concha Posted December 7, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 7 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: I did address it as anybody can see and I even agreed on a related issue. Again, you're just a lightweight and have exhausted all of your insults and quips by page 2. As mentioned... You made an irrelevant point about women in STEM. You made a commentary on the author. You asked an irrelevant question about Covid. You made no substantive effort at all to address the thesis. Is there no material basis for the idea that underrepresentation reflects underqualification? There is evidence provided that supports the assertion. Your "responses" have not addressed the article at all. You are a clown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, concha said: So you think there is no basis for the idea that underrepresentation reflects underqualification? There's no basis for the author, the paid shill that she is, to claim that there's no systemic racism/bias when her entire argument is that black kids don't learn, can't read and aren't qualified. If an entire race is failing to achieve at the rate alleged by the author then the issue is systemic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 7, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 1 minute ago, Atticus Finch said: It took me one post for you to breakdown for "serious academic" concha to blithering buffoon who spouts boilerplate phrases about liberals, teacher union henchmen, etc. Again, Andy, anything substantive from you regarding the the thesis and evidence provided by the author as a basis for the idea that underrepresentation reflects underqualification? We're on page 3. Got anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 15 minutes ago, concha said: You made an irrelevant point about women in STEM. Only you think it's irrelevant. And that's not exaggeration. You don't even seem to understand this issue. It's not the first time simple concepts have eluded you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 10 minutes ago, concha said: You made a commentary on the author. 100% factual and unrebutted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 10 minutes ago, concha said: You asked an irrelevant question about Covid. Again, relevant and related to the author's motivations and biases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 7, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 Just now, Atticus Finch said: There's no basis for the author, the paid shill that she is, to claim that there's no systemic racism/bias when her entire argument is that black kids don't learn, can't read and aren't qualified. If an entire race is failing to achieve at the rate alleged by the author then the issue is systemic. Finally, some semblance of a relevant response. I would say that the author's idea that underrepresentation reflects underqualification is true at the adult level, but reflects serious issues that need to be dealt with at the child/youth level. A company shouldn't be deemed racist for hiring and promoting the most qualified, as long as that is what they are doing. But if we provide shit government schools (as huge swathes of young blacks are subjected to) and don't improve them or offer alternatives, then there IS an issue in that area. The same with the effects of our justice system and mass incarceration. Bad schools, high crime and absent fathers create areas where opportunity dies (leaves). Care to discuss the merits of inner city schools, teacher unions, the '94 crime bill, school choice...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 13 minutes ago, concha said: You made no substantive effort at all to address the thesis. I did. 👇 1 hour ago, Atticus Finch said: It's the kernel of truth wrapped in a shell of pablum with a no-solutions-here cherry on top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 13 minutes ago, concha said: Your "responses" have not addressed the article at all. concha, you're too dumb to even be discussing this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, concha said: Finally, some semblance of a relevant response. I've read more Heather Mac Donald than you. I know exactly what it's about before I even read it. She's a paid agenda-pusher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, concha said: I would say that the author's idea that underrepresentation reflects underqualification is true at the adult level, but reflects serious issues that need to be dealt with at the child/youth level. Which the author has no interest in addressing. Her interest is in calling something a myth, dismissing it and making sure that the systemic aspect that she rejects continues for as long as possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, concha said: But if we provide shit government schools (as huge swathes of young blacks are subjected to) and don't improve them or offer alternatives, then there IS an issue in that area. The same with the effects of our justice system and mass incarceration. Bad schools, high crime and absent fathers create areas where opportunity dies (leaves). Again, which the author has no interest in addressing. That's not her gig. Her gig is to promote myth-busting to a conservative audience and get them dismiss the issue writ-large. She's against police reform. Against criminal justice reform. She's quoted as saying that there's been no arm of government more dedicated to blacks lives mattering than police. She's a professional denier. A loon. A person so elitist that she added a space to her last name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 13 minutes ago, concha said: Care to discuss the merits of inner city schools, teacher unions, the '94 crime bill, school choice...? This is where the agenda-pushing comes in which, again, is the entire point of her existence. We know that you're going to give us a bunch of opinions, many of them laughable and unsupported, on these things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 7, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 17 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: I did. 👇 An article with stats and evidence and such you don't like. Got it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 7, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 17 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: concha, you're too dumb to even be discussing this. Says the failed $20/hr bureaucrat with the clown degree. 🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 7, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 16 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: I've read more Heather Mac Donald than you. I know exactly what it's about before I even read it. She's a paid agenda-pusher. 1) An assertion with no basis other than in your imagination. 2) She leans right. And she provides evidence to support her ideas. Unlike you, who provides opinions you yank out of your ass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 concha knows he's dumb and it makes him angry. Again, not my problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 7, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 17 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: Which the author has no interest in addressing. Her interest is in calling something a myth, dismissing it and making sure that the systemic aspect that she rejects continues for as long as possible. She doesn't address what is arguably outside the scope of what she is talking about. She provides evidence. And as regards the "systemic aspect that she rejects", it was in general created by and is in general perpetuated by liberals. 🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, concha said: 2) She leans right. And she provides evidence to support her ideas. Unlike you, who provides opinions you yank out of your ass. Leans right. 😄 She's a loon who's paid to write pablum. This is indisputable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 7, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 Just now, Atticus Finch said: concha knows he's dumb and it makes him angry. Again, not my problem. Concha knows that he enjoys watching you squirm, flail, shuck and jive. Please continue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 7, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 Just now, Atticus Finch said: Leans right. 😄 She's a loon who's paid to write pablum. This is indisputable. I love it when Andy writes shit like "This is Indisputable". It's means it is 110% disputable. 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, concha said: She doesn't address what is arguably outside the scope of what she is talking about. So, again, I was right and you whined about it. Par for the course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, concha said: She provides evidence. She claims that something that's systemic isn't systemic. She's a paid shill who has made an entire career off calling everything a myth. She's unoriginal and disingenous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 4 minutes ago, concha said: And as regards the "systemic aspect that she rejects", it was in general created by and is in general perpetuated by liberals. 😄 There it is. I was waiting for that. concha is so profoundly dumb that this is really the only thing he knows how to do. In fact, even when the places aren't governed by liberals he doesn't know what to do so he just blames it on liberal "culture" in and around the said place. And, again, there are no solutions here and no care given. concha just wants to blame liberals. Everybody here knows his game. Not a serious person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 7, 2020 Report Share Posted December 7, 2020 6 minutes ago, concha said: Concha knows that he enjoys watching you squirm, flail, shuck and jive. It took one post for you to get off your "serious" concha script and breakdown into your typical routine. The only person who flailed, squirmed or jived is you. The fact that you have to pretend to be a serious person is rather comical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.