a porker could have questioned Hillary's health. Must be all that riding in golf carts. Wonder why he doesn't walk the course. Oh, I forgot, bone spurs. G'night COFFEE BOY Maybe because she was hacking her guts up, passing out and couldn't walk up stairs on her own. Just throwing it out there. Rage on. Your president cares. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aZjimbo Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 7 hours ago, concha said: I believe the claim is that the dossier was used for FISA warrants. But you eat that NYT shit up like chocolate ice cream. I'm sure it's delicious. Are you saying the NY Slimes slants one way or another? I would have never guessed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aZjimbo Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 2 hours ago, stanscript said: Again, a right wing pundit = fake news Sorry, coffee boy, you'll have to do a lot better than that. Can't wait to see Trump's tweets in the AM. Bet he is warming up his thumbs as we speak. Oh wait after 3 straight days of golf (or is it 4?), he probably will sleep like a baby tonight. Melania is relieved than he won't be grabbing her by the............tonight. Ah the left. Such class! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 ^^ class?..like you, Tex and Concha show all the time....class?...you have no clue what class is James....you're a Trumper..class and knowledge aren't needed or required...you just need to know Donny is right and the MSM lies...right James?.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 it looks like "loose lips" may have sunk Donny ship....looks like Georgie had a little too much to drink and started talking to the wrong people huh?..LOL...what are Fox news and the right going to do now that they don't have the big bad dossier as complaint # 1 to cry about anymore??....back to the Uranium b.s and Benghazi now?... ...and to make matters worse for the Trumpers is that Georgie may have been wearing a microphone for months as no Trumpers knew what was going on....looks like he's saving his own ass at Donny and Co.'s expense....go get em' George! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
15yds4gibberish Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 12 hours ago, concha said: Noted in the link I sent. Concha, I read the article and the links. It's not in there. We live in an age when a lot of noise is being injected into the system. So much so that it's nearly impossible to separate out the signal from the noise. Here are some of the reasons why I read your article and have to dismiss it as noise. It starts with the publication itself. This is an admittedly Breitbart conservative source, so I know going in it's going to be slanted. Fine, at least I know what I'm in for. Then we get to the story itself. The byline indicates it's written by somebody named "sundance." Not fine. Whenever a story is written anonymously, the rule of thumb I use is to read it to understand what people are talking about, but to dismiss the content because nobody stands behind it. Occasionally, you'll see an anonymously written article from a legitimate news organization - It still means nobody stands behind it. I recommend dismissing the content of these too (an exception would be stories written by "the editorial board.") In the very first sentence 'sundance' tells us "The New York Times, via Clinton's favorite voice Maggie Haberman, pushes out an article attempting to cloud..." This is wrong. And it it basic. Maggie Haberman did not write the NY Times piece in question. You can fact check this for yourself by reading the byline on the NYT story. Based on this, I know immediately Sundance is at least unreliable and probably worse. The rest of the article is very poorly written and constructed, but it basically claims the NYTimes story is absurd on the face using 3 sets of links/sources. The first link(s) is a series of stuff written by "Imperator Rex," it is about how we should read Maggie Haberman. So the anonymous "Imperator Rex" is writing about how we should hate somebody who didn't write the NYT article in question. This can be dismissed. The second link(s) is a series of stuff written by "name redacted" -- The main complaints of which appears to be that Papadopolous's name doesn't appear in the Joint Analysis Report -- Which, by nature of the JAR document itself, we wouldn't expect it to, and that FISA warrants can't be issued based on the Dossier. There are multiple problems with this complaint. First 'name redacted' has no idea on what basis the FISA warrents were issued, and second, Hillary Clinton herself could have walked into the FBI with evidence and a FISA warrant could be issued as long as it established a criminal or national security predicate for the investigations. The veracity of the warrant is for the courts to decide, and they will. It is very likely this will eventually become public in the end, so we will see. The third link(s) is a series of more stuff by "sundance," it is more about why he doesn't like Maggie Haberman. Again, Maggie Haberman didn't write the article he's trying to refute. Sundance is either incompetent, or he's simply trying to whip people into a frenzy, counting on the fact that his readers won't check his work. It can be dismissed. There's more, but this post is too long already. Suffice it to say I have to throw a flag and penalize this 'story' 15 yards for gibberish. We all need to work harder at learning how to separate signal from the noise. We are all going to make mistakes, but I believe the future of our republic depends on our efforts to become better, more discerning citizens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 37 minutes ago, 15yds4gibberish said: Concha, I read the article and the links. It's not in there. We live in an age when a lot of noise is being injected into the system. So much so that it's nearly impossible to separate out the signal from the noise. Here are some of the reasons why I read your article and have to dismiss it as noise. It starts with the publication itself. This is an admittedly Breitbart conservative source, so I know going in it's going to be slanted. Fine, at least I know what I'm in for. Then we get to the story itself. The byline indicates it's written by somebody named "sundance." Not fine. Whenever a story is written anonymously, the rule of thumb I use is to read it to understand what people are talking about, but to dismiss the content because nobody stands behind it. Occasionally, you'll see an anonymously written article from a legitimate news organization - It still means nobody stands behind it. I recommend dismissing the content of these too (an exception would be stories written by "the editorial board.") In the very first sentence 'sundance' tells us "The New York Times, via Clinton's favorite voice Maggie Haberman, pushes out an article attempting to cloud..." This is wrong. And it it basic. Maggie Haberman did not write the NY Times piece in question. You can fact check this for yourself by reading the byline on the NYT story. Based on this, I know immediately Sundance is at least unreliable and probably worse. The rest of the article is very poorly written and constructed, but it basically claims the NYTimes story is absurd on the face using 3 sets of links/sources. The first link(s) is a series of stuff written by "Imperator Rex," it is about how we should read Maggie Haberman. So the anonymous "Imperator Rex" is writing about how we should hate somebody who didn't write the NYT article in question. This can be dismissed. The second link(s) is a series of stuff written by "name redacted" -- The main complaints of which appears to be that Papadopolous's name doesn't appear in the Joint Analysis Report -- Which, by nature of the JAR document itself, we wouldn't expect it to, and that FISA warrants can't be issued based on the Dossier. There are multiple problems with this complaint. First 'name redacted' has no idea on what basis the FISA warrents were issued, and second, Hillary Clinton herself could have walked into the FBI with evidence and a FISA warrant could be issued as long as it established a criminal or national security predicate for the investigations. The veracity of the warrant is for the courts to decide, and they will. It is very likely this will eventually become public in the end, so we will see. The third link(s) is a series of more stuff by "sundance," it is more about why he doesn't like Maggie Haberman. Again, Maggie Haberman didn't write the article he's trying to refute. Sundance is either incompetent, or he's simply trying to whip people into a frenzy, counting on the fact that his readers won't check his work. It can be dismissed. There's more, but this post is too long already. Suffice it to say I have to throw a flag and penalize this 'story' 15 yards for gibberish. We all need to work harder at learning how to separate signal from the noise. We are all going to make mistakes, but I believe the future of our republic depends on our efforts to become better, more discerning citizens. My bad. I was looking at another site where the clarification was clearly made. Apologies. The story's failure to consider timing of things, statements by involved parties, personal connections... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aZjimbo Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 2 hours ago, DBP66 said: ^^ class?..like you, Tex and Concha show all the time....class?...you have no clue what class is James....you're a Trumper..class and knowledge aren't needed or required...you just need to know Donny is right and the MSM lies...right James?.... Speaking of complete lack of class I bring you georgie boy; the all hate Trump poster of 2017 and his best comeback is she won the popular vote. LOL. 7 more years georgie. You'll never make it. Watching you implode is sheer delight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 and watching your dopey ass defend everything Donny 24-7 is much more delightful James...you got your work cut out for you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thc6795 Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 17 hours ago, stanscript said: Yeah, yeah, yeah. The link wasn't an article, it was an "on the money" skit. Very funny stuff, if you have an open mind. Oops, forgot who I was talking to.....sorry. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bill-maher-donald-trump-russia-joins-the-dots_us_59cf4640e4b05f005d346ae5 The Conservative Tree House has problems with fact based reporting. Even Shep Smith from FOX has pointed that out (See supposed Puerto Rico Truckers' strike lie from Conservative Tree House.) That you "buy" such garbage (sh*t) is hilarious, "lad." Trump is still President. He will be in the morning as well. All your crying will change nothing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanscript Posted January 1, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 1, 2018 On 12/30/2017 at 4:43 PM, ORabidOne said: Trump KNEW he was screwed, when for the first time in U.S. history, a Special Counsel was appointed to FIND a crime, rather than to investigate one! The crime was that the Russians interfered and the Trump people kept lying about their contact with them. The intelligence agencies of the United States, Britain, Australia and Dutch have evidence of Russian interference and conspiracy. If Trump and Co. did nothing wrong, there would be nothing to cover up. There's an awful lot of smoke on Trump and Company. There is an awful lot of evidence of Russian money laundering, too. This investigation will have much, much more of a conclusion than the blue dress that Kevin Starr revealed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FolsomStateTitles Posted January 1, 2018 Report Share Posted January 1, 2018 On 12/30/2017 at 11:56 PM, concha said: Maybe because she was hacking her guts up, passing out and couldn't walk up stairs on her own. Just throwing it out there. Rage on. Your president cares. You are the ultimate libtard troll. Enjoy the next 3 years. That's all you're going to get. Fake news. Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 1, 2018 Report Share Posted January 1, 2018 1 minute ago, FolsomStateTitles said: You are the ultimate libtard troll. Enjoy the next 3 years. That's all you're going to get. Fake news. Lol You are the site's new piñata. Welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FolsomStateTitles Posted January 1, 2018 Report Share Posted January 1, 2018 3 minutes ago, concha said: You are the site's new piñata. Welcome. You're my new fake news libtard. Welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted January 1, 2018 Report Share Posted January 1, 2018 ^^ go get em' cuz....but may i suggest calling him a Contard?....he's not smart enough to be a Libtard.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FolsomStateTitles Posted January 1, 2018 Report Share Posted January 1, 2018 1 hour ago, DBP66 said: ^^ go get em' cuz....but may i suggest calling him a Contard?....he's not smart enough to be a Libtard.... Maybe a "ConTard" or "RepubliCON" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 On 12/30/2017 at 6:35 PM, stanscript said: FOX and Friends i recall watching this program years ago, it was amazing how little common knowledge these 3 had. People are hired for these shows because they can speak and read and are camera friendly. These talking heads don't study history, political science, sociology....they study broadcasting. So, frankly, when they utter an opinion, it's often very misinformed and intellectually hollow. No different than a sportswriter doing a athletic poll. But back on subject, this particular show stood out to me worst than any other as a bastion of frat boys/girls playing grown up. I assume they are much more knowledge today having been at it for years but still, as they are steeped in conspiracy and real fake news, I doubt they hold any value other than a marketing tool for the GOP and Trump specifically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aZjimbo Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 41 minutes ago, noonereal said: i recall watching this program years ago, it was amazing how little common knowledge these 3 had. People are hired for these shows because they can speak and read and are camera friendly. These talking heads don't study history, political science, sociology....they study broadcasting. So, frankly, when they utter an opinion, it's often very misinformed and intellectually hollow. No different than a sportswriter doing a athletic poll. But back on subject, this particular show stood out to me worst than any other as a bastion of frat boys/girls playing grown up. I assume they are much more knowledge today having been at it for years but still, as they are steeped in conspiracy and real fake news, I doubt they hold any value other than a marketing tool for the GOP and Trump specifically. And then tell me what ABC, CBS, NBC, cnn, mslsd, the NY slimes, etc are other than a left wing communist marketing tool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 1 hour ago, aZjimbo said: And then tell me what ABC, CBS, NBC, cnn, mslsd, the NY slimes, etc are other than a left wing communist marketing tool. only fox news was conceived and set up as a propaganda wing of the gop that makes it very different and an obvious source of right wing bias heck, they even promoted the tea baggers, arranged and rallied these extremists nothing in the main steam is even close if one were to look objectively Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aZjimbo Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 Just now, noonereal said: only fox news was conceived and set up as a propaganda wing of the gop that makes it very different and an obvious source of right wing bias heck, they even promoted the tea baggers, arranged and rallied these extremists nothing in the main steam is even close if one were to look objectively You are 100% full of shit and an extremely good liar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 2 hours ago, aZjimbo said: You are 100% full of shit and an extremely good poor liar. fify Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.