Tell us all, Democrats are not racist or are they just scumbags...??

[Mag44]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tim-scott-uncle-racial-slur-democrats-silent-twitter 

[concha]

They are both.

 

[Mag44]

13 minutes ago, concha said:

They are both.

 

You keep it pithy....

[SeaShells21]

15 minutes ago, concha said:

They are both.

 

Aren’t both sides both ☺️

[Mag44]

5 minutes ago, SeaShells21 said:

Aren’t both sides both ☺️

Moreso on the left,but, you have a valid point..

[Troll]

Here’s What the Study Found

The study in question — which, by the way, isn’t from a news source or media outlet but Pew Research for heaven’s sake — is, when all’s said and done, pretty damning. 

Interestingly enough, the study, which is titled Pew American Trends Panel: Wave 64, was dated March 2020 — over a year ago. Yet it took a Ph.D. candidate in political science posting about the study on Twitter for it to garner even a smidge of attention.

The study, which examined white liberals, moderates, and conservatives, both male and female, found that conservatives were far less likely to be diagnosed with mental health issues than those who identified as either liberal or even “very liberal.” What’s more, white women suffered the worst of all. White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives.

Zach Goldberg, the doctoral candidate in question, consolidated the study’s info in a set of visuals and posted them to a thread on Twitter. But it’s important to note that he clarified the following: “I didn't write this thread to mock white liberals or their apparently disproportionate rates of mental illness (and you shouldn't either). Rather, this is a question that's underexplored and which may shed light on attitudinal differences towards various social policies." He’s right.

Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified psychiatrist who’s treated mental disorders for over 30 years, agrees and adds that white liberalism thrives on supposedly championing “workers,” “minorities,” “the little guy,” “women,” and the “unemployed,” who they continuously see as “wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised, exploited, and victimized” with little to no agency of their own (A view that often mutates into the infantilizing and patronizing of certain groups within a narrative). 

When those raised to think reality is subjective bump up against objective reality, there can be mental health consequences.

The people responsible for these crimes? As Rossiter tells it: “poverty, disease, war, ignorance, unemployment, racial prejudice, ethnic and gender discrimination, modern technology, capitalism, globalization, and imperialism. In the radical liberal mind, this suffering is inflicted on the innocent by various predators and persecutors: ‘Big Business,’ ‘Big Corporations,’ ‘greedy capitalists,’ ‘U.S. Imperialists,’ ‘the oppressors,’ ‘the rich,’ ‘the wealthy,’ ‘the powerful,’ and ‘the selfish’.”

That’s pretty much an exhaustive list of every grievance and every perpetrator that progressives see as responsible for these injustices which plague our disenfranchised communities while moderates and conservatives seemingly sit idly by unconcerned with anything but their own privilege.

But as the study exemplifies, the champions of these causes (white women in particular) aren’t exactly living the liberated utopia they believe we all should be living.

Taking It Seriously

It’s truly unfortunate that so many women are facing these kinds of issues, and that this prevalence of mental illness among progressive women might be being weaponized for political purposes. If there’s one thing this topic deserves, it’s delicacy and empathy. We should feel compassion for these women, especially if we’ve struggled with mental health ourselves.

But at the heart of the matter is this: Progressivism is an ideology that supposedly demands equality for all, and one that keeps score to an exhausting degree. The privilege between social classes, between races, between men and women, between religious and non-religious, and more, all have to be constantly monitored, and “inequality” has to be exposed for the purposes of “accountability.” That kind of behavior isn’t just unrealistic, it’s unsustainable. In all honesty, it’s understandable that anxiety and depression thrive in these kinds of environments when we’re focusing on every minute, problematic issue in our world and not able to take comprehensive, productive action to solve all these problems.

Progressivism demands equality for all and keeps score to an exhausting, unsustainable degree.

There's also the unrelenting focus on oppression, verbal violence, and micro-aggressions. We know that building resiliency against hardship is the best weapon against depression and anxiety, yet progressive ideology forces its followers to wallow in feelings of helplessness and victimhood. Instead of empowering women and minorities with self-knowledge, strength of character, and resilience to hardship, progressivism encourages victims to stay in a place of fear and helplessness.

 

 

 

[Mag44]

1 hour ago, Troll said:

Here’s What the Study Found

The study in question — which, by the way, isn’t from a news source or media outlet but Pew Research for heaven’s sake — is, when all’s said and done, pretty damning. 

Interestingly enough, the study, which is titled Pew American Trends Panel: Wave 64, was dated March 2020 — over a year ago. Yet it took a Ph.D. candidate in political science posting about the study on Twitter for it to garner even a smidge of attention.

The study, which examined white liberals, moderates, and conservatives, both male and female, found that conservatives were far less likely to be diagnosed with mental health issues than those who identified as either liberal or even “very liberal.” What’s more, white women suffered the worst of all. White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives.

Zach Goldberg, the doctoral candidate in question, consolidated the study’s info in a set of visuals and posted them to a thread on Twitter. But it’s important to note that he clarified the following: “I didn't write this thread to mock white liberals or their apparently disproportionate rates of mental illness (and you shouldn't either). Rather, this is a question that's underexplored and which may shed light on attitudinal differences towards various social policies." He’s right.

Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified psychiatrist who’s treated mental disorders for over 30 years, agrees and adds that white liberalism thrives on supposedly championing “workers,” “minorities,” “the little guy,” “women,” and the “unemployed,” who they continuously see as “wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised, exploited, and victimized” with little to no agency of their own (A view that often mutates into the infantilizing and patronizing of certain groups within a narrative). 

When those raised to think reality is subjective bump up against objective reality, there can be mental health consequences.

The people responsible for these crimes? As Rossiter tells it: “poverty, disease, war, ignorance, unemployment, racial prejudice, ethnic and gender discrimination, modern technology, capitalism, globalization, and imperialism. In the radical liberal mind, this suffering is inflicted on the innocent by various predators and persecutors: ‘Big Business,’ ‘Big Corporations,’ ‘greedy capitalists,’ ‘U.S. Imperialists,’ ‘the oppressors,’ ‘the rich,’ ‘the wealthy,’ ‘the powerful,’ and ‘the selfish’.”

That’s pretty much an exhaustive list of every grievance and every perpetrator that progressives see as responsible for these injustices which plague our disenfranchised communities while moderates and conservatives seemingly sit idly by unconcerned with anything but their own privilege.

But as the study exemplifies, the champions of these causes (white women in particular) aren’t exactly living the liberated utopia they believe we all should be living.

Taking It Seriously

It’s truly unfortunate that so many women are facing these kinds of issues, and that this prevalence of mental illness among progressive women might be being weaponized for political purposes. If there’s one thing this topic deserves, it’s delicacy and empathy. We should feel compassion for these women, especially if we’ve struggled with mental health ourselves.

But at the heart of the matter is this: Progressivism is an ideology that supposedly demands equality for all, and one that keeps score to an exhausting degree. The privilege between social classes, between races, between men and women, between religious and non-religious, and more, all have to be constantly monitored, and “inequality” has to be exposed for the purposes of “accountability.” That kind of behavior isn’t just unrealistic, it’s unsustainable. In all honesty, it’s understandable that anxiety and depression thrive in these kinds of environments when we’re focusing on every minute, problematic issue in our world and not able to take comprehensive, productive action to solve all these problems.

Progressivism demands equality for all and keeps score to an exhausting, unsustainable degree.

There's also the unrelenting focus on oppression, verbal violence, and micro-aggressions. We know that building resiliency against hardship is the best weapon against depression and anxiety, yet progressive ideology forces its followers to wallow in feelings of helplessness and victimhood. Instead of empowering women and minorities with self-knowledge, strength of character, and resilience to hardship, progressivism encourages victims to stay in a place of fear and helplessness.

 

 

 

Michael  Savages book,,Liberalism is a Mental Disorder", from years ago,  bears this out...

[Atticus Finch]

Didn't you post this already?

And the irony of claiming that other people have mental disorders.

😄

[Old Rabid One]

7 hours ago, Mag44 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tim-scott-uncle-racial-slur-democrats-silent-twitter 

HUSH YO MOUTH THERE PILGRIM! You sir, are going to HELL!

[Old Rabid One]

6 hours ago, concha said:

They are both.

 

How in the WORLD do you survive in the BLUE ATL?

[Old Rabid One]

6 hours ago, Mag44 said:

Moreso on the left,but, you have a valid point..

What's CRAAAZY about wanting to make America great again? Cause it's sure as shit heading in the opposite direction! You had better brush up on your Mandarin!

[Mag44]

11 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

Didn't you post this already?

And the irony of claiming that other people have mental disorders.

😄

Atti, Fuck you...You never read the book....Read it, your in it...

[Mag44]

8 hours ago, Old Rabid One said:

What's CRAAAZY about wanting to make America great again? Cause it's sure as shit heading in the opposite direction! You had better brush up on your Mandarin!

Not really...Mitch McConnell is a scumbag,as is his wife...

[Atticus Finch]

1 minute ago, Mag44 said:

Atti, Fuck you...You never read the book....

Of course I didn't read that book.

Just like I never read any of Ann Coulter's 9 different books about liberals being poopy heads.

[Troll]

47 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

Of course I didn't read that book.

Just like I never read any of Ann Coulter's 9 different books about liberals being poopy heads.

YES....

...of course you would think that ignorance of the other side is something to brag about.

It was a very silly question

for drummer to even ask you.

[Atticus Finch]

27 minutes ago, Troll said:

YES....

...of course you would think that ignorance of the other side is something to brag about.

Nobody is more informed of the "other" side than I am.

[Troll]

10 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

Nobody is more informed of the "other" side than I am.

well you just stated that you (of course) refuse to even read about or consider it.

so were you lying before...

or are you lying now ?

 

[Mag44]

50 minutes ago, Troll said:

YES....

...of course you would think that ignorance of the other side is something to brag about.

It was a very silly question

for drummer to even ask you.

Ya know Troll, your right....🙀

[Atticus Finch]

9 minutes ago, Troll said:

well you just stated that you (of course) refuse to even read about or consider it.

Yeah, I refuse to read a trash book by a known clown who has suggested we undertake a Muslim genocide and once claimed that PTSD among veterans was a sign of weakness.

Michael Savage isn't a serious person. To suggest that not reading his garbage makes me uninformed of the other side is yet more proof of what a clown you are.

[Troll]

9 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

Yeah, I refuse to read a trash book by a known clown who has suggested we undertake a Muslim genocide and once claimed that PTSD among veterans was a sign of weakness.

Michael Savage isn't a serious person. To suggest that not reading his garbage makes me uninformed of the other side is yet more proof of what a clown you are.

Again no...

I not suggesting anything,

I'm saying that you can't brag about thinking you know something

at the same time as you are bragging about refusing to know.

 

Hope this helps   👍

 

PS: so which one is you lying ???

[Atticus Finch]

40 minutes ago, Troll said:

Again no...

I not suggesting anything,

I'm saying that you can't brag about thinking you know something

at the same time as you are bragging about refusing to know.

This is complete nonsense as usual from you.

Not reading an unserious person isn't refusing to know about the other side.

Feel free to tag me again when you finally make a good and/or legitimate point.

[Troll]

4 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

This is complete nonsense as usual from me.

Not reading about it  is refusing to know about the other side.

Feel free to abuse me again when I never make a good and/or legitimate point.

FIFY 👍