Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 6 minutes ago, concha said: No such offense was committed to begin with.Ā š So then why are you wasting your time arguing procedure? I already know the answer. You're dishonest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 13 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: This has been the most bipartisan impeachment in American history. concha's head explodes when reasonable people attempt to hold a wannabe strongman to account. Why? Because he's a vagina who praises dictators. Ā Wow, that's awesome. Except that 45 of 50 Republican Senators can read the constitution making this farce DOA. Ā And speaking of vaginas, post birth, have you ever touched a vagina without paying first, Andy? Or ever? Survey saysĀ š¤£. Ā Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 4 minutes ago, concha said: No, Andy lies. As usual. You said impeachment was unconstitutional. You're wrong. As usual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, Atticus Finch said: So then why are you wasting your time arguing procedure? I already know the answer. You're dishonest. Ā This whole site is meant to waste time, Andy. Which is whichĀ your life is consumed by it. š¤” Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, concha said: Except that 45 of 50 Republican Senators can read the constitution making this farce DOA. But 5 of them could read further, or know historical precedent, and understood that conviction doesn't just mean removal but also disqualification. We know that you guzzle Rand's words like you guzzle Trump's jizz. But Schumer actually successfully rebutted his claim with facts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 3 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: You said impeachment was unconstitutional. You're wrong. As usual. Ā No, I didn't. I actually posted the text from the constitution about it. Andy lying. Again. Andy = lyingĀ š© Ā Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 2 minutes ago, concha said: No, I didn't. You did. š 1 hour ago, concha said: Can anyone point out the language in the Constitution relevant to impeachment that covers a private citizen? 34 minutes ago, concha said: Trump is no longer in office and can therefore not be removed from office. The purpose of impeachment is to remove from office. So please explain why this farce continues? 29 minutes ago, concha said: And he can't defend the clearly the unconstitutional ongoing impeachment proceedings. Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 The only thing clear is that concha guzzled Rand's jizz like he does Trump's and didn't listen any further. Here's the entire Rand Paul agument followed by the rebuttal from Schumer. Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 The embarrassments never cease for concha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 38 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: You did. š Ā Ā No. This is your usual dumbass Andy-schtick.Ā You post quotes that don't say what you claim hoping that dumbasses will just believe you.Ā š¤”Ā š¤£ Ā 1) This first quote in no way at all says impeachment is unconstitutional.Ā 2) Ditto. 3) "Ongoing". Not impeachment per se. Ā You are an asswipe. š Ā Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 38 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: Ā or know historical precedent, and understood that conviction doesn't just mean removal but also disqualification. Yes we all know your excuse for wanting to continueĀ impeachment āremoval from officeā proceedings is because of the subsequent consequences, but you still canāt remove some one who has already been unseated. Ā And you still cannot have legislatures conducting trials or imposing sentences onĀ private citizens. Ā The whole farce is just par for the course, but as long as you are enjoying your š© dinner.Ā šæ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Ā Andy has a real fixation with "jizz guzzling" today. Maybe Andy finally scored. No va-jay-jay involved, of course. But who are we to judge? š¤£ Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 17 minutes ago, concha said: No. Yes, you did. š 1 hour ago, concha said: And he can't defend the clearly the unconstitutional ongoing impeachment proceedings. Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 19 minutes ago, concha said: You post quotes that don't say what you claim hoping that dumbasses will just believe you.Ā You claimed that you didn't say that this impeachment was unconstitutional. But you did. š 1 hour ago, concha said: And he can't defend the clearly the unconstitutional ongoing impeachment proceedings. Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 20 minutes ago, concha said: You are an asswipe. One that exposes you nearly every time you hit submit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, Atticus Finch said: Yes, you did. š Ā Ā No, Andy. Claiming "impeachmentĀ is unconstitutional" (your words, not mine) and "this particular impeachment is unconstitutional" are two very different things. This is probably hard for you to comprehend and accept given that you are both a liar and stupid. š¤” Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 1 minute ago, concha said: No, Andy. Ā But you did, concha. š 1 hour ago, concha said: And he can't defend the clearly the unconstitutional ongoing impeachment proceedings. Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 2 minutes ago, concha said: Claiming "impeachmentĀ is unconstitutional" (your words, not mine) and "this particular impeachment is unconstitutional" are two very different things. Trump was impeached on January 12th. You are hemorrhaging badly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 First, concha says something ridiculously stupid (that this impeachment is unconstitutional) and then says that he never said that. It's almost as if he tries to one-up his lying self every single day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, Atticus Finch said: Ā But you did, concha. š Ā Ā Andy doesn't understand that "ongoing" clearly refers to a specific impeachment and not impeachment in general.Ā Andy isĀ REALLY,Ā REALLY stupid. š¤£ Ā He's going to post it again like some idiot American tourist who thinks that yelling at foreigners will magically make them understand English.Ā š¤”Ā š Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, concha said: Andy doesn't understand that "ongoing" clearly refers to a specific impeachment and not impeachment in general. I've already addressed that lie. You said it, concha. š 1 hour ago, concha said: And he can't defend the clearly the unconstitutional ongoing impeachment proceedings. Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 1 minute ago, Atticus Finch said: First, concha says something ridiculously stupid (that this impeachment is unconstitutional) and then says that he never said that. It's almost as if he tries to one-up his lying self every single day. Ā LMAOĀ Ā š¤£ So now Andy, after being exposed for his stupidity, changes the terms of his claim. Priceless. Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 1 minute ago, concha said: He's going to post it again like some idiot American tourist who thinks that yelling at foreigners will magically make them understand English.Ā Yes, I will. Because you said it and it is one of the stupidest things you've ever said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, concha said: LMAOĀ We're now on the emoji freakout part of concha's stages of grief. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, Atticus Finch said: I've already addressed that lie. You said it, concha. š Ā Ā No, Andy. You literally quoted where I stated "ongoing impeachment", not "impeachment". š¤” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.