Jump to content

Booker T. Washington vs. Tucker


GHSFPS

Recommended Posts

Guest LOSer
7 minutes ago, steeler01 said:

Alvin didn't play defense though. Norcross had no chance at stopping BTW from the get go. ECHS kept saying, they'll settle in, which never happened. 

He's employing the Kamara defense for games in which they gave up 55 and 36 points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

 

They didnt just lose to the eventual National Champs in 2013, they lost to North Gwinnett 36-17 in the 3rd game of the season also. Which they came back to beat in the state title, 31-14.

They lost to the 2nd best team in Georgia, in a game that was back and forth and North Gwinnett won on a double reverse pass(Broke Norcross with it). After that game, I told you that if they played again, Norcross would be at least 50/50 to win that game. Those teams would go 5-5 playing 10 games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
2 hours ago, ECHS05 said:

You post a teams CalPreps rating.

 

17 hours ago, LOSer said:

These were the best teams they played:

Lost to #101 Lovejoy by 21 (56-35)

Beat #397 Mill Creek by 7 (42-35)

Lost to #667 McEachern by 22 (49-27)

Beat #770 Marietta by 13 (45-32)

Beat #883 Valdosta by 28 (42-14)

They also managed to squeeze in this result:

Lost to #2496 South Cobb by 1 (27-26)

Take out the calpreps ratings from above and I don't have to change a single word. The point remains the same and the context supports it.

This is just a crutch that you use when you can't support your arguments. Everyone knows it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
38 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

Just to make it look your way, you put Lovejoy at # 101 when actually they were # 83. 

Yes, they were Top 100

qVKh8Xo.png

Why are you even here?

You're the guy that my avatar picture is pointing to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
36 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

So I show you a screenshot of the updated ratings from calpreps itself (you must be unfamiliar with the recent tweak?) and your comeback is to post outdated information from a different website?

You're too dumb even for nolebull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
19 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

Come back

mGmx7rF.png

What still gets me is how this guy Sportsnut thinks he's nailing it.

I mean he couldn't be more satisfied with himself while he mangles facts, the English language and everything in between.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
2 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

I was aware of the fact that we were referring to the year 2012. No matter what tweaking took place, in 2012, Lovejoy was # 83.

mGmx7rF.png

Calpreps disagrees with you.

This is a screenshot from 5 minutes ago.

2012 Lovejoy is #101.

Now we'll watch you disregard a proven fact and continue with your agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
1 minute ago, Sportsnut said:

Couldn't be updated because Rockdale, Alcovy, North Gwinnett and North Cobb are not on the schedule. 

You are not very bright.

The formula was updated a month ago.

So the 2012 ratings were redone.

Lovejoy = #101

The person who isn't bright is you.

But you think you're nailing it which is quite funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
5 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

I was aware of the fact that we were referring to the year 2012. No matter what tweaking took place, in 2012, Lovejoy was # 83.

 

Just now, Sportsnut said:

What you posted is from 2012. 

Now who's dumb?

o.O

This guy is rewriting the book on what it is to be insanely dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
Just now, Sportsnut said:

Then is then Now is now. You can't confuse the two. Now Lovejoy is # 101 for 2012 but then, in 2012, Lovejoy was # 83. 

The previous formula has been scrapped.

So therefore they have a new one.

They redid their ratings. The "old" ratings no longer exist. That's how formulas work.

Lovejoy is #101 using the calpreps algorithm.

You're just too stupid to digest it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
1 minute ago, Sportsnut said:

This guy is making you look bad. 

You can't spell, can't think and can't argue.

But, boy, do you think you're nailing it.

It's funny.

I'm slightly entertained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
8 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

Then is then, now is now. How are you going to change that?

I'm not going to change it, Calpreps is.

They use an algorithm. When the algorithm changes, so do the ratings.

Math is math.

It's not one thing in 2012 and another thing in 2017.

If the math changes then the results change too.

You're really dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
6 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

No way you or anyone else can change what was. 

calpreps is the product.

Their math changed. Therefore, the result changed.

You need to quit because you've reached a territory unknown to even the dumbest posters on this board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
1 minute ago, Sportsnut said:

It has to be one thing in 2012 and another in 2017. They can't exist at the same time because they occupied time at a different time. 

They didn't exist at the same time.

The algorithm changed and then so did the results.

There's only one calpreps rating.

It's the one being used right now.

Lovejoy = #101

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
4 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

You can't change yesterday.

The people who run an algorithm can do whatever they want.

They changed their formula and re-ran the numbers.

Lovejoy = #101

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
2 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

Just for giggles, are Calpreps and Maxpreps the same? I don't think so. Look back at my post. It is Maxpreps, not Calpreps.

Yes, they use the same ratings.

You're hopeless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LOSer
26 minutes ago, Sportsnut said:

I said, Maxpreps was what I used, not Calpreps 

It's the same rating.

Maxpreps uses Calpreps.

You just don't know anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...