concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 3 minutes ago, Guccifer said: I posted the charts that you've ignored. LFPR was trending down for the first decade of the 21st century and into the second one. Projections show it declining even more for the next 5-10 years. You really just said a trend stopped the 5 years before Obama despite the fact that it kept going down for 4 more years? Amazing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 2 hours ago, concha said: 5) Getting back to the tired "It dropped from 2000..." schtick. Wrong. 49 minutes ago, Guccifer said: Lie #1094756 So now concha thinks that the LFPR declining since 2000 is "wrong" The period from 2000 to 2009 by itself would constitute the largest decline in LFPR in recorded history. 20 minutes ago, concha said: So WHAT????? So to review.... concha lies I refute him He responds with "SO WHAT!?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 5 minutes ago, Guccifer said: I posted the charts that you've ignored. LFPR was trending down for the first decade of the 21st century and into the second one. Projections show it declining even more for the next 5-10 years. You really just said a trend stopped the 5 years before Obama despite the fact that it kept going down for 4 more years? Amazing. This is a chart actually from the BLS. That's the folks who actually measure the LFPR: You're like my younger boy years ago after mauling his brother's birthday cake prior to the party. Big chunk of the cake eaten, chocolate icing all over his face... but God bless him he denied like a champ. (Not actually my kid, but you get the idea) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanscript Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 ‘FINE PRINT’ ON THOSE ‘$1,000’ BONUSES https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/congratulations-on-your-1000-tax-reform-bonus_us_5a7362fbe4b06ee97af0acd2?section=us_politics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, Guccifer said: So to review.... concha lies I refute him He responds with "SO WHAT!?" Canes, It stopped declining at the end of 2004. It actually INCREASED in 2006. Your shit is sooooooooo weak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, stanscript said: ‘FINE PRINT’ ON THOSE ‘$1,000’ BONUSES https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/congratulations-on-your-1000-tax-reform-bonus_us_5a7362fbe4b06ee97af0acd2?section=us_politics Shouldn't it read "On Some of Those"? Takes your small victories where you get them I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 14 minutes ago, concha said: This line represented the largest decline in recorded history. It was fueled by retiring Baby Boomers and more late teens and early 20's going to college and staying longer. This trend merely snowballed into Obama's term. The rate isn't going to go up much any time soon. In fact economists expect it to continue to go down. concha has already began trying to soften the ground under Trump by claiming that it's good news. It means more people are looking for work. But that's not what he was saying in 2014. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 5 minutes ago, concha said: It stopped declining at the end of 2004. Then how could it plummet in 2009? Sometimes you say things that are so farcical that it's unbelievable. But then I remember that you're just an agenda-pusher and that accuracy isn't really your thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 3 minutes ago, Guccifer said: This line represented the largest decline in recorded history. It was fueled by retiring Baby Boomers and more late teens and early 20's going to college and staying longer. This trend merely snowballed into Obama's term. The rate isn't going to go up much any time soon. In fact economists expect it to continue to go down. concha has already began trying to soften the ground under Trump by claiming that it's good news. It means more people are looking for work. But that's not what he was saying in 2014. Yeah.... You can dance around the 5 entire years before Obama where it stopped in it tracks (and even increased a bit for awhile... some trend ), however, everyone can see your smoke and mirrors routine. No matter how much you use your blue crayon. LMAO You just have no shame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 Just now, concha said: You can dance around the 5 entire years before Obama where it stopped in it tracks (and even increased a bit I've already addressed the stupidity of this claim. And it doesn't cover for the fact that you lied and said that there was no decline from 2000. You are incapable of being honest in any way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilDog Posted February 2, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 14 minutes ago, stanscript said: ‘FINE PRINT’ ON THOSE ‘$1,000’ BONUSES https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/congratulations-on-your-1000-tax-reform-bonus_us_5a7362fbe4b06ee97af0acd2?section=us_politics I hate when ignorant people get excited by thinking the owner of the cake who gives you some crumbs is actually looking out for your best interest. If these are such great tax Breaks why give them such small so called bonuses. Even those Bonuses are taxed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 3 minutes ago, Guccifer said: Then how could it plummet in 2009? Sometimes you say things that are so farcical that it's unbelievable. But then I remember that you're just an agenda-pusher and that accuracy isn't really your thing. I thought this was Canes. Maybe it's DBP with another name? Been spelled out, son. Easily readable on the chart, son. 2000 through2004: dropped 1.4 long before Obama 2005 through 2009: Net stagnant for the 5 years prior to Obama 2009 through 2013: Obama years. Folks can look at the chart. I like the chart. It shows you for the lying fool you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, concha said: You can dance around the 5 entire years before Obama where it stopped in it tracks And, of course, it didn't stop because it plummeted (in your words) after that. concha's rank stupidity (or maybe just bias) shows here. He refuses to accept the underlying fundamentals that cause such drops. Just because it hovers around the same percent for a few years doesn't change the underlying cause. The trend was all one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 Just now, concha said: Been spelled out, son. This is a whopper of a lie. concha never explains "why" for anything. It's just Obama = blame and Trump = praise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 minute ago, concha said: 2000 through2004: dropped 1.4 long before Obama 2005 through 2009: Net stagnant for the 5 years prior to Obama 2009 through 2013: Obama years. Folks can look at the chart. I like the chart. It shows you for the lying fool you are. This proves nothing except that you definitely don't understand trends and fundamentals. But, again, you're an agenda-pusher with no shame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 3 minutes ago, Guccifer said: I've already addressed the stupidity of this claim. And it doesn't cover for the fact that you lied and said that there was no decline from 2000. You are incapable of being honest in any way. When did i ever say there was no decline from 2000? WTF? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 minute ago, Guccifer said: This proves nothing except that you definitely don't understand trends and fundamentals. But, again, you're an agenda-pusher with no shame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 minute ago, concha said: When did i ever say there was no decline from 2000? WTF? Here. 3 hours ago, concha said: 5) Getting back to the tired "It dropped from 2000..." schtick. Wrong. I mean you've definitely achieved the world record for shamelessness. Lie, get corrected then lie about saying the original lie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 minute ago, Guccifer said: Here. I mean you've definitely achieved the world record for shamelessness. Lie, get corrected then lie about saying the original lie. And anyone can go back and see that the "..." is your claim that there was a dropping trend from 2000-2009. I've just spent umpteen posts showing the ACTUAL DATA which proves the trend was from 2000 through 2004. 2005 until 2009 was flat. I'm glad I didn't go to Florida Atlantic. Apparently all they teach there is bullshit and deception. Do yourself a favor and find a reputable night school program somewhere that teaches basic math and comprehension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guccifer Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 minute ago, concha said: And anyone can go back and see that the "..." is your claim that there was a dropping trend from 2000-2009. And anyone can read you say there was no decline from 2000 and then demand evidence that you said it. You did say it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 26 minutes ago, Guccifer said: And anyone can read you say there was no decline from 2000 and then demand evidence that you said it. You did say it. Context, context.. Unfortunately for you, the class can see your posts and what I was referring to. Let's see if you are at all capable of honest discourse: TRUE or FALSE: "The steepest 5-year drop in the entire history of the LFPR happened under the presidency of Barack Obama" Can you do it? Can you answer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanscript Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 hour ago, concha said: Shouldn't it read "On Some of Those"? Takes your small victories where you get them I guess. Thanks for pointing it out, Concha. It should probably read: FINE PRINT ON THE ‘VAST MAJORITY’ OF THOSE SO-CALLED ‘$1,000 BONUSES.’ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 3 minutes ago, stanscript said: Thanks for pointing it out, Concha. It should probably read: FINE PRINT ON THE ‘VAST MAJORITY’ OF THOSE SO-CALLED ‘$1,000 BONUSES.’ Can you document that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanscript Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, concha said: Can you document that? I did, already. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/congratulations-on-your-1000-tax-reform-bonus_us_5a7362fbe4b06ee97af0acd2 Before you get your knickers twisted you have to realize that there is a big difference between being eligible for a $1,000 bonus and ACTUALLY GETTING ONE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 2, 2018 Report Share Posted February 2, 2018 5 minutes ago, stanscript said: I did, already. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/congratulations-on-your-1000-tax-reform-bonus_us_5a7362fbe4b06ee97af0acd2 Before you get your knickers twisted you have to realize that there is a big difference between being eligible for a $1,000 bonus and ACTUALLY GETTING ONE. Maybe I missed in the article where over half of the 3M+ bonuses so far announced fall under the type of plan mentioned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.