BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 7 hours ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said: Fool your reply is fail... Once again you come post some shit you just pulled from your ass and your idiot trailer crew of flunkies eat it up because they don’t know wtf you’re talking about Your elderly drivel gets debunked ... over and over... definitely one of the biggest clowns on this board... besides that infinitely stupid ass Pops 240k is a prediction from The White House you dumb piece of shit...that number is at odds with IHME dummy There’s no outside government models involved in this. In fact the White House REFUSES to let other experts know how they came up with that number But noooooooo , lets just call this post a fail and post bullshit to prove it, simply because truth makes your clueless ass feel uncomfortable for the the third time, YOU are the reason people should be tested before they’re allowed to vote SHEEEAAAT SOC, They should tested before procreating...fuck the vote! I say no more.. tie the tubes and off the nuts! BGW 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 SOC went Harvey Martin on that ass... BGW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 15, 2020 Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 3 hours ago, DevilDog said: SOC come in here like Mike Tyson on Trevor Berbick's ass. Except it ended up a Buster Douglas. Truth. 🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCIntellectualProperty Posted April 15, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 2 hours ago, concha said: Except it ended up a Buster Douglas. Truth. 🤣 The moment you become a Buster Douglas, I immediately become Evander and retire you.... you claimed these were not the White House’ own projections: fail you claimed 240k was me overstating their high end numbers: fail Experts and Trump’s advisers doubt White House’s 240,000 coronavirus deaths estimate Leading disease forecasters, whose research the White House used to conclude 100,000 to 240,000 people will die nationwide from the coronavirus, were mystified when they saw the administration’s projection this week. The experts said they don’t challenge the numbers’ validity but that they don’t know how the White House arrived at them. White House officials have refused to explain how they generated the figure — a death toll bigger than the United States suffered in the Vietnam War or the 9/11 terrorist attacks. They have not provided the underlying data so others can assess its reliability or provided long-term strategies to lower that death count. ——————————————————————————————— Any shred of of dignity would lead most men to admit they misspoke on the matter. (The operative word being ‘men’) You owe that much to the clowns here that blindly follow you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 15, 2020 Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 1 minute ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said: The moment you become a Buster Douglas, I immediately become Evander and retire you.... you claimed these were not the White House’ own projections: fail you claimed 240k was me overstating their high end numbers: fail Experts and Trump’s advisers doubt White House’s 240,000 coronavirus deaths estimate Leading disease forecasters, whose research the White House used to conclude 100,000 to 240,000 people will die nationwide from the coronavirus, were mystified when they saw the administration’s projection this week. The experts said they don’t challenge the numbers’ validity but that they don’t know how the White House arrived at them. White House officials have refused to explain how they generated the figure — a death toll bigger than the United States suffered in the Vietnam War or the 9/11 terrorist attacks. They have not provided the underlying data so others can assess its reliability or provided long-term strategies to lower that death count. ——————————————————————————————— Any shred of of dignity would lead most men to admit they misspoke on the matter. (The operative word being ‘men’) You owe that much to the clowns here that blindly follow you You posted 250k in the thread title you fucking imbecile. 250k > 240k 🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCIntellectualProperty Posted April 15, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 8 minutes ago, concha said: You posted 250k in the thread title you fucking imbecile. 250k > 240k 🤣 That was an honest mistake on my end... I completely overlooked it.... didn’t even realize i typed 250k until you mentioned it... let me fix that now see how simple that was? even that was a simple outlier for what initially got your panties in a bunch... try addressing your idiotic assertion that the WH didn’t come up with these numbers.... you know, the shit that made you comment to begin with 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockinl Posted April 15, 2020 Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 6 hours ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said: Obama was one of the best I’ve seen in my lifetime.... any fools that that lumps him with Trump or Bush immediately discredits themselves Expectation met. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 15, 2020 Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 6 minutes ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said: That was an honest mistake on my end... I completely overlooked it.... didn’t even realize i typed 250k until you mentioned it... let me fix that now see how simple that was? even that was a simple outlier for what initially got your panties in a bunch... try addressing your idiotic assertion that the WH didn’t come up with these numbers.... you know, the shit that made you comment to begin with The WH derived their numbers from other models.They did not create them from whole cloth as you assert. They were clear about this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCIntellectualProperty Posted April 15, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 1 minute ago, rockinl said: Expectation met. You met mine as well.... Mr. ‘I voted for him the first term’ 🤣🤣🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCIntellectualProperty Posted April 15, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 1 minute ago, concha said: The WH derived their numbers from other models.They did not create them from whole cloth as you assert. They were clear about this. The WH DID come up with these numbers... whether they did ‘whole cloth’ (tf is that😂😂😂)or not is irrelevant AND unknown since no one outside the WH knows how they came up with these figures... Dude give this dumb shit a rest and stop reaching Cops shoot for that 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 15, 2020 Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said: The WH DID come up with these numbers... whether they did ‘whole cloth’ (tf is that😂😂😂)or not is irrelevant AND unknown since no one outside the WH knows how they came up with these figures... Dude give this dumb shit a rest and stop reaching Cops shoot for that The WH literally states that they used a dozen and then a smaller group of other projections as their source data. The high end of the death estimate for the current IHME projection is 176k. That is after a reduction or two following the release of the 240k number by the WH. Your assertion that the WH threw out a high number to make the current numbers look "not so bad" is pure jackass. The term "whole cloth" is probably too educated for you. I'll dumb shit down for you in the future. 👍 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCIntellectualProperty Posted April 15, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 44 minutes ago, concha said: Your assertion that the WH threw out a high number to make the current numbers look "not so bad" is pure jackass. Well... that’s your opinion on the matter and it’s yet to substantiated one way or the other ... what IS undeniably JACKASS is your own assertion that the WH didn’t come up with the numbers in the first place. i think you would’ve fared much better if you’d just kept it to your opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slotback Right Posted April 15, 2020 Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 13 hours ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said: Yet another Trumptard that doesn’t exactly comprehend what he’s been reading... incorrigible Might as well count me in too Bozo, 'cause that was a face-plant if ever I saw one. Concha owned you!😝😂🤣 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted April 15, 2020 Report Share Posted April 15, 2020 I dunno boys, SOC got this one, 3 knockdowns in one round... It's over, get over it. BGW 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cat_Scratch Posted April 21, 2020 Report Share Posted April 21, 2020 https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/total-confirmed-cases-of-covid-19-per-million-people?year=2020-04-21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.