BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 7 hours ago, rockinl said: Dont forget to kiss your fat ass Mommy before you roll over and go night night. You need the hillbilly slapped out of your trailer park mouth. Well, it won’t be your soft ass slapping anybody that’s for damn sure. Mom still looks great at 78 and still ride horseback and pistol whip your sorry ass into shape everyday of the week and twice on Sunday. Trust me, you don’t want any of this smoke. Carry on, Capt Obvi.... BGW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCIntellectualProperty Posted April 14, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 13 hours ago, rockinl said: Love these "clickbait" type post. Same handful show up to back Obama, same show up to back Trump. Its predictable. More so with the Obama backers. Fools dont realize that neither actually give shit about anyone here. More so with the Obama backers huh....isn’t that obvious... and typical Fools don’t realize that SOC actually don’t give a shit what Trash Ass Trumptards think 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 18 minutes ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said: Fools don’t realize that SOC actually don’t give a shit what Trash Ass Trumptards think Clearly. 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCIntellectualProperty Posted April 14, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 16 hours ago, concha said: Oh, and the predictions were generally coming from non-governmental sources like the IHME, which is associated with the sooper-dooper conservative University of Washington and partly funded that that arch-right winger Bill Gates. Thread = Fail Fool your reply is fail... Once again you come post some shit you just pulled from your ass and your idiot trailer crew of flunkies eat it up because they don’t know wtf you’re talking about Your elderly drivel gets debunked ... over and over... definitely one of the biggest clowns on this board... besides that infinitely stupid ass Pops 240k is a prediction from The White House you dumb piece of shit...that number is at odds with IHME dummy There’s no outside government models involved in this. In fact the White House REFUSES to let other experts know how they came up with that number But noooooooo , lets just call this post a fail and post bullshit to prove it, simply because truth makes your clueless ass feel uncomfortable for the the third time, YOU are the reason people should be tested before they’re allowed to vote 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 1 hour ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said: Fool your reply is fail... Once again you come post some shit you just pulled from your ass and your idiot trailer crew of flunkies eat it up because they don’t know wtf you’re talking about Your elderly drivel gets debunked ... over and over... definitely one of the biggest clowns on this board... besides that infinitely stupid ass Pops 240k is a prediction from The White House you dumb piece of shit...that number is at odds with IHME dummy There’s no outside government models involved in this. In fact the White House REFUSES to let other experts know how they came up with that number But noooooooo , lets just call this post a fail and post bullshit to prove it, simply because truth makes your clueless ass feel uncomfortable for the the third time, YOU are the reason people should be tested before they’re allowed to vote Well dammit SOC!!! Whew!!! BGW 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 2 hours ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said: Fool your reply is fail... Once again you come post some shit you just pulled from your ass and your idiot trailer crew of flunkies eat it up because they don’t know wtf you’re talking about Your elderly drivel gets debunked ... over and over... definitely one of the biggest clowns on this board... besides that infinitely stupid ass Pops 240k is a prediction from The White House you dumb piece of shit...that number is at odds with IHME dummy There’s no outside government models involved in this. In fact the White House REFUSES to let other experts know how they came up with that number But noooooooo , lets just call this post a fail and post bullshit to prove it, simply because truth makes your clueless ass feel uncomfortable for the the third time, YOU are the reason people should be tested before they’re allowed to vote From the Daily Mail, April 3rd: Quote Deborah Birx, coordinator of the coronavirus task force, said Tuesday the figures were based on five or six modelers, including from Imperial College in Britain and Harvard, Columbia and Northeastern universities. 'It was their models that created the ability to see what these mitigations could do, how steeply they could depress the curve,' Birx said. She previously said the task force was reviewing the work of 12 models. 'Then we went back to the drawing board over the last week or two, and worked from the ground up, utilizing actual reporting of cases,' Birx said. ... Imperial College and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at University of Washington (IHME) models predict the closest figures to those dished out by the White House. Imperial College estimated there could be as many as 2.2 million US deaths if no action was taken to slow the spread, 1.1 million deaths if moderate mitigation was adopted, and an unspecified number of deaths if drastic measures were taken. This tallies with the White House's worst-case scenario of 1.5 million to 2.2 million deaths if Americans and the government does nothing to slow the spread. IHME estimated US deaths will lie between 38,000 and 162,000 if every state issues a lockdown and stays on lockdown until the summer. So let's review... you use the very upper end of the number stated by the WH (actually, you overstate it 🤡 ). The WH has been clear that its numbers are derived from several different models, mainly from universities (ex. IHME and Imperial College London amongst others). The WH numbers were announced two weeks ago. Since, many of the predictive models have reduced their projections markedly (in at least one case (the IHME) more than once. Here is a quote regarding the IHME model just a few days before (March 26th) the WH announced it's 100k-240k range: Quote The UW team’s predictions are couched in statistical caveats. For example, the death toll projection of 81,114 has a 95% confidence interval of 7,977 to 251,059 deaths. So, asshat, the numbers from the WH took into account numbers from IHME (and other sources) and were not wildly at odds with key examples of them. But don't let that get in the way of a dumbass drive-by. 2 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thc6795 Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 16 minutes ago, concha said: From the Daily Mail, April 3rd: So let's review... you use the very upper end of the number stated by the WH. The WH has been clear that its numbers are derived from several different models, mainly from universities (ex. IHME and Imperial College London amongst others). The WH numbers were announced two weeks ago. Since, many of the predictive models have reduced their projections markedly (in at least one case (the IHME) more than once. Here is a quote regarding the IHME model just a few days before (March 26th) the WH announced it's 100k-240k range: So, asshat, the numbers from the WH took into account numbers from IHME (and other sources) and were not wildly at odds with key examples of them. But don't let that get in the way of a dumbass drive-by. This is called being bitch slapped! 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockinl Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 2 hours ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said: More so with the Obama backers huh....isn’t that obvious... and typical. Yes. Typical. I actually voted for him in round 1. You backed/back Obama for the same reasons many white voters didnt/dont. I get it. Fact of human nature. I wouldnt mind having a beer with Obama, but he wasnt a great President. Neither were most in my lifetime. Fools don’t realize that SOC actually don’t give a shit what Trash Ass Trumptards think. You must, or you post threads like this mainly for reactions. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockinl Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 7 hours ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said: Well, it won’t be your soft ass slapping anybody that’s for damn sure. Mom still looks great at 78 and still ride horseback and pistol whip your sorry ass into shape everyday of the week and twice on Sunday. Trust me, you don’t want any of this smoke. Carry on, Capt Obvi.... BGW Youre a smart ass bitch who contributes nothing here but childish wise cracks. Mind your own fucking business and you wont get your wig split. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 SOC gets rekt yet again lol. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 1 hour ago, rockinl said: Youre a smart ass bitch who contributes nothing here but childish wise cracks. Mind your own fucking business and you wont get your wig split. I welcome the opportunity. Nothing but air and opportunity. I would love to piece you out. Slowly and sadistically. BGW 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hardcore Troubador Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 13 minutes ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said: I welcome the opportunity. Nothing but air and opportunity. I would love to piece you out. Slowly and sadistically. BGW 1 hour ago, rockinl said: Youre a smart ass bitch who contributes nothing here but childish wise cracks. Mind your own fucking business and you wont get your wig split. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 Just now, Hardcore Troubador said: His feelers got hurt (I assume a he) and he said bad things about mama... unforgivable. So, I need to get the energy out of the body and help him into recovery. LOL. BGW 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 Watching dudes challenge each other to fights on the internets will probably never get old. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cat_Scratch Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 20 hours ago, concha said: Per Politifact: N95 masks were depleted after the H1N1 outbreak in 2009, and experts warned years ago that the supply should have been replenished. China bought almost the entire US stock of face masks from N95 respirators to regular face masks. On January 28 the chartered Boeing 747 cargo plane fully loaded with the protective equipment left for China from Chicago After trump was lied to by the Chinese leaders about how bad the virus is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCIntellectualProperty Posted April 14, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 4 hours ago, concha said: From the Daily Mail, April 3rd: So let's review... you use the very upper end of the number stated by the WH (actually, you overstate it 🤡 ). The WH has been clear that its numbers are derived from several different models, mainly from universities (ex. IHME and Imperial College London amongst others). The WH numbers were announced two weeks ago. Since, many of the predictive models have reduced their projections markedly (in at least one case (the IHME) more than once. Here is a quote regarding the IHME model just a few days before (March 26th) the WH announced it's 100k-240k range: So, asshat, the numbers from the WH took into account numbers from IHME (and other sources) and were not wildly at odds with key examples of them. But don't let that get in the way of a dumbass drive-by. Again.... you pull more crap from your ass... and your crew of flunkies take it as gold because they won’t dare research themselves. smh... whether they ‘derived’ from university models or not: ‘White House officials have refused to explain how they generated the figure‘ That in itself makes your reply a fail.Period Even the researchers whose model the WH used were mystified by those numbers and don’t HOW the White House arrived at them. Name dropping those same researchers to bolster your claim that the White House didn’t come to these numbers itself is hilarious READ THE ENITRE ARTICLE NEXT TIME 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCIntellectualProperty Posted April 14, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 4 hours ago, zulu1128 said: SOC gets rekt yet again lol. Lol... yeah right concha pivoted from suggesting the White House didn’t come up with these figures to telling us HOW they came up with the figures🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Only fools fall for that... they’ll show themselves soon enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueliner Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 4 hours ago, concha said: From the Daily Mail, April 3rd: So let's review... you use the very upper end of the number stated by the WH (actually, you overstate it 🤡 ). The WH has been clear that its numbers are derived from several different models, mainly from universities (ex. IHME and Imperial College London amongst others). The WH numbers were announced two weeks ago. Since, many of the predictive models have reduced their projections markedly (in at least one case (the IHME) more than once. Here is a quote regarding the IHME model just a few days before (March 26th) the WH announced it's 100k-240k range: So, asshat, the numbers from the WH took into account numbers from IHME (and other sources) and were not wildly at odds with key examples of them. But don't let that get in the way of a dumbass drive-by. When I read his post, I knew that it wasn't going to end well for him. I was right again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueliner Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 4 hours ago, thc6795 said: This is called being bitch slapped! Yep. Pretty much🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCIntellectualProperty Posted April 14, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 4 hours ago, rockinl said: Believe whatever makes you feel comfy... Obama was one of the best I’ve seen in my lifetime.... any fools that that lumps him with Trump or Bush immediately discredits themselves 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCIntellectualProperty Posted April 14, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 6 minutes ago, Blueliner said: When I read his post, I knew that it wasn't going to end well for him. I was right again. Yet another Trumptard that doesn’t exactly comprehend what he’s been reading... incorrigible 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilDog Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 SOC come in here like Mike Tyson on Trevor Berbick's ass. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 3 minutes ago, DevilDog said: SOC come in here like Mike Tyson on Trevor Berbick's ass. Man, Iron Mike!!! Analogy is those that keep getting up.... mercy ruled like a mutha' fucka' Stay the fuck down...lol. BGW 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilDog Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 1 minute ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said: Man, Iron Mike!!! Analogy is those that keep getting up.... mercy ruled like a mutha' fucka' Stay the fuck down...lol. BGW Yeah the old 3 knockdown rule on one punch. SOC ain't trying to hear nuttin bout Trump. He clicked clean off safe. 🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted April 14, 2020 Report Share Posted April 14, 2020 6 minutes ago, DevilDog said: Yeah the old 3 knockdown rule on one punch. SOC ain't trying to hear nuttin bout Trump. He clicked clean off safe. 🤣 I've been laughing my ass off with that shit! They are weeping and wailing over the orange man. Makes no sense. BGW 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.