noonereal Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 TRUMP https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/us/politics/us-attorney-justice-department-trump.html?_r=0 This guy is more fuc%ed up more than I ever thought. Obviously he is a narcissist but OK many politicians and generals are. But this kind of thinking? This mind set is not healthy and IS filled with potential danger to our institutions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxchoboian Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 "It is not unusual for a new president to replace United States attorneys appointed by a predecessor" is what I read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted March 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, maxchoboian said: "It is not unusual for a new president to replace United States attorneys appointed by a predecessor" is what I read. not at all, we all know that it's the sweeping mandate and his other tweets that make it clear where this is coming from Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horsefly Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 The whole sweeping mass changes is the result of making decisions based on who is on the left or right or who is blue or red as opposed to what is right or wrong. It's a sad state of affairs when one only sees things through partisan lenses. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 He couldn't beat Clintons record of firing 93 attorneys all at once 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 And shame on you Nooner for believing anything the failing fake news York Times is pushing out there https://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/nets-ignored-clinton-firing-93-us-attorneys-fret-over-bushs-8-3142007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted March 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 21 minutes ago, Horsefly said: The whole sweeping mass changes is the result of making decisions based on who is on the left or right or who is blue or red as opposed to what is right or wrong. It's a sad state of affairs when one only sees things through partisan lenses. and honest, getting his views from television instead of the top advisers in the world? Something is very wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted March 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 17 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: And shame on you Nooner for believing anything the failing fake news York Times is pushing out there https://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/nets-ignored-clinton-firing-93-us-attorneys-fret-over-bushs-8-3142007 as max correctly pointed out, the event is common what is not common is how and why Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 1 hour ago, noonereal said: as max correctly pointed out, the event is common what is not common is how and why Without molding from the mainstream media, can you answer the how and why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted March 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: Without molding from the mainstream media, can you answer the how and why? why would I source rogue, tabloid or radical "news?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, noonereal said: why would I source rogue, tabloid or radical "news?" So instead you source news from controlled interest groups with direct ties to Clinton and Obama? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GloryDays Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 6 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: But how do you explain... THIS! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 Paranoia. N-o-o-n-e-r-e-a-l. Paranoia. Thank you. Do I win the OP question? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted March 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: So instead you source news from controlled interest groups with direct ties to Clinton and Obama? No I source it from traditional, respected and professional sources. Color me silly but people who just make stuff up and call it news are not sources I respect. I also don't like editorial sold as news, the go to source for right leaning Americans. Sad really.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GloryDays Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: Or... THIS! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted March 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 1 minute ago, ECHS05 said: Noonereal. N-o-o-n-e-r-e-a-l. Noonereal. Thank you. Do I win the OP question? No, Dumpling, again you receive a failing grade. I swear, I am beginning to think in addition to your immaturity and emotional issues, you may just be just not able to be educated. Possibly a fall when young? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 Glory, you can only come up with Satire and sarcasm when you have nothing to convey. That's the first sign that someone doesn't have any input whatsoever to counter an argument Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GloryDays Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: Glory, you can only come up with Satire and sarcasm when you have nothing to convey. That's the first sign that someone doesn't have any input whatsoever to counter an argument I don't like to water the weeds. Also... Explain, THIS! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 Your as brainwashed as they come. Facts are presented to you but you stick your fingers in your ear and yell, "nanananananan!!!!!" Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GloryDays Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: Your as brainwashed as they come. Facts are presented to you but you stick your fingers in your ear and yell, "nanananananan!!!!!" Lol Nole, I'm both happy that someone thinks highly of you, and sad that that someone is you. THIS! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxchoboian Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, GloryDays said: Nole, I'm both happy that someone thinks highly of you, and sad that that someone is you. THIS! These pictures made me laugh this morning. People are creative. People are good. It's all good. Maybe not quite. Feels good to chuckle, I know that. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMaximumHornetSting Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 How do you spell paranoia? Rockwell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.