Jump to content

Misleading CNN headline


Nolebull813

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Warrior said:

What bet did you win down low bro?

The bet you are saying you won and used the fact that the subject of the bet wasn’t mentioned anywhere in the indictment as proof you won… that is, until you found out it was mentioned in the indictment. Twice. Then all of a sudden it didn't qualify as proof anymore. Funny how that worked out for you.

🤡

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoBigBlack said:

The bet you are saying you won and used the fact that the subject of the bet wasn’t mentioned anywhere in the indictment as proof you won… that is, until you found out it was mentioned in the indictment. Twice. Then all of a sudden it didn't qualify as proof anymore. Funny how that worked out for you.

🤡

Proof….haha Have you seen it? Nope - mentioned in a Jack Smith indictment means absolutely Zero

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Warrior said:

Proof….haha Have you seen it? Nope - mentioned in a Jack Smith indictment means absolutely Zero

But that’s not what you said when you thought it wasn’t in the indictment. Haha?


And no member of the public will ever see it, numbnuts. You’re a Welcher who entered a bet in bad faith and don’t have the money to pay up, because you lied about your income too, I’m sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GoBigBlack said:

But that’s not what you said when you thought it wasn’t in the indictment. Haha?


And no member of the public will ever see it, numbnuts. You’re a Welcher who entered a bet in bad faith and don’t have the money to pay up, because you lied about your income too, I’m sure. 

Jack Smith is a proven hatchet man for the Dems. I’ll want until this goes to court. Smith like special counsel Weiss are lying stooges for their side.


Smith prosecuted the former Republican governor of Virginia, Bob McDonnell. The U.S. Supreme Court later overturned the case in a unanimous 8-0 decision. The Court observed that “there is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns. It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.” 
 

 

The Supreme Court also rebuked Smith and warned that “the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors is a threat to our separation of powers.”

Smith also prosecuted Arizona Congressman Rick Renzi – a Republican – on corruption charges, which the Supreme Court upheld. Trump later pardoned Renzi. The Republican claimed he had been “wrongly convicted by a Department of Justice that engaged in witness tampering, illegal wiretapping, and gross prosecutorial misconduct.” 

“He’s destroyed a lot of lives. Lives have been destroyed. He’s destroyed people—he’s destroyed lives,” Trump said of Smith. "He was Lois Lerner and the IRS case, which was one of the most egregious abuses what happened. The government had to apologize to people."

Trump condemned Smith for going after Christians and Republicans, calling him “deranged.” He said the special counsel had abused his power and that history would look upon this moment, saying it would be remembered as an “embarrassment” for the entire nation. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Warrior said:

Jack Smith is a proven hatchet man for the Dems. I’ll want until this goes to court. Smith like special counsel Weiss are lying stooges for their side.

And your position is that he straight up lied… on the biggest and most publicized indictment in the history of the country.
 

Despite the fact that he already had all the evidence in the world, had no reason to make anything up, and the lie would be easily proven and land him in jail himself, one of the top prosecutors in the world told one of the biggest, most public, and egregiously stupid lies in history after months of preparation? And nobody on Trump’s team or even Trump himself has once denied it to be true once the indictment came out? How often did you eat paint chips as a child?
 

Of course you’ll wait for the trial. And then you’ll have some excuse after that, like always. You lost, Welcher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Horsefly said:

Who cares.  Why is it we don’t see sound bites and thoughts on the BRICS alliance and it’s potential economic impact on our economy..which could be devastating! 

what’s the GOPs platform in addressing and combating BRICS policies, do you know? 

Very good point...

Problem is, all you will get is denial after denial, fool charts from Golf, idiocrisy from Ga + Willy, economy is great + go joey  from 66 etc etc...

a latherfest of ignorance in many threads, after breaching the subject multiple times, going back quite a ways...

as example, See for yourself...(click for the thread 👇)

 

 

 

PS: Do you think Joey's confiscation of "dollars" from foreign entities even remotely associated with the "war in ukr" had anything to do with the $$$ de-stabilization? (faith in fiat, being what it is...) 🤔

 

BTW: Not sure what the right's $ combat plan is,

but they were printing dilutionary dollars as fast as the lefties soooo.... 

🤷‍♂️

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoBigBlack said:

And your position is that he straight up lied… on the biggest and most publicized indictment in the history of the country.
 

Despite the fact that he already had all the evidence in the world, had no reason to make anything up, and the lie would be easily proven and land him in jail himself, one of the top prosecutors in the world told one of the biggest, most public, and egregiously stupid lies in history after months of preparation? And nobody on Trump’s team or even Trump himself has once denied it to be true once the indictment came out? How often did you eat paint chips as a child?
 

Of course you’ll wait for the trial. And then you’ll have some excuse after that, like always. You lost, Welcher. 

My position is he’s a proven partisan hack that has lied and misled the court in the past multiple times. I’ll wait and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...